2024 NCAA Tournament predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“The visions are clear now. I see possible futures, all at once. Our enemies are all around us, and in so many futures they prevail. But I do see a way, there is a narrow way through.”

— Paul Atreides, “Dune: Part Two” (2024)

It’s time to fill out brackets because March Madness is here. I won’t lie, I haven’t paid much attention to the college basketball regular season. That means that I’m either going to do horribly or get almost every pick correct. I’ve been cramming in research the last 40(ish) hours since the bracket was revealed Sunday. I now wish that my West Virginia Mountaineers had given me a reason to care about this college basketball season.

Two years ago was the worst I’ve ever done when it comes to predicting the NCAA Tournament. I lost two Final Four teams, including my national champion, on the first day of the tournament. I was a little better last year, but still wasn’t great thanks to Arizona and Purdue letting me down on, you guessed it, the first day of the tournament. I feel like my reputation is on the line this year, so I really need a good showing. That’s why I relied pretty heavily on KenPom rankings.

We saw so many upsets in the conference tournaments last week, which is why this was one of the craziest “on the bubble” debates in years. It certainly feels like we’re in for another very unpredictable NCAA tournament. However, the last two tournaments were two of the craziest that I’ve witnessed in my life. I also think we’re due for a tournament where we see mostly chalk.

As always, March Madness is a welcome sight at this point in the sports calendar. I need something to take my attention away from NFL free agency news, which is pretty dry right now. Keep your head on a swivel these next three weeks. I can already feel my bracket being busted.

Colorado Buffaloes forward Tristan da Silva (23) celebrates with guard K.J. Simpson (2) in the first half against the California Golden Bears at the CU Events Center. Mandatory Credit: Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

First Four — Dayton, Ohio

No. 16 Wagner (16-15) vs. No. 16 Howard (18-16)

I’ll give the advantage to Howard in this matchup. The Bison not only rank higher in KenPom rankings, but they’ve won nine of their last 11 games. They also have tournament experience after making an appearance last year. I doubt Wagner, which averages just 63.5 points per game, is good enough offensively to win in the tournament.

Winner: Howard

No. 10 Colorado State (24-10) vs. No. 10 Virginia (23-10)

Mountain West teams haven’t performed well in the tournament for the last decade — posting a record of 12-26 since 2013. However, I think Colorado State is an underseeded team. The Rams rank 31 spots higher than Virginia in KenPom rankings. That’s quite a disparity. The Cavaliers also lost five of their last nine games to end the regular season.

Winner: Colorado State

No. 16 Grambling State (20-14) vs. No. 16 Montana State (17-17)

There’s quite a disparity between these teams when it comes to KenPom rankings. Montana State ranks No. 213, whereas Grambling State ranks No. 267. I’ll give the advantage to to the Bobcats. I’m not convinced that the Tigers are good enough offensively — averaging just 67.6 points per game — to score on Montana State’s defense.

Winner: Montana State

No. 10 Colorado (24-10) vs. No. 10 Boise State (22-10)

Colorado is another team that I think is underseeded. The Buffaloes rank in the top 30 in the country, according to KenPom (Boise State ranks No. 39). They also ended the season on a positive note — winning eight of their last nine games. The Broncos have never won a tournament game in program history and I doubt that changes this year.

Winner: Colorado

Round of 64

Connecticut Huskies guard Tristen Newton (2) drives to the basket against St. John’s Red Storm guard Daniss Jenkins (5) during the second half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 16 Stetson (22-12) vs. No. 1 UConn (31-3) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I have a difficult time seeing UConn getting bounced early in this tournament. The Huskies have too much depth and have been the most consistent team in the country all season. No. 16 seeds have been more competitive against No. 1 seeds in recent years, but I don’t see an upset happening in this matchup. UConn should cruise to the next round.

Winner: UConn

No. 9 Northwestern (21-11) vs. No. 8 Florida Atlantic (25-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic hasn’t been as consistent this season as last season. The Owls are still a very good team, though. They rank in the top 45 in KenPom, and rank in the top 20 in adjusted offensive efficiency. Northwestern will have a very difficult time defensively in this matchup. I also think Florida Atlantic has the coaching advantage in Dusty May.

Winner: Florida Atlantic

No. 12 UAB (22-11) vs. No. 5 San Diego State (24-10) — Spokane, Wash.

We didn’t get a single No. 12 seed to upset a No. 5 seed last year. In the last 20 years, history says to expect at least two upsets the year after that happens. I’m not convinced there will be an upset in this matchup, though. San Diego State is an elite defensive team and UAB isn’t a great offensive team. I think the Blazers will have a difficult time scoring on the Aztecs.

Winner: San Diego State

No. 13 Yale (22-9) vs. No. 4 Auburn (27-7) — Spokane, Wash.

Ivy League schools are always tricky teams in the tournament. This won’t be an easy game for Auburn. I’m still picking the Tigers to win, though. They rank No. 4 in the country in KenPom rankings, so they might be the most underseeded team in this tournament field. Yale isn’t a terrific defensive team, which should bode well for Auburn, which averages 83.2 points per game.

Winner: Auburn

No. 11 Duquesne (24-11) vs. No. 6 BYU (23-10) — Omaha, Neb.

Duquesne is a hot team right now, but I doubt it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. BYU ranks No. 16 in the country, according to KenPom, so it’s a very underseeded team. The Cougars are also one of the top offensive teams in the country — ranking No. 11 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt the Dukes will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: BYU

No. 14 Morehead State (26-8) vs. No. 3 Illinois (26-8) — Omaha, Neb.

The Big Ten tournament champion hasn’t made it past the first weekend of the NCAA tournament since 2019. I wouldn’t be so quick to pick Illinois to win this game given that track record. I’ll still pick the Fighting Illini to win, though. They’ve been playing well since late January — winning 12 of their last 15 games, including seven of their last eight.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake (28-6) vs. No. 7 Washington State (24-9) — Omaha, Neb.

The line of this game has shifted quite a bit in favor of Drake since it opened. I think that’s pretty telling to take the Bulldogs seriously in this matchup. Drake will likely have the best player in this game in Tucker DeVries, who averages 21.8 points per game. I think Washington State’s defense will have its hands full with him. The Bulldogs also have more tournament experience.

Winner: Drake

No. 15 South Dakota State (22-12) vs. No. 2 Iowa State (27-7) — Omaha, Neb.

I can’t bring myself to pick against Iowa State in this matchup. The Cyclones are red hot right now after winning 11 of their last 13 games, including winning three Big 12 tournament games by a combined 61 points. This is one of the weaker South Dakota State teams in the last 15 years. I also expect this to essentially be a home game for Iowa State.

Winner: Iowa State

North Carolina Tar Heels guard R.J. Davis (4) shoots the ball against the North Carolina State Wolfpack during the second half at Capital One Arena. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 16 Howard vs. No. 1 North Carolina (27-7) — Charlotte, N.C.

North Carolina has played like one of the top teams in the country the last few weeks, even though it might be overseeded a bit. The Tar Heels have won 20 of their last 24 games. If not for an NC State team getting hot at the right time, North Carolina probably would’ve won the ACC tournament. I highly doubt Howard is good enough to pull off a historic upset.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 9 Michigan State (19-14) vs. No. 8 Mississippi State (21-13) — Charlotte, N.C.

Mississippi State is playing well right now, but I’ll give the advantage to Michigan State in this matchup. Tom Izzo has been one-and-done just six times in his previous 25 tournament appearances. I also think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time scoring on the Spartans’ defense, which ranks in the top 10 in adjusted defensive efficiency.

Winner: Michigan State

No. 12 Grand Canyon (29-4) vs. No. 5 Saint Mary’s (26-7) — Spokane, Wash.

I think this is the mostly likely 5/12 matchup to end in an upset. Grand Canyon is the highest ranking No. 12 seed in KenPom (No. 53). The Antelopes have lost only four games all season and they have a head coach with plenty of tournament experience in Bryce Drew. Saint Mary’s is one of those teams that I never trust in the tournament and I won’t start now.

Winner: Grand Canyon

No. 13 Charleston (27-7) vs. No. 4 Alabama (21-11) — Spokane, Wash.

Alabama didn’t end the regular season on a positive note — losing four of its last six games. I wouldn’t rule out a potential upset in this matchup, but I don’t see it happening. Charleston is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. You have to be a great defensive team in order to knock off the Crimson Tide, who average 90.8 points per game.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico (26-9) vs. No. 6 Clemson (21-11) — Memphis, Tenn.

I’ve mostly picked against Mountain West schools so far, but I’ll take the upset here. Clemson isn’t playing well right now. The Tigers have lost four of their last eight games, including two losses to very bad Notre Dame and Boston College teams. New Mexico is surging after winning its conference tournament last week. Vegas also favors the Lobos in this matchup.

Winner: New Mexico

No. 14 Colgate (25-9) vs. No. 3 Baylor (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

Even though Colgate will be making its fourth-consecutive tournament appearance, I don’t take it that seriously. The Raiders have been outscored by a combined 44 points during that stretch. Baylor is one of the top offensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt Colgate will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada (26-7) vs. No. 7 Dayton (24-7) — Salt Lake City

I feel an upset brewing in this matchup. Dayton has to make a long trip west despite being the higher seed, which benefits Nevada. The Wolf Pack played well down the stretch — winning 11 of their last 14 games. I think the Flyers have been too inconsistent defensively all season. Nevada also ranks in the top 40 in the country in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency.

Winner: Nevada

No. 15 Long Beach State (21-14) vs. No. 2 Arizona (25-8) — Salt Lake City

I have a difficult time seeing Arizona getting bounced early in back-to-back seasons. The Wildcats shoot the ball very well and rank in the top 20 in the country in offensive rebounds. That ought to bode well in the tournament. Long Beach State is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. I think the Beach will have a difficult time slowing down Arizona’s offense.

Winner: Arizona

Houston Cougars guard L.J. Cryer (4) drives with the ball as Rice Owls guard Alem Huseinovic (23) defends during the second half at Fertitta Center. Mandatory Credit: Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 16 Longwood (21-13) vs. No. 1 Houston (30-4) — Memphis, Tenn.

I fully expect Houston to bounce back after getting blown out in the Big 12 championship. The Cougars are one of the more talented teams in this tournament and are excellent defensively. This is a very bad matchup for Longwood, which ranks near the bottom among tournament teams offensively. Houston shouldn’t have too many issues in this matchup.

Winner: Houston

No. 9 Texas A&M (20-14) vs. No. 8 Nebraska (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

I think this is a terrible matchup for Nebraska. The Cornhuskers rank in the bottom third in the country in offensive rebounds and total rebounds allowed per game. Texas A&M doesn’t shoot the ball that well, but getting second-chance opportunities will only improve its chances of winning. The Aggies are also playing well after winning five of their last six games.

Winner: Texas A&M

No. 12 James Madison (31-3) vs. No. 5 Wisconsin (22-13) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

James Madison poses a lot of problems for Wisconsin. The Dukes rank in the top five in defending 3-pointers. They’ve also won 13 straight games. I’m still picking the Badgers to win, though. They shoot the ball well and take care of the basketball. The difference in the game will likely be which team collects more offensive rebounds, and I give that advantage to Wisconsin.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 13 Vermont (28-6) vs. No. 4 Duke (24-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I’m to the point that I need to see Vermont pull off an upset in the tournament before I pick it to do so. The Catamounts have never advanced past the Round of 64 under head coach John Becker. That’s why I’ll take Duke to win this game. The Blue Devils will have a significant talent advantage, which will likely be the difference in this matchup.

Winner: Duke

No. 11 NC State (22-14) vs. No. 6 Texas Tech (23-10) — Pittsburgh

I think NC State will be gassed after winning five games in five days in the ACC tournament. The Wolfpack now have a quick turnaround and play on Thursday. I think that bodes well for Texas Tech, which KenPom considers to be a top 25 team in the country. The Red Raiders have been the far more consistent team all season. I like them to advance to the next round.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 14 Oakland (23-11) vs. No. 3 Kentucky (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Kentucky has been very inconsistent defensively, but I still expect it to win this game. Oakland isn’t a very good offensive team — ranking in the bottom 15 among tournament teams in adjusted offensive efficiency. I highly doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Wildcats. I expect Kentucky to advance to the Round of 32.

Winner: Kentucky

No. 10 Colorado vs. No. 7 Florida (24-11) — Indianapolis

This is a dangerous matchup for Florida. The Gators aren’t a great defensive team and will be shorthanded, and Colorado is a good offensive team. This will likely be a very high-scoring game, but I’ll still give the advantage to Florida. The Gators are elite offensively — ranking in the top 15 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, points per game, and offensive rebounding.

Winner: Florida

No. 15 Western Kentucky (22-11) vs. No. 2 Marquette (25-9) — Indianapolis

I think this is a very bad matchup for Western Kentucky, which struggles on the offensive end of the court. Marquette is one of the better defensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency. Points will be hard to come by for the Hilltoppers, which will make it incredibly difficult to pull off the upset.

Winner: Marquette

Purdue Boilermakers center Zach Edey (15) shoots the ball while Indiana Hoosiers center Kel’el Ware (1) defends in the second half at Mackey Arena. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 16 Montana State vs. No. 1 Purdue (29-4) — Indianapolis

I highly doubt Purdue will overlook its opponent this year. I fully expect last year’s loss to No. 16-seeded Fairleigh Dickinson to be in the back of its mind. The Boilermakers might have the best player in the tournament in Zach Edey, who averages 24.4 points per game. Like Arizona, I don’t think Purdue will be bounced early in back-to-back seasons.

Winner: Purdue

No. 9 TCU (21-12) vs. No. 8 Utah State (27-6) — Indianapolis

Given the Mountain West’s recent history in the tournament, there’s no way I’m picking against TCU. The Horned Frogs rank 15 spots ahead of Utah State in KenPom rankings, and in the top 50 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, adjusted defensive efficiency, and offensive rebounds. This feels like a very bad matchup for the Aggies.

Winner: TCU

No. 12 McNeese State (30-3) vs. No. 5 Gonzaga (25-7) — Salt Lake City

McNeese State will be a trendy pick because it’s one of the most improved teams in the country from last year, and this isn’t a great Gonzaga team. However, I’m not picking against Mark Few. He hasn’t been eliminated in the Round of 64 since 2008. KenPom also considers Gonzaga to be a top 15 team in the country, so it feels like a very underseeded team.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 13 Samford (29-5) vs. No. 4 Kansas (22-10) — Salt Lake City

I actually came close to picking the upset in this game. Kansas was hobbling at the end of the regular season — losing six of its last 10 games, including back-to-back losses by a combined 50 points. The Jayhawks have also sustained injuries to some of their better players. I still think Kansas has what it takes to beat Samford, which struggles on the defensive end of the court.

Winner: Kansas

No. 11 Oregon (23-11) vs. No. 6 South Carolina (26-7) — Pittsburgh

I’m not doubting Dana Altman in the tournament. He’s never lost in the Round of 64 as Oregon’s head coach. Altman has even made it past the first weekend five times in the last seven tournament appearances with the Ducks. South Carolina has been a good story to get to this point. I just think the Gamecocks are catching Oregon at the wrong time.

Winner: Oregon

No. 14 Akron (24-10) vs. No. 3 Creighton (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Akron managed to win the MAC tournament, but I’m not convinced it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. The Zips have been too inconsistent on both ends of the court all season. Creighton is an excellent offensive team — averaging 80.5 points per game. I have more trust in the Bluejays, who haven’t lost in the Round of 64 since 2018.

