2024 NCAA Tournament predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“The visions are clear now. I see possible futures, all at once. Our enemies are all around us, and in so many futures they prevail. But I do see a way, there is a narrow way through.”

— Paul Atreides, “Dune: Part Two” (2024)

It’s time to fill out brackets because March Madness is here. I won’t lie, I haven’t paid much attention to the college basketball regular season. That means that I’m either going to do horribly or get almost every pick correct. I’ve been cramming in research the last 40(ish) hours since the bracket was revealed Sunday. I now wish that my West Virginia Mountaineers had given me a reason to care about this college basketball season.

Two years ago was the worst I’ve ever done when it comes to predicting the NCAA Tournament. I lost two Final Four teams, including my national champion, on the first day of the tournament. I was a little better last year, but still wasn’t great thanks to Arizona and Purdue letting me down on, you guessed it, the first day of the tournament. I feel like my reputation is on the line this year, so I really need a good showing. That’s why I relied pretty heavily on KenPom rankings.

We saw so many upsets in the conference tournaments last week, which is why this was one of the craziest “on the bubble” debates in years. It certainly feels like we’re in for another very unpredictable NCAA tournament. However, the last two tournaments were two of the craziest that I’ve witnessed in my life. I also think we’re due for a tournament where we see mostly chalk.

As always, March Madness is a welcome sight at this point in the sports calendar. I need something to take my attention away from NFL free agency news, which is pretty dry right now. Keep your head on a swivel these next three weeks. I can already feel my bracket being busted.

Colorado Buffaloes forward Tristan da Silva (23) celebrates with guard K.J. Simpson (2) in the first half against the California Golden Bears at the CU Events Center. Mandatory Credit: Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

First Four — Dayton, Ohio

No. 16 Wagner (16-15) vs. No. 16 Howard (18-16)

I’ll give the advantage to Howard in this matchup. The Bison not only rank higher in KenPom rankings, but they’ve won nine of their last 11 games. They also have tournament experience after making an appearance last year. I doubt Wagner, which averages just 63.5 points per game, is good enough offensively to win in the tournament.

Winner: Howard

No. 10 Colorado State (24-10) vs. No. 10 Virginia (23-10)

Mountain West teams haven’t performed well in the tournament for the last decade — posting a record of 12-26 since 2013. However, I think Colorado State is an underseeded team. The Rams rank 31 spots higher than Virginia in KenPom rankings. That’s quite a disparity. The Cavaliers also lost five of their last nine games to end the regular season.

Winner: Colorado State

No. 16 Grambling State (20-14) vs. No. 16 Montana State (17-17)

There’s quite a disparity between these teams when it comes to KenPom rankings. Montana State ranks No. 213, whereas Grambling State ranks No. 267. I’ll give the advantage to to the Bobcats. I’m not convinced that the Tigers are good enough offensively — averaging just 67.6 points per game — to score on Montana State’s defense.

Winner: Montana State

No. 10 Colorado (24-10) vs. No. 10 Boise State (22-10)

Colorado is another team that I think is underseeded. The Buffaloes rank in the top 30 in the country, according to KenPom (Boise State ranks No. 39). They also ended the season on a positive note — winning eight of their last nine games. The Broncos have never won a tournament game in program history and I doubt that changes this year.

Winner: Colorado

Round of 64

Connecticut Huskies guard Tristen Newton (2) drives to the basket against St. John’s Red Storm guard Daniss Jenkins (5) during the second half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 16 Stetson (22-12) vs. No. 1 UConn (31-3) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I have a difficult time seeing UConn getting bounced early in this tournament. The Huskies have too much depth and have been the most consistent team in the country all season. No. 16 seeds have been more competitive against No. 1 seeds in recent years, but I don’t see an upset happening in this matchup. UConn should cruise to the next round.

Winner: UConn

No. 9 Northwestern (21-11) vs. No. 8 Florida Atlantic (25-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic hasn’t been as consistent this season as last season. The Owls are still a very good team, though. They rank in the top 45 in KenPom, and rank in the top 20 in adjusted offensive efficiency. Northwestern will have a very difficult time defensively in this matchup. I also think Florida Atlantic has the coaching advantage in Dusty May.

Winner: Florida Atlantic

No. 12 UAB (22-11) vs. No. 5 San Diego State (24-10) — Spokane, Wash.

