2024 NCAA Tournament predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“The visions are clear now. I see possible futures, all at once. Our enemies are all around us, and in so many futures they prevail. But I do see a way, there is a narrow way through.”

— Paul Atreides, “Dune: Part Two” (2024)

It’s time to fill out brackets because March Madness is here. I won’t lie, I haven’t paid much attention to the college basketball regular season. That means that I’m either going to do horribly or get almost every pick correct. I’ve been cramming in research the last 40(ish) hours since the bracket was revealed Sunday. I now wish that my West Virginia Mountaineers had given me a reason to care about this college basketball season.

Two years ago was the worst I’ve ever done when it comes to predicting the NCAA Tournament. I lost two Final Four teams, including my national champion, on the first day of the tournament. I was a little better last year, but still wasn’t great thanks to Arizona and Purdue letting me down on, you guessed it, the first day of the tournament. I feel like my reputation is on the line this year, so I really need a good showing. That’s why I relied pretty heavily on KenPom rankings.

We saw so many upsets in the conference tournaments last week, which is why this was one of the craziest “on the bubble” debates in years. It certainly feels like we’re in for another very unpredictable NCAA tournament. However, the last two tournaments were two of the craziest that I’ve witnessed in my life. I also think we’re due for a tournament where we see mostly chalk.

As always, March Madness is a welcome sight at this point in the sports calendar. I need something to take my attention away from NFL free agency news, which is pretty dry right now. Keep your head on a swivel these next three weeks. I can already feel my bracket being busted.

Colorado Buffaloes forward Tristan da Silva (23) celebrates with guard K.J. Simpson (2) in the first half against the California Golden Bears at the CU Events Center. Mandatory Credit: Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

First Four — Dayton, Ohio

No. 16 Wagner (16-15) vs. No. 16 Howard (18-16)

I’ll give the advantage to Howard in this matchup. The Bison not only rank higher in KenPom rankings, but they’ve won nine of their last 11 games. They also have tournament experience after making an appearance last year. I doubt Wagner, which averages just 63.5 points per game, is good enough offensively to win in the tournament.

Winner: Howard

No. 10 Colorado State (24-10) vs. No. 10 Virginia (23-10)

Mountain West teams haven’t performed well in the tournament for the last decade — posting a record of 12-26 since 2013. However, I think Colorado State is an underseeded team. The Rams rank 31 spots higher than Virginia in KenPom rankings. That’s quite a disparity. The Cavaliers also lost five of their last nine games to end the regular season.

Winner: Colorado State

No. 16 Grambling State (20-14) vs. No. 16 Montana State (17-17)

There’s quite a disparity between these teams when it comes to KenPom rankings. Montana State ranks No. 213, whereas Grambling State ranks No. 267. I’ll give the advantage to to the Bobcats. I’m not convinced that the Tigers are good enough offensively — averaging just 67.6 points per game — to score on Montana State’s defense.

Winner: Montana State

No. 10 Colorado (24-10) vs. No. 10 Boise State (22-10)

Colorado is another team that I think is underseeded. The Buffaloes rank in the top 30 in the country, according to KenPom (Boise State ranks No. 39). They also ended the season on a positive note — winning eight of their last nine games. The Broncos have never won a tournament game in program history and I doubt that changes this year.

Winner: Colorado

Round of 64

Connecticut Huskies guard Tristen Newton (2) drives to the basket against St. John’s Red Storm guard Daniss Jenkins (5) during the second half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 16 Stetson (22-12) vs. No. 1 UConn (31-3) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I have a difficult time seeing UConn getting bounced early in this tournament. The Huskies have too much depth and have been the most consistent team in the country all season. No. 16 seeds have been more competitive against No. 1 seeds in recent years, but I don’t see an upset happening in this matchup. UConn should cruise to the next round.

Winner: UConn

No. 9 Northwestern (21-11) vs. No. 8 Florida Atlantic (25-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic hasn’t been as consistent this season as last season. The Owls are still a very good team, though. They rank in the top 45 in KenPom, and rank in the top 20 in adjusted offensive efficiency. Northwestern will have a very difficult time defensively in this matchup. I also think Florida Atlantic has the coaching advantage in Dusty May.

Winner: Florida Atlantic

No. 12 UAB (22-11) vs. No. 5 San Diego State (24-10) — Spokane, Wash.

We didn’t get a single No. 12 seed to upset a No. 5 seed last year. In the last 20 years, history says to expect at least two upsets the year after that happens. I’m not convinced there will be an upset in this matchup, though. San Diego State is an elite defensive team and UAB isn’t a great offensive team. I think the Blazers will have a difficult time scoring on the Aztecs.

Winner: San Diego State

No. 13 Yale (22-9) vs. No. 4 Auburn (27-7) — Spokane, Wash.

Ivy League schools are always tricky teams in the tournament. This won’t be an easy game for Auburn. I’m still picking the Tigers to win, though. They rank No. 4 in the country in KenPom rankings, so they might be the most underseeded team in this tournament field. Yale isn’t a terrific defensive team, which should bode well for Auburn, which averages 83.2 points per game.

Winner: Auburn

No. 11 Duquesne (24-11) vs. No. 6 BYU (23-10) — Omaha, Neb.

Duquesne is a hot team right now, but I doubt it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. BYU ranks No. 16 in the country, according to KenPom, so it’s a very underseeded team. The Cougars are also one of the top offensive teams in the country — ranking No. 11 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt the Dukes will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: BYU

No. 14 Morehead State (26-8) vs. No. 3 Illinois (26-8) — Omaha, Neb.

The Big Ten tournament champion hasn’t made it past the first weekend of the NCAA tournament since 2019. I wouldn’t be so quick to pick Illinois to win this game given that track record. I’ll still pick the Fighting Illini to win, though. They’ve been playing well since late January — winning 12 of their last 15 games, including seven of their last eight.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake (28-6) vs. No. 7 Washington State (24-9) — Omaha, Neb.

The line of this game has shifted quite a bit in favor of Drake since it opened. I think that’s pretty telling to take the Bulldogs seriously in this matchup. Drake will likely have the best player in this game in Tucker DeVries, who averages 21.8 points per game. I think Washington State’s defense will have its hands full with him. The Bulldogs also have more tournament experience.

Winner: Drake

No. 15 South Dakota State (22-12) vs. No. 2 Iowa State (27-7) — Omaha, Neb.

I can’t bring myself to pick against Iowa State in this matchup. The Cyclones are red hot right now after winning 11 of their last 13 games, including winning three Big 12 tournament games by a combined 61 points. This is one of the weaker South Dakota State teams in the last 15 years. I also expect this to essentially be a home game for Iowa State.

Winner: Iowa State

North Carolina Tar Heels guard R.J. Davis (4) shoots the ball against the North Carolina State Wolfpack during the second half at Capital One Arena. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 16 Howard vs. No. 1 North Carolina (27-7) — Charlotte, N.C.

North Carolina has played like one of the top teams in the country the last few weeks, even though it might be overseeded a bit. The Tar Heels have won 20 of their last 24 games. If not for an NC State team getting hot at the right time, North Carolina probably would’ve won the ACC tournament. I highly doubt Howard is good enough to pull off a historic upset.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 9 Michigan State (19-14) vs. No. 8 Mississippi State (21-13) — Charlotte, N.C.

Mississippi State is playing well right now, but I’ll give the advantage to Michigan State in this matchup. Tom Izzo has been one-and-done just six times in his previous 25 tournament appearances. I also think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time scoring on the Spartans’ defense, which ranks in the top 10 in adjusted defensive efficiency.

Winner: Michigan State

No. 12 Grand Canyon (29-4) vs. No. 5 Saint Mary’s (26-7) — Spokane, Wash.

I think this is the mostly likely 5/12 matchup to end in an upset. Grand Canyon is the highest ranking No. 12 seed in KenPom (No. 53). The Antelopes have lost only four games all season and they have a head coach with plenty of tournament experience in Bryce Drew. Saint Mary’s is one of those teams that I never trust in the tournament and I won’t start now.

Winner: Grand Canyon

No. 13 Charleston (27-7) vs. No. 4 Alabama (21-11) — Spokane, Wash.

Alabama didn’t end the regular season on a positive note — losing four of its last six games. I wouldn’t rule out a potential upset in this matchup, but I don’t see it happening. Charleston is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. You have to be a great defensive team in order to knock off the Crimson Tide, who average 90.8 points per game.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico (26-9) vs. No. 6 Clemson (21-11) — Memphis, Tenn.

I’ve mostly picked against Mountain West schools so far, but I’ll take the upset here. Clemson isn’t playing well right now. The Tigers have lost four of their last eight games, including two losses to very bad Notre Dame and Boston College teams. New Mexico is surging after winning its conference tournament last week. Vegas also favors the Lobos in this matchup.

Winner: New Mexico

No. 14 Colgate (25-9) vs. No. 3 Baylor (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

Even though Colgate will be making its fourth-consecutive tournament appearance, I don’t take it that seriously. The Raiders have been outscored by a combined 44 points during that stretch. Baylor is one of the top offensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt Colgate will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada (26-7) vs. No. 7 Dayton (24-7) — Salt Lake City

I feel an upset brewing in this matchup. Dayton has to make a long trip west despite being the higher seed, which benefits Nevada. The Wolf Pack played well down the stretch — winning 11 of their last 14 games. I think the Flyers have been too inconsistent defensively all season. Nevada also ranks in the top 40 in the country in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency.

Winner: Nevada

No. 15 Long Beach State (21-14) vs. No. 2 Arizona (25-8) — Salt Lake City

I have a difficult time seeing Arizona getting bounced early in back-to-back seasons. The Wildcats shoot the ball very well and rank in the top 20 in the country in offensive rebounds. That ought to bode well in the tournament. Long Beach State is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. I think the Beach will have a difficult time slowing down Arizona’s offense.

Winner: Arizona

Houston Cougars guard L.J. Cryer (4) drives with the ball as Rice Owls guard Alem Huseinovic (23) defends during the second half at Fertitta Center. Mandatory Credit: Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 16 Longwood (21-13) vs. No. 1 Houston (30-4) — Memphis, Tenn.

I fully expect Houston to bounce back after getting blown out in the Big 12 championship. The Cougars are one of the more talented teams in this tournament and are excellent defensively. This is a very bad matchup for Longwood, which ranks near the bottom among tournament teams offensively. Houston shouldn’t have too many issues in this matchup.

Winner: Houston

No. 9 Texas A&M (20-14) vs. No. 8 Nebraska (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

I think this is a terrible matchup for Nebraska. The Cornhuskers rank in the bottom third in the country in offensive rebounds and total rebounds allowed per game. Texas A&M doesn’t shoot the ball that well, but getting second-chance opportunities will only improve its chances of winning. The Aggies are also playing well after winning five of their last six games.

Winner: Texas A&M

No. 12 James Madison (31-3) vs. No. 5 Wisconsin (22-13) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

James Madison poses a lot of problems for Wisconsin. The Dukes rank in the top five in defending 3-pointers. They’ve also won 13 straight games. I’m still picking the Badgers to win, though. They shoot the ball well and take care of the basketball. The difference in the game will likely be which team collects more offensive rebounds, and I give that advantage to Wisconsin.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 13 Vermont (28-6) vs. No. 4 Duke (24-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I’m to the point that I need to see Vermont pull off an upset in the tournament before I pick it to do so. The Catamounts have never advanced past the Round of 64 under head coach John Becker. That’s why I’ll take Duke to win this game. The Blue Devils will have a significant talent advantage, which will likely be the difference in this matchup.

Winner: Duke

No. 11 NC State (22-14) vs. No. 6 Texas Tech (23-10) — Pittsburgh

I think NC State will be gassed after winning five games in five days in the ACC tournament. The Wolfpack now have a quick turnaround and play on Thursday. I think that bodes well for Texas Tech, which KenPom considers to be a top 25 team in the country. The Red Raiders have been the far more consistent team all season. I like them to advance to the next round.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 14 Oakland (23-11) vs. No. 3 Kentucky (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Kentucky has been very inconsistent defensively, but I still expect it to win this game. Oakland isn’t a very good offensive team — ranking in the bottom 15 among tournament teams in adjusted offensive efficiency. I highly doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Wildcats. I expect Kentucky to advance to the Round of 32.

Winner: Kentucky

No. 10 Colorado vs. No. 7 Florida (24-11) — Indianapolis

This is a dangerous matchup for Florida. The Gators aren’t a great defensive team and will be shorthanded, and Colorado is a good offensive team. This will likely be a very high-scoring game, but I’ll still give the advantage to Florida. The Gators are elite offensively — ranking in the top 15 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, points per game, and offensive rebounding.

Winner: Florida

No. 15 Western Kentucky (22-11) vs. No. 2 Marquette (25-9) — Indianapolis

I think this is a very bad matchup for Western Kentucky, which struggles on the offensive end of the court. Marquette is one of the better defensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency. Points will be hard to come by for the Hilltoppers, which will make it incredibly difficult to pull off the upset.

Winner: Marquette

Purdue Boilermakers center Zach Edey (15) shoots the ball while Indiana Hoosiers center Kel’el Ware (1) defends in the second half at Mackey Arena. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 16 Montana State vs. No. 1 Purdue (29-4) — Indianapolis

I highly doubt Purdue will overlook its opponent this year. I fully expect last year’s loss to No. 16-seeded Fairleigh Dickinson to be in the back of its mind. The Boilermakers might have the best player in the tournament in Zach Edey, who averages 24.4 points per game. Like Arizona, I don’t think Purdue will be bounced early in back-to-back seasons.

Winner: Purdue

No. 9 TCU (21-12) vs. No. 8 Utah State (27-6) — Indianapolis

Given the Mountain West’s recent history in the tournament, there’s no way I’m picking against TCU. The Horned Frogs rank 15 spots ahead of Utah State in KenPom rankings, and in the top 50 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, adjusted defensive efficiency, and offensive rebounds. This feels like a very bad matchup for the Aggies.