Winner: Creighton

No. 10 Colorado State vs. No. 7 Texas (20-12) — Charlotte, N.C.

I think Texas is a better team than what its record would indicate. The Longhorns had bad luck in Big 12 play (losing six games by fewer than 10 points). They should benefit by getting out of conference play. Texas will also have a significant talent advantage in this matchup. Colorado State struggles to defend 3-pointers and the Longhorns rank in the top 60 in 3-point shooting.

Winner: Texas

No. 15 Saint Peter’s (19-13) vs. No. 2 Tennessee (24-8) — Charlotte, N.C.

Don’t be so quick to rule out Saint Peter’s. The Peacocks have caught fire the last few weeks — winning eight of their last 10 games. I expect Tennessee to win this game comfortably, though. The Volunteers are one of the best defensive teams in this tournament. I think Saint Peter’s will have a difficult time scoring enough points to pull off the upset.

Winner: Tennessee

Round of 32

Iowa State Cyclones guard Keshon Gilbert (10) drives around Houston Cougars guard Ramon Walker Jr. (3) during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 8 Florida Atlantic vs. No. 1 UConn — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic’s defense is the main reason why I doubt it can make another deep run like last year. The Owls rank No. 109 in adjusted defensive efficiency. They also allow 10.8 offensive rebounds per game, which puts them in the bottom half of the country. This feels like a mismatch in favor of UConn. The Huskies have plenty of scoring depth and too much size in the post.

Winner: UConn

No. 5 San Diego State vs. No. 4 Auburn — Spokane, Wash.

I actually think Auburn matches up well against San Diego State’s defense. The Tigers shoot the ball well and do a good job collecting offensive rebounds. They also have scoring depth, with six different players averaging at least 7.1 points per game, and 11 different players to play in at least 28 games. I don’t think the Aztecs have the depth to keep up with Auburn.

Winner: Auburn

No. 6 BYU vs. No. 3 Illinois — Omaha, Neb.

This will likely be a difficult matchup for BYU to pull off the upset. Illinois has a lot of depth, with nine different players appearing in at least 24 games, and one of the best guards in the country in Terrence Shannon Jr. The Fighting Illini can also win in a variety of ways, which is always valuable in the tournament. I also think Brad Underwood is a better coach than Mark Pope.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake vs. No. 2 Iowa State — Omaha, Neb.

Having DeVries might be good enough to beat Washington State, but I doubt it’ll be enough to upset Iowa State. The Cyclones are arguably the best defensive team in the country — ranking in the top five in adjusted defensive efficiency and points allowed per game. I think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time winning if DeVries has limited scoring chances.

Winner: Iowa State

Arizona Wildcats guard Caleb Love (2) celebrates against the Southern California Trojans in the second half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 9 Michigan State vs. No. 1 North Carolina — Charlotte, N.C.

I have a ton of respect for Izzo, but this feels like the end of the road for Michigan State. The Spartans have been too inconsistent all season. I don’t think they’re good enough offensively to upset North Carolina, which ranks No. 6 in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Tar Heels are the more talented team, so I expect them to take care of business and advance to the next round.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 12 Grand Canyon vs. No. 4 Alabama — Spokane, Wash.

Grand Canyon might be good enough to upset Saint Mary’s, but I doubt that it can knock off Alabama. The Crimson Tide are one of the best offensive teams in the tournament. The Antelopes aren’t a great defensive team — ranking No. 51 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 106 in 3-point defense. I like Alabama to get to the Sweet 16 for a second-consecutive year.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico vs. No. 3 Baylor — Memphis, Tenn.

New Mexico is a good defensive team, but it’ll have a difficult time defending Baylor’s offense. The Bears rank in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency and 3-point shooting. They’re also a very physical team and do a good job of getting offensive rebounds. That’ll likely be a significant disadvantage for the Lobos. New Mexico ranks No. 153 in offensive rebounds allowed per game.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada vs. No. 2 Arizona — Salt Lake City

I don’t think Nevada is good enough on the glass to upset Arizona. The Wildcats average 13.2 offensive rebounds per game, and the Wolf Pack rank No. 106 in offensive rebounds allowed per game. I don’t think that matchup bodes well for Nevada because Arizona is an elite offensive team. If the Wildcats get second-chance opportunities, I don’t see how they lose this game.

Winner: Arizona

Marquette Golden Eagles head coach Shaka Smart talks to guard Stevie Mitchell (4) as he coaches against the Providence Friars during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 9 Texas A&M vs. No. 1 Houston — Memphis, Tenn.

This is a dangerous matchup for Houston. Texas A&M is one of the hottest teams in the country right now. The Aggies also played the Cougars very tough back in December. I think that’ll be in the back of Kelvin Sampson’s mind, though. Houston is an excellent defensive team — allowing just 57 points per game. I think Texas A&M will have a difficult time making shots.

Winner: Houston

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 4 Duke — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I didn’t like the way that Duke ended the regular season. The Blue Devils lost their last two games, including a pretty embarrassing loss to North Carolina on their own home court. This is a much different Wisconsin team than we’ve seen since the Bo Ryan era. The Badgers rank No. 13 in adjusted offensive efficiency and shoot nearly 35% from 3-point territory.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 3 Kentucky — Pittsburgh

Since 2008, only seven teams ranked outside the top 200 in defensive efficiency made it to the Sweet 16. That doesn’t bode well for Kentucky, which allows 79.7 points per game and 12 offensive rebounds per game. I think Texas Tech is good enough defensively to slow down the Wildcats’ offense. I also don’t have much trust in John Calipari, who hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2019.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 2 Marquette — Indianapolis

I actually think this is a favorable matchup for Florida. Marquette ranks in the bottom half of the country in 3-point defense and offensive rebounds allowed per game. The Gators are so good offensively. They’ll make the Golden Eagles pay if given second-chance opportunities. Lastly, I don’t trust Shaka Smart in the tournament. He hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2011.

Winner: Florida

Tennessee Volunteers head coach Rick Barnes during the second half against the South Carolina Gamecocks at Thompson-Boling Arena at Food City Center. Mandatory Credit: Randy Sartin-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 9 TCU vs. No. 1 Purdue — Indianapolis

This could be a problematic matchup for Purdue. TCU wants to speed the game up, whereas Purdue wants to slow the game down. Press defense gave the Boilermakers trouble last year, but they’ve done a better job taking care of the ball this year. Purdue is more experienced in the backcourt this year than it was last year, too. I also don’t have much trust in Jamie Dixon in the tournament.

Winner: Purdue

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 4 Kansas — Salt Lake City

If Kansas was healthy, I’d probably pick the Jayhawks to win this game. I don’t know how effective Kevin McCullar Jr. and Hunter Dickinson will be, even though they’re expected to be available. I’ll give the advantage to Gonzaga. Few has made it to the Sweet 16 in eight straight tournament appearances. Him and the Bulldogs are a safe bet in the first two rounds.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 11 Oregon vs. No. 3 Creighton — Pittsburgh

Creighton should win this game and advance to the next round. Oregon has been too inconsistent on both ends of the court. The Ducks rank No. 70 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 240 in 3-point defense. The Bluejays are one of the top offensive teams in the tournament — averaging 80.5 points per game. I expect Creighton will take advantage of that mismatch.

Winner: Creighton

No. 7 Texas vs. No. 2 Tennessee — Charlotte, N.C.

I’m not looking too much into the way Tennessee performed in the SEC tournament. KenPom has the Volunteers ranked in the top 10, and No. 3 in adjusted defensive efficiency. I think it’ll be difficult for Texas to make shots against in this matchup. The Longhorns have been too inconsistent on the defensive end of the court. I like the Volunteers to advance.

Winner: Tennessee

Sweet 16

Illinois Fighting Illini guard Terrence Shannon Jr. (0) dunks against the Ohio State Buckeyes during the first half at Target Center. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional semifinals — Boston

No. 4 Auburn vs. No. 1 UConn

If Auburn was in the West or Midwest regionals, I’d pick it to get to the Final Four. If any team can knock off UConn before the Elite Eight, I think it’s the Tigers. They match up very well with the Huskies. The problem is that UConn is really good, especially offensively. This will essentially be a home game for UConn, too. With almost a week to prepare, I give the advantage to Dan Hurley.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 2 Iowa State

Since 2000, Iowa State has won the Big 12 tournament five times and advanced to the Elite Eight just once after doing so. The Cyclones typically get up for the Big 12 tournament, but not the big dance. That’s part of the reason why I like Illinois in this matchup. I also think the Fighting Illini’s offense, which averages 84.4 points per game, poses a lot of problems for Iowa State’s defense.

Winner: Illinois

Baylor Bears forward Jalen Bridges (11) reacts after a made basket with guard Ja’Kobe Walter (4) against the TCU Horned Frogs during the first half at Ed and Rae Schollmaier Arena. Mandatory Credit: Raymond Carlin III-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional semifinals — Los Angeles

No. 4 Alabama vs. No. 1 North Carolina

As always, my biggest concern with Alabama is its defense. The Crimson Tide are one of the worst defensive teams in the tournament — ranking No. 112 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allowing 81.1 points per game. That’s not good enough. North Carolina is one of the top defensive teams in the country and I think it’ll be able to slow down Alabama’s offense.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 2 Arizona

I’ve been burned by Arizona too many times over the years. At this point, I need to see the Wildcats make a deep tournament run before I predict them to do so. I think Baylor poses trouble for Arizona. The Bears are a very good offensive team and won’t be afraid of Arizona’s size. With almost a week to prepare, I’ll give the advantage to the better head coach in Scott Drew.

Winner: Baylor

Texas Tech Red Raiders head coach Grant McCasland reacts during the second half against the Iowa State Cyclones at James H. Hilton Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Reese Strickland-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional semifinals — Dallas

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 1 Houston

Wisconsin is a great offensive team, but scoring points on Houston’s defense will be a tall order. The Cougars rank in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency, points allowed per game, 3-point defense, and turnovers forced. Houston will also have a significant talent advantage. A lot of things will have to break the Badgers’ way in order to pull off the upset.

Winner: Houston

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 6 Texas Tech

I think this matchup favors Texas Tech. Florida’s porous defense, which ranks No. 83 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allows 78.5 points per game, will likely prevent it from getting past the Sweet 16. The Red Raiders are solid offensive team and should be able to make shots against the Gators. I also think Grant McCasland is an ascending head coach, which benefits Texas Tech.

Winner: Texas Tech

Gonzaga Bulldogs head coach Mark Few looks on against the Santa Clara Broncos in the second half at McCarthey Athletic Center. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional semifinals — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 1 Purdue

This might be the weakest Gonzaga team that we’ve seen in recent years, but I’ll still take the upset. The Bulldogs have the coaching advantage with Few, who’ll have almost a week to prepare for this game. I also don’t trust Matt Painter and Purdue. The Boilermakers have made it to the Elite Eight just once in the previous 14 tournament appearances under Painter.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 2 Tennessee

Death, taxes, and Rick Barnes not getting past the Sweet 16. I just don’t trust Tennessee to make a deep tournament run, even though it’s an excellent defensive team. Creighton shoots the ball well, takes care of the ball, and should get second-chance opportunities against Tennessee. I think the Bluejays get back to the Elite 8 for a second-consecutive season.

Winner: Creighton

Elite Eight

Connecticut Huskies head coach Dan Hurley coaches against the Xavier Musketeers during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional final — Boston

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 1 UConn

I think this is a very favorable matchup for UConn. Illinois has struggled on the defensive end of the court — ranking No. 93 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 236 in 3-point defense. I doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Huskies, who might be the best offensive team in the tournament. The Fighting Illini will have a very difficult time defending UConn.

Winner: UConn

North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis reacts during the second half against the Duke Blue Devils at Cameron Indoor Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Kinnan-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional final — Los Angeles

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 1 North Carolina

Baylor’s inconsistent defense will likely be its downfall in the tournament. The Bears rank No. 64 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 189 in 3-point defense. North Carolina shoots the ball well and is just as aggressive as Baylor on the glass (maybe more so). The Tar Heels are also an elite defensive team. I don’t think they’re getting enough credit from the pundits.

Winner: North Carolina

Houston Cougars guard Jamal Shead (1) brings the ball up court during the first half against the Texas Tech Red Raiders at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional final — Dallas

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 1 Houston

These teams played twice in the regular season and Houston won both meetings by a combined 46 points. I expect the Cougars to win a third meeting. I don’t think Texas Tech has the horses to keep up with Houston. The Cougars might be the most athletic team in the tournament. They also have an experienced backcourt, which they didn’t have last year.

Winner: Houston

Creighton Bluejays guard Baylor Scheierman (55) controls the ball against Villanova Wildcats guard Jordan Longino (15) in the first half at Wells Fargo Center. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Ross-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional final — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 3 Creighton

I’m not crazy about any of the higher seeds in this regional, but one of them is likely going to win it. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll pick Creighton. I think the Bluejays have the least amount of baggage and they showed last year they can make a deep tournament run. Gonzaga’s defense, which has been good but not great, will have a difficult time slowing down Creighton’s offense.

Winner: Creighton

Final Four — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 North Carolina vs. No. 1 UConn

North Carolina is certainly capable of knocking off UConn. The Tar Heels are good enough defensively to contain the Huskies’ offense — holding opponents to shoot just 40.7% from the field and limiting second-chance opportunities. I’m not sure North Carolina is consistent enough offensively, though. I also think UConn has the more complete team and a better head coach.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 1 Houston

I expect Creighton’s run to come to an end in this game. The Bluejays will have a difficult time scoring against Houston’s defense, which holds its opponents to shoot just 37.9% from the field. I don’t know where Creighton’s points will come from if it can’t make shots because it’s not a great offensive rebounding team. I like the Cougars to advance to the national championship.

Winner: Houston

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball National Championship Trophy. Mandatory credit: Getty Images.

National Championship — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 Houston vs. No. 1 UConn

These just feel like the most complete teams in the tournament. They’re both athletic, talented, and well coached. My readers know how much I hate picking defending champions, but I think UConn is a wagon. The Huskies have won 21 of their last 22 games and have shown no sign of slowing down. That’s why I think UConn is the most likely team to defend its title since Florida in 2007.

I also think the Huskies can be effective offensively on Houston’s stout defense. UConn had six different players lead the team in scoring in a game in the regular season, including five different players to score at least 20 points in a game. That typically bodes well in the tournament. The Huskies are also aggressive on the boards and play great defense. I think they cut down the nets again.

Winner: UConn

Contact me

It’s time for the Arizona Coyotes to move, but where?

Movie quote of the day:

“If we get jammed up, we’re holding court on the street.”

– James Coughlin, “The Town” (2010)

Arizona Coyotes center Nick Schmaltz (8) celebrates with right wing Clayton Keller (9) after scoring a goal against the Nashville Predators in the second period at Mullett Arena. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports


Last week, a plan to build a new arena in Tempe, Ariz., for the Coyotes was rejected by voters. The team responded by stating that its future “will be evaluated by our owners and the National Hockey League” in the next few weeks. For hockey fans, this shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. 

Arizona is considered to be the laughing stock of the NHL, which has tried hard to keep the team in the area for years. The league has even gone as far as to take over ownership of the team when previous majority owner Jerry Moyes filed for bankruptcy in 2009. It’s time for this experiment to end because the Coyotes have a history of dysfunction. 

Since the original Winnipeg Jets relocated to Arizona and became the Coyotes in 1996, the team has had 11 different ownership groups, only 10 postseason appearances (four since 2003), and played in three different arenas. One of the reasons for the latter is because Gila River Arena (now Diamond Desert Arena) chose not to renew its operating agreement with Arizona, even threatening to lock out the team for not paying $1.3 million in taxes and $250,000 to the city of Glendale. 

That kind of dysfunction makes the Cleveland Browns, Detroit Lions, Miami Marlins, or New York Knicks seem competent. 

The Coyotes have also ranked in the bottom three in attendance in eight of the last 10 seasons when they played in Glendale. The two seasons when Arizona didn’t rank in the bottom three were shortened by the COVID-19 pandemic. From 2011-19, the Coyotes had an average attendance of 13,269, which is only 77.4% of the capacity of their arena. That’s abysmal when you consider that the average attendance of the rest of the league was 17,626. They’ve been playing at Arizona State’s Mullett Arena, which seats less than 5,000, since 2022. 

I’m not convinced that the people of Arizona don’t care about hockey. Auston Matthews, who’s currently one of the best players in the NHL, is from the area. They’ve even embraced the other professional sports teams in the state (Arizona Cardinals, Arizona Diamondbacks, and Phoenix Suns). It’s clear that the people have never embraced the Coyotes and that’s evident since they just rejected the proposal to build a new arena, which was only going to cost them around $200 million. Arizona can’t go back to the Footprint Center (home of the Suns) either because the arena wasn’t built to host a hockey team. 

I understand why the NHL would want a team in the Phoenix area. It’s one of the largest markets in the country, with a population of 4.8 million in the metropolitan area. However, the Coyotes have been a total disaster and the events of last week should be an indicator to move the team elsewhere. 

I don’t have a preference what the Coyotes choose to do, but I anticipate them to move because I think they’re out of options in Arizona. So, where could they go? 

Atlanta Thrashers center Bryan Little (10) celebrates scoring a goal against the Ottawa Senators with right wing Blake Wheeler (26) and defenseman Zach Bogosian (4) in the second period at Philips Arena. Mandatory Credit: Dale Zanine-USA TODAY Sports

Atlanta

Go ahead and laugh at me for putting Atlanta on my list. The NHL has tried to have a team in Atlanta twice before the teams relocated to Canadian cities (Calgary and Winnipeg). However, rumors of the NHL’s  potential return there have picked up steam in recent weeks. In April, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported of a $2 billion project to build a new arena for the Atlanta area, with the hopes of landing an NHL franchise. 

I’ll be keeping an eye on if that project comes to fruition, but I highly doubt the Coyotes will move to Atlanta. If that happens, it’d change the landscape of the NHL. A team from the Eastern Conference would have to move to the Western Conference. I don’t think the league wants to do that. The most likely candidate to switch conferences is probably Detroit, which used to be in the West before the league moved it to the East so that it had an excuse to expand to Las Vegas and Seattle to give each conference 16 teams. 

I’m not convinced that the NHL has closed the door on Atlanta, but this doesn’t feel like the right time to go back. 

General aerial view of the downtown Houston skyline and the Toyota Center and Minute Maid Park before the AFC Wild Card playoff football game between the Kansas City Chiefs and Houston Texans at NRG Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Houston

This feels like the most likely landing spot for Arizona, if it chooses to relocate. The NHL has never had a team in Houston and I think it wants to change that. If I knew nothing about hockey, I would’ve already assumed Houston had a team. 

It almost makes too much sense to move the Coyotes to Houston. The city is the biggest market, with a population of 7.1 million in the metro area, to only have three teams in the “Big Four” sports leagues. I think Houston is a good sports town, too. The people support the Astros, Rockets, and Texans. More importantly, the Toyota Center (home of the Rockets) is able to host hockey games. 

Moving Arizona to Houston wouldn’t alter the landscape of the NHL either. The Coyotes currently compete in the Central Division of the West and that wouldn’t change by moving to Houston because the Dallas Stars compete in the same division and conference. 

It seems like Arizona could move to Houston tomorrow if it really wanted. I think it’d be cool to have a hockey rivalry in Texas. My only concern is if Houston wants an NHL team and if it’d be a “hockey town.” That’s an important variable for the NHL, which doesn’t make as much money as the other leagues.

General view of Union Station and Kauffman Center for Performing Arts and the Sprint Center and the downtown Kansas City skyline. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee/Image of Sport-USA TODAY Sports

Kansas City, Mo.

Many people probably don’t know that the NHL once had a team in Kansas City. The Scouts played there from 1974-76 before relocating to Colorado, and then relocated again in 1982. They’re currently known as the New Jersey Devils. 

I could see a scenario where the NHL returns to Kansas City. The T-Mobile Center is a relatively new arena — opening in 2007 — and is able to host hockey games. The Big 12 also hosts its men’s basketball tournament there, and the city is a popular place to visit among fans of that conference. 

An estimated 2.3 million people live in the Kansas City area, too. While I’ve never been there, I get the impression that it’s a good sports town. The people support both the Chiefs and Royals, even though the latter hasn’t won more than 74 games since 2018. 

I doubt Kansas City is near the top of the NHL’s list of desired markets, but I’m also not convinced that it’s near the bottom. If the Coyotes moved there, it wouldn’t change the league’s landscape at all. Plus, I wouldn’t mind seeing an Interstate 70 rivalry against St. Louis. 

Buildings in Downtown Milwaukee are seen from a helicopter during a ride through MyFlight Tours over the Milwaukee area on Sunday, Jan. 29, 2023. Mandatory credit: Journal Sentinel

Milwaukee

Like Kansas City, I think Milwaukee is a realistic landing spot for Arizona. The Fiserv Forum is a brand new arena — having opened in 2018 — and is capable of hosting hockey games. The landscape of the NHL wouldn’t change at all if the Coyotes moved there. 

Another thing that Milwaukee has going for it is the passionate fans in Wisconsin. They’re some of the best sports fans in the country. We know the fans support the Green Bay Packers, but they also have a history of supporting the Brewers and Bucks. An estimated 2 million people live in the Milwaukee area, too. With Wisconsin being a cold-weather state, it’s safe to assume that the fans will be passionate about hockey. 

I’m not sure the NHL needs a team in Milwaukee, though. The league already has a lot of teams in the American Midwest in Chicago, Columbus, Detroit, Minnesota, and St. Louis. I’m also not sure that Chicago and Detroit — two Original Six teams — will allow Milwaukee to get a hockey team. 

General view of the Oregon Convention Center and downtown Portland skyline. The venue will play host to the 2016 IAAF World Championships in Athletics. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Portland, Ore.

It’s no secret that Portland is trying to add more pro sports teams. The city was linked to the Oakland A’s when the team initially started looking to relocate. Since that’s not likely to happen, Portland has thrown its hat in the ring to get an MLB expansion team

Portland is also growing rapidly — increasing its population 49.2% since 1990. An estimated 2.5 million people live in the area, too. Portland has a history of supporting the Trail Blazers. In the last five seasons that weren’t impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the team has had an average attendance of 18,827. That’s 97% of the capacity of the Moda Center, which is capable of hosting hockey games. 

Arizona potentially moving to Portland would change the NHL’s landscape, but not enough to sway the league to try to stop it. The Coyotes would stay in the West, but would have to change to the Pacific Division. That’s a quick fix, though. Just move Vegas to the Central. The league did something similar when it expanded to Seattle by moving Arizona from the Pacific to the Central. 

Portland is one the largest markets to only have one pro sports team. I think that’s going to change in the next 10-15 years. I just don’t see the city as a “hockey town.” Another thing going against Portland is that the NHL already has two teams in the Pacific Northwest in Seattle and Vancouver. 

The Stastny Brothers, Peter (left), Marian (center), and Anton (right), of the Quebec Nordiques on the ice in a game against the New York Islanders at Nassau Coliseum, Uniondale, N.Y., in the early 1980s. Mandatory credit: Getty Images

Québec City

The NHL currently has seven teams located in Canada. I’m under the impression that it wants to make it an even eight teams one day. If so, the logical market is Québec City, which used to have an NHL team for over 20 years. 

The Québec Nordiques had support and were relatively competitive during that stretch before being forced to move to Colorado. They’re now known as the Colorado Avalanche, who’ve won three Stanley Cups since 1996. 

I think it’s fair to say that the people of Québec City were robbed in the mid-90s. The only reason why the Nordiques moved was because the city’s government wouldn’t help the team build a new arena. That’s no longer an issue. Québec City opened the Vidéotron Centre in 2015, which is capable of hosting hockey games. 

I don’t think the NHL is done with Québec City, but I also don’t see Arizona moving there. The city has the same disadvantage as Atlanta. If the Coyotes moved from the West to the East, it’d completely alter the league’s landscape and I don’t think that’s logical right now. Hang in there, Québec City, I think you’ll get the Nordiques back one day. 

Winter scene of Salt Lake City Utah skyline showing the Mormon Temple in downtown backed by the snowcapped Wasatch Mountains. Mandatory credit: Douglas Pulsipher/Visit Salt Lake

Salt Lake City

A few weeks ago, I made a case for why an MLB team in Salt Lake City makes a lot of sense. I also think it’s a realistic landing spot for Arizona. Phoenix and Salt Lake City are separated by a little over 500 miles, so it’d be a cost-effective move. 

The owner of the Utah Jazz and Real Salt Lake has even stated interest in luring an NHL team to Salt Lake City. That’s important because, sometimes, the owner of an NBA team doesn’t want to share an arena with an NHL team. It doesn’t seem like that would be an issue in Salt Lake City. 

The city supports both the Jazz and Real Salt Lake. It also experiences cold weather on a yearly basis, so I could easily see it being a “hockey town.” Moving the Coyotes to Salt Lake City wouldn’t change the league’s landscape either. 

I could see Salt Lake City getting an NHL team one day. I actually think it makes more sense to have a team there as opposed to Kansas City or Milwaukee. There’s not much to dislike about Salt Lake City. I just think it’s going to be difficult to beat out Houston for a team. 

A general view of the Golden Gate Bridge and the skyline of downtown San Francisco prior to Super Bowl 50 between the Denver Broncos and the Carolina Panthers. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Somewhere else?

There’s always a possibility that the field will be able to lure Arizona. The NHL used to have a team in the San Francisco Bay Area in the California Golden Seals and moved to Cleveland and became the Barons. That team is now the Dallas Stars. There are several good markets where the league doesn’t have a footprint. 

I wouldn’t rule out the Coyotes moving to Cincinnati, Cleveland, Indianapolis, San Antonio, San Diego, or San Francisco. Each of those cities are large enough markets and have arenas, and some are capable of hosting NHL games. Maybe Arizona moves to Hartford, Conn., and the Whalers return to the NHL? Are you sensing a pattern that I’m bringing up markets that used to have hockey teams? 

I haven’t forgotten about Canada, but the only market that makes any sense is Québec City. The NHL has a team in each of the top seven cities in Canada, and Québec City ranks eighth. Hamilton (Toronto area) might be large enough to host a team. However, I doubt the Maple Leafs — an Original Six team — will want another team in their backyard. Halifax and Saskatoon have tried to land NHL teams in the past, but the cities have a combined metro population of 783,183. I don’t think a Canadian city, outside of Québec City, is capable of hosting a hockey team. 

If the field ends up luring Arizona, it feels like it’s going to be an American city. 

Contact me

This has to be the worst I’ve done predicting a NCAA tournament bracket

Movie quote of the day:

“I’m embarrassed. I really thought I could feel it.”

– Ricky Bobby, “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby” (2006)

Kentucky Wildcats forward Keion Brooks Jr. (12) reacts after losing to the Saint Peter’s Peacocks during the first round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports


All I saw this past weekend was people complaining about the state of their NCAA tournament brackets, claiming how their brackets were “busted.”

I want to make it clear that losing one or two of your predicted Sweet 16 teams, or even one or two of your predicted Elite Eight teams isn’t considered a “busted” bracket. That’s just March. It’s time we redefined the term “busted bracket” because some of us are in much worse shape, like myself. So, I really don’t want to hear your complaints.

I strongly debated printing off a copy of my bracket and setting it on fire after the first day of the tournament was completed. Regardless of what happens the rest of this tournament, it’s going to take some time to get the stink off the way I predicted this year’s bracket.

If you think I’m exaggerating, allow me to recap.

Richmond Spiders forward Tyler Burton (3) celebrates with teammates after defeating the Iowa Hawkeyes during the first round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at KeyBank Center. Mandatory Credit: Gregory Fisher-USA TODAY Sports


By the end of Thursday evening, No. 2-seeded Kentucky fell to No. 15-seeded Saint Peter’s and No. 5-seeded Iowa lost to No. 12-seeded Richmond. Keep in mind, I picked both of those teams to go to the Final Four, and I had Kentucky cutting down the nets.

Those results came on the first day of the tournament.

I have no idea how the Hawkeyes, who were shooting 47.8% from the field and 41% from 3-point territory in their last 14 games, all of a sudden couldn’t make shots. Richmond wasn’t a very good defensive team, yet Iowa finished the game shooting 36.4% from the field and 20.7% from 3-point range. I know that eventually the shots aren’t going to fall, but how can you not carry over the momentum from winning the Big Ten tournament?

Kentucky’s loss to Saint Peter’s left me dumbfounded. All I heard was how experienced the Wildcats were and how much scoring depth they had this year. Well, that talent and experience certainly didn’t show up against a team that looks like it plays in a high school gym. No offense to Saint Peter’s. I don’t want to hear anymore from the talking heads about how much talent Kentucky has or how great of a head coach John Calipari is, even though the evidence might prove otherwise. As far as I’m concerned, I can’t trust the Wildcats anymore in the tournament.

I’m done picking either of those teams to make deep tournament runs again. If you think my bad luck ends there, I assure you that it doesn’t.

Miami (Fl) Hurricanes guard Bensley Joseph (4) and teammates react from the bench against the Auburn Tigers in the second half during the second round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at Bon Secours Wellness Arena. Mandatory Credit: Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports


The other teams that “busted” my bracket at least waited until the Round of 32 to let me down. So, I guess thank you? I can also stomach their disappointing losses because they lost to fellow Power 5 institutions.

Unlike Kentucky and Iowa, I actually blame myself for picking Auburn and Tennessee to get to the Elite Eight. Both coaches don’t have the best track records in the NCAA tournament. I’ve told myself for years to not trust Bruce Pearl and Rick Barnes, especially Barnes, come tournament time. I’ve even warned my Auburn friends that Pearl is going to disappoint you probably more than once in the tournament.

Like I said, I can tolerate Auburn and Tennessee losing to the likes of Miami and Michigan. Both Jim Larrañaga and Juwan Howard have proven themselves to be good coaches, and both programs have talented players. Michigan also strikes me as a team that was destined for a deep postseason run after playing one of the toughest schedules in college basketball and losing a lot of close games.

Regardless, I didn’t take my own advice when it comes to Pearl and Barnes in the tournament. So, the current humiliation is totally on me.

I could also throw in other schools like UConn, Virginia Tech, and Wisconsin as total disappointments.