Winner: TCU

No. 12 McNeese State (30-3) vs. No. 5 Gonzaga (25-7) — Salt Lake City

McNeese State will be a trendy pick because it’s one of the most improved teams in the country from last year, and this isn’t a great Gonzaga team. However, I’m not picking against Mark Few. He hasn’t been eliminated in the Round of 64 since 2008. KenPom also considers Gonzaga to be a top 15 team in the country, so it feels like a very underseeded team.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 13 Samford (29-5) vs. No. 4 Kansas (22-10) — Salt Lake City

I actually came close to picking the upset in this game. Kansas was hobbling at the end of the regular season — losing six of its last 10 games, including back-to-back losses by a combined 50 points. The Jayhawks have also sustained injuries to some of their better players. I still think Kansas has what it takes to beat Samford, which struggles on the defensive end of the court.

Winner: Kansas

No. 11 Oregon (23-11) vs. No. 6 South Carolina (26-7) — Pittsburgh

I’m not doubting Dana Altman in the tournament. He’s never lost in the Round of 64 as Oregon’s head coach. Altman has even made it past the first weekend five times in the last seven tournament appearances with the Ducks. South Carolina has been a good story to get to this point. I just think the Gamecocks are catching Oregon at the wrong time.

Winner: Oregon

No. 14 Akron (24-10) vs. No. 3 Creighton (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Akron managed to win the MAC tournament, but I’m not convinced it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. The Zips have been too inconsistent on both ends of the court all season. Creighton is an excellent offensive team — averaging 80.5 points per game. I have more trust in the Bluejays, who haven’t lost in the Round of 64 since 2018.

Winner: Creighton

No. 10 Colorado State vs. No. 7 Texas (20-12) — Charlotte, N.C.

I think Texas is a better team than what its record would indicate. The Longhorns had bad luck in Big 12 play (losing six games by fewer than 10 points). They should benefit by getting out of conference play. Texas will also have a significant talent advantage in this matchup. Colorado State struggles to defend 3-pointers and the Longhorns rank in the top 60 in 3-point shooting.

Winner: Texas

No. 15 Saint Peter’s (19-13) vs. No. 2 Tennessee (24-8) — Charlotte, N.C.

Don’t be so quick to rule out Saint Peter’s. The Peacocks have caught fire the last few weeks — winning eight of their last 10 games. I expect Tennessee to win this game comfortably, though. The Volunteers are one of the best defensive teams in this tournament. I think Saint Peter’s will have a difficult time scoring enough points to pull off the upset.

Winner: Tennessee

Round of 32

Iowa State Cyclones guard Keshon Gilbert (10) drives around Houston Cougars guard Ramon Walker Jr. (3) during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 8 Florida Atlantic vs. No. 1 UConn — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic’s defense is the main reason why I doubt it can make another deep run like last year. The Owls rank No. 109 in adjusted defensive efficiency. They also allow 10.8 offensive rebounds per game, which puts them in the bottom half of the country. This feels like a mismatch in favor of UConn. The Huskies have plenty of scoring depth and too much size in the post.

Winner: UConn

No. 5 San Diego State vs. No. 4 Auburn — Spokane, Wash.

I actually think Auburn matches up well against San Diego State’s defense. The Tigers shoot the ball well and do a good job collecting offensive rebounds. They also have scoring depth, with six different players averaging at least 7.1 points per game, and 11 different players to play in at least 28 games. I don’t think the Aztecs have the depth to keep up with Auburn.

Winner: Auburn

No. 6 BYU vs. No. 3 Illinois — Omaha, Neb.

This will likely be a difficult matchup for BYU to pull off the upset. Illinois has a lot of depth, with nine different players appearing in at least 24 games, and one of the best guards in the country in Terrence Shannon Jr. The Fighting Illini can also win in a variety of ways, which is always valuable in the tournament. I also think Brad Underwood is a better coach than Mark Pope.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake vs. No. 2 Iowa State — Omaha, Neb.

Having DeVries might be good enough to beat Washington State, but I doubt it’ll be enough to upset Iowa State. The Cyclones are arguably the best defensive team in the country — ranking in the top five in adjusted defensive efficiency and points allowed per game. I think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time winning if DeVries has limited scoring chances.

Winner: Iowa State

Arizona Wildcats guard Caleb Love (2) celebrates against the Southern California Trojans in the second half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 9 Michigan State vs. No. 1 North Carolina — Charlotte, N.C.

I have a ton of respect for Izzo, but this feels like the end of the road for Michigan State. The Spartans have been too inconsistent all season. I don’t think they’re good enough offensively to upset North Carolina, which ranks No. 6 in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Tar Heels are the more talented team, so I expect them to take care of business and advance to the next round.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 12 Grand Canyon vs. No. 4 Alabama — Spokane, Wash.

Grand Canyon might be good enough to upset Saint Mary’s, but I doubt that it can knock off Alabama. The Crimson Tide are one of the best offensive teams in the tournament. The Antelopes aren’t a great defensive team — ranking No. 51 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 106 in 3-point defense. I like Alabama to get to the Sweet 16 for a second-consecutive year.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico vs. No. 3 Baylor — Memphis, Tenn.

New Mexico is a good defensive team, but it’ll have a difficult time defending Baylor’s offense. The Bears rank in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency and 3-point shooting. They’re also a very physical team and do a good job of getting offensive rebounds. That’ll likely be a significant disadvantage for the Lobos. New Mexico ranks No. 153 in offensive rebounds allowed per game.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada vs. No. 2 Arizona — Salt Lake City

I don’t think Nevada is good enough on the glass to upset Arizona. The Wildcats average 13.2 offensive rebounds per game, and the Wolf Pack rank No. 106 in offensive rebounds allowed per game. I don’t think that matchup bodes well for Nevada because Arizona is an elite offensive team. If the Wildcats get second-chance opportunities, I don’t see how they lose this game.

Winner: Arizona

Marquette Golden Eagles head coach Shaka Smart talks to guard Stevie Mitchell (4) as he coaches against the Providence Friars during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 9 Texas A&M vs. No. 1 Houston — Memphis, Tenn.

This is a dangerous matchup for Houston. Texas A&M is one of the hottest teams in the country right now. The Aggies also played the Cougars very tough back in December. I think that’ll be in the back of Kelvin Sampson’s mind, though. Houston is an excellent defensive team — allowing just 57 points per game. I think Texas A&M will have a difficult time making shots.

Winner: Houston

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 4 Duke — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I didn’t like the way that Duke ended the regular season. The Blue Devils lost their last two games, including a pretty embarrassing loss to North Carolina on their own home court. This is a much different Wisconsin team than we’ve seen since the Bo Ryan era. The Badgers rank No. 13 in adjusted offensive efficiency and shoot nearly 35% from 3-point territory.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 3 Kentucky — Pittsburgh

Since 2008, only seven teams ranked outside the top 200 in defensive efficiency made it to the Sweet 16. That doesn’t bode well for Kentucky, which allows 79.7 points per game and 12 offensive rebounds per game. I think Texas Tech is good enough defensively to slow down the Wildcats’ offense. I also don’t have much trust in John Calipari, who hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2019.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 2 Marquette — Indianapolis

I actually think this is a favorable matchup for Florida. Marquette ranks in the bottom half of the country in 3-point defense and offensive rebounds allowed per game. The Gators are so good offensively. They’ll make the Golden Eagles pay if given second-chance opportunities. Lastly, I don’t trust Shaka Smart in the tournament. He hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2011.

Winner: Florida

Tennessee Volunteers head coach Rick Barnes during the second half against the South Carolina Gamecocks at Thompson-Boling Arena at Food City Center. Mandatory Credit: Randy Sartin-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 9 TCU vs. No. 1 Purdue — Indianapolis

This could be a problematic matchup for Purdue. TCU wants to speed the game up, whereas Purdue wants to slow the game down. Press defense gave the Boilermakers trouble last year, but they’ve done a better job taking care of the ball this year. Purdue is more experienced in the backcourt this year than it was last year, too. I also don’t have much trust in Jamie Dixon in the tournament.

Winner: Purdue

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 4 Kansas — Salt Lake City

If Kansas was healthy, I’d probably pick the Jayhawks to win this game. I don’t know how effective Kevin McCullar Jr. and Hunter Dickinson will be, even though they’re expected to be available. I’ll give the advantage to Gonzaga. Few has made it to the Sweet 16 in eight straight tournament appearances. Him and the Bulldogs are a safe bet in the first two rounds.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 11 Oregon vs. No. 3 Creighton — Pittsburgh

Creighton should win this game and advance to the next round. Oregon has been too inconsistent on both ends of the court. The Ducks rank No. 70 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 240 in 3-point defense. The Bluejays are one of the top offensive teams in the tournament — averaging 80.5 points per game. I expect Creighton will take advantage of that mismatch.

Winner: Creighton

No. 7 Texas vs. No. 2 Tennessee — Charlotte, N.C.

I’m not looking too much into the way Tennessee performed in the SEC tournament. KenPom has the Volunteers ranked in the top 10, and No. 3 in adjusted defensive efficiency. I think it’ll be difficult for Texas to make shots against in this matchup. The Longhorns have been too inconsistent on the defensive end of the court. I like the Volunteers to advance.

Winner: Tennessee

Sweet 16

Illinois Fighting Illini guard Terrence Shannon Jr. (0) dunks against the Ohio State Buckeyes during the first half at Target Center. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional semifinals — Boston

No. 4 Auburn vs. No. 1 UConn

If Auburn was in the West or Midwest regionals, I’d pick it to get to the Final Four. If any team can knock off UConn before the Elite Eight, I think it’s the Tigers. They match up very well with the Huskies. The problem is that UConn is really good, especially offensively. This will essentially be a home game for UConn, too. With almost a week to prepare, I give the advantage to Dan Hurley.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 2 Iowa State

Since 2000, Iowa State has won the Big 12 tournament five times and advanced to the Elite Eight just once after doing so. The Cyclones typically get up for the Big 12 tournament, but not the big dance. That’s part of the reason why I like Illinois in this matchup. I also think the Fighting Illini’s offense, which averages 84.4 points per game, poses a lot of problems for Iowa State’s defense.

Winner: Illinois

Baylor Bears forward Jalen Bridges (11) reacts after a made basket with guard Ja’Kobe Walter (4) against the TCU Horned Frogs during the first half at Ed and Rae Schollmaier Arena. Mandatory Credit: Raymond Carlin III-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional semifinals — Los Angeles

No. 4 Alabama vs. No. 1 North Carolina

As always, my biggest concern with Alabama is its defense. The Crimson Tide are one of the worst defensive teams in the tournament — ranking No. 112 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allowing 81.1 points per game. That’s not good enough. North Carolina is one of the top defensive teams in the country and I think it’ll be able to slow down Alabama’s offense.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 2 Arizona

I’ve been burned by Arizona too many times over the years. At this point, I need to see the Wildcats make a deep tournament run before I predict them to do so. I think Baylor poses trouble for Arizona. The Bears are a very good offensive team and won’t be afraid of Arizona’s size. With almost a week to prepare, I’ll give the advantage to the better head coach in Scott Drew.

Winner: Baylor

Texas Tech Red Raiders head coach Grant McCasland reacts during the second half against the Iowa State Cyclones at James H. Hilton Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Reese Strickland-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional semifinals — Dallas

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 1 Houston

Wisconsin is a great offensive team, but scoring points on Houston’s defense will be a tall order. The Cougars rank in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency, points allowed per game, 3-point defense, and turnovers forced. Houston will also have a significant talent advantage. A lot of things will have to break the Badgers’ way in order to pull off the upset.

Winner: Houston

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 6 Texas Tech

I think this matchup favors Texas Tech. Florida’s porous defense, which ranks No. 83 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allows 78.5 points per game, will likely prevent it from getting past the Sweet 16. The Red Raiders are solid offensive team and should be able to make shots against the Gators. I also think Grant McCasland is an ascending head coach, which benefits Texas Tech.

Winner: Texas Tech

Gonzaga Bulldogs head coach Mark Few looks on against the Santa Clara Broncos in the second half at McCarthey Athletic Center. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional semifinals — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 1 Purdue

This might be the weakest Gonzaga team that we’ve seen in recent years, but I’ll still take the upset. The Bulldogs have the coaching advantage with Few, who’ll have almost a week to prepare for this game. I also don’t trust Matt Painter and Purdue. The Boilermakers have made it to the Elite Eight just once in the previous 14 tournament appearances under Painter.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 2 Tennessee

Death, taxes, and Rick Barnes not getting past the Sweet 16. I just don’t trust Tennessee to make a deep tournament run, even though it’s an excellent defensive team. Creighton shoots the ball well, takes care of the ball, and should get second-chance opportunities against Tennessee. I think the Bluejays get back to the Elite 8 for a second-consecutive season.

Winner: Creighton

Elite Eight

Connecticut Huskies head coach Dan Hurley coaches against the Xavier Musketeers during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional final — Boston

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 1 UConn

I think this is a very favorable matchup for UConn. Illinois has struggled on the defensive end of the court — ranking No. 93 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 236 in 3-point defense. I doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Huskies, who might be the best offensive team in the tournament. The Fighting Illini will have a very difficult time defending UConn.

Winner: UConn

North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis reacts during the second half against the Duke Blue Devils at Cameron Indoor Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Kinnan-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional final — Los Angeles

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 1 North Carolina

Baylor’s inconsistent defense will likely be its downfall in the tournament. The Bears rank No. 64 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 189 in 3-point defense. North Carolina shoots the ball well and is just as aggressive as Baylor on the glass (maybe more so). The Tar Heels are also an elite defensive team. I don’t think they’re getting enough credit from the pundits.

Winner: North Carolina

Houston Cougars guard Jamal Shead (1) brings the ball up court during the first half against the Texas Tech Red Raiders at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional final — Dallas

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 1 Houston

These teams played twice in the regular season and Houston won both meetings by a combined 46 points. I expect the Cougars to win a third meeting. I don’t think Texas Tech has the horses to keep up with Houston. The Cougars might be the most athletic team in the tournament. They also have an experienced backcourt, which they didn’t have last year.

Winner: Houston

Creighton Bluejays guard Baylor Scheierman (55) controls the ball against Villanova Wildcats guard Jordan Longino (15) in the first half at Wells Fargo Center. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Ross-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional final — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 3 Creighton

I’m not crazy about any of the higher seeds in this regional, but one of them is likely going to win it. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll pick Creighton. I think the Bluejays have the least amount of baggage and they showed last year they can make a deep tournament run. Gonzaga’s defense, which has been good but not great, will have a difficult time slowing down Creighton’s offense.

Winner: Creighton

Final Four — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 North Carolina vs. No. 1 UConn

North Carolina is certainly capable of knocking off UConn. The Tar Heels are good enough defensively to contain the Huskies’ offense — holding opponents to shoot just 40.7% from the field and limiting second-chance opportunities. I’m not sure North Carolina is consistent enough offensively, though. I also think UConn has the more complete team and a better head coach.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 1 Houston

I expect Creighton’s run to come to an end in this game. The Bluejays will have a difficult time scoring against Houston’s defense, which holds its opponents to shoot just 37.9% from the field. I don’t know where Creighton’s points will come from if it can’t make shots because it’s not a great offensive rebounding team. I like the Cougars to advance to the national championship.

Winner: Houston

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball National Championship Trophy. Mandatory credit: Getty Images.

National Championship — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 Houston vs. No. 1 UConn

These just feel like the most complete teams in the tournament. They’re both athletic, talented, and well coached. My readers know how much I hate picking defending champions, but I think UConn is a wagon. The Huskies have won 21 of their last 22 games and have shown no sign of slowing down. That’s why I think UConn is the most likely team to defend its title since Florida in 2007.

I also think the Huskies can be effective offensively on Houston’s stout defense. UConn had six different players lead the team in scoring in a game in the regular season, including five different players to score at least 20 points in a game. That typically bodes well in the tournament. The Huskies are also aggressive on the boards and play great defense. I think they cut down the nets again.

Winner: UConn

Contact me

Don’t rule out Oregon State, Washington State joining the Big 12 and changing the college football landscape forever

Movie quote of the day:

“I hate her. In fact, the day you broke up with her I marked that down on my calendar as a day of rejoicement. I’m going to celebrate it with a cake with her face on it, but instead of eating it, we smash it.”

– Stainer, “She’s Out of My League” (2010)

Oregon State Beavers running back Damien Martinez (6) carries the ball against the Washington State Cougars in the first half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports


I was ready to believe that the conference realignment buzz was slowing down. I was under the impression that all that was left to determine was which school The American would add to replace SMU and the fate of Oregon State and Washington State.

However, the conference realignment buzz has cranked back up again, specifically in regards to Oregon State and Washington State. 

A few weeks ago, those two schools filed a legal complaint against the Pac-12 and commissioner George Kliavkoff, seeking a temporary restraining order to protect the future of the conference. The basis for this decision comes because Oregon State and Washington State believe that the 10 members that are leaving won’t have the conference’s best interest at heart, even going so far as to believe that those members will vote to dissolve the Pac-12. Basically, Oregon State and Washington State want full control of the conference’s future. A hearing on the matter is slated for Nov. 14. 

This puts those two schools in a precarious situation. As it stands, the Pac-12 champion is going to have a guaranteed spot in the 12-team College Football Playoff next year. The new format is going to have six guaranteed spots for conference champions (each of the Power 5 conference champions and the highest-ranked Group of 5 conference champion) and six wild cards. It’s important to know that the 6+6 format isn’t set after next season, and the the CFP management committee has yet to determine if the format will stay the same or change after the Pac-12 lost 10 of its members back in the summer. In fact, the committee punted on making a decision the issue recently

Oregon State Beavers defensive back Jaden Robinson (4) breaks up a pass intended for Washington State Cougars wide receiver Josh Kelly (3) in the second half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports


Oregon State and Washington State have a clear path to the CFP unless the format changes, even though they’re the only remaining members in the Pac-12. That will eventually change because the NCAA has a requirement that an FBS conference needs at least eight members, but there’s a two-year grace period. That means ESPN might have to pay about $320 million to Oregon State and Washington State, and potentially to schools like Boise State, Colorado State, San Diego State, UNLV, etc. 

Things could obviously change, though. The committee could eventually determine that the Pac-12 will lose its guaranteed spot in the CFP. The problem with that is that there’s no precedent for it. Remember, the old Big East/The American lost its guaranteed spot only because the BCS was scrapped and the CFP was formed, and the powers that be determined there wouldn’t be guaranteed spots in the new postseason format.

There’s also no technical explanation of the differences between the Power 5 and Group of 5 entities, which is a big problem for the committee. It’s likely not going to be able to explain it without referencing the colloquial expression “I know it when I see it” from Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in 1964.

The main difference between the different levels of competition in the NCAA (FBS, FCS, Division II, Division III) is mostly the number of scholarships. However, Power 5 and Group of 5 schools have the same number of football scholarships (85). That’s why those schools are considered to be on the same level and are told that they’re competing for the same national championship, even though we all know that’s not true. 

The College Football Playoff national championship trophy is displayed during Big Ten media days at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Robert Goddin-USA TODAY Sports


This is a significant development. I don’t expect ESPN to willingly pay $320 million to Oregon State and Washington State if the CFP format doesn’t change, and especially if the Pac-12 ever merges with the Mountain West and/or The American.

Oregon State and Washington State are in a pretty strong position, which is why I expect them to use it as leverage for ESPN to pull strings to get them in a Power 5 conference. The most like destination is the Big 12. Oregon State and Washington State are much better fits in that conference than the ACC, Big Ten, or the SEC. The two schools would also be quality additions to the Big 12. Oregon State has a solid football program right now and its baseball team has made it to Omaha, Neb., for the College World Series six times since 2005. Washington State has had a respectable football program for the last 30 years, and has its cool College Gameday tradition.

I think it’s more likely than not that Oregon State and Washington State end up in the Big 12. It’ll be much cheaper for ESPN to broadcast their games in the conference at a reduced share (roughly $20 million per school) than it would be to give them a share of the CFP revenue. It would also benefit Oregon State and Washington State in the long-term future to join the Big 12, instead of potentially joining the American or Mountain West.

I also wouldn’t be surprised if ESPN waited for the committee to come to a decision on the format for the expanded CFP. If the Pac-12 loses its guaranteed spot, it’ll cost ESPN even less money to broadcast Oregon State and Washington State games in either the Mountain West or The American. That could be problematic, though, because the committee won’t meet again for a while and the clock is ticking. Plus, in order to change the CFP format, there has to be a unanimous decision by the committee, and The American commissioner Mike Aresco has said he won’t vote to change the format. So, that might not be the best course of action.

There could be a lot more riding on this development than just which conference Oregon State and Washington State join. The committee has a huge decision to make these next few weeks when it comes to the CFP format. I don’t think anyone wants to see more substantial changes to the highest level of college football, but I can’t help but see the writing on the wall. It feels like this will be the first step in the Power 5 conferences separating from the Group of 5 conferences or vice versa, which will completely change the college football landscape forever.

There’s been so much tension between the two entities since the CFP was established. The Group of 5 schools only receive 20% of the revenue, and there have even been rumblings of them starting their own playoff format. Unless the committee decides to give more than one Group of 5 conference champion a guaranteed spot in the CFP, which I highly doubt will happen, I think there’s only going to be more division. Regardless of how the committee handles the Pac-12’s situation.

Contact me

Adding Cal, Stanford, SMU isn’t going to save the ACC

Movie quote of the day:

“If in doubt, Meriadoc, always follow your nose.”

– Gandalf, “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” (2001)

ACC commissioner Jim Phillips speaks to the media during ACC Media Days at the Westin Hotel in Charlotte. Mandatory Credit: Jim Dedmon-USA TODAY Sports


I realize how late I am to write about the recent conference realignment news from the ACC, but I’ve been swamped with other projects. I finally found the time to write my thoughts. 

Even though the news the last few weeks has been devoted to the Big 12, Big Ten, and Pac-12 (RIP), the ACC found itself in the news for the wrong reasons. Florida State has been vocal about how unhappy it is in the ACC, specifically with the conference’s current revenue distribution and media rights agreement. The Seminoles have even threatened to pay the $120 million exit fee to leave the conference — going so far as to work with a private equity firm to help with costs.

Everyone was so caught up with the exit fee that they ignored the biggest issue facing Florida State, which was the ACC’s grant of rights that doesn’t expire until 2036. The Seminoles were free to pay the exit fee and leave the conference, but it’d be pointless to do so if they couldn’t get out of the grant of rights. If Florida State had left the ACC without getting out of the grant of rights, it’d mean that any media revenue that the school generated would still go to the ACC for the next 13 years. That’s why I never believed the Seminoles were going to leave the conference any time soon. 

The other issue was that there likely wasn’t a conference that would take Florida State right now. I doubt the Big Ten would be interested because the school isn’t a member of the Association of American Universities. Every member of the Big Ten is an AAU member except Nebraska, which was an AAU member at the time it joined the conference. I also think the Big 12 and SEC are content at 16 members…for now. It seems like the Seminoles are stuck.

I bring all that up because I don’t think Florida State is going to stop trying to get out of the ACC. The conference makes substantially less money in media revenue than the Big Ten and SEC. The Seminoles view themselves on the same competitive level as some of the institutions in those conferences. Florida State isn’t going to tolerate the ACC for much longer. If the Seminoles are looking elsewhere, it’s safe to assume that Clemson, Miami, North Carolina, and even Notre Dame are doing the same. 

In an effort to either put off the day that those schools leave the conference (or avoid it altogether), the ACC made the decision to expand west by adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU. 

On the surface, I can see why the conference made this decision. Cal and Stanford are excellent academic institutions and are great fits in the ACC because of that. SMU also isn’t an academic slouch and gives the conference a footprint in Texas. Adding those three schools will also lead to $72 million in extra revenue from the TV networks. Cal and Stanford are going to take a significantly reduced share of revenue distribution, and SMU will forgo any revenue for almost a decade. That means more money in the pockets of the other ACC members, so it was a win for all parties. 

The problem with adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU is that they don’t bring much to the table. When was the last time Cal was relevant in a revenue-generating sport? Probably since Aaron Rodgers or Marshawn Lynch played football there. Stanford has pretty much been irrelevant historically in revenue-generating sports, with the exception of the Jim Harbaugh and David Shaw years in football. SMU has plenty of boosters with deep pockets, but that’s about all it brings to the table. The Mustangs haven’t even been able to win The American since joining the conference in 2013. 

The other commonality with all three institutions is that, while located in large markets, none of them control their market. TCU has more of a footprint in Dallas than SMU, and even the Horned Frogs are likely behind Texas. For years, Larry Scott and the Pac-12 tried to establish a footprint in the San Francisco Bay Area, but to no avail. 

I just don’t see how these additions are going to lead to anything good for the ACC. I don’t think Cal, Stanford, or SMU will compete in the conference. They’re also not geographic fits and travel costs will be through the roof. For the time being, it probably won’t mean much with those institutions accepting reduced shares of media revenue for the next few years. That’ll send a larger chunk of the metaphorical pie to Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina’s pockets, which should appease everyone in the short term. 

However, when the western schools start receiving larger shares, that’s not going to make Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina very happy. Remember, those were the four ACC members that were vehemently opposed to adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU. It wasn’t until a last-minute switch from NC State that the three western schools even had the votes to be accepted into the conference. 

Adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU feels like the beginning of the end for the ACC. Once Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina leave for either the Big Ten or SEC, I can’t imagine the ACC survives. The conference doesn’t have much to offer outside of those four schools. The majority of the members that would be left behind are small, private institutions that aren’t big brands or that competitive in athletics. They’re just along for the ride to collect a $30 million check from media partners.

What I’m seeing develop in the ACC is awfully close to what we just saw happen in the Pac-12. For years, the ACC has placed too much of an emphasis on academics. That’s part of the reason why the conference has ranked dead last among Power 5 (4?) conferences in TV viewership for the last few years. The ACC also hasn’t wanted to be associated with conferences/institutions that don’t share the same academic values. That’s why it partnered with the Big Ten and Pac-12 in The Alliance and why the ACC explored a merger with the Pac-12 about a year ago.

Without big brands like Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina, I have a difficult time seeing any TV network paying top dollar to broadcast Boston College, Stanford, SMU, Syracuse, Wake Forest, etc. Keep in mind that the Big 12, Big Ten, and SEC will likely get the opportunity to re-negotiate new media rights agreements before the ACC can re-negotiate the one that it agreed to in 2016. The conference is going to have to think outside the box to find other revenue streams, which it has started to do, but I’m not convinced it’s going to be enough.

I don’t expect any schools to leave the ACC for at least a few years, and a lot can change in that time, but things don’t look good for the conference right now.

Contact me

College football Week 2 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“I don’t know whether to help you or euthanize you.”

– Jacob Palmer, “Crazy, Stupid, Love” (2011)

Week 1 record: 7-5 (58.3%)
All-time record: 943-466 (66.9%)

Friday:

Kansas Jayhawks linebacker Rich Miller (30) and defensive lineman Austin Booker (9) celebrate after a play during the first half against the Missouri State Bearsa at David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports


Illinois (1-0) at Kansas (1-0)
David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, Kan.
Line: Kansas -3
Over/under: 57.5

It sounds like quarterback Jalon Daniels is expected to play. If so, I’ll give the advantage to Kansas. Daniels is one of the most dynamic quarterbacks in college football. The Jayhawks have averaged 37.1 points per game offensively in the last 12 games he’s started. I think Illinois, which has scored 30 points or more just five times under Bret Bielema, is going to have a difficult time outscoring the Jayhawks.

Prediction: Kansas 34, Illinois 24

Saturday:

Notre Dame Fighting Irish quarterback Sam Hartman (10) celebrates with tight end Holden Staes (13) after a touchdown in the second quarter against the Tennessee State Tigers at Notre Dame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports


No. 10 Notre Dame (2-0) at NC State (1-0)
Carter-Finley Stadium
Raleigh, N.C.
Line: Notre Dame -7.5
Over/under: 50.5

I have no idea what to expect from NC State. The Wolfpack’s performance last week left a lot to be desired. NC State averaged just 5.1 yards per play offensively in a struggle win over UConn. I’ve been pretty impressed with Notre Dame through two weeks – outscoring opponents 98-6. I expect quarterback Sam Hartman to make a few too many plays and lead the Fighting Irish to victory.

Prediction: Notre Dame 28, NC State 20

Utah Utes head coach Kyle Whittingham works the sideline during their game against the Florida Gators at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Swinger-USA TODAY Sports


No. 12 Utah (1-0) at Baylor (0-1)
McLane Stadium
Waco, Texas
Line: Utah -7.5
Over/under: 47.5

I expect Baylor to be more buttoned up this week, but this is going to be a difficult game for it to win. The Bears’ offensive line struggled last week against Texas State. Utah’s strength is in the trenches, which doesn’t bode well for Baylor. The Utes have had more time to prepare for this game, too. The Bears are also going to be without their starting quarterback. Utah should win this game.