Michigan Wolverines center Hunter Dickinson (1) celebrates defeating the Tennessee Volunteers during the second round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports


Through the first two rounds this year, I’ve collected 38 points. I don’t have a history of all my March Madness picks since I started filling out brackets in 2005. Thanks to this blog, though, I can go back as far as 2017 and track my picks. Believe it or not, those 38 points aren’t the worst I’ve done after the first weekend.

Last year, I had 34 points after the first weekend. However, I didn’t lose two Final Four teams, and my national champion, on the first day of the tournament like I did this year. So, I still think that this year takes the cake for the worst bracket that I’ve predicted.

I’m not going to blame myself, though. Unlike previous years, I don’t think I picked too many upsets. I also didn’t follow college basketball that closely this year. I relied way too much on the word of the so called “experts” on TV/podcasts when I did my research. On top of that, I knew going in that this was going to be an unpredictable tournament. There weren’t many clear favorites in college basketball this season and we’re seeing that in the thick of March Madness.

I love this time of year and I have higher expectations for myself when it comes to filling out brackets. I don’t know about you guys, but I can get tired of the madness quickly.

Contact Me

2022 NCAA Tournament predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“I have been falling…for 30 minutes!”

– Loki, “Thor: Ragnarok” (2017)

I can only speak for myself, but March Madness is coming at a good point in my life. I’m getting somewhat tired of the NFL offseason, specifically the drama that occurred between my Green Bay Packers and quarterback Aaron Rodgers. I’m always excited for March Madness, but that feels particularly true this year. I not only need to consume a sport that isn’t football, but I need to write about a sport that isn’t football on this blog.

For the first time since 2019, we’re getting a normal NCAA tournament. Keep in mind that last year’s tournament was played exclusively in Indiana and the tournament was cancelled the year before that. That won’t be the case this year. Fourteen cities across the country will be hosting tournament games and teams won’t be contained to a bubble. It feels good to get back to this point. Let’s hope it stays this way for a long time.

It feels like I say this every year, but this feels like a wide-open tournament. There have been five different teams to hold the No. 1 rank by the Associated Press. That’s not even counting all the other shakeups in the rankings throughout the season. This feels like a tournament that could either be loaded with first-round upsets, or could get wild near the end and have a bunch of No. 1 or No. 2 seeds lose in the Sweet 16 or Elite Eight. My guess is the latter. I’d completely throw out the seeds when filling out your brackets. This has a chance to be a wild tournament and I did the best I could to try to make predictions.

Round of 64

Gonzaga Bulldogs forward Drew Timme (2) dribbles the basketball against Saint Mary’s Gaels center Mitchell Saxen (10) during the first half in the finals of the WCC Basketball Championships at Orleans Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports


West Regional

No. 16 Georgia State (18-10) vs. No. 1 Gonzaga (26-3) – Portland, Ore.

Only once in NCAA tournament history has a No. 16 seed beat a No. 1 seed in the Round of 64. Gonzaga has made it to the Sweet 16 in each of its last five tournament appearances. I expect a similar result this time around.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 9 Memphis (21-10) vs. No. 8 Boise State (27-7) – Portland, Ore.

I’ve been torn on this game all week. Both of these teams are playing well right now. I’m going to go with Boise State, though. The Broncos have won 24 of their last 27 games, including winning a pretty good Mountain West twice.

Winner: Boise State

No. 12 New Mexico State (26-6) vs. No. 5 UConn (23-9) – Buffalo, N.Y.

New Mexico State is good in a few different areas of the game, but it doesn’t shoot the ball particularly well. UConn has more talent and is much better on the offensive end. I also think Dan Hurley is an underrated coach.

Winner: UConn

No. 13 Vermont (28-5) vs. No. 4 Arkansas (25-8) – Buffalo, N.Y.

I was so close to picking the upset in this game. I think Vermont is a dangerous team that is capable of pulling off an upset. However, Arkansas is playing well right now – winners of 15 of its last 18 games. I think the Razorbacks get it done.

Winner: Arkansas

No. 11 Notre Dame (23-10) vs. No. 6 Alabama (19-13) – San Diego

I was originally going to pick the upset, but I’m not convinced that Notre Dame/Rutgers is good enough on either end of the court to pull off the upset. Alabama has been inconsistent, but I think it’s just good enough to win this game.

Winner: Alabama

No. 14 Montana State (27-7) vs. No. 3 Texas Tech (25-9) – San Diego

Montana State is actually one of the best-shooting teams in the country. However, I doubt that the Bobcats will shoot well against Texas Tech. The Red Raiders are an excellent defensive team – ranking in the top 100 in field goal- and 3-point defense.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 10 Davidson (27-6) vs. No. 7 Michigan State (22-12) – Greenville, S.C.

I wouldn’t rule out Davidson in this matchup. The Wildcats are very good at playing fundamental basketball. I could see them giving Michigan State fits. However, Tom Izzo is an excellent coach and the Spartans have more talent.

Winner: Michigan State

No. 15 Cal State Fullerton (21-10) vs. No. 2 Duke (28-6) – Greenville, S.C.

I don’t like the way that Duke ended the regular season, but it has so much talent on its roster. I don’t think Cal State Fullerton will be able to keep up. If this is Mike Krzyzewski’s last run, it can’t end with a loss in the Round of 64.

Winner: Duke

Baylor Bears guard James Akinjo (11) drives to the basket around Oklahoma Sooners guard Jordan Goldwire (0) during the first half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports


East Regional

No. 16 Norfolk State (24-6) vs. No. 1 Baylor (26-6) – Fort Worth, Texas

No disrespect to Norfolk State, but it ranks in the bottom 20 in the country in strength of schedule. I don’t think the Spartans are going to be ready for Baylor. The Bears are too talented and shouldn’t have many issues advancing to the next round.

Winner: Baylor

No. 9 Marquette (19-12) vs. No. 8 North Carolina (24-9) – Fort Worth, Texas

Shaka Smart doesn’t have a good track record in the tournament. He has a record of 2-7 ever since taking VCU to the Final Four in 2013. I’m having a difficult time trusting Smart and Marquette. I’ll go with North Carolina.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 12 Indiana (21-13) vs. No. 5 Saint Mary’s (25-7) – Portland, Ore.

Saint Mary’s is another team that I’ve learned to never trust in the tournament. The Gaels have made it past the Round of 64 just three times in program history. Indiana has been playing very well since the start of the Big Ten tournament.

Winner: Indiana

No. 13 Akron (24-9) vs. No. 4 UCLA (25-7) – Portland, Ore.

I’m not seeing an upset in this matchup. According to KenPom, Akron ranks as the No. 57 team in this tournament. I think the Zips are slightly overseeded. UCLA is the more talented team in this matchup and is built for a deep run.

Winner: UCLA

No. 11 Virginia Tech (23-12) vs. No. 6 Texas (21-11) – Milwaukee

I don’t like picking against Chris Beard, and I do think Texas is under seeded, but this feels like a tough matchup for the Longhorns. Texas has won only nine of its last 18 games, whereas Virginia Tech has won 13 of its last 15.

Winner: Virginia Tech

No. 14 Yale (19-11) vs. No. 3 Purdue (27-7) – Milwaukee

I usually give Ivy League teams credit, but this feels like a tough matchup for Yale. Purdue ranks No. 3 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, whereas the Bulldogs rank No. 203. I don’t expect the Boilermakers to have many problems.

Winner: Purdue

No. 10 San Francisco (24-9) vs. No. 7 Murray State (30-2) – Indianapolis

I went back and forth on which team to pick in this matchup. I eventually decided to go with Murray State. The Racers are very good on both ends of the court and have three players who can score 20 points any given night.

Winner: Murray State

No. 15 Saint Peter’s (19-11) vs. No. 2 Kentucky (26-7) – Indianapolis

Saint Peter’s will have a difficult time defending Kentucky. The Wildcats have a very talented roster and average close to 80 points per game. John Calipari also hasn’t lost in the Round of 64 since his early years at Memphis.

Winner: Kentucky

Arizona Wildcats guard Dalen Terry (4) dunks against the UCLA Bruins during the second half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports


South Regional

No. 16 Wright State (22-13) vs. No. 1 Arizona (31-3) – San Diego

Tommy Lloyd has done an excellent job in his first season in Arizona. The Wildcats rank in the top 20 in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency. I’m struggling to see a scenario where Wright State/Bryant pulls off the upset.

Winner: Arizona

No. 9 TCU (20-12) vs. No. 8 Seton Hall (21-10) – San Diego

TCU ranks in the bottom 40 in the country in turnovers – committing 14.5 per game – and struggles to shoot the ball. Jamie Dixon is also a coach that I don’t trust in the tournament. I feel like I have to pick Seton Hall.

Winner: Seton Hall

No. 12 UAB (27-7) vs. No. 5 Houston (29-5) – Pittsburgh

UAB has size and shoots the ball well. Houston is going to be very tough matchup for the Blazers, though. The Cougars are one of the best defensive teams in the country – allowing only 58.9 points and forcing 14.4 turnovers per game.

Winner: Houston

No. 13 Chattanooga (27-7) vs. No. 4 Illinois (22-10) – Pittsburgh

If not for late-game heroics, I doubt Chattanooga would be in this position. I think the Mocs are going to have a difficult time defending Illinois’ offense, which averages 75.8 points per game and shoots almost 37% from 3-point territory.

Winner: Illinois

No. 11 Michigan (17-14) vs. No. 6 Colorado State (25-5) – Indianapolis

I’d ignore Michigan’s record. Part of the reason why the Wolverines have 14 losses is because they played one of the toughest schedules in the country. Michigan shoots the ball very well, too. This feels like a tough draw for Colorado State.

Winner: Michigan

No. 14 Longwood (26-6) vs. No. 3 Tennessee (26-7) – Indianapolis

Tennessee is entering the NCAA tournament on a high note. The Volunteers have won 15 of their last 17 games, including winning the SEC tournament a few days ago. I doubt Longwood will pose much of a problem for Tennessee.

Winner: Tennessee

No. 10 Loyola Chicago (25-7) vs. No. 7 Ohio State (19-11) – Pittsburgh

Ohio State is hobbling into the NCAA tournament. The Buckeyes have lost seven of their last 13 games, including four of their last five. I also don’t think Chris Holtmann is much of a coach either. I’ll ride with Sister Jean.

Winner: Loyola Chicago

No. 15 Delaware (22-12) vs. No. 2 Villanova (26-7) – Pittsburgh

Delaware got hot at the right time in order to punch its ticket to the NCAA tournament. Villanova has the depth and ability to play in a variety of different ways. I expect the Wildcats to give the Fightin’ Blue Hens a lot of trouble.

Winner: Villanova

Kansas Jayhawks head coach Bill Self smiles in the second half against the Texas Tech Red Raiders at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Amy Kontras-USA TODAY Sports


Midwest Regional

No. 16 Texas Southern (19-12) vs. No. 1 Kansas (28-6) – Fort Worth, Texas

Bill Self hasn’t lost a game in the Round of 64 since 2006. I don’t see that streak breaking this year. Kansas isn’t the most talented team in this tournament, but it’s very well rounded. I expect the Jayhawks to roll against Texas Southern.

Winner: Kansas

No. 9 Creighton (22-11) vs. No. 8 San Diego State (23-8) – Fort Worth, Texas

These teams are almost mirror images of each other. They play great defense and can disappear on the offensive end. The team that wins is the one that will be more efficient offensively, so I give the slight advantage to Creighton.

Winner: Creighton

No. 12 Richmond (23-12) vs. No. 5 Iowa (26-9) – Buffalo, N.Y.

Richmond is certainly capable of pulling off an upset, but I’m having a difficult time picking against Iowa. The Hawkeyes are red hot right now. They’ve won 12 of their last 14 games, including winning the Big Ten tournament.

Winner: Iowa

No. 13 South Dakota State (30-4) vs. No. 4 Providence (25-5) – Buffalo, N.Y.

Don’t sleep on the upset in this matchup. Providence feels like a team that is vastly overseeded. KenPom has the Friars as the No. 43 team in this tournament. However, he also has South Dakota State ranked much lower.

Winner: Providence

No. 11 Iowa State (20-12) vs. No. 6 LSU (22-11) – Milwaukee

This feels like the most likely first-round matchup to end in an upset since LSU fired Will Wade just a few days ago. I have no idea what to expect from the Tigers without their head coach. I think Iowa State gets the win.

Winner: Iowa State

No. 14 Colgate (23-11) vs. No. 3 Wisconsin (24-7) – Milwaukee

Colgate is going to have to do everything right to knock off Wisconsin. The Badgers are one of the best defensive teams in the country – ranking in the top third in the country in points allowed per game and 3-point defense.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 10 Miami (23-10) vs. No. 7 USC (26-7) – Greenville, S.C.

Miami feels like a slightly overseeded team. KenPom has the Hurricanes as the No. 48 team in this tournament. They also weren’t that impressive in a weak ACC this season. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll go with USC.

Winner: USC

No. 15 Jacksonville State (21-10) vs. No. 2 Auburn (27-5) – Greenville, S.C.

Auburn has kind of stumbled in recent weeks – losing four of its last nine games. However, I don’t think Jacksonville State is good enough on the offensive end to get the upset. The Tigers are very talented team and should win.

Winner: Auburn

Round of 32

Connecticut Huskies forward Isaiah Whaley (5) celebrates with guard Tyrese Martin (4) after blocking a shot in the first half against the Villanova Wildcats at the Big East Tournament at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Wendell Cruz-USA TODAY Sports


West Regional

No. 8 Boise State vs. No. 1 Gonzaga – Portland, Ore.

Boise State could make this a game because it does a good job of offensive rebounding – grabbing 10.2 per game. I’m not convinced that’s going to be good enough to upset Gonzaga, though. The Bulldogs should have the talent and coaching advantage in this matchup.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 5 UConn vs. No. 4 Arkansas – Buffalo, N.Y.

I don’t really have anything scientific with this pick, but I’ll take UConn to win. KenPom and NET have the Huskies ranked higher than Arkansas, and Nate Silver gives UConn a 49% chance to advance to the Sweet 16. The Huskies are also playing well right now – winners of seven of their last nine games.

Winner: UConn

No. 6 Alabama vs. No. 3 Texas Tech – San Diego

Unless your team is incredibly efficient on the offensive end, I think you’re going to have a hard time beating Texas Tech. The Red Raiders rank in the top 20 in the country in field goal defense, turnovers forced, and defensive rebounds. I expect Alabama to have a difficult time making shots.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 7 Michigan State vs. No. 2 Duke – Greenville, S.C.

I wouldn’t quickly pencil in Duke to win this game. I think Michigan State matches up well with Duke because neither team has shown consistency this season. There’s a good chance that Izzo uglies this game up in order to pull off the upset. I still expect the Blue Devils to get it done, though.

Winner: Duke

Virginia Tech Hokies guard Hunter Cattoor (0) reacts after hitting a three point shot against the Duke Blue Devils during the first half of the ACC Men’s Basketball Tournament final at Barclays Center. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports


East Regional

No. 8 North Carolina vs. No. 1 Baylor – Fort Worth, Texas

I think Baylor is the most vulnerable No. 1 seed this year. The Bears aren’t consistent enough on the offensive end. I wouldn’t be surprised if they lose this game, but this is going to essentially be a home game for them and they have the coaching advantage in Scott Drew.

Winner: Baylor

No. 12 Indiana vs. No. 4 UCLA – Portland, Ore.