Prediction: Utah 27, Baylor 17

Colorado Buffaloes quarterback Shedeur Sanders (2) throws a pass in the second quarter against the TCU Horned Frogs at Amon G. Carter Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports


Nebraska (0-1) at No. 22 Colorado (1-0)
Folsom Field
Boulder, Colo.
Line: Colorado -2.5
Over/under: 58.5

I wouldn’t be so quick to count out Nebraska in this game. I realize that the Cornhuskers didn’t impress anyone last week, but Matt Rhule is a quality head coach and they have extra time to prepare. I also think there’s a chance that Colorado comes out flat coming off an emotional win. However, I think the Buffaloes have too much firepower offensively. I’m not sure Nebraska can keep up.

Prediction: Colorado 34, Nebraska 28

Mississippi Rebels running back Quinshon Judkins (4) reacts with Mississippi Rebels defensive linemen JJ Pegues (89) after a touchdown during the second half against the Mercer Bears at Vaught-Hemingway Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Petre Thomas-USA TODAY Sports


No. 20 Ole Miss (1-0) at No. 24 Tulane (1-0)
Yulman Stadium
New Orleans
Line: Ole Miss -7.5
Over/under: 66

This is one of the more underrated matchups this week. I think Tulane poses a lot of problems for Ole Miss. The Green Wave are going to lean on their run game and try to keep the ball away from Lane Kiffin and the Rebels’ offense. Ole Miss hasn’t exactly been a defensive juggernaut under Kiffin. However, I think the Rebels are too explosive offensively. I doubt Tulane will be able to slow them down.

Prediction: Ole Miss 38, Tulane 31

Texas A&M Aggies linebacker Chantz Johnson (23) and linebacker Edgerrin Cooper (45) react to a play during the third quarter against New Mexico Lobos at Kyle Field. Mandatory Credit: Maria Lysaker-USA TODAY Sports


No. 23 Texas A&M (1-0) at Miami (1-0)
Hard Rock Stadium
Miami
Line: Texas A&M -4.5
Over/under: 51.5

I was impressed with both of these teams last week. This game ought to be more entertaining than it was last year. I’m going to give the slight advantage to Texas A&M, though. I think the Aggies have the better head coach/quarterback combination. They should also have the more talented team. I’mstruggling to see the areas of this matchup that Miami can exploit.

Prediction: Texas A&M 27, Miami 24

Iowa Hawkeyes quarterback Cade McNamara (12) throws a pass against the Utah State Aggies during the third quarter at Kinnick Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeffrey Becker-USA TODAY Sports


Iowa (1-0) at Iowa State (1-0)
Jack Trice Stadium
Ames, Iowa
Line: Iowa -3.5
Over/under: 36.5

I feel like too many people are riding with Iowa State to win this game because of how Iowa played last week. Kirk Ferentz has had Matt Campbell’s number in this rivalry. The Hawkeyes have won five of the previous six meetings between these teams, and outscored the Cyclones 151-81 during that stretch. I also think Iowa has the advantage at quarterback in Cade McNamara.

Prediction: Iowa 20, Iowa State 16

Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh Panthers running back Rodney Hammond Jr. (6) runs after a pass reception against the Wofford Terriers during the third quarter at Acrisure Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports


Cincinnati (1-0) at Pitt (1-0)
Acrisure Stadium
Pittsburgh
Line: Pitt -7
Over/under: 46.5

I think this is a favorable matchup for Pitt. The Panthers have the better head coach in Pat Narduzzi. Cincinnati’s defense also showed vulnerability against the run against Eastern Kentucky last week – allowing 4.5 yards per carry. I expect Narduzzi to have noticed that and for the Panthers to lean on their run game, which accumulated over 200 rushing yards last week.

Prediction: Pitt 24, Cincinnati 20

Oregon Ducks running back Jordan James (20) celebrates during the first half after scoring a touchdown against the Portland State Vikings at Autzen Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Wayrynen-USA TODAY Sports


No. 13 Oregon (1-0) at Texas Tech (0-1)
Jones AT&T Stadium
Lubbock, Texas
Line: Oregon -6.5
Over/under: 68.5

I understand that Texas Tech suffered an embarrassing loss, but I think it can win this game. It’s not easy to play in Lubbock, especially at night. I also think Joey Maguire will have the Red Raiders better prepared this week. I’m just not convinced Texas Tech can slow down Oregon’s rushing attack after giving up 171 yards on the ground to Wyoming last week. I have to go with the Ducks.

Prediction: Oregon 41, Texas Tech 31

Wisconsin Badgers head coach Luke Fickell celebrates with wide wide receiver Chimere Dike (13) following a touchdown during the second quarter against the Buffalo Bulls at Camp Randall Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-USA TODAY Sports


No. 19 Wisconsin (1-0) at Washington State (1-0)
Martin Stadium
Pullman, Wash.
Line: Wisconsin -6.5
Over/under: 58.5

I’m going to be bold and pick the upset. Wisconsin quarterback Tanner Mordecai has had issues with turnovers – throwing 23 interceptions in his last 23 starts against FBS competition. Washington State has been able to force turnovers under head coach Jake Dickert – ranking in the top 40 the last two seasons. I also think Cougars quarterback Cam Ward poses a lot of problems for Wisconsin’s defense.

Prediction: Washington State 34, Wisconsin 31

Oklahoma State’s Ollie Gordon II (0) runs the ball against Central Arkansas in the first quarter at Boone Pickens Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Nathan J. Fish-USA TODAY Sports


Oklahoma State (1-0) at Arizona State (1-0)
Mountain America Stadium
Tempe, Ariz.
Line: Oklahoma State -3.5
Over/under: 56.5

Neither of these teams were impressive last week, so I’m going to lean on coaching. Oklahoma State has the clear advantage in that area in Mike Gundy. I expect him to have the Cowboys ready to play after a lackluster performance against an FCS opponent. I also think Oklahoma State is the better defensive team. That should keep quarterback Jaden Rashada in check, which will be the difference in the game.

Prediction: Oklahoma State 28, Arizona State 24

Game of the week:

Alabama Crimson Tide quarterback Jalen Milroe (4) celebrates with offensive lineman JC Latham (65) after scoring against the Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders during the first half at Bryant-Denny Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Gary Cosby Jr.-USA TODAY Sports


No. 11 Texas (1-0) at No. 3 Alabama (1-0)
Bryant-Denny Stadium
Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Line: Alabama -7
Over/under: 53.5

I can’t shake the feeling that Texas has had this game circled for a year. The Longhorns should’ve won last year’s meeting between these teams and I think they’ll want to send a message since they’re about to join the SEC. I’m not going to pick against Nick Saban, though. He has a record of 28-2 against his former assistant coaches. Alabama also has a record of 99-5 at home since 2008.

Prediction: Alabama 31, Texas 24

Contact me

College football Week 1 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“I always tell the truth. Even when I lie.”

– Tony Montana, “Scarface” (1983)

2022 record: 111-62 (64.1%)
All-time record: 936-461 (67%)

Thursday:

Utah Utes running back Micah Bernard (2) runs with the ball after a catch against the Stanford Cardinal in the second quarter at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-USA TODAY Sports


Florida at No. 14 Utah
Rice-Eccles Stadium
Salt Lake City
Line: Utah -4.5
Over/under: 43.5

Utah will have its hands full if quarterback Cam Rising doesn’t play in this game. Florida is talented enough to knock off the Utes. I just don’t know what to expect from the Gators, though. They’re a low-altitude team with a lot of question marks heading to high altitude, which isn’t insignificant. Rice-Eccles is one of the toughest places to play in college football. I’m not confident in it, but I’m going with Utah.

Prediction: Utah 23, Florida 20

Minnesota Golden Gophers quarterback Athan Kaliakmanis (8) throws the ball against the Iowa Hawkeyes during the first quarter at Huntington Bank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-USA TODAY Sports


Nebraska at Minnesota
Huntington Bank Stadium
Minneapolis
Line: Minnesota -7
Over/under: 42.5

This will be Matt Rhule’s first game as Nebraska’s head coach, and I feel like it’s coming at the wrong time. I doubt the Cornhuskers are going to be polished enough to go on the road and knock off Minnesota. Nebraska is breaking in new playbooks and several new players. The Golden Gophers are entering Year 7 of P.J. Fleck’s tenure and should be in a better spot as a program. 

Prediction: Minnesota 23, Nebraska 17

Friday:

Louisville Cardinals running back Jawhar Jordan (25) runs the ball against North Carolina State Wolfpack cornerback Aydan White (3) during the second half at Cardinal Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Rhodes-USA TODAY Sports


Louisville vs. Georgia Tech
Mercedes-Benz Stadium
Atlanta
Line: Louisville -7.5
Over/under: 48.5

A part of me thinks Georgia Tech might be able to win this game. The Yellow Jackets were a competitive team last season when Brent Key took over as interim head coach. The word “interim” has now been removed from his title. I’m still going to give the advantage to Louisville, though. I think the Cardinals have the better head coach in Jeff Brohm, along with the talent advantage.

Prediction: Louisville 27, Georgia Tech 20

Saturday:

TCU Horned Frogs head coach Sonny Dykes on the sidelines during a game against the Iowa State Cyclones at Amon G. Carter Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Raymond Carlin III-USA TODAY Sports


Colorado at No. 17 TCU
Amon G. Carter Stadium
Fort Worth, Texas
Line: TCU -20.5
Over/under: 63.5

Colorado has the athletes on the perimeter to make this game intriguing. However, I have reservations about what kind of players the Buffaloes have in the trenches. That’s where this game will be decided, and I have to give the advantage in that area to TCU. Even though the Horned Frogs are breaking in a lot of new faces, I think they’re in a better spot as a program than Colorado.

Prediction: TCU 41, Colorado 24

Ohio State Buckeyes running back Miyan Williams (3) breaks away for a long touchdown run during the second quarter against the Indiana Hoosiers at Ohio Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Joseph Maiorana-USA TODAY Sports


No. 3 Ohio State at Indiana
Memorial Stadium
Bloomington, Ind.
Line: Ohio State -29.5
Over/under: 59.5

I’ll be surprised if Indiana makes this a competitive game. Indiana doesn’t have as much talent on its roster as Ohio State. The Hoosiers also struggled defensively last year – allowing 176.2 rushing yards per game and 33.9 points per game. The Buckeyes might be breaking in a new starting quarterback, but their run game should be excellent. I also trust Ryan Day to have a good offensive game plan.

Prediction: Ohio State 45, Indiana 17

Washington Huskies quarterback Michael Penix Jr. (9) celebrates after throwing a touchdown pass to wide receiver Rome Odunze (1) against the Stanford Cardinal during the third quarter at Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-USA TODAY Sports


Boise State at No. 10 Washington
Husky Stadium
Seattle
Line: Washington -14.5
Over/under: 58.5

Boise State has a pretty good run game, but quarterback Taylen Green isn’t much of a thrower. I highly doubt that’s going to be good enough to go on the road knock off Washington. The Huskies are returning a lot of production, including quarterback Michael Penix Jr., from an offense that averaged 43.2 points per game at home last year. This feels like a game the Huskies should win.

Prediction: Washington 38, Boise State 24

UTSA Roadrunners quarterback Frank Harris (0) celebrates a touchdown in the first half against the North Texas Mean Green at the Alamodome. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Dunn-USA TODAY Sports


UTSA at Houston
TDECU Stadium
Houston
Line: UTSA -1.5
Over/under: 59.5

This feels like a problematic matchup for Houston. The Cougars are breaking in a lot of new faces on their roster, including starting quarterback. On the other side, UTSA is one of the best Group of 5 programs in the country. The Roadrunners are also going to have a significant advantage at the quarterback position with Frank Harris. I’ll take UTSA to get the huge win on the road.

Prediction: UTSA 34, Houston 27

Penn State Nittany Lions running back Nicholas Singleton (10) celebrates with offensive linesman Juice Scruggs (70) after scoring a touchdown during the second quarter against the Maryland Terrapins at Beaver Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matthew OHaren-USA TODAY Sports


West Virginia at No. 7 Penn State
Beaver Stadium
University Park, Pa.
Line: Penn State -20.5
Over/under: 50.5

Both of these teams are breaking in new starting quarterbacks and have question marks at the wide receiver position. This game will be decided by which team can run the ball better. Penn State has the advantage in that area. I highly doubt West Virginia’s defense, which allowed 149.6 yards per game on the ground last year, can slow down Penn State’s rushing attack.

Prediction: Penn State 35, West Virginia 14

North Carolina Tar Heels quarterback Drake Maye (10) looks to pass in the first quarter at Kenan Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports


No. 21 North Carolina vs. South Carolina
Bank of America Stadium
Charlotte, N.C.
Line: North Carolina -2.5
Over/under: 64.5

I originally had North Carolina winning this game in the preseason. However, the closer we get to this game the more I like South Carolina’s chances. Even though the Tar Heels will have the better quarterback in Drake Maye, I think the Gamecocks have the better team. I also think South Carolina has the better personnel in the trenches. I expect that to be the difference in this matchup.

Prediction: South Carolina 30, North Carolina 27

Tulane Green Wave head coach Willie Fritz during the first quarter against the Tulsa Golden Hurricane at Skelly Field at H.A. Chapman Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brett Rojo-USA TODAY Sports


South Alabama at No. 24 Tulane
Yulman Stadium
New Orleans
Line: Tulane -6.5
Over/under: 51.5

I had a difficult time picking against Tulane in this matchup. I think South Alabama is a good team, but the Green Wave are in a much better spot as a program. I don’t see Tulane coming out flat after posting a record of 12-2 and beating USC in the Cotton Bowl a season ago. The Green Wave also have the talent advantage. This just feels like a tough game for the Jaguars to win, especially with it being on the road.

Prediction: Tulane 28, South Alabama 21

Monday:

Clemson running back Will Shipley (1) runs for a 50-yard touchdown against Syracuse during the fourth quarter at Memorial Stadium in Clemson, South Carolina on Saturday, October 22, 2022. Mandatory Credit: Ken Ruinard-USA TODAY Sports


No. 9 Clemson at Duke
Wallace Wade Stadium
Durham, N.C.
Line: Clemson -12.5
Over/under: 55.5

I wouldn’t be so quick to rule out Duke in this game. The Blue Devils should be a pretty good team because they’re returning a lot of production from a team that won nine games last year. The Tigers are also breaking in a new offensive coordinator, so I doubt they’re going to be polished for Week 1. I’m still going to pick Clemson to win, though, because it’ll have a significant talent advantage.