UCLA does a really good job of taking care of the basketball. I think that’s very important in the tournament. The teams that don’t beat themselves typically make deep runs. That’s why I expect the Bruins to win this game. They’re too talented and don’t hurt themselves.

Winner: UCLA

No. 11 Virginia Tech vs. No. 3 Purdue – Milwaukee

Both of these teams have the ability to make shots and be efficient offensively. So, the winner is going to be the team that can make stops. I don’t think Purdue can do that. According to KenPom, the Boilermakers rank among the bottom 20 teams in the tournament in adjusted defensive efficiency.

Winner: Virginia Tech

No. 7 Murray State vs. No. 2 Kentucky – Indianapolis

This is going to be a difficult matchup for Kentucky. I think Murray State is much better than its seed would indicate. The Racers have the scoring ability to go toe-to-toe with the Wildcats. I think Kentucky’s combination of talent, depth, and coaching will be the difference maker, though.

Winner: Kentucky

Houston Cougars guard Kyler Edwards (11) celebrates after scoring a three point shot against the Memphis Tigers during the first half at Dickies Arena. Mandatory Credit: Chris Jones-USA TODAY Sports


South Regional

No. 8 Seton Hall vs. No. 1 Arizona – San Diego

Seton Hall feels like it might be an underseeded team. The Pirates rank in the top 75 in the country in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency, but I don’t think they have the horses to upset Arizona. The Wildcats have the deeper and more talented team. I like them to advance.

Winner: Arizona

No. 5 Houston vs. No. 4 Illinois – Pittsburgh

I’m going to give the advantage to Houston in this matchup. The Cougars have a ton of scoring depth, with six players averaging at least 10.1 points per game. They also rank in the top 10 among tournament teams in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency.

Winner: Houston

No. 11 Michigan vs. No. 3 Tennessee – Indianapolis

Michigan got the benefit of the doubt because it played a tough schedule. I don’t see the Wolverines getting past this point, though. I have a hard time trusting teams to figure it out in the tournament when they didn’t in the regular season. I expect Tennessee to take care of business.

Winner: Tennessee

No. 10 Loyola Chicago vs. No. 2 Villanova – Pittsburgh

Loyola Chicago likes to slow it down and force opponents to play its way, but I don’t think that’ll effect Villanova. The Wildcats also don’t play with much tempo – ranking second to last among tournament teams – and are still efficient offensively. I think Villanova matches up well with the Ramblers.

Winner: Villanova

Iowa Hawkeyes guard Tony Perkins (11) and forward Keegan Murray (15) celebrate beating Purdue Boilermakers at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports


Midwest Regional

No. 9 Creighton vs. No. 1 Kansas – Fort Worth, Texas

Creighton is one of the worst offensive teams in the tournament. The Bluejays rank in the bottom 12 in adjusted offensive efficiency. They’re likely going to have a difficult time scoring on Kansas, which ranks in the top 30 in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Jayhawks ought to be able to advance.

Winner: Kansas

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 4 Providence – Buffalo, N.Y.

Ed Cooley has done a great job building up Providence in the last decade, but he doesn’t have a great track record in the NCAA tournament – winning one game in five appearances. Iowa is hot right now – averaging 85.2 points in its last 14 games. I think the Hawkeyes keep their momentum going.

Winner: Iowa

No. 11 Iowa State vs. No. 3 Wisconsin – Milwaukee

Iowa State is another team that isn’t very good on the offensive end – ranking among the bottom 10 teams in the tournament in adjusted offensive efficiency. Dating back to the Bo Ryan days, Wisconsin is always a tough team defensively. This feels like a nightmare matchup for the Cyclones.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 7 USC vs. No. 2 Auburn – Greenville, S.C.

I flirted with taking the upset, but changed my mind after doing some research. USC isn’t very good offensively and is one of the worst teams in the country at forcing turnovers. I haven’t been that impressed with Auburn recently, but it’ll advance if it takes care of the ball.

Winner: Auburn

Sweet 16

Duke Blue Devils head coach Mike Krzyzewski coaches against the Miami Hurricanes during the second half of the ACC Tournament semifinal game at Barclays Center. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports


West Regional semifinals – San Francisco

No. 5 UConn vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

I think UConn matches up well with Gonzaga. The Huskies rank in the top six in the country in both offensive and defensive rebounds, and I think they might have the better backcourt. Keep in mind, the Huskies have played well this season when they’ve had a healthy lineup. I think Mark Few will have his team ready after almost a full week of preparation, though.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 3 Texas Tech vs. No. 2 Duke

I’m not trying to sound like a Duke hater, but I’m semi-convinced that the tournament will be rigged for Krzyzewski to go out on top. This game will be a tough matchup for the Blue Devils, though. They have one of the youngest rosters in the country and lack an offensive identity. I don’t think that’s a good recipe when going up against Texas Tech’s defense. I’ll take the Red Raiders.

Winner: Texas Tech

UCLA Bruins guard Jules Bernard (1) dribbles behind Arizona Wildcats guard Justin Kier (5) during the first half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports


East Regional semifinals – Philadelphia

No. 4 UCLA vs. No. 1 Baylor

I think UCLA is the most underrated team in this tournament. The Bruins rank in the top 15 in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency. They also do a good job of making 3-pointers, free throws, and limiting turnovers. Baylor’s offense is too inconsistent at times. The Bears also don’t shoot the ball particularly well and turn the ball over too much. I’ll pick UCLA to get the upset.

Winner: UCLA

No. 11 Virginia Tech vs. No. 2 Kentucky

This feels like when Virginia Tech’s run is going to end. The Hokies don’t match up with Kentucky. Virginia Tech is one of the worst rebounding teams in the country – averaging only 8.6 offensive rebounds and 32.2 total rebounds per game. I think Oscar Tshiebwe, who’s the frontrunner to win Naismith College Player of the Year, and the Wildcats’ frontcourt will be too much for the Hokies.

Winner: Kentucky

Tennessee Volunteers guard Zakai Zeigler (5) drives to the basket against Texas A&M Aggies forward Ethan Henderson (10) in the first half at Amelie Arena. Mandatory Credit: Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports


South Regional semifinals – San Antonio

No. 5 Houston vs. No. 1 Arizona

If Houston was healthy and in another bracket, I’d probably pick it to go much deeper in the tournament. Facing Arizona in the Sweet 16 is a tough draw. I’ll give the Wildcats the advantage because I think they’ll be the healthier team. Arizona also has more scoring depth, with four players who average at least 10.1 points per game, and then another five players who average between 5.0-7.6 points.

Winner: Arizona

No. 3 Tennessee vs. No. 2 Villanova

I usually don’t trust Rick Barnes in the NCAA tournament. However, Tennessee is playing very well right now. Villanova’s lack of a post presence worries me. I also think the Wildcats rely too much on 3-pointers – ranking No. 4 in 3-point attempts among tournament teams. Opponents have shot only 31.2% from beyond the arc against the Volunteers this season.

Winner: Tennessee

Wisconsin Badgers guard Brad Davison (34) shoots the ball while Michigan State Spartans guard Max Christie (5) defends in the first half at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports


Midwest Regional semifinals – Chicago

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 1 Kansas

I’m actually not crazy about this Kansas team. It’s far from Self’s most talented team. The Jayhawks also aren’t great when Ochai Agbaji isn’t making shots. I don’t trust the rest of their lineup to step up if Agbaji doesn’t get going. Iowa is arguably the hottest team in the country and it might have the best player in the tournament in Murray Keegan. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll take the Hawkeyes.

Winner: Iowa

No. 3 Wisconsin vs. No. 2 Auburn

I think Wisconsin is way too reliant on Johnny Davis. If he gets hot, Wisconsin ought to win this game. I think that’s going to be a tall order against Auburn’s defense, which ranks in the top 100 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency, field-goal defense, 3-point defense, and turnovers forced. I don’t really trust the Tigers, but this feels like a favorable matchup for them.

Winner: Auburn

Elite Eight

Texas Tech Red Raiders guard Davion Warren (2) looks for an opening around Kansas Jayhawks guard Dajuan Harris Jr. (3) during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports


West Regional final – San Francisco

No. 3 Texas Tech vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

Texas Tech has what it takes to knock off Gonzaga. The Red Raiders are excellent defensively and are physical in the paint. They’ll be able to body Drew Timme and collect rebounds. That’s the key to beating the Bulldogs. At some point, though, Texas Tech has to be able to make shots, which it hasn’t been able to do consistently this season. I’m not sold on Gonzaga getting to the Final Four, but I can’t deny that it’s the best overall team in this region.

Winner: Gonzaga

Kentucky Wildcats forward Oscar Tshiebwe (34) reacts after a basket against the Vanderbilt Commodores at Amelie Arena. Mandatory Credit: Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports


East Regional final – Philadelphia

No. 4 UCLA vs. No. 2 Kentucky

I don’t anticipate UCLA to have quite the same run as it did last year. Even though I think the Bruins are an underrated team, they had some magic last year that I doubt they’ll be able to replicate. UCLA also doesn’t match up that well with Kentucky. The Bruins don’t have as good of a post presence as the Wildcats. I think UCLA will struggle to contain Tshiebwe. If the Bruins somehow manage to contain him, this Kentucky team has the ability to make shots.

Winner: Kentucky

Arizona Wildcats center Oumar Ballo (11) celebrates after the Wildcats defeated the UCLA Bruins to win the Pac-12 Conference Championship at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports


South Regional final – San Antonio

No. 3 Tennessee vs. No. 1 Arizona

Tennessee is one of the hottest teams in the country right now. However, the Volunteers don’t have enough scoring depth to knock off Arizona. Tennessee only has two players who average double figures, and only four other players who average between 5.0 to 9.9 points. The Wildcats had five different players lead the team in scoring this season, and four of those players also eclipsed 20 points. I think that’s going to be tough for Tennessee to overcome.

Winner: Arizona

Auburn Tigers guard Wendell Green Jr. (1) drives to the basket as Texas A&M Aggies guard Hassan Diarra (5) defends during the second half at Amalie Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports


Midwest Regional final – Chicago

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 2 Auburn

I don’t believe that I’ve ever picked any team lower than a No. 4 seed to make the Final Four. There’s a first time for everything, though. I can’t say it enough that I really like the way that Iowa has been playing. In their last 14 games, the Hawkeyes are shooting 47.8% from the field and 41.3% from 3-point territory. Auburn’s inconsistent backcourt worries me a lot, too, and I don’t trust Bruce Pearl as a head coach. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll pick Iowa to beat the Tigers.

Winner: Iowa

Final Four – New Orleans

No. 2 Kentucky vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

I’ve been adamant in the past about why I don’t trust Gonzaga in the NCAA tournament. My opinion isn’t changing this year. I don’t think the Bulldogs are challenged enough in the regular season and I think that’s always going to hurt them. I also don’t think Gonzaga is as good of a team as last year. The Bulldogs aren’t as strong in the post and their backcourt has been inconsistent. I think Kentucky matches up very well with Gonzaga. The Wildcats are physical and can limit Timme’s production down low. Kentucky also has a deep scoring lineup.

Winner: Kentucky

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 1 Arizona

Momentum only lasts for so long in the tournament. Sure, every now and then a team like UConn in 2011 and 2014 gets hot and wins the whole thing, but it’s rare. Iowa has been shooting the ball well, but I think you also need size and a great defense to beat a team of Arizona’s caliber. The Hawkeyes struggle on the defensive end of the court – ranking in the bottom half among tournament teams in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Wildcats have one of the deepest and biggest lineups in the country. I expect Iowa to have a difficult time getting shots off against Arizona.

Winner: Arizona

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball National Championship Trophy. Mandatory credit: Getty Images.

National Championship – New Orleans

No. 2 Kentucky vs. No. 1 Arizona

I have a pair of wildcats playing for the national championship. Sorry, I had to point that out. This Kentucky team actually feels like it could be John Calipari’s best team. It’s not necessarily Calipari’s most talented team, even though it’s not that much of a drop-off, but Kentucky has an experienced roster for a change and it can win in a variety of ways. I also think Kentucky has the scoring depth to match Arizona. Kentucky had seven different players lead the team in scoring this season, and six of them eclipsed 20 points. Arizona is going to have a difficult time defending Kentucky’s offense. In one game for all the marbles, I have more trust in Calipari than I do Lloyd. I think Kentucky will be cutting down the nets.

Winner: Kentucky

Contact Me

2022 College Football Playoff National Championship pick

Movie quote of the day:

“I go to bed with all my friends.”

– M. Gustave, “The Grand Budapest Hotel” (2014)

New Year’s Six bowls record: 3-3 (50%)
2021 record: 103-69 (59.8%)
All-time record: 825-398 (67.4%)

College Football Playoff National Championship presented by AT&T
No. 3 Georgia (13-1) vs. No. 1 Alabama (13-1)
Lucas Oil Stadium
Indianapolis
Line: UGA -2.5
O/U: 52

I wasn’t convinced that it would happen, but we’re getting a rematch of the SEC Championship in the national championship. It’ll also be the second time in the last five seasons that Alabama and Georgia will play for the title. At the end of the day, these were arguably the best two teams in college football. Nick Saban will also take on one of his former assistants in Kirby Smart, and it seems things always get interesting when they face each other.

Alabama Crimson Tide players raise the Cotton Bowl trophy after the game against the Cincinnati Bearcats in the 2021 Cotton Bowl college football CFP national semifinal game at AT&T Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports

This is Alabama’s sixth appearance in the national championship since the Playoff began in 2014, and the ninth time that the Crimson Tide have played for a national title since Saban took over the program in 2007. The strength of Alabama is its offense, which averages 41.4 points per game. Similar to last year, the Crimson Tide are loaded with offensive playmakers, led by Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback Bryce Young and a plethora of weapons in wide receivers Jameson Williams, Slade Bolden, and Ja’Corey Brooks, tight ends Cameron Latu and Jahleel Billingsley, and running back Brian Robinson. The Crimson Tide’s offense is the only unit that had Georgia’s defense on its heels this season.

Alabama’s defense is far from the best unit that Saban has had during his tenure in Tuscaloosa. The Crimson Tide have been vulnerable on that side of the ball – allowing at least 20 points in seven games, which is very uncharacteristic of a Saban defense. Although, I think Alabama is starting to figure things out on that side of the ball. The Crimson Tide haven’t lacked talent either. They have quite a few players who could end up being first-round draft picks in linebacker Christian Harris, defensive lineman Phidarian Mathis, safety Jordan Battle, and cornerback Josh Jobe.

The last two times I’ve watched Alabama this season, the more it reminds me of Clemson’s 2016 team. For those that don’t remember, Clemson underperformed for most of that season and then caught fire in the ACC Championship and the semifinal game – winning by a combined 38 points – and then went on to beat Alabama in the national championship. The Crimson Tide are reminding me so much of that team. They didn’t play their best football for most of this season, but have played like a completely different team in the first meeting against Georgia and against Cincinnati. I really do believe that Alabama is peaking at the right time.

Georgia Bulldogs quarterback Stetson Bennett (13) throws oranges as he celebrates with the Orange Bowl Trophy after defeating the Michigan Wolverines in the Orange Bowl college football CFP national semifinal game at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mandatory Credit: Rhona Wise-USA TODAY Sports

I wouldn’t rule out Georgia in this game just because of how the SEC Championship played out back in December. There’s a reason why Vegas favors the Bulldogs. I have no idea what happened in the SEC Championship. For now, I’m chalking it up to Georgia drinking its own Kool-Aid and not taking Alabama seriously. I think that the Bulldogs proved in the Orange Bowl that they’re still an excellent team.