Prediction: Clemson 31, Duke 21

Sunday/Game of the week:

LSU Tigers quarterback Jayden Daniels (5) scrambles against the Alabama Crimson Tide during the second half at Tiger Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports


No. 5 LSU vs. No. 8 Florida State
Camping World Stadium
Orlando, Fla.
Line: LSU -2.5
Over/under: 55.5

Florida State got the better of LSU last year, but I’m not anticipating the same result this time around. The Tigers are returning a lot of production from a team that finished strong last season – winning six of their last eight games and appeared in the SEC championship. They have the talent and coaching advantage, too. I expect Brian Kelly to have LSU ready to play.

Prediction: LSU 31, Florida State 24

Contact me

2023 college football season predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“Musn’t be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.”

– Eames, “Inception” (2010)

Georgia Bulldogs head coach Kirby Smart holds the trophy after winning the CFP national championship game against the TCU Horned Frogs at SoFi Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports


I’m not sure I’d be prepared to make my college football season predictions if it wasn’t for the recent conference realignment news. Truthfully, this season has snuck up on me. The news of Oregon and Washington heading to the Big Ten, and Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah going to the Big 12, got the juices flowing and made me eager for the start of the season. I’ve been hustling to get my research done for all Power 5 programs, and the top Group of 5 programs.  

The wait is finally over, though, because Week 1 technically starts this weekend. Even though the matchups aren’t particularly intriguing (aside from Notre Dame facing Navy in Ireland and Ohio playing San Diego State), I wanted to get my predictions finalized before any games were played. I didn’t want any of the results from this weekend to impact my outlook.

My immediate impression for this season is that there are some excellent storylines: Georgia is trying to become the first program to win three-consecutive national championships since Minnesota did it between 1934-36; the Pac-12 is arguably the most compelling Power 5 conference in the wake of its demise; Texas could really be back; Ohio State is trying to get back to being the top dog in the Big Ten; and many others. There’s also a lot of uncertainty at the top of college football, with several programs breaking in new starting quarterbacks.

Remember, we’ve also had plenty of conference realignment beginning this year at both the Power 5 and Group of 5 levels: BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF are now in the Big 12; Charlotte, FAU, North Texas, Rice, UAB, and UTSA joined the American; and Liberty, Jacksonville State, New Mexico State, and Sam Houston State joined the Conference USA. I don’t think we’re done with conference realignment either because we still haven’t seen the ramifications of the Pac-12’s demise trickle down to the Group of 5 level. 

There shouldn’t be any shortage of entertainment this season. 

Southern California Trojans quarterback Caleb Williams (13) throws the ball against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish in the first half at United Airlines Field at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Major award winners

AwardWinner
Heisman (most outstanding player)QB Caleb Williams, USC
Maxwell (best player)Caleb Williams, USC
Davey O’Brien (best quarterback)Caleb Williams, USC
Doak Walker (best running back)Blake Corum, Michigan
Fred Biletnikoff (best wide receiver)Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State
Bronko Nagurski (defensive player of the year)Edge Jared Verse, Florida State
Outland (best lineman)T Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State
Butkus (best linebacker)Jeremiah Trotter, Clemson
Jim Thorpe (best defensive back)CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama
Lou Groza (best kicker)Ryan Coe, North Carolina
Price’s predicted major award winners


I know, I know, no player has won the Heisman Trophy twice since Archie Griffin won it in 1974 and 1975. My readers know that I hate picking chalk, but I think Williams is due to make history this season. Every quarterback in Lincoln Riley’s system has either put up better numbers each year in the system or the best numbers of their college careers. Williams is entering his third year in Riley’s system, dating back to their time at Oklahoma. The last quarterback we saw do that was Baker Mayfield, who won the Heisman in that third year. Williams is also a heavy favorite to win the award.

Michigan has relied heavily on its run game the last two seasons, with its top two rushers accounting for a combined 801 carries. I expect the same to happen this season. Remember, Corum rushed for almost 1,500 yards and 18 touchdowns last season. The only way he might not win the Doak Walker Award is if Michigan manages his workload and gives his backup the same amount of carries. There might be a new quarterback at Ohio State, but I don’t think that’s going to prevent Harrison Jr. from winning the Biletnikoff Award. He’s regarded as the best wide receiver prospect in the 2024 NFL Draft and I think the Ohio State coaching staff is going to find ways to get him the ball.

I had a difficult time giving the Outland Trophy to anyone but Fashanu. Not only is he expected to be the best offensive lineman in the country, but he’s going to pave the way for what should be an excellent rushing attack for Penn State. I struggled with the Lou Groza Award, but I eventually landed on Coe. North Carolina ought to have one of the best offenses in the country and should move the ball with ease, so Coe should see plenty of kicking opportunities.

As for the Nagurski Trophy, I think Verse should be considered the favorite. He’s arguably the best pass rusher in college football after accumulating nine sacks and 17 tackles for loss last season. I couldn’t think of any linebackers with a better chance of winning the Butkus Award than Trotter. He showed a lot of promise last year and I expect him to improve. The best defensive back in the country is arguably McKinstry, so he had to be my pick to win the Jim Thorpe Award. When it comes to defensive backs, I have a lot of trust in Nick Saban to develop them.

Clemson Tigers quarterback Cade Klubnik (2) throws a pass during the first half of the 2022 Orange Bowl against the Tennessee Volunteers at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jasen Vinlove-USA TODAY Sports

ACC

TeamRecord
1Clemson*11-2 (7-1)
2Florida State10-3 (7-1)
3North Carolina10-2 (6-2)
4Duke9-3 (5-3)
5Miami8-4 (5-3)
6Louisville7-5 (5-3)
7Syracuse7-5 (4-4)
8NC State7-5 (4-4)
9Pitt6-6 (4-4)
10Virginia Tech7-5 (3-5)
11Wake Forest5-7 (3-5)
12Georgia Tech4-8 (2-6)
13Boston College5-7 (1-7)
14Virginia2-10 (0-8)
Price’s ACC projections (* conference championship winner)


It actually wasn’t as easy to pick Clemson to win the ACC this season as opposed to previous seasons. There’s a lot of uncertainty facing the Tigers. Mainly, how much will Cade Klubnik improve as a quarterback and whether he’ll mesh with new offensive coordinator Garrett Riley. However, Clemson should still have the most talented team in the conference. The Tigers also benefit from playing Florida State, North Carolina, and Notre Dame at home. I’m not convinced Clemson can make the College Football Playoff, but a trip to the Orange Bowl is a reasonable expectation. 

If any team is going to beat out Clemson to win the ACC, I think it’s Florida State. The Seminoles are returning a lot of talent from a team that won 10 games last year. However, I’m not ready to believe that head coach Mike Norvell has the program ready to take the next step. North Carolina is certainly talented enough to win the conference, but I have reservations about its defense, which allowed 31.3 points per game last year against FBS competition. Having Drake Maye at quarterback will put the Tar Heels in a good spot to win a lot of games, though. 

I’m going out on a limb and picking Duke to improve from last year, even though its schedule is going to be incredibly difficult. I think head coach Mike Elko has the Blue Devils heading in the right direction. We’re going to find out just how good of a coach Mario Cristobal is, but there’s too much talent on Miami’s roster for the team to be as bad as it was last year. Even though I’m high on Jeff Brohm as a head coach, I think Louisville’s quarterback situation could hold the team back. I’m not convinced that Syracuse is going to improve much after sneaking up on the ACC last year.

I don’t know how good NC State or Virginia Tech are going to be, but both teams have manageable non-conference schedules. I think that’ll propel them to bowl eligibility. This could be a long season for Pitt. The Panthers have a brutal non-conference schedule and are losing a lot of production from last year. I think Pat Narduzzi deserves the benefit of the doubt, though. Dave Clawson and Wake Forest will likely have a difficult time getting to an eighth-straight bowl game without quarterback Sam Hartman.

Texas Longhorns quarterback Quinn Ewers (3) throws a pass during the first half against the Kansas Jayhawks at David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Big 12

TeamRecord
1Texas*11-2 (8-1)
2Texas Tech9-4 (7-2)
3Kansas State9-3 (6-3)
4Oklahoma9-3 (6-3)
5TCU8-4 (5-4)
6UCF7-5 (5-4)
7Baylor7-5 (5-4)
8Oklahoma State8-4 (5-4)
9Kansas7-5 (4-5)
10West Virginia6-6 (4-5)
11BYU5-7 (3-6)
12Houston4-8 (2-7)
13Cincinnati4-8 (2-7)
14Iowa State3-9 (1-8)
Price’s Big 12 projections (* conference championship winner)


I realize that college football fans are fatigued with Texas. Time and time again the Longhorns have entered the season with so much hype only to fall on their faces by the end. However, I think this team is different. Steve Sarkisian has done an excellent job assembling talent. I think Texas has the right pieces both on the perimeter and in the trenches to make a run at the Big 12 championship. I also like the options the Longhorns have at quarterback in Quinn Ewers or Arch Manning. If either of them play at a high level, Texas has a chance to make the Playoff. 

I’ve been talking myself into Texas Tech recently. The Red Raiders are returning a lot of production from last year. They also benefit from playing Kansas State and TCU at home. This will likely be Texas Tech’s best chance to win the Big 12 since the Mike Leach era. I expect Kansas State to be near the top of the conference despite the departure of running back Deuce Vaughn. The Wildcats might have the best offensive line and defensive line combination in the Big 12, besides Texas. Quarterback Will Howard improved a lot last year, too. Kansas State has a good chance to defend the conference title. 

I expect Oklahoma to show improvement in Brent Venables’ second season. The Sooners have too much talent to finish below .500 again. TCU likely takes a step back (maybe even further than I think) after so much going its way last year and losing a lot of production from that team. UCF will have its growing pains in Year 1 in the Big 12. The Knights are a talented team and Gus Malzahn is a proven head coach, though. I wouldn’t be surprised if Baylor finishes lower than seventh, but I’m banking on Dave Aranda to turn things around. I’m very uncertain about Oklahoma State, but its non-conference schedule is manageable. Mike Gundy also seems to surprise everyone when expectations are low.

Kansas won’t be able to surprise anyone this year. However, I doubt the Jayhawks regress much. Jalon Daniels is a very underrated quarterback and Kansas is returning a lot of production from last year. I’m more optimistic about West Virginia than I should be, even though I have no trust in Neal Brown and his staff. The Mountaineers are returning several key players in the trenches and have a good backfield. I feel like that should be enough to get WVU to bowl eligibility. After the recent news out of the program, I’ll be very surprised if Iowa State doesn’t finish near the bottom of the Big 12.

Michigan Wolverines running back Blake Corum (2) stiff arms Nebraska Cornhuskers defensive back Malcolm Hartzog (13) in the first half at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports

Big Ten

East DivisionRecordWest DivisionRecord
1Michigan*12-1 (8-1)Wisconsin10-3 (7-2)
2Ohio State11-1 (8-1)Iowa9-3 (6-3)
3Penn State10-2 (7-2)Minnesota7-5 (5-4)
4Maryland8-4 (5-4)Illinois6-6 (4-5)
5Michigan State6-6 (4-5)Nebraska6-6 (4-5)
6Indiana3-9 (1-8)Purdue5-7 (3-6)
7Rutgers3-9 (1-8)Northwestern2-10 (0-9)
Price’s Big Ten projections (* conference championship winner)


Michigan has proven the last two seasons that it runs the Big Ten. I see no reason to think otherwise this season. The Wolverines are returning a lot of production on both sides of the ball, including starting quarterback J.J. McCarthy and leading rusher Corum. They also have the right pieces in the trenches on both sides of the ball. Michigan benefits from playing Ohio State at home, too. I’m not convinced that the Wolverines will finish the regular season undefeated like last year, but I expect them to win the Big Ten and be in the Playoff conversation for a third-straight season. 

Ohio State has what it takes to win the Big Ten from a talent standpoint. I’m not sure I trust Ryan Day to do it, though. The Buckeyes have been passed over by Michigan recently. Plus, Ohio State is breaking in a new quarterback and I don’t know what to expect. The next team that I think can win the Big Ten is Penn State. This could be the best collection of talent the Nittany Lions have had in recent years. Penn State is in great shape in the trenches, backfield, and secondary. My concern with the Nittany Lions is their uncertainty at the quarterback and wide receiver positions.

I’m expecting Luke Fickell to have a smooth transition in his first year at Wisconsin. There will be growing pains, but Fickell brought in a nice haul of players from the transfer portal. The Badgers also benefit from being in the West division. Maryland actually has some talent on its roster, but it’s in one of the most difficult divisions in college football. The Terrapins should consider it a success if they get to eight wins. I’m not sure how good Iowa or Minnesota will be this season, but their schedules are manageable. 

I’m tired of Bret Bielema proving me wrong every year, which is why I have Illinois getting to bowl eligibility. I’m very curious to see how much success Matt Rhule has in his first year at Nebraska. I think he’s inheriting some talent and he brought in a good transfer portal class. Mel Tucker likely has to get Michigan State to bowl eligibility to have a chance to keep his job. That’s not out of the question since the Spartans face Washington, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, and Penn State all at home. I expect Purdue to struggle in Ryan Walters’ first season as head coach. 

USC Trojans head coach Lincoln Riley reacts to a touchdown against the Utah Utes in the first quarter at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-USA TODAY Sports

Pac-12 (RIP)

TeamRecord
1USC*11-2 (8-1)
2Washington10-3 (7-2)
3Utah10-2 (7-2)
4Oregon10-2 (7-2)
5Oregon State9-3 (6-3)
6UCLA8-4 (5-4)
7Washington State6-6 (4-5)
8Arizona6-6 (4-5)
9Cal5-7 (3-6)
10Arizona State4-8 (2-7)
11Colorado3-9 (1-8)
12Stanford2-10 (0-9)
Price’s Pac-12 projections (* conference championship winner)


It’s a shame that in the last year of the Pac-12 (as we know it) the conference is at its most interesting. I had a difficult time picking against USC to win the Pac-12 this season. The Trojans are returning the Heisman Trophy winner from last year in Williams. They also return a lot of production and brought in a strong transfer portal class. My only reservation is USC’s defense, which struggled at times a season ago. At the end of the day, the Trojans are going to be a talented team. I also trust Riley, who’s never won fewer than 10 games in a full season as a head coach. 

The top of the Pac-12 is loaded with quality teams in Washington, Utah, and Oregon. Each of those teams are returning great quarterbacks and have enough talent to win a lot of games. Each of those teams also play each other, too, including USC. It’s going to be a gauntlet for the teams at the top of the conference. I give the slight edge to the Huskies as the team that’s going to be in the Pac-12 Championship because they get Oregon and Utah at home. However, if either the Utes or Ducks are in the conference championship, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised. 

I also wouldn’t sleep on Oregon State as a team that could win the Pac-12. Jonathan Smith has done an excellent job building up the Beavers, and they made an upgrade at quarterback by grabbing D.J. Uiagalelei from the transfer portal. I expect UCLA to regress a little bit, but Chip Kelly has that program in a good spot. I think the Bruins will be fine. Arizona and Washington State have what it takes to finish higher in the Pac-12 standings. Both teams are going to be scrappy, but I’m not convinced they have the horses on their roster to hang with the top teams in the conference.

With the exception of Stanford, I think the bottom of the Pac-12 is somewhat strong. Cal and Arizona State have enough talent to get to bowl eligibility, but I need to see it happen. Everyone is going to be interested in watching Deion Sanders in his first year as Colorado’s head coach. The Buffaloes have some talent after hauling in the No. 1 transfer portal class. I just have a hard time seeing Sanders turning things around there in a single offseason after the program went 1-11 last year. 

Alabama Crimson Tide running back Jase McClellan (2) runs the ball against Kansas State Wildcats Kansas State Wildcats safety VJ Payne (19) during the second half in the 2022 Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome. Mandatory Credit: Andrew Wevers-USA TODAY Sports

SEC

East DivisionRecordWest DivisionRecord
1Georgia12-1 (8-0)Alabama*12-1 (7-1)
2Tennessee9-3 (5-3)LSU10-2 (6-2)
3Florida6-6 (4-4)Texas A&M10-2 (6-2)
4Kentucky7-5 (3-5)Ole Miss8-4 (4-4)
5South Carolina6-6 (3-5)Arkansas7-5 (3-5)
6Missouri4-8 (1-7)Mississippi State7-5 (3-5)
7Vanderbilt5-7 (1-7)Auburn6-6 (2-6)
Price’s SEC projections (* conference championship winner)


I went back and forth on which team to pick to win the SEC. I eventually landed on Alabama. Contrary to what some people think, I don’t believe the Nick Saban dynasty is over. The Crimson Tide had some bad luck last year — losing two games by a total of four points. This Alabama team will likely have a formidable rushing attack, which shouldn’t be overlooked. The best Saban-coached teams had run-heavy offenses. I also think Saban revamping his coaching staff by hiring Tommy Rees and Kevin Steele as his coordinators could rejuvenate the Crimson Tide. 

I might not have Georgia winning the SEC, but I’m still very high on the Bulldogs. They have a roster loaded with talent. I have no doubt that Kirby Smart will just reload after losing so many players to the NFL last year. I think the pundits are a little too high on LSU entering this season. The Tigers were eight points away from being a 7-5 team last year. I expect LSU to progress under Brian Kelly, but I think the program is at least another year from potentially being a national championship contender. 

I’m going to bet on Jimbo Fisher to get Texas A&M back on track this season. He’s too good of a head coach and the Aggies have too much talent to have another disastrous season like they did last year. I don’t anticipate Tennessee to drop off too much despite losing some highly-regarded players to the NFL. Josh Heupel has the Volunteers in a good spot right now, and I think Joe Milton will be a solid quarterback. Ole Miss has a chance to finish higher in the West. The Rebels lost some close games last year and return a lot of production from that team. I also wouldn’t doubt Lane Kiffin.

Arkansas, Florida, and South Carolina are all in the same boat. They’re teams with enough talent to win a lot of games, but have incredibly difficult schedules. I wanted to give each of those teams more wins, but struggled to find them. Getting quarterback Devin Leary out of the transfer portal is going to help Kentucky a lot this season. He’s a solid player that should help the Wildcats be competitive. I expect both Mississippi State and Auburn to have growing pains this season since they both have first-year head coaches. 

Notre Dame Fighting Irish head coach Marcus Freeman sings the Notre Dame Alma Mater with his players after the Notre Dame Fighting Irish defeated the UNLV Rebels at Notre Dame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports

Notre Dame

Projected record: 9-3

I don’t think Notre Dame has received enough credit for how it finished last season. Remember, the Fighting Irish started 0-2, with losses to Ohio State and Marshall, and it felt like they were in for a long season. However, they rebounded and won nine of their last 11 games. Notre Dame is returning a lot of production from last year, and also made a big splash in the transfer portal by landing Hartman. The Fighting Irish have a good chance of making an appearance in a New Year’s Six bowl game, but they have a difficult schedule. They have road games at NC State, Duke, Louisville, and Clemson, along with home games against Ohio State and USC. I think this could be a scenario where Notre Dame is a better team than it was last season, but it doesn’t show up in the win column. 

UTSA Roadrunners quarterback Frank Harris (0) celebrates a touchdown in the first half against the North Texas Mean Green at the Alamodome. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Dunn-USA TODAY Sports

Group of 5 representative in the New Year’s Six

Pick: UTSA
Projected record: 11-2

Everyone is going to pick Tulane to be the Group of 5 representative in a New Year’s Six bowl game this season. I wanted to go against the grain and pick UTSA, though. Jeff Traylor has done an excellent job building up the Roadrunners – winning 30 games the last three seasons. UTSA also returns a lot of experience and production on both sides of the ball. The Roadrunners might also have the best quarterback at the Group of 5 level in Frank Harris, who’s thrown for 71 touchdowns and ran for over 1,600 yards the last three years. Another reason why I like UTSA’s chances of making it to a New Year’s Six bowl game is its move to the American, which will garner more respect from the playoff committee. Seven times in the last nine years has the Group of 5 representative been from the American.

New Year’s Six projections

Bowl gameTeamTeam
Sugar (College Football Playoff semifinal)No. 4 Ohio StateNo. 1 Alabama
Rose (College Football Playoff semifinal)No. 3 GeorgiaNo. 2 Michigan
Cotton (at-large vs at-large)OregonTexas
Orange (ACC vs. Big Ten/Notre Dame/SECLSUClemson
Fiesta (at-large vs at-large)Penn StateUSC
Peach (at-large vs at-large)UTSAFlorida State
Price’s projections for the New Year’s Six bowl games

College Football Playoff National Championship

No. 2 Michigan vs. No. 1 Alabama

Since not many teams at the top of college football are returning quality starting quarterbacks, I think that means that the teams that run the ball effectively will be in a better position to win. The two teams that I think will be the best in that department are Alabama and Michigan. They’re two of the most complete teams heading into the season. The Crimson Tide and the Wolverines should have imposing rushing attacks, solid defenses, and plenty of talent elsewhere on their rosters. I’m also not going to shortchange either team at the quarterback position. McCarthy performed well for Michigan last year as a sophomore. Alabama has yet to name a starter, but I think it’ll be fine wither either Jalen Milroe or Tyler Buchner. Both players were highly recruited out of high school.

Alabama Crimson Tide head coach Nick Saban looks on against the LSU Tigers during the first half at Tiger Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports


Let me take you back to late Sept. 2015. Alabama hadn’t won a national championship in two years and sustained a loss to Ole Miss at home in Week 3. Everyone thought the Saban dynasty was over at the time. The Crimson Tide then won 12 games in a row, including the national championship. This year feels similar to 2015. Alabama hasn’t won a national championship in two years and everyone, again, thinks the Saban dynasty is over. I, obviously, don’t share that opinion.

I think the pundits are putting too much stock in the Crimson Tide’s quarterback battle. They’re not the only team at the top of college football breaking in a new starter. Plus, Alabama has won national championships in the Saban era despite not having a great quarterback. Those teams ran the ball effectively, controlled the time of possession, prevented opponents from scoring too many points, and had a quarterback that limited turnovers. I expect the Crimson Tide to return to their roots and play that way this season, which is why I’m picking them to win it all.

Winner: Alabama

Contact me

6 potential dark horses at the Power 5 level in 2023

Movie quote of the day:

“I’m drowning here, and you’re describing the water!”

– Melvin Udall, “As Good as it Gets” (1997)

North Carolina Tar Heels quarterback Drake Maye (10) throws a pass against the Miami Hurricanes during the first quarter at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rich Storry-USA TODAY Sports


Everyone loves a dark horse. I think we get tired of hearing the talking heads on TV previewing the college football season by only discussing the favorites in each conference. There are other good teams out there besides Alabama, Georgia, Michigan, Ohio State, etc. 

This is always a fun topic to discuss, which is why I waited to publish it at the end of the week when everyone is focused on the weekend, and the fact that we’re a week from games being played. 

I like to consider a team to be a dark horse when it’s not receiving many first-place votes from media members in the conference’s preseason poll. A dark horse also has to have a realistic path to winning its conference, whether that’s a manageable schedule, having enough talent on its roster to make a run, or being competitive in recent years. 

My list of potential dark horses only consists of six teams, and none of them are from the SEC. I tried to include SEC teams on this list, but I just don’t think there’s a team outside of Alabama and Georgia that have a realistic chance of winning that conference. 

ACC

Former Purdue head coach Jeff Brohm is Introduced as Louisville’s next head coach. Mandatory credit: The Courier-Journal


Louisville Cardinals
2022 record: 8-5 (W, Fenway Bowl vs. Cincinnati)
Returning production: 56% (61% offensively, 50% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 86.8
Transfer portal rank: No. 14
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

I’ve made it clear in the past how much I respect Jeff Brohm as a head coach. He’s won at both Western Kentucky and Purdue, including taking the Boilermakers to the Big Ten championship last season. Brohm is now at Louisville and I think he’s inheriting a good situation. The Cardinals have recruited well in recent years and collected a good haul of players from the transfer portal. The biggest question mark for Louisville is if it can replace quarterback Malik Cunningham, but Brohm has been active this offseason trying to accomplish that. He brought in two transfers from Power 5 programs, along with four-star recruit Pierce Clarkson. The Cardinals have the talent for a quick transition to Brohm’s system. They also benefit by not playing Clemson or Florida State, and only have three true road games this season.

North Carolina Tar Heels quarterback Drake Maye (10) looks to pass in the first quarter at Kenan Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports


North Carolina Tar Heels
2022 record: 9-5
Returning production: 68% (69% offensively, 68% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 89.96
Transfer portal rank: No. 29
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

If any team not named Clemson or Florida State can win the ACC, it’s North Carolina. The Tar Heels have one of the best quarterbacks in the country in Drake Maye, who completed 66.2% of his passes and threw 38 touchdowns last season. North Carolina has a plethora of talent around him and is returning a lot of production. I also think that the Tar Heels have a manageable schedule. Their toughest true road games are arguably against Clemson and NC State, and those games won’t be played until late November. North Carolina’s Week 1 matchup against South Carolina will likely determine how this season will go for the Tar Heels. If they win that game, they’re going to have a great chance to win 10 games and compete for the ACC championship.

Big 12

Texas Tech Red Raiders quarterback Tyler Shough (12) passes against the Mississippi Rebels in the first half in the 2022 Texas Bowl at NRG Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Thomas Shea-USA TODAY Sports


Texas Tech Red Raiders
2022 record: 8-5
Returning production: 64% (75% offensively, 52% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 86.60
Transfer portal rank: No. 57
Vegas projected win total: 7.5

The closer we get to the start of the season, the more Texas Tech is coming up as a potential dark horse to win the Big 12. For good reason, too. The Red Raiders showed a lot of promise in Joey McGuire’s first season. They won eight games, including wins over Texas and Ole Miss. That came despite starting quarterback Tyler Shough missing half the season due to injury. If he’s healthy, Texas Tech has a chance to make a run at the Big 12 championship. In the six games Shough was under center last season, the Red Raiders averaged 39.5 points per game and won five games. Texas Tech is returning a lot of production, too. The schedule won’t make things easy for the Red Raiders, though. They have road trips to Baylor, BYU, and Texas, along with a home game against Oregon.

UCF Knights head coach Gus Malzahn looks on during warms up before the game against the Boise State Broncos at Bounce House. Mandatory Credit: Mike Watters-USA TODAY Sports


UCF Knights
2022 record: 9-5
Returning production: 66% (62% offensively, 69% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 85.91
Transfer portal rank: No. 42
Vegas projected win total: 6.5

Of the new members of the Big 12 (BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF), I think the Knights have the best chance to win the conference this season. The Knights have been an ascending program since 2017 – posting a record of 53-13 (excluding the shortened 2020 season). UCF is also returning a lot of production from last season, including quarterback John Rhys Plumlee, who’s one of the more dynamic rushers in the country at the position. I also think the Knights benefit by having Gus Malzahn as their head coach, who has Power 5 experience and is no stranger to big games. The problem for UCF is its schedule, which features road trips to Boise State, Kansas State, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech. It won’t be easy, but I think the Knights have enough talent to compete for the Big 12 title.

Big Ten

Wisconsin head football coach Luke Fickell is shown during practice Tuesday, April 11, 2023 at Camp Randall Stadium in Madison, Wis. Mandatory Credit: Mark Hoffman-USA TODAY Sports


Wisconsin Badgers
2022 record: 7-6 (W, Guaranteed Rate Bowl vs. Oklahoma State)
Returning production: 72% (75% offensively, 66% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 88.03
Transfer portal rank: No. 27
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

I don’t see many reasons why Wisconsin can’t compete for the Big Ten championship in Luke Fickell’s first season. The biggest problem with the Badgers in recent years has been offensive ineptitude and lack of quality quarterbacks. I doubt that’ll be the case this season under Fickell. He hired Phil Longo as his offensive coordinator, who has a good track record when it comes to scoring points, and picked up talented quarterback Tanner Mordecai in the transfer portal. This isn’t going to be the same Wisconsin program that we’re used to seeing. The main reason why I like the Badgers, though, is because they’re in the Big Ten West division, which is wide open. If they can get to the Big Ten championship, Fickell is a good enough head coach to get the better of Jim Harbaugh or Ryan Day.