The main reason why Georgia made it to this point is its defense, which is led by likely future first-round draft picks in defensive linemen Jordan Davis and Devonte Wyatt, linebacker Nakobe Dean, and cornerback Derion Kendrick. The Bulldogs’ defense has allowed an average of just 9.0 points per game (yes, you’re reading that correctly) this season, and that’s including giving up 41 points to Alabama.

Georgia’s weakness is definitely its offense, which does just enough to get the job done. When your defense allows fewer than 10 points per game, though, it’s reasonable to think your offense doesn’t need to be that good. Quarterback Stetson Bennett played very well against Michigan, but he still has his limitations. Unlike previous years, the Bulldogs have a running back-by-committee approach in the run game. They also only have one pass catcher with more than 50 receptions, and that’s tight end Brock Bowers.

The 2022 CFP College Football Playoff national championship logo is placed on the outside of Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Marc Lebryk-USA TODAY Sports

Saban and Smart have played each other four times since Smart took over at Georgia in 2016. The first two games were decided by a combined 10 points. However, the last two meetings haven’t been close, with Alabama winning by a combined 34 points. I stand by what I said before the SEC Championship, I think the Bulldogs have an advantage over the Crimson Tide in the trenches. That could be problematic for Alabama because that’s where football games are typically won. I expect this game to be much closer than the first meeting this season, but I’m still going to pick the Crimson Tide to win.

I think Alabama matches up pretty well against Georgia in other areas. The Crimson Tide’s passing attack is capable of spreading Georgia’s defense out, creating a lot of open spaces, and Young is plenty good enough to get the ball in his playmakers’ hands. I can’t bring myself to trust the Bulldogs either. They’ve had plenty of opportunities to beat Alabama in the past and have always found a way to blow it. I just think Saban has Smart’s number. I also don’t think Bennett and Georgia’s offense will be able to make as many plays as Young and the Crimson Tide’s offense.

Prediction: Alabama 31, Georgia 24

Contact Me

2021 men’s basketball national championship prediction

Movie quote of the day:

“This one’s for your warden!”

– Johnny Cash, “Walk the Line” (2005)

Baylor Bears head coach Scott Drew (left) waves to the crowd as he walks off the court after the game against the Houston Cougars in the national semifinals of the Final Four of the 2021 NCAA Tournament at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports

Baylor (27-2) vs. Gonzaga (31-0)
Lucas Oil Stadium
Indianapolis
Line: GONZ -4.5
O/U: 159.5

I started watching March Madness when I was 12 years old, which would’ve been the 2005 NCAA Tournament. I can’t really speak for any of the national championships prior to that year, but this is the first national championship matchup that I feel has been as anticipated as that 2005 national championship between Illinois and North Carolina. There have been some excellent national championships since 2005, but I’m not sure any of them were as hyped up as this one between Gonzaga and Baylor, besides the game in 2005. The only one that might come close is the 2008 matchup between Kansas and Memphis. After not having a national championship in two years because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we should have a great game tonight. These were the two best teams all season – combining for a record of 58-2. I expect a lot of points to be scored in a wildly entertaining contest.

Baylor Bears guard Jared Butler (12) handles the ball against the Arkansas Razorbacks during the first half in the Elite Eight of the 2021 NCAA Tournament at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

Let’s start things off this breakdown with Baylor. I think the Bears are a tricky matchup for Gonzaga. They rank in the top 25 in the country this season in offensive rebounding (12.6 per game), 3-point shooting (41.2%), offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency, all while playing in one of the toughest conferences in the country. Not even the undefeated Bulldogs managed to do that. I think the Bears certainly have the ability to keep up with Gonzaga’s fast-paced playing style. Since the team’s COVID-19 pause back in February, Scott Drew has had Baylor playing extremely well. The Bears have won 10 of their last 12 games. In the NCAA tournament, they’ve averaged 75.2 points per game, shot 46% from the field and 37.9% from deep, and their average margin of defeat has been 15.2 points. If there’s a weakness with Baylor, I think it’s that it hasn’t shot the ball as well from 3-point territory in the tournament as it did in the regular season.

Gonzaga Bulldogs guard Jalen Suggs (1) celebrate making the game winning shot against the UCLA Bruins in the national semifinals of the Final Four of the 2021 NCAA Tournament at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Robert Deutsch-USA TODAY Sports

I’m curious to see how Gonzaga bounces back after that last-second win over UCLA in its Final Four game. I think it’s easy for college players to come out flat the following game after an emotional win like that. I’ve seen it happen too many times in college athletics. With this being the national championship, though, I have a hard time seeing that happening. Mark Few is an excellent coach and I think he’ll have the Bulldogs ready to go for this game. Similar to Baylor, Gonzaga can win in a variety of different ways, which makes this such an impressive team. The Bulldogs have had six different players score double-figures in this NCAA tournament, and their average margin of victory in their last five games has been 19.8 points. I think depth could be an issue for this team, though. Gonzaga’s bench doesn’t go very deep, unlike Baylor’s bench. If foul trouble or injuries become an issue in tonight’s game, I think it could be very difficult for the Bulldogs to win.

Gonzaga Bulldogs head coach Mark Few during the second half against the UCLA Bruins in the national semifinals of the Final Four of the 2021 NCAA Tournament at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports

We were robbed of this matchup in the regular season because of COVID-19. It only makes sense that we get it for the national championship in stead. I really want to take Baylor because I don’t think Gonzaga has been tested by a team of the Bears’ caliber this season. Sure, UCLA was playing extremely well in the tournament, but Baylor is a completely different animal. The Bears are loaded with talented guards like Jared Butler, MaCio Teague, and Davion Mitchell. They all have the capability to make 3-pointers, which should be troublesome for Gonzaga. However, I think the Bulldogs have the length – with players like Drew Timme, Corey Kispert, and Anton Watson – to counter Baylor’s sharp-shooting ability. The Bears are going to have a very difficult time shooting over those guys. The Bulldogs are so efficient offensively, have so much scoring depth, and are also a very good defensive team. I’ve been hard on them this season, but it’s so hard to not pick them in this game. The Bulldogs really are a perfectly-assembled team. I think Gonzaga starts this game fairly slow, but eventually gets in the groove and manages to win its first national title in program history.

Prediction: Gonzaga 81, Baylor 77

Thanks for reading

Shane Price
Follow me on Twitter – @priceisright53

2021 NCAA Tournament predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“Hey, guys. You ready to let the dogs out?”

– Alan Garner, “The Hangover” (2009)

March Madness, it’s good to have you back. We’re a year from when the entire world stopped because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 NCAA Tournament was canceled because of it. This time last year, I would’ve given an arm or a leg to be able to watch some college basketball, or any sports for that matter. It feels so refreshing to know that March Madness is coming back today. It’s been far too long since I last watched my West Virginia Mountaineers play in the NCAA tournament.

As opposed to previous years, the 2021 NCAA Tournament will be hosted almost exclusively in the city of Indianapolis, Ind., giving the tournament a “bubble.” I seem to say this every year, but it’s even more relevant this season, I have no idea what to expect. This season, it’s more than just the upsets that could potentially happen. As we saw a little bit in the conference tournaments, you also have to factor in the possibility for teams to be eliminated because of a COVID-19 positive test. That could cause so much more chaos to this tournament.

When it comes to upsets, I think there’s a very good chance we’re going to get a lot. It’s just so hard to judge teams this teams because of different bodies of work. Some teams have played as many as 30 games, and some have played as few as 15 (and almost exclusively against conference opponents). There’s a very good chance that the majority of teams in the tournament are overseeded or underseeded, which is why I think there’s likely going to be a lot of chaos in the early rounds. It’s just so hard to tell at this stage. I’ll admit, though, that I didn’t go crazy and pick a bunch of upsets.

Round of 64:

Gonzaga Bulldogs guard Jalen Suggs (1) and head coach Mark Few (R) react during the second half of the West Coast Conference Tournament championship game against the BYU Cougars at Orleans Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 1

No. 16 Norfolk State (17-7) vs. No. 1 Gonzaga (26-0)

I usually don’t like picking undefeated teams to win it all, but there’s no way I can pick against Gonzaga this round. The Bulldogs are just so good on both ends of the court.

Prediction: Gonzaga

No. 9 Missouri (16-9) vs. No. 8 Oklahoma (15-10)

Oklahoma has lost five of its last six games, and Missouri has lost six of its last nine. With neither team playing well, I don’t really know which one to pick. I have a lot of respect for Lon Kruger, though, so I guess I’ll take the Sooners.

Prediction: Oklahoma

No. 12 UC Santa Barbara (22-4) vs. No. 5 Creighton (20-8)

It didn’t take long to pick my first upset. Creighton is a good team, but it’s had off-the-court problems with head coach Greg McDermott taking time off this season due to using insensitive comments. In McDermott’s return in the Big East tournament, the Bluejays looked out of sorts. UC Santa Barbara is an efficient team on ends of the court and is very good defensively – allowing just 62.8 points per game. I like the Gauchos.

Prediction: UC Santa Barbara

No. 13 Ohio (16-7) vs. No. 4 Virginia (18-6)

I think this could be a nightmare matchup for Virginia. Ohio has the ability to score – averaging 80.9 points per game. This Virginia team is much worse defensively than previous teams have been since Tony Bennett took over as head coach. I think the Cavaliers are going to have their hands full on the defensive end. However, in games that I expect to be close, I like to pick the better free-throw shooting team. Virginia is the third-best free-throw shooting team in the country, while the Bobcats rank in the 200s.

Prediction: Virginia

No. 11 Drake (26-4) vs. No. 6 USC (22-7)

I’ve seen USC play a handful of times. I think the Trojans are an athletic and well-coached team. Drake has played a pretty weak schedule this season – its best wins coming against Kansas State and Loyola Chicago. I have no idea what to expect from the Bulldogs. I realize that the Pac-12 isn’t that great of a conference, but I have a feeling that USC is a little underseeded.

Prediction: USC

No. 14 Eastern Washington (16-7) vs. No. 3 Kansas (20-8)

Kansas was playing very well – winners of eight of its last nine games – before the Big 12 tournament. In the conference tournament, a few key players sat out and the Jayhawks were also forced to forfeit to Texas because of a positive COVID-19 test. How that will affect them is unclear. The good news is that Eastern Washington isn’t highly thought of – ranking No. 110 in KenPom’s rankings, which is 11th worst among tournament teams. I have to go with Kansas in this one.

Prediction: Kansas

No. 10 VCU (19-7) vs. No. 7 Oregon (20-6)

These teams have totally contrasting styles. Oregon is very good on the offensive end – shooting 47.1% from the field and 37.9% of 3-point territory. VCU is an excellent defensive team – allowing just 65.2 points per game and ranking No. 11 in defensive efficiency. In the tournament, I usually like to pick the teams that have better shooters and the better head coach. Oregon has that advantage by a mile.

Prediction: Oregon

No. 15 Grand Canyon (17-6) vs. No. 2 Iowa (21-8)

Iowa very well might have the best player in the tournament in Luka Garza. I think Grand Canyon is going to have a hard time defending Iowa’s offensive attack, which averages 83.8 points per game.

Prediction: Iowa

Michigan Wolverines head coach Juwan Howard talks to his players during action against the Michigan State Spartans Sunday, March 7, 2021, at the Breslin Center in East Lansing. Mandatory credit: Detroit Free Press.

Regional No. 4

No. 16 Texas Southern (17-8) vs. No. 1 Michigan (20-4)

Mount St. Mary’s and Texas Southern are the two worst teams in the NCAA tournament, according to KenPom. Michigan ought to cruise to the next round.

Prediction: Michigan

No. 9 St. Bonaventure (16-4) vs. No. 8 LSU (18-9)

I think this might be the best 8 vs. 9 matchup. Both of these teams are playing very well entering the tournament. I’ve gone back and forth on which team to pick, but I’m going to go with LSU. The Tigers have more athletes and I thought they really showed what they could do in the SEC tournament. LSU also shoots the ball better and grabs more offensive rebounds than the Bonnies.

Prediction: LSU

No. 12 Georgetown (13-12) vs. No. 5 Colorado (22-8)

Picking Georgetown is a little tempting since it just got hot and won the Big East, but I think Colorado is the better team and should be able to advance. The Buffaloes are a well-coached team that shoot the ball pretty well. This matchup will likely come down to turnovers, and the Hoyas are one of the worst at taking care of the ball – committing 15.3 turnovers per game.

Prediction: Colorado

No. 13 UNC Greensboro (21-8) vs. No. 4 Florida State (16-6)

I’m not sure why, but I’m a little tempted to pick UNC Greensboro. However, I’m just not sure the Spartans have enough horses to pull off the upset. Florida State is very athletic and the better offensive team. I like the Seminoles to move on.

Prediction: Florida State

No. 11 UCLA (18-9) vs. No. 6 BYU (20-6)

I don’t really know what to make of BYU. The Cougars don’t have any impressive wins outside of San Diego State and it feels like we’re just giving them credit for playing Gonzaga pretty tough a few days ago. UCLA sort of hobbled into the tournament – losers of four of its last five games. However, all four of those losses came against fellow tournament teams and three of those games were on the road. I think Mick Cronin is a good coach, too. I think he’ll have the Bruins ready against BYU.

Prediction: UCLA

No. 14 Abilene Christian (23-4) vs. No. 3 Texas (19-7)

Statistically, Abilene Christian is one of the best defensive teams in this tournament. Texas appears to be hitting its stride, though, after winning the Big 12 tournament. The Longhorns have a lot of athleticism. I have to pick them to win this game.

Prediction: Texas

No. 10 Maryland (16-13) vs. No. 7 UConn (15-7)

I’ve seriously gone back and forth on which team to pick in this matchup. I’ve changed my mind quite a few times, but I think UConn has the coaching advantage with Dan Hurley. I’m sure Maryland is battle-tested after playing in a very tough Big Ten this year, but I can’t get over those 13 losses. In what should be a very close game, I have to go with the Huskies because they’re a better free-throw shooting team.

Prediction: UConn

No. 15 Iona (12-5) vs. No. 2 Alabama (24-6)

The only thing intriguing about this matchup is that Rick Pitino is coaching Iona. I wouldn’t completely sleep on the Gaels, but I don’t think they’re good enough to upset Alabama.

Prediction: Alabama

Baylor Bears guard Davion Mitchell (45) celebrates with guard MaCio Teague (31) after scoring against the Kansas State Wildcats during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 2

No. 16 Hartford (15-8) vs. No. 1 Baylor (22-2)

This is Hartford’s first trip to the Division I NCAA tournament, but I think it’ll be a quick one. The Hawks aren’t a good enough offensive team to keep up with Baylor.

Prediction: Baylor

No. 9 Wisconsin (17-12) vs. No. 8 North Carolina (18-10)

Both of these teams are very similar because they’re great on the defensive end. So, this game will likely be decided by which team can shoot the ball better, and I give Wisconsin that advantage. The Badgers are more efficient on offense, a much better 3-point shooting team, and take care of the ball better than North Carolina. Wisconsin isn’t entering the tournament on the highest note, but I still like it to advance.