Pac-12 (RIP)

Oregon State Beavers head coach Jonathan Smith against the Arizona State Sun Devils at Sun Devil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports


Oregon State Beavers
2022 record: 10-3 (W, Las Vegas Bowl vs. Florida)
Returning production: 65% (78% offensively, 52% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 85.82
Transfer portal rank: No. 60
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

Oregon State might end up being left behind when it comes to conference realignment, but its football program is in a great spot. With the exception of the shortened season in 2020, the Beavers have improved their win total every year under head coach Jonathan Smith. This has a chance to be his best team, too. Oregon State is returning a lot of production from a team that won 10 games and hung tough with the better teams in the Pac-12 last year. The Beavers also added quarterback D.J. Uiagalelei from the transfer portal, who’s better than people think. The conference is going to be a gauntlet this season, but Oregon State avoids USC and gets Utah, UCLA, and Washington at home. It’s not inconceivable that the Beavers find themselves in the Pac-12 championship come December.

Contact me

13 mystery teams at the Power 5 level in 2023

Movie quote of the day:

“I guess it comes down to a simple choice, really. Get busy living, or get busy dying.”

– Andy Dufresne, “The Shawshank Redemption” (1994)

Texas A&M Aggies quarterback Conner Weigman (15) throws the ball during the first quarter against the LSU Tigers at Kyle Field. Mandatory Credit: Maria Lysaker-USA TODAY Sports


Last year, I called this list “Power 5 teams that could play spoiler.” I’ll admit that I was never crazy about that title because it took too much explaining for my readers to understand what I meant. So, I changed it to mystery teams at the Power 5 level this season. 

So, what classifies as a mystery team? I think it has to be a team that doesn’t have high expectations going into a season, along with a compelling storyline. That could be a team with first-year head coach, a team with a head coach on the hot seat, a team that overhauled its roster, or whether or not a team can replicate its success from previous seasons, etc. You get my point.

I went through each Power 5 conference and tried to pinpoint each of its mystery teams. Then, I formed a question regarding each team’s outlook entering this season. I originally had 11 teams on this list, but I had to add Iowa State and Northwestern after the recent news coming out of those programs in recent weeks.

ACC

Duke Blue Devils head coach Mike Elko leads his team out prior to the first quarter against the Northwestern Wildcats at Ryan Field. Mandatory Credit: Patrick Gorski-USA TODAY Sports


Duke Blue Devils
2022 record: 9-4
Returning production: 71% (82% offensively, 60% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 85.59
Transfer portal rank: No. 59
Vegas projected win total: 6.5

Can Mike Elko replicate the success he had in his first season? Duke’s football program struggled significantly between 2019-21 – winning a combined 10 games. Nobody expected anything from Elko in his first season with the Blue Devils and he found a way to win nine games. Duke’s four losses also came by a combined 16 points, so it could’ve just as easily have won 10 or 11 games. If that had happened, there’d be a lot more buzz surrounding the Blue Devils heading into this season. Duke returns a good amount of production from last season, including starting quarterback Riley Leonard. The Blue Devils have a difficult schedule, though, with games against Clemson, Notre Dame, Florida State, and North Carolina. I’m very curious to see if last year was a fluke.

Big 12

Baylor Bears head coach Dave Aranda reacts during the second half against the TCU Horned Frogs at Amon G. Carter Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports


Baylor Bears
2022 record: 6-7
Returning production: 55% (60% offensively, 51% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 86.80
Transfer portal rank: No. 23
Vegas projected win total: 7.5

Can Dave Aranda get Baylor back to being one of the top teams in the Big 12? In 2021, the Bears won the Big 12, and defeated Ole Miss in the Sugar Bowl, in Aranda’s second season as head coach. Baylor’s football program had so much momentum going into last season – even picked to finish first by the media in the preseason poll. However, the Bears failed to live up to the hype. Their offense took a step back mostly due to the play of quarterback Blake Shapen, who threw 18 touchdowns and 10 interceptions in 13 games. I think there’s a lot of pressure on Aranda right now. I’m not sure he can afford to have another subpar season, which could very well happen because Baylor’s roster leaves a lot to be desired. However, I also have some faith in Aranda to get things right.

Iowa State Cyclones head coach Matt Campbell leads his team onto the field prior to their game against the West Virginia Mountaineers at Mountaineer Field at Milan Puskar Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Ben Queen-USA TODAY Sports


Iowa State Cyclones
2022 record: 4-8
Returning production: 63% (76% offensively, 51% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 85.89
Transfer portal rank: No. 84
Vegas projected win total: 5.5

What is going on at Iowa State? The Cyclones are in the middle of a major scandal involving their own players betting on sports, including their own games. It doesn’t involve irrelevant players either. So far, Iowa State has had the following players caught up in this scandal: Starting quarterback Hunter Dekkers, leading rusher Jirehl Brock, starting defensive tackle Isaiah Lee, and a variety of other players. I think it’s safe to assume that they won’t be suiting up this season. The Cyclones won only four games last year, so they’re not a team that can afford to lose starters and key contributors. I’m also not convinced this scandal is over either. A lot of people think highly of Matt Campbell, but he has his hands full right now and I could see a scenario where he loses his job for this scandal.

Kansas Jayhawks quarterback Jalon Daniels (6) throws a pass during the first half against the Texas Longhorns at David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports


Kansas Jayhawks
2022 record: 6-7
Returning production: 85% (91% offensively, 80% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 84.82
Transfer portal rank: No. 51
Vegas projected win total: 5.5

Was last season a flash in the pan for Kansas or will it continue to improve? Nobody anticipated the Jayhawks having as much success as they did last season. Kansas started 5-0, including three wins by one possession or in overtime, and then lost seven of its last eight games. That slide toward the end of the season could be attributed to the injury to quarterback Jalon Daniels. It could also just as easily be attributed to opposing teams figuring out how to prepare for the Jayhawks once they got more tape. Regardless, there’s room for optimism for Kansas fans. The Jayhawks are returning a lot of production and I think Lance Leipold is an underrated head coach. However, I could also see Kansas reverting back to the program that won a combined 23 games between 2010-21.

Oklahoma State Cowboys head coach Mike Gundy walks along the sideline during a college football game between Oklahoma State and West Virginia at Boone Pickens Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Bryan Terry-USA TODAY Sports


Oklahoma State Cowboys
2022 record: 7-6
Returning production: 57% (65% offensively, 50% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 86.42
Transfer portal rank: No. 22
Vegas projected win total: 6.5

Can Mike Gundy get Oklahoma State back on track? I think one of the more underreported storylines this offseason is the current state of the Cowboys. They lost five of their last six games to finish last season. Defensive coordinator Jim Knowles left for Ohio State. That’s not even counting the 20 players that entered the transfer portal, including starting quarterback Spencer Sanders, leading rusher Dominic Richardson, and two of the team’s top four pass catchers. There’s a lot of uncertainty surrounding Oklahoma State. I’m actually not sure how the Cowboys received a first-place vote in this year’s preseason Big 12 poll. I think there’s a lot riding on this season for Gundy if things go poorly. At the same time, it feels like Gundy is at his best when the team has zero expectations.

Big Ten

Michigan State Spartans head coach Mel Tucker reacts during the first half against the Illinois Fighting Illini at Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Ron Johnson-USA TODAY Sports


Michigan State Spartans
2022 record: 5-7
Returning production: 68% (80% offensively, 56% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 87.25
Transfer portal rank: No. 45
Vegas projected win total: 5.5

Can Mel Tucker replicate the success he had in 2021? I thought it was too early for Michigan State fans to call for Tucker’s job after last season. He was just one year removed from an 11-win season and a victory in the Peach Bowl over Pitt in 2021. However, when you back and look, it’s easy to think that the Spartans were just fortunate that season – winning five games by fewer than 10 points. It’s borderline inexcusable for a head coach to go from 11 wins to five wins, so I understand the frustration. Michigan State also had no semblance of an offense last year – averaging just 20.6 points per game and 3.8 yards per rush. I think Tucker’s back is against the wall, especially if Michigan and Ohio State continue their dominance. He has to show that he can get back to the level of success he had in 2021.

Nebraska Cornhuskers head coach Matt Rhule at the introductory press conference at the Hawks Championship Center on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln campus. Mandatory Credit: Steven Branscombe-USA TODAY Sports


Nebraska Cornhuskers
2022 record: 4-8
Returning production: 69% (72% offensively, 66% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 87.62
Transfer portal rank: No. 28
Vegas projected win total: 6.5

How much success is Matt Rhule going to have in his first season at Nebraska? History shows that it won’t be that much. As much as I respect Rhule, he struggled significantly in his first season at both Temple and Baylor – posting a combined record of 3-21. However, Temple has never had much success in football and Baylor was in the middle of a scandal. The circumstances aren’t quite the same for him right now. The Cornhuskers are returning a good amount of production from last season, including three of their top four rushers and their top three defensive players. They’ve recruited well in recent years and Rhule brought in a solid transfer portal class. The Big Ten West is also wide open, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he finds a way to have success in his first season.

Northwestern Wildcats quarterback Ryan Hilinski (3) drops back in the pocket against the Northwestern Wildcats during the second quarter at Beaver Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matthew OHaren-USA TODAY Sports


Northwestern Wildcats
2022 record: 1-11
Returning production: 56% (46% offensively, 66% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 86.75
Transfer portal rank: No. 74
Vegas projected win total: 3.5

How does the Northwestern football program respond to the recent hazing scandal and Pat Fitzgerald getting fired? It’s been a tumultuous few weeks. The team didn’t even show up for Big Ten media days. I always had a lot of respect for Fitzgerald. He took the school’s football program to heights that it’s never been to, including three 10-win seasons, appearing in two Big Ten championships, and five bowl game wins. I’m struggling to see the Wildcats sustaining the success they had under Fitzgerald. They’re not returning much production from a team that only won one game last season. Without him, I think the future is bleak for Northwestern. I could see the Wildcats reverting back to their dark days between 1972-94, when they won a combined 46 games during that stretch.

Pac-12 (RIP)

Arizona Wildcats running back Michael Wiley (6) celebrates a touchdown with tight end Tanner McLachlan (84) against the Arizona State Sun Devils during the Territorial Cup at Arizona Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports


Arizona Wildcats
2022 record: 5-7
Returning production: 57% (72% offensively, 42% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 85.21
Transfer portal rank: No. 53
Vegas projected win total: 4.5

Can Arizona take the next step under Jedd Fisch? It’s no secret that the Wildcats have fallen on hard times since the Rich Rodriguez era. Arizona won a total of 10 games from 2018-21. Things appear to be trending up under Fisch, though. The Wildcats showed a lot of improvement last year in his second season as head coach – improving their win total from one to five, including a road win over No. 12 UCLA. Arizona is also returning a lot of production from a potent offense that averaged 30.8 points per game. Fisch has a lot of momentum right now both on the field and in recruiting. Plus, the announcement of the move to the Big 12 put the Wildcats back in the public eye. I think this program is heading in the right direction and I’m curious to see how it performs this season.

Colorado Buffaloes head coach Deion Sanders during the first half of the spring game at Folsom Filed. Mandatory Credit: Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports


Colorado Buffaloes
2022 record: 1-11
Returning production: 57% (57% offensively, 57% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 85.80
Transfer portal rank: No. 1
Vegas projected win total: 3.5

How much success is Deion Sanders going to have in his first season at Colorado after overhauling the roster? The way Sanders has embraced the transfer portal has been the topic of conversation all offseason. He’s brought in an astounding 50 transfers in just a few months, which led all of college football. Two of those transfers were Travis Hunter and Shedder Sanders (son of Deion), who were both highly recruited out of high school. The team that ranked second in total number of transfers was Arizona State with 30. I actually respect the way Sanders handled matters this offseason. It shows that he’s committed to winning right now and Colorado needs someone like him. With so much roster overhaul, I doubt it’s going to lead to wins, but I’m very curious to see how it pans out.

SEC

Mississippi State Bulldogs quarterback Will Rogers (2) makes a pass against the Texas A&M Aggies during the fourth quarter at Davis Wade Stadium at Scott Field. Mandatory Credit: Matt Bush-USA TODAY Sports


Mississippi State Bulldogs
2022 record: 9-4
Returning production: 57% (71% offensively, 43% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 87.46
Transfer portal rank: No. 41
Vegas projected win total: 6.5

How does Mississippi State perform after Mike Leach’s death? I thought he was building something special with the Bulldogs. They won nine games last year for the first time since the Dan Mullen era. There’s a lot to like about Mississippi State. The Bulldogs have one of the better quarterbacks in the SEC in Will Rogers, who’s thrown 71 touchdowns the last two seasons. New head coach Zach Arnett is inheriting a great situation, but I’m not convinced that he can sustain what Leach was building. That’s more because of how much respect I had for Leach rather than if I believe in Arnett. Mississippi State also has a difficult schedule, including road games at South Carolina, Arkansas, Auburn, and Texas A&M. That’s not even counting playing Alabama, LSU, and Ole Miss at home.

South Carolina Gamecocks quarterback Spencer Rattler (7) runs the ball against the Texas A&M Aggies in the first quarter at Williams-Brice Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Blake-USA TODAY Sports


South Carolina Gamecocks
2022 record: 8-5
Returning production: 55% (63% offensively, 48% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 87.99
Transfer portal rank: No. 30
Vegas projected win total: 6.5

Can South Carolina take a step closer to returning to the Steve Spurrier era? Head coach Shane Beamer has exceeded expectations with the Gamecocks, including improving their win total each of the last two seasons. South Carolina also finished strong last season – winning three of its last four regular season games, including wins over Tennessee and Clemson. The Gamecocks have also recruited well under Beamer. I doubt they’ll be able to unseat Georgia at the top of the SEC East division, but they have a legitimate opportunity to finish second. There’s a lot of uncertainty surrounding Florida and Kentucky, and Tennessee is losing a lot of production from last season. South Carolina also avoids playing Alabama and LSU. This team could just as easily finish fourth or fifth in the SEC East, too.

Texas A&M Aggies head coach Jimbo Fisher directs his team against the South Carolina Gamecocks in the second quarter at Williams-Brice Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Blake-USA TODAY Sports


Texas A&M Aggies
2022 record: 5-7
Returning production: 80% (82% offensively, 77% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 92.40
Transfer portal rank: No. 26
Vegas projected win total: 7.5

Can Jimbo Fisher finally put it together at Texas A&M? I actually went back and forth on whether to count the Aggies as a mystery team or a dark horse in the SEC. I landed on mystery team because there’s so much uncertainty surrounding Texas A&M entering this season. The Aggies have the talent to make a run at the SEC title – finishing in the top 15 in recruiting each of the last four years. Texas A&M might also have a promising young quarterback in Conner Weigman, who threw eight touchdowns and zero interceptions in five games last season. He also led the Aggies to an upset win over No. 5 LSU in the last week of the regular season. I wouldn’t go so far as to say this is a “make or break” year for Fisher given his buyout, but his team must show improvement.

Contact me

The Big 12 deserves this victory

Movie quote of the day:

“You should’ve gone for the head.”

– Thanos, “Avengers: Infinity War” (2018)

A view of the Big 12 conference champion trophy during the Big 12 Media Day at AT&T Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports


All the talk by the pundits the last few years was how the Big 12 was on shaky ground and how the conference would fold by 2025. 

I understand why everyone thought that way, though. As a fan of a Big 12 school since 2012, a cloud always seemed to hang over the conference. It lost four members (Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, and Texas A&M) to other conferences in 2010 and 2011. Oklahoma and Texas seemed to be reluctant members of the Big 12 the last decade. The conference tried to expand in 2016 and the efforts were quashed, which cost its members the opportunity to make more money. The Big 12 also lacked its own TV network and was last in line to get a new media rights deal.

The tea leaves appeared to read that the conference’s demise was imminent. When Oklahoma and Texas announced they were leaving the Big 12 for the SEC in 2021, and other members reportedly started to search for a home in another conference, that presumed judgement day was on the horizon. 

When the market for expansion from other conferences turned out to be lukewarm, the remaining eight Big 12 members stuck together in solidarity. That turned out to be the right decision. 

I was often critical of Bob Bowlsby’s tenure as Big 12 commissioner, but he deserves a lot of credit for the conference being in its current state. He convinced the remaining members to stay together, and expanded to add BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF. Each of those schools are solid brands located in large markets and have had success in football. 

Those actions by Bowlsby finally gave the Big 12 some semblance of stability after the departures of Oklahoma and Texas, but the upward trend would only be getting started. 

Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark speaks to the press during Big 12 football media day at AT&T Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports


I was impressed with the conference’s decision to hire Brett Yormark to succeed Bowlsby as commissioner. He was an outside-the-box hire, with experience at NASCAR, Brooklyn Sports & Entertainment, and Roc Nation. He was also the type of innovative leader the Big 12 needed. 

Yormark has been the conference’s commissioner for only a year and has already shown an incredible vision for the future. He announced the new Rucker Park program in New York (taking advantage of the Big 12’s recent dominance in college basketball), a partnership with the NFL to form Big 12 Pro Day (the first ever conference-wide pro day, replacing the traditional on-campus pro days), and the launch of Big 12 Mexico (an attempt to expand the conference’s brand internationally). The way he presented at Big 12 media day was reminiscent of Steve Jobs at Apple. 

The most impressive part of Yormark’s year-long tenure is how he negotiated a new, respectable media rights deal (leapfrogging the Pac-12 by doing so) within three months of taking the job. That gave the Big 12 even more stability and allowed Yormark to pursue Colorado to return to the conference. That caused Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah to follow. 

Seriously, who would’ve thought the Big 12 would be in this position two years ago? The conference now sits at 16 members, and each one seems to be on the same page and is aware of where it stands in the ever-changing landscape of college athletics. You could make the argument that the Big 12 is the best overall athletic conference from top to bottom in the revenue-generating sports. The Big 12 now seems poised to outlast both the Pac-12 and ACC and become the third major conference in college athletics. 

Kansas Jayhawks forward David McCormack (33) and Texas Tech Red Raiders forward Bryson Williams (11) compete for the tip-off in the first half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Amy Kontras-USA TODAY Sports


After the events of the last few weeks, I think everyone can see that the college football landscape is shifting toward either two super conferences or one super conference. I’m not convinced that the Big 12 will ever be able to pass the Big Ten or SEC in revenue and become one of those super conferences. However, I think Yormark has demonstrated that he’s seeing one, two, possibly three moves ahead of the other commissioners of the major conferences. I think he’s just getting started creating different revenue streams for the Big 12. We’ll see if that can keep the conference alive. 

In terms of which of the major conferences are going to survive 10-20 years from now, it’s fair to assume that the Big 12 won’t be able to do so. It lacks the big brands like the ones in the Big Ten and SEC. My rebuttal against that is my point earlier that the Big 12 is now full of members that know where they stand in college athletics and are on the same page, which ought to create stability. Plus, the Big 12 has demonstrated time and time again in the last decade that it’ll find a way to endure. I wouldn’t be so quick to count the conference out.

That’s an issue for another day, though. In the meantime, Big 12 fans need to enjoy this deserving victory. The conference has been left for dead twice since 2010 and is now in a position of strength for the first time in decades.  

Contact me

The Pac-12’s demise has been imminent for decades

Movie quote of the day:

“Did you order the code red?”

– Daniel Kafee, “A Few Good Men” (1992)

A detailed view of the Pac-12 Conference logo at midfield at Allegiant Stadium before the 2021 Pac-12 Championship Game between the Oregon Ducks and the Utah Utes. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports


We witnessed history in college athletics at the end of last week. Five members of the Pac-12 left the conference in a single day, which will be the unofficial death blow. It’s time to perform last rites, if no one has done so already. 

It all started with Oregon and Washington — in the middle of a morning meeting about a potential grant of rights for the future of the Pac-12 — revealing that they were heading to the Big Ten. Then, it was announced later that day that Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah were following Colorado to the Big 12. 

I don’t know what’s to come for the remaining members — Cal, Oregon State, Stanford, and Washington State. There are rumors of a potential merger with the Mountain West. I’ve also read that the Big 12 might not be done and could target some of those schools to add to its inventory. 

This kind of mass exodus from a single conference isn’t completely unprecedented. Just read up on what happened to the old Southwest Conference. I’ll admit that that was a little before my time, though. 

I’m not the least bit surprised that it got to this point for the Pac-12. It seemed like it was trending in this direction for a while, which is why I’ve spent so much time writing about it in the past year. The only part of the Pac-12’s demise that truly surprised me is how quick it happened. Within a span of 10 days, the conference lost six of its remaining 10 members. History would show that the decision to switch conferences usually takes longer than just a few days. 

The Pac-12’s roots go back more than 100 years when it was originally called the Pacific Coast Conference. So, how did it come to this for such a storied conference? I actually think the Pac-12’s demise has been imminent for a while. 

Pac-12 Commissioner George Kliavkoff speaks during Pac-12 Media Day at Resorts World Las Vegas. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports


The Pac-12’s downward trend began when it hired Larry Scott as commissioner back in 2009. Scott had previously worked for the Women’s Tennis Association and was the president and CEO of ATP Properties, which is a division of the Americans of Tennis Professionals. 

His tenure actually got off to a good start. Within a year, the then Pac-10 expanded to add Colorado and Utah (becoming what is now the Pac-12). Then, Scott negotiated a lucrative media rights deal worth $3 billion with ESPN and FOX, and created the Pac-12 Network. Everything seemed to be trending up. 

The problem is that the Pac-12 Network turned into a disaster. It struggled with distribution and wasn’t as financially viable as the Big Ten and SEC networks. That’s why many of the Pac-12’s current members are in financial trouble and looking for a bigger check from other conferences. The conference’s decision to not play a full season during the COVID-19 pandemic probably didn’t help matters either. 

Scott also placed too much of an emphasis on Olympic sports, which shouldn’t surprise anyone given his tennis background. That’s really poor decisionmaking because revenue-generating sports drive media rights deals and athletic department budgets. When it was announced that he would no longer be the Pac-12’s commissioner in 2021, a lot of people, including myself, thought the conference could turn things around if it made the right hire. 

Enter George Kliavkoff, who came to the Pac-12 from MGM Resorts International and had a background with a variety of TV networks. Hiring Kliavkoff felt like an outside-the-box way of thinking and I actually applauded the conference for doing it. However, you could argue that Kliavkoff has been even more disastrous than Scott. 

Let’s start with “The Alliance.” Remember that? Within a few months of Kliavkoff’s tenure as Pac-12 commissioner, he “joined forces” with the ACC and Big Ten in response to the SEC adding Oklahoma and Texas. “The Alliance” was originally intended to be a collaborative approach to further evolve college athletics and scheduling. Kliavkoff also gave us this gem of a quote in regards to how “The Alliance” would prevent conferences from poaching members of another conference, “There’s no signed contract. There’s an agreement among three gentlemen. There’s a commitment between 41 presidents and chancellors and 41 athletic directors to do what we say we’re going to do…there’s no signed contract and there doesn’t need to be.” 

It should be noted that UCLA and USC announced that they were headed to the Big Ten within a year of that quote. After their departures, Kliavkoff turned to ACC commissioner Jim Phillips about a potential merger with a conference championship in Las Vegas. That ended up going nowhere.

Kliavkoff also butchered the Pac-12’s media rights negotiations. He decided to pass on re-upping with ESPN and FOX to take the bidding to the open market, where he asked for $50 million per school. I understand that it’s a negotiation and you start high and meet in the middle, but that was a huge misstep. Not only was the Pac-12 not worth that amount of money without UCLA and USC, but that also allowed the Big 12 to leapfrog the Pac-12 to a new media rights deal. That gave the Big 12 the stability and exposure that schools like Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah wanted. 

Now, I admit that I gave Kliavkoff and the Pac-12 the benefit of the doubt during its media rights negotiations. I thought the conference was valuable because it was the only premier college football in the Mountain and Pacific time zones. I also thought it was smart to embrace streaming services because I think those are the future of media rights deals. Kliavkoff either wasn’t able to sell the Pac-12 to these streaming services or they just weren’t interested in paying a premium. Somehow, though, he was able to convince the members of the conference to be patient as they waited over a year for a new media rights deal. 

Another misstep by Kliavkoff came at Pac-12 media day when he got to the podium and said he wouldn’t reveal a media rights deal in order to keep the attention on football. That implied he had a deal in the works, which he later backtracked and said to reporters “You’re reading too much into that” when asked follow-up questions. He also said, “The longer we wait for the media deal, the better our options get.” 

I remember reading those quotes by Kliavkoff and thinking, “Who are you kidding, dude?” The latter of the two quotes just screamed incompetence because that’s not how negotiating works. That moment was the end of the line for Colorado, which bolted for the Big 12 the next week. Colorado’s departure also forced Kliavkoff to present the numbers of the media rights deal he’d been sitting on from Apple to the remaining Pac-12 members, which wasn’t on par with the Big 12’s deal with ESPN and FOX ($31.7 million per school). 

So, Scott did nothing to further elevate the Pac-12’s brand under his tenure and Kliavkoff constantly had egg land on his face. It’s been an embarrassing display of leadership by both men. 

Oregon Ducks running back Noah Whittington (22) picks up a first down during the first half as he is tackled by Washington Huskies cornerback Mishael Powell (23) at Autzen Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Wayrynen-USA TODAY Sports


Something else to remember about conference realignment is that the athletic directors, conferences, and TV networks don’t have full control of the situation. Ultimately, it comes down to the presidents, chancellors, and governing boards of universities to decide whether or not to leave a conference to join another one. While Scott and Kliavkoff deserve the blame for the current state of the Pac-12, it’s important to remember how the administrations of the conference’s institutions mishandled several situations in recent decades (yes, decades). 

There have been several times when the TV networks told the Pac-12 what would be in its best interest and the conference chose not to do it. The Pac-12 frequently overlooked BYU when it came to expansion, which is why the school is currently a member of the Big 12. I can’t state enough how adding BYU likely saved the Big 12 from extinction a few years ago, while also lining the conference’s pockets because the school is a great brand with a large following. The Pac-12 sure could’ve used a brand like BYU in its recent media rights negotiations. 

The Pac-12 also had the chance to destroy the Big 12 not only once, but twice, in the span of 11 years. After Colorado and Nebraska left the Big 12 in 2010, there was reportedly an agreement in place that would allow Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, and Texas Tech to join the Pac-12. That would’ve been a death blow to the Big 12. Instead, Pac-12 institutions quashed it. That allowed the Big 12 to stay alive and add TCU and West Virginia. The Pac-12 sure could’ve used those Big 12 schools in its recent media rights negotiations. 

In 2021, there were talks of a merger between the Big 12 and Pac-12. Once again, Pac-12 institutions quashed it. That allowed the Big 12 to stay together and add BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF. Again, the Pac-12 sure could’ve used those Big 12 schools in its recent media rights negotiations. 

So, why did Pac-12 institutions make so many terrible decisions in the last 11 years? I think it comes down to a combination of arrogance and hubris, along with cultural and political differences. Plus, I think the whole “conference of champions” mindset gave Pac-12 members an inflated sense of self-worth. 

I don’t think Pac-12 institutions wanted to be associated with Big 12 institutions. For the most part, Pac-12 schools have very high academic standards and are located in areas of the country with left-leaning political ideologies. That’s not the case with the Big 12. The members of that conference don’t have high academic standards and are located in areas with right-leaning political ideologies. I also don’t think the Pac-12 wanted anything to do with religious-affiliated schools like Baylor, BYU, and TCU. 

Now, I don’t like the term “coastal elite” because I think it’s used too much. However, I think it applies to the Pac-12. The institutions of that conference didn’t want anything to do with the political and cultural aspects of Middle America and the Big 12. If it did, the Big 12 would’ve folded back in 2010 or in 2021. 

There’s a reason why the Pac-12 wanted to be aligned with the ACC and Big Ten when its back was against the wall. Those two conferences have high academic standards and have common political ideologies. In the past few weeks, Pac-12 fanbases also coined the term “truck stop conference” when referring to the Big 12. 

Do you see my point? That kind of “coastal elite” attitude is why the Pac-12 is currently in this situation, along with terrible leadership from the conference and its institutions. I don’t think most college football fans, including the TV networks, wanted the Pac-12 to end. It’s hard for me to feel sorry for the conference, though, when it made the wrong decision time and time again. Well, the chickens have come home to roost and it’s fitting that the Big 12 is getting the last laugh. 

Contact me