Prediction: Wisconsin

No. 12 Winthrop (23-1) vs. No. 5 Villanova (16-6)

This is another 5 vs. 12 matchup that I think will end in an upset. The Wildcats hobbled into the postseason – losers of four of their last seven games, and three of their last four. Villanova has also had some key injuries. Winthrop feels like an underseeded team. The Eagles rank in the top 40 in the country in offensive and defensive efficiency. I also think they’re catching the Wildcats at the right time.

Prediction: Winthrop

No. 13 North Texas (17-9) vs. No. 4 Purdue (18-9)

I think Matt Painter is a good enough coach to trust in the postseason. The Boilermakers can also win in a variety of different ways, which will make things difficult for North Texas to pull off the upset. I just don’t think the Mean Green have what it takes offensively to knock off Purdue.

Prediction: Purdue

No. 11 Utah State (20-8) vs. No. 6 Texas Tech (17-10)

Texas Tech has one of the best pure scorers in the tournament in Mac McClung. Utah State has been a great defensive team all season, but I think the Aggies will have their hands full defending McClung. I respect Chris Beard a lot as a head coach, too. I like the Red Raiders to move on.

Prediction: Texas Tech

No. 14 Colgate (14-1) vs. No. 3 Arkansas (22-6)

I seriously flirted with Colgate to win this game. The Raiders are one of the best offensive teams in the country, but I’m just not sure how good they really are because they’ve only played 15 games against seven or eight opponents. I think Arkansas is a very well-coached team under Eric Musselman. The Razorbacks also do a very good job at forcing turnovers – averaging 15.3 per game. I’ll take Arkansas to escape with a win.

Prediction: Arkansas

No. 10 Virginia Tech (15-6) vs. No. 7 Florida (14-9)

I don’t really like the position Virginia Tech is in right now. Due to COVID-19 outbreaks, the Hokies have played just three games since the beginning of February. I don’t think they’re ready for the NCAA tournament. I have a hard time trusting Florida because it’s been pretty inconsistent this season. However, someone has to win this game and I just think the Gators are more prepared to get the win.

Prediction: Florida

No. 15 Oral Roberts (16-10) vs. No. 2 Ohio State (21-9)

Oral Roberts has the ability to put up points, but it’s going to need to play good defense to pull off the upset against Ohio State. The Golden Eagles allow 75.8 points per game and rank No. 281 in defensive efficiency. I expect the Buckeyes to win this game easily.

Prediction: Ohio State

The Illinois Fighting Illini celebrate their 91-88 victory over the Ohio State Buckeyes after the Big Ten Tournament title game Sunday, March 14, 2021, at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. Mandatory credit: The Indianapolis Star.

Regional No. 3

No. 16 Drexel (12-7) vs. No. 1 Illinois (23-6)

Drexel enters the NCAA tournament on a hot streak, but I don’t think it’ll be able to knock off Illinois. The Fighting Illini are really good on both ends of the court and Brad Underwood might be the most underrated head coach in the country.

Prediction: Illinois

No. 9 Georgia Tech (17-8) vs. No. 8 Loyola Chicago (24-4)

I usually like picking teams that got hot and won their conference tournament, especially at the larger schools, but I think this is a bad matchup for Georgia Tech. I think Loyola Chicago is going to be a dangerous team. In terms of efficiency, the Ramblers are very good on both ends of the court and rank No. 9 in KenPom’s power rankings. I like them to move on.

Prediction: Loyola Chicago

No. 12 Oregon State (17-12) vs. No. 5 Tennessee (18-8)

Again, I’m kind of going against what I usually like to do. Oregon State has been a great story, but I think the Beavers’ run ends here. Tennessee is a pretty good offensive team, but it’s also great defensively. I think Oregon State will have a difficult time scoring against the Volunteers, who allow just 63.2 points per game. Tennessee also has the coaching advantage with Rick Barnes.

Prediction: Tennessee

No. 13 Liberty (23-5) vs. No. 4 Oklahoma State (20-8)

Oklahoma State is entering the tournament as one of the hottest teams in the country – winners of 11 of its last 15 games, and eight of its last 10. The Cowboys are loaded with talent, including the likely future No. 1 pick Cade Cunningham.

Prediction: Oklahoma State

No. 11 Syracuse (16-9) vs. No. 6 San Diego State (23-4)

It’s so hard to pick against a Hall of Fame head coach like Jim Boeheim. However, I just can’t put much trust in Syracuse. The Orange have been too inconsistent this season. I’m also not sure Syracuse is a good enough offensive team to overcome San Diego State’s stout defense, which allows just 60.6 points per game. The Aztecs also enter the tournament on a 14-game win streak and I think that has to count for something.

Prediction: San Diego State

No. 14 Morehead State (23-7) vs. No. 3 West Virginia (18-9)

I don’t think Morehead State is a good enough offensive team to pull off an upset in this matchup – averaging just 68.8 points per game and ranking No. 181 in offensive efficiency. I think the Mountaineers have flaws, but I think they should win fairly comfortably.

Prediction: West Virginia

No. 10 Rutgers (15-11) vs. No. 7 Clemson (16-7)

I was originally going to pick Clemson, but I’m not sure the Tigers are a good enough offensive team to win this game. They don’t shoot the ball particularly well – ranking No. 240 in the country in field-goal percentage. Rutgers is a good defensive team and does a very good job of taking care of the ball. I’ll take the Scarlet Knights.

Prediction: Rutgers

No. 15 Cleveland State (19-7) vs. No. 2 Houston (24-3)

Cleveland State just doesn’t match up well with Houston. The Vikings aren’t great on the offensive end – averaging just 71.5 points per game. That won’t be good enough to upset the Cougars, who rank No. 4 in the country in defensive efficiency and allow just 57.9 points per game.

Prediction: Houston

Round of 32:

The Southern California Trojans sideline cheers after a shot by guard Amar Ross (55) during the second half against the Stanford Cardinals at Galen Center. Mandatory Credit: Kelvin Kuo-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 1

No. 8 Oklahoma vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

I respect Kruger a lot, but I’m just not sure Oklahoma has what it takes right now to knock off Gonzaga. The Sooners just aren’t playing well enough to win this game, but I expect them to put up a tough fight. I have to go with the Bulldogs, though.

Prediction: Gonzaga

No. 12 UC Santa Barbara vs. No. 4 Virginia

I’m going to have to go with Virginia in this one. The Cavaliers have the coaching advantage with Bennett, which I think is huge when it comes to these games in the tournament after just one day of preparation. UC Santa Barbara is a very good defensive team, but Virginia has the ability to counter it because it shoots the ball pretty well.

Prediction: Virginia

No. 6 USC vs. No. 3 Kansas

I’m really not crazy about picking Kansas this year. The Jayhawks were rolling going into the Big 12 tournament, but they now have personnel question marks. I’m just not sure what to expect from Kansas. I actually think USC can go toe-to-toe with Kansas’ athleticism. The Trojans also shoot the ball well – shooting 46.7% from the field and 34.7% from 3-point territory – and rank in the top 50 in the country in both offensive and defensive efficiency.

Prediction: USC

No. 7 Oregon vs. No. 2 Iowa

I do think Oregon can give Iowa some fits. The Hawkeyes really struggle at defending 3-pointers and the Ducks are an excellent 3-point shooting team. Since both of these teams can shoot the ball well, this game will likely come down to turnovers. Iowa is one of the best teams in the country at taking care of the basketball and Oregon isn’t exactly terrific at forcing turnovers. I like the Hawkeyes to squeak out the win.

Prediction: Iowa

Colorado Buffaloes guard D’Shawn Schwartz (5) celebrates the win over the against the UCLA Bruins at the CU Events Center. Mandatory Credit: Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 4

No. 8 LSU vs. No. 1 Michigan

I wouldn’t be surprised if LSU makes this a very competitive game, or even pulls off the upset. Michigan is a very good offensive team, though – ranking in the top 35 in the country in offensive efficiency, field goal percentage, 3-point field goal percentage, and turnovers per game. LSU has struggled on the defensive end this season – allowing 75.3 points per game and ranking No. 225 in efficiency. I think the Wolverines should be able to get the win.

Prediction: Michigan

No. 5 Colorado vs. No. 4 Florida State

I don’t think Colorado is as athletic, nor shoots the ball as well, as Florida State, but I actually like the Buffaloes in this game. They’re very good in some areas that I think get overlooked. Colorado is the one of the top free-throw shooting teams in the country, it takes care of the ball, and is also a very good defensive team – allowing just 63.3 points per game. I think this is a tough matchup for the Seminoles.

Prediction: Colorado

No. 11 UCLA vs. No. 3 Texas

I find it hard to pick against Texas right now. The Longhorns are hot – winners of five games in a row, including winning the Big 12 tournament. The Longhorns have the ability to make shots and I’m just not sure UCLA will be able to keep up. I expect Cronin to have to have the Bruins ready to play, but I just think Texas has more athletes. The Longhorns should be able to advance.

Prediction: Texas

No. 7 UConn vs. No. 2 Alabama

I actually think UConn could make this a tough game for Alabama. The Crimson Tide are going to shoot a lot of 3-pointers – leading the country in 3-point attempts – and the Huskies actually defend 3-pointers pretty well. However, I think UConn also has to make shots to beat Alabama, which is struggled to do in the regular season. I’ll take the Crimson Tide to escape with a win and move on.

Prediction: Alabama

Texas Tech Red Raiders head coach Chris Beard reacts after a play against the Texas Longhorns during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 2

No. 9 Wisconsin vs. No. 1 Baylor

Wisconsin has had a hard time defending 3-pointers this season – allowing teams to shoot 33% from deep. Baylor is the best 3-point shooting team in the country – shooting 41.8% from 3-point territory. I think this is a tough matchup for the Badgers. I like the Bears to move on.

Prediction: Baylor

No. 12 Winthrop vs. No. 4 Purdue

As good of an offensive team as Winthrop is, I have to go with Purdue to win this game. I think the Boilermakers are the better defensive team, especially when it comes to defending 3-pointers. They also have one of the tallest lineups in the country, which will help out-rebound the Eagles.

Prediction: Purdue

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 3 Arkansas

I think Texas Tech is going to pull off the upset in this game. Arkansas forces a lot of turnovers, but the Red Raiders are one of the best in the country when it comes to taking care of the basketball – ranking No. 4 in the country in turnover margin. Texas Tech is also a good offensive rebounding team, which could pose problems for the Razorbacks.

Prediction: Texas Tech

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 2 Ohio State

Florida has been too inconsistent this season for me to pick an upset. Ohio State has been the superior team all season and I have no reason to believe it won’t be able to win this game. The Buckeyes are a very good offensive team and I think the Gators will have a hard time defending them.

Prediction: Ohio State

Oklahoma State Cowboys guard Cade Cunningham (2) shoots against Texas Longhorns guard Matt Coleman III (2) during the first half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 3

No. 8 Loyola Chicago vs. No. 1 Illinois

I’d flirt with an upset here if I wasn’t so high on Illinois. Even though the Ramblers are one of the best defensive teams in this tournament, I think the Fighting Illini will be able to score points. Illinois ranks in the top 30 in the country in both field-goal and 3-point field-goal percentage.

Prediction: Illinois

No. 5 Tennessee vs. No. 4 Oklahoma State

Tennessee is a very good defensive team, but I think it’s going to have a very hard time defending Oklahoma State’s offensive attack, which has been averaging 80.3 points in its last eight games. I think the Cowboys are the better team right now and I like them to advance.

Prediction: Oklahoma State

No. 6 San Diego State vs. No. 3 West Virginia

Maybe I’ve seen WVU play too many times, but I’m tempted to pick San Diego State. However, the best way to beat the Aztecs is to take care of the basketball and convert on 3-point attempts. The Mountaineers rank in the 100 in the country in both of those categories.

Prediction: West Virginia

No. 10 Rutgers vs. No. 2 Houston

These are two very good defensive teams, but I have to give the advantage to Houston. The Cougars rank in the top five in both offensive and defensive efficiency. I just don’t think Rutgers have the shooting ability to score enough points on Houston’s defense.

Prediction: Houston

Sweet 16:

Iowa Hawkeyes center Luka Garza (55) reacts to the crowd after making a shot against the Illinois Fighting Illini in the first half at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Aaron Doster-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 1

No. 4 Virginia vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

There’s no way I can pick against Gonzaga in this matchup. I don’t think Virginia is quite good enough on either side of the court in order to pull off the upset. The Bulldogs are loaded with scoring threats and I think the Cavaliers are going to have a hard time defensively.

Prediction: Gonzaga

No. 6 USC vs. No. 2 Iowa

Iowa is probably going to have to get scoring from other players not named Garza in this matchup, because USC has the size underneath to limit Garza’s scoring production. While I think the Trojans could make this a game, I’m not sure their 3-point defense is good enough. The Hawkeyes shoot the ball very well from 3-point territory and USC ranks No. 210 in the country when it comes to defending 3-pointers.

Prediction: Iowa

Texas Longhorns guard Matt Coleman III (2) celebrates with guard Courtney Ramey (3) and guard Jase Febres (13) after winning the Big 12 Conference Tournament Championship against the Oklahoma State Cowboys at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 4

No. 5 Colorado vs. No. 1 Michigan

I’m just not sure Colorado is quite good enough on the offensive end of the court to upset Michigan. The Wolverines have the ability to consistently make shots – ranking in the top 25 in both field goal and 3-point percentage. Michigan also does a very good job of taking care of the basketball. I think this is going to be a very tough matchup for the Buffaloes to win.

Prediction: Michigan

No. 3 Texas vs. No. 2 Alabama

I think Texas matches up pretty well with Alabama because the Longhorns defend 3-pointers pretty well. However, the Crimson Tide take care of the ball a little better than Texas and force a lot of turnovers, whereas the Longhorns are bad in both of those categories. The Crimson Tide are also better at grabbing offensive rebounds and free throw shooting, and have the better head coach in Nate Oats. This feels like a game Alabama will be able to win.

Prediction: Alabama

Illinois Fighting Illini forward Giorgi Bezhanishvili (15) defends against Ohio State Buckeyes forward E.J. Liddell (32) in the first half at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Aaron Doster-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 2

No. 4 Purdue vs. No. 1 Baylor

I think Purdue certainly has the capability to upset Baylor. The Boilermakers are pretty good at defending 3-pointers and have a variety of ways to score baskets. I have a hard time picking against the Bears, though. They shoot the ball just a little bit better than Purdue, which I think will be the difference maker. I do think the Boilermakers will make this a very difficult game for the Bears to win.

Prediction: Baylor

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 2 Ohio State

This is where I see Texas Tech’s run ending. Eventually, I think the Red Raiders’ 3-point defense, which ranks No. 252 in the country, will come back to haunt them. Ohio State is a pretty good 3-point shooting team – averaging 36.4% from deep. I’m sure Beard will keep this a competitive game, but Texas Tech just doesn’t seem to match up. I like the Buckeyes to get the win in this matchup.

Prediction: Ohio State

West Virginia Mountaineers forward Emmitt Matthews Jr. (11) dunks the ball during the second half against the Baylor Bears at WVU Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Ben Queen-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 3

No. 4 Oklahoma State vs. No. 1 Illinois

This will be a very entertaining game. I’d be very interested to watch Underwood against his former school. If Oklahoma State was in any other bracket, I’d probably take it to make it to the Elite 8. As I’ve said before, though, I’m very high on Illinois. The Fighting Illini have the ability to outshoot Oklahoma State’s offense.

Prediction: Illinois

No. 3 West Virginia vs. No. 2 Houston

Everything in this game seems to give the advantage to Houston. Statistically, the Cougars are a better defensive team, shoot the ball a little better, grab more rebounds, make more free throws than WVU. As much as I love Bob Huggins and the Mountaineers, I think this will be a very difficult matchup for them to win. I’m not super confident in it, but I’ll take Houston to advance.

Prediction: Houston

Elite Eight:

Gonzaga Bulldogs forward Drew Timme (2) celebrates teammate Gonzaga Bulldogs guard Aaron Cook (4) three pointer against the Loyola Marymount Lions in the second half at McCarthey Athletic Center. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 1

No. 2 Iowa vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

Iowa has been too inconsistent on the defensive end this season. I think the Hawkeyes are plenty capable of defeating Gonzaga, but I just don’t see it happening. The Bulldogs have so much scoring depth, with four different players scoring at least 25 points this season. Gonzaga also has the length down low to defend Garza and prevent him from making a huge impact. I like the Bulldogs to get back to the Final Four.

Prediction: Gonzaga

Alabama Crimson Tide forward Herbert Jones (1) during the second half against Georgia Bulldogs at Coleman Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Marvin Gentry-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 4

No. 2 Alabama vs. No. 1 Michigan

I think Michigan is good enough to make it this far in the tournament without its second-leading scorer, Isaiah Livers. I think this is the end of the road for the Wolverines, though. I just think it’s going to be hard to get to the Final Four without Livers. Not only that, but Michigan doesn’t defend the 3-ball all that well – allowing teams to convert on 3-pointers 33% of the time. I think Oats is going to exploit that matchup as the Crimson Tide get to the Final Four for the first time in program history.

Prediction: Alabama

Baylor Bears guard Jared Butler (12) runs the offense against the Kansas State Wildcats during the second half at Ferrell Center. Mandatory Credit: Raymond Carlin III-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 2

No. 2 Ohio State vs. No. 1 Baylor

Ohio State doesn’t match up that well with Baylor. The Buckeyes have struggled defending 3-pointers this season – allowing teams to shoot 34% from deep. I think Baylor will be able to make 3-pointers at will against the Buckeyes. The Bears will also probably have the best player on the court in this game with Jared Butler. They ought to be able to make an appearance in the Final Four for the first time since 1950.

Prediction: Baylor

Illinois Fighting Illini forward Giorgi Bezhanishvili (15) reacts to making a basket while being fouled as guard Da’Monte Williams (20) celebrates in the game against the Ohio State Buckeyes in the second half at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Aaron Doster-USA TODAY Sports

Regional No. 3

No. 2 Houston vs. No. 1 Illinois

Houston’s defense has been spectacular this season, but Illinois has the star power to score on the Cougars. The Fighting Illini are very good offensively – shooting 49.8% from the field and 37.6% from 3-point from beyond the arc – and should be able to make shots against Houston’s defense. I’m very high on the Fighting Illini and I like them to punch their ticket to the Final Four.

Prediction: Illinois

Final Four:

No. 2 Alabama vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

I do think Alabama can go toe-to-toe with Gonzaga in terms of scoring, but the Bulldogs should be able to win. First of all, I think the Crimson Tide’s luck with the 3-ball is going to run out at some point in this tournament. Teams have to win in other ways in order to win it all and I’m just not sure that Alabama can do it. The Bulldogs are better at shooting the ball from all over the court, and can even rebound the ball better than the Crimson Tide. I have to pick Gonzaga.

Prediction: Gonzaga

No. 1 Illinois vs. No. 1 Baylor

These two teams played in the regular season and it ended with Baylor winning by 13 points. I think Illinois is the better team this time around – winners of 15 of its last 16 games against a very tough Big Ten conference schedule. The Fighting Illini are playing their best basketball and will be ready to play against Baylor. Give him almost a full week to prepare and I think Brad Underwood will be able to dial up a better game plan than Scott Drew.

Prediction: Illinois

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball National Championship Trophy. Mandatory credit: Getty Images.

National Championship:

No. 1 Illinois vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

I think we’re going to have two teams compete for a chance to win their first national championship this year. I’ve never been a huge believer that a school like Gonzaga can win a national title, though, because the Bulldogs practically sleep walk through the weak West Coast Conference. That kind of mentality won’t work in the NCAA tournament. For whatever reason, I don’t think Gonzaga is going to win it all this season. So, essentially by default, I have to pick Illinois to win it all. I think Illinois is just as good of a team as Gonzaga, and it’s also battle-tested after facing a tough Big Ten conference schedule this season. The Fighting Illini are playing like the best team in the country right now. They have the head coach in Underwood and the star players like Ayo Dosunmu and Kofi Cockburn to get it done. I really like Illinois to cut down the nets.

Prediction: Illinois

Thanks for reading

Shane Price
Follow me on Twitter – @priceisright53

NFL week 2 picks

Movie Quote of the Day:

“You wasted $150,000 on an education you could’ve got for $1.50 in late fees at the library.”

– Will Hunting, Good Will Hunting (1997)

I didn’t have a great record last week. I was surprised with a couple of upsets. Philadelphia let me down in their game, but they still almost pulled off the win. Same with Minnesota, they looked really bad. I’ll give credit to San Fracisco though, they looked a lot better than I thought they’d be. Buffalo surprised me too, I expected Indianapolis to struggle, but I thought they’d be able to make plays to stay in the game.

Week one record: 9-7 (56.2 percent)
All-time record: 9-7 (56.2 percent)

Tonight:

Chiefs quarterback Alex Smith.

Chiefs quarterback Alex Smith.

Denver (1-0) vs. Kansas City (1-0)
Arrowhead Stadium
Kansas City, Mo.
Line: KC -3

Denver didn’t look impressive last week against Baltimore. If it weren’t for the Broncos’ defense they wouldn’t have won the game. Kansas City looked really good against Houston last week. They straight up dominated them from start to finish. Like I’ve already said in recent posts, I think Peyton Manning’s days are done. Arrowhead Stadium is a hostile environment, it could get ugly for Denver. I like the home team.

Prediction: Chiefs 28, Broncos 20

Sunday:

Carolina quarterback Cam Newton.

Carolina quarterback Cam Newton.

Houston (0-1) vs. Carolina (1-0)
Bank of America Stadium
Charlotte, N.C.
Line: CAR -3

The scoreboard didn’t show it, but Houston was dominated by Kansas City last week. Carolina beat Jacksonville comfortably, but wasn’t impressive. Both of these teams have their struggles on offense, but have stout defenses. It’s all about the quarterback in today’s NFL, and Cam Newton is a pretty good one. Whoever is the starting quarterback for Houston, I can’t see them making more plays than Cam Newton. I think this will be a low-scoring game, but I like Carolina.

Prediction: Panthers 20, Texans 17

San Francisco running back Carlos Hyde.

San Francisco running back Carlos Hyde.

San Francisco (1-0) vs. Pittsburgh (0-1)
Heinz Field
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Line: PIT -6

San Francisco didn’t look as bad as I thought they’d be, but Minnesota looked really bad against them. Pittsburgh’s defense looked awful against New England. The Steelers will be without running back Le’Veon Bell for another week, but DeAngelo Williams filled in fine for him against New England. Pittsburgh’s offense is a lot better than Minnesota’s, I think the 49ers will have their hands full trying to slow down the Steelers’ offense. I think Pittsburgh will be ready to play this game after a letdown last week.

Prediction: Steelers 35, 49ers 24

New Orleans quarterback Drew Brees.

New Orleans quarterback Drew Brees.

Tampa Bay (0-1) vs. New Orleans (0-1)
Mercedes-Benz Superdome
New Orleans, La.
Line: NO -11

Tampa Bay looked like they were still the worst team in the NFL last week. New Orleans played well against a pretty good Arizona team, and came close to beating them. Marcus Mariota torched Tampa Bay’s defense, and I think Drew Brees ought to do the same at home. I think New Orleans will win comfortably.

Prediction: Saints 34, Buccaneers 14

Minnesota running back Adrian Peterson.

Minnesota running back Adrian Peterson.

Detroit (0-1) vs. Minnesota (0-1)
TCF Bank Stadium
Minneapolis, Minn.
Line: MIN -2.5

Both teams weren’t impressive in their season openers, particularly Minnesota. Detroit gave up a ton of yards to San Diego’s offense. Minnesota just looked bad on all sides of the football. I expect Minnesota to play better at home, but I think they still have a long way to go. Detroit’s defense struggled against the San Diego, but I still like them to get the win on the road.

Prediction: Lions 23, Vikings 17

Chicago quarterback Jay Cutler.

Chicago quarterback Jay Cutler.

Arizona (1-0) vs. Chicago (0-1)
Soldier Field
Chicago, Ill.
Line: ARI -2

Arizona looked like the team that I expected for this season. The Cardinals are well-coached and have a pretty good defense. Chicago looked much improved, but they’re still not a very good team. They’re particularly still bad on defense. I think this game could get more out of hand because Arizona has a much better defense than Green Bay and will be able to get more stops. I expect Arizona to get a road win.

Prediction: Cardinals 27, Bears 17

Buffalo quarterback Tyrod Taylor.

Buffalo quarterback Tyrod Taylor.

New England (1-0) vs. Buffalo (1-0)
Ralph Wilson Stadium
Buffalo, N.Y.
Line: Even

New England was another team that looked the way I expected them to play. They were pretty good on offense, but struggled at times on defense. Buffalo impressed me in their win against Indianapolis, they looked really good. Buffalo is a crazy place to play, that Bills defense is something special. I think Buffalo’s defense will make it difficult for Brady. I like the Bills.

Prediction: Bills 24, Patriots 21

Cincinnati tight end Tyler Eifert.

Cincinnati tight end Tyler Eifert.

San Diego (1-0) vs. Cincinnati (1-0)
Paul Brown Stadium
Cincinnati, Ohio
Line: CIN -3

San Diego impressed me in their win because they came back from a 21-3 deficit to win their game against Detroit. Cincinnati looked a lot better than I thought they’d be. Cincinnati’s defense could pose trouble for San Diego’s average offensive line. I don’t like a west coast team traveling to the east coast to play a game. I like Cincinnati to get the win.

Prediction: Bengals 27, Chargers 21

Tennessee quarterback Marcus Mariota.

Tennessee quarterback Marcus Mariota.

Tennessee (1-0) vs. Cleveland (0-1)
FirstEnergy Stadium
Cleveland, Ohio
Line: Even

Tennessee looked awesome against Tampa Bay, especially quarterback Marcus Mariota. They dominated Tampa Bay in every aspect of the game. Cleveland still looks like a normal Cleveland team, they were abysmal last week. I’m looking forward to seeing what Mariota does in his second start, he set quite the bar last week. I think Tennessee wins this game because they have the better coach and quarterback.

Prediction: Titans 24, Browns 13

Giants quarterback Eli Manning.

Giants quarterback Eli Manning.

Atlanta (1-0) vs. New York (0-1)
MetLife Stadium
East Rutherford, N.J.
Line: NYG -2.5

Atlanta looked like a Super Bowl contender in that first half against Philadelphia on Monday night. However, Philadelphia started to figure out how their weaknesses and the Falcons didn’t look near the same in the second half. New York almost escaped Dallas with a win, but poor clock management prevented that from happening. I think Atlanta will struggle on the road, and I think the Giants will play angry after that loss last week. It’ll be a close game though.

Prediction: Giants 26, Falcons 23

St. Louis quarterback Nick Foles.

St. Louis quarterback Nick Foles.

St. Louis (1-0) vs. Washington (0-1)
FedEx Field
Landover, Md.
Line: STL -3.5

St. Louis impressed me against Seattle, they were the better team that day. Washington looked improved, but they blew a lead at home. I’m curious to see if St. Louis comes out flat on the road after an emotional home win. St. Louis is a better coached team than Washington and they have the better defense. Like I’ve said before, I’m not a believer in Jay Gruden as a NFL coach. I think Washington will make it difficult, but St. Louis gets the road win.

Prediction: Rams 21, Redskins 17

Miami wide receiver Jarvis Landry.

Miami wide receiver Jarvis Landry.

Miami (1-0) vs. Jacksonville (0-1)
EverBank Stadium
Jacksonville, Fla.
Line: MIA -7

Miami disappointed me a little bit last week, but they battled back and got a nice road win. Jacksonville was about what I expected. I think both teams will roughly play the same as they did last week. I expect Miami’s defensive line to make it difficult for Jacksonville’s offensive line. I really like Miami’s offense and I expect them to score points. I think Jacksonville makes it difficult for Miami, but I think Miami pulls away in the second half.

Prediction: Dolphins 23, Jaguars 14

Oakland linebacker Khalil Mack.

Oakland linebacker Khalil Mack.

Baltimore (0-1) vs. Oakland (0-1)
O.co Coliseum
Oakland, Calif.
Line: BAL -7

Baltimore struggled on the road against Denver last week, which is uncharacteristic of this Ravens team. They usually play very well on the road. I expected improvement from Oakland, but they still looked awful. Oakland could be without Derek Carr after his hand injury last week. Either way, I don’t think Oakland will win this game. Baltimore will win comfortably.

Prediction: Ravens 27, Raiders 13

Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford.

Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford.

Dallas (1-0) vs. Philadelphia (0-1)
Lincoln Financial Field
Philadelphia, Pa.
Line: PHI -5

Dallas impressed me in their win against New York because they didn’t get very many breaks in the game, yet still won. Philadelphia was the better team against Atlanta, but it took them a half to get it together. Dallas will be without wide receiver Dez Bryant for a few weeks. I think Philadelphia will play well at home, and I think DeMarco Murray will have a big game against his former team. I’ll take the Eagles.

Prediction: Eagles 30, Cowboys 24

Monday:

Indianapolis quarterback Andrew Luck.

Indianapolis quarterback Andrew Luck.

New York (1-0) vs. Indianapolis (0-1)
Lucas Oil Stadium
Indianapolis, Ind.
Line: IND -7.5

New York won easily and looked decent, but Cleveland is awful. Indianapolis struggled against Buffalo on the road. I expect Indianapolis to play better at home. I can’t see Luck getting outplayed by a lesser quarterback in a second consecutive week. I don’t think the Colts defense is any good and that could make it easier for the Jets to score points. I still think the Colts win, but it’ll be close.

Prediction: Colts 27, Jets 23

Game of the Week:

Seattle tight end Jimmy Graham.

Seattle tight end Jimmy Graham.

Seattle (0-1) vs. Green Bay (1-0)
Lambeau Field
Green Bay, Wisc.
Line: GB -3.5

Both of these defenses struggled last week. Seattle gave up 34 points to Nick Foles and St. Louis. Green Bay gave up over 400 yards of offense against Chicago. I’ll give some credit to the Rams and the Bears, they were improved from where they were a season ago. I could go either way for this game. I think Green Bay is going to be hungry to beat Seattle after the NFC Championship. I don’t think this Seattle team has the right mindset right now. However, Green Bay gave up over 150 yards rushing to Matt Forte last week. I think Marshawn Lynch has a field day against Green Bay’s defense, especially now that Green Bay’s starting inside linebacker Sam Barrington is done for the year. I can’t bring myself to pick Green Bay, I think Seattle gets back on track.

Prediction: Seahawks 31, Packers 30

Thanks for reading

Shane Price
Follow me on Twitter – @priceisright53