We didn’t get a single No. 12 seed to upset a No. 5 seed last year. In the last 20 years, history says to expect at least two upsets the year after that happens. I’m not convinced there will be an upset in this matchup, though. San Diego State is an elite defensive team and UAB isn’t a great offensive team. I think the Blazers will have a difficult time scoring on the Aztecs.

Winner: San Diego State

No. 13 Yale (22-9) vs. No. 4 Auburn (27-7) — Spokane, Wash.

Ivy League schools are always tricky teams in the tournament. This won’t be an easy game for Auburn. I’m still picking the Tigers to win, though. They rank No. 4 in the country in KenPom rankings, so they might be the most underseeded team in this tournament field. Yale isn’t a terrific defensive team, which should bode well for Auburn, which averages 83.2 points per game.

Winner: Auburn

No. 11 Duquesne (24-11) vs. No. 6 BYU (23-10) — Omaha, Neb.

Duquesne is a hot team right now, but I doubt it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. BYU ranks No. 16 in the country, according to KenPom, so it’s a very underseeded team. The Cougars are also one of the top offensive teams in the country — ranking No. 11 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt the Dukes will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: BYU

No. 14 Morehead State (26-8) vs. No. 3 Illinois (26-8) — Omaha, Neb.

The Big Ten tournament champion hasn’t made it past the first weekend of the NCAA tournament since 2019. I wouldn’t be so quick to pick Illinois to win this game given that track record. I’ll still pick the Fighting Illini to win, though. They’ve been playing well since late January — winning 12 of their last 15 games, including seven of their last eight.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake (28-6) vs. No. 7 Washington State (24-9) — Omaha, Neb.

The line of this game has shifted quite a bit in favor of Drake since it opened. I think that’s pretty telling to take the Bulldogs seriously in this matchup. Drake will likely have the best player in this game in Tucker DeVries, who averages 21.8 points per game. I think Washington State’s defense will have its hands full with him. The Bulldogs also have more tournament experience.

Winner: Drake

No. 15 South Dakota State (22-12) vs. No. 2 Iowa State (27-7) — Omaha, Neb.

I can’t bring myself to pick against Iowa State in this matchup. The Cyclones are red hot right now after winning 11 of their last 13 games, including winning three Big 12 tournament games by a combined 61 points. This is one of the weaker South Dakota State teams in the last 15 years. I also expect this to essentially be a home game for Iowa State.

Winner: Iowa State

North Carolina Tar Heels guard R.J. Davis (4) shoots the ball against the North Carolina State Wolfpack during the second half at Capital One Arena. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 16 Howard vs. No. 1 North Carolina (27-7) — Charlotte, N.C.

North Carolina has played like one of the top teams in the country the last few weeks, even though it might be overseeded a bit. The Tar Heels have won 20 of their last 24 games. If not for an NC State team getting hot at the right time, North Carolina probably would’ve won the ACC tournament. I highly doubt Howard is good enough to pull off a historic upset.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 9 Michigan State (19-14) vs. No. 8 Mississippi State (21-13) — Charlotte, N.C.

Mississippi State is playing well right now, but I’ll give the advantage to Michigan State in this matchup. Tom Izzo has been one-and-done just six times in his previous 25 tournament appearances. I also think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time scoring on the Spartans’ defense, which ranks in the top 10 in adjusted defensive efficiency.

Winner: Michigan State

No. 12 Grand Canyon (29-4) vs. No. 5 Saint Mary’s (26-7) — Spokane, Wash.

I think this is the mostly likely 5/12 matchup to end in an upset. Grand Canyon is the highest ranking No. 12 seed in KenPom (No. 53). The Antelopes have lost only four games all season and they have a head coach with plenty of tournament experience in Bryce Drew. Saint Mary’s is one of those teams that I never trust in the tournament and I won’t start now.

Winner: Grand Canyon

No. 13 Charleston (27-7) vs. No. 4 Alabama (21-11) — Spokane, Wash.

Alabama didn’t end the regular season on a positive note — losing four of its last six games. I wouldn’t rule out a potential upset in this matchup, but I don’t see it happening. Charleston is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. You have to be a great defensive team in order to knock off the Crimson Tide, who average 90.8 points per game.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico (26-9) vs. No. 6 Clemson (21-11) — Memphis, Tenn.

I’ve mostly picked against Mountain West schools so far, but I’ll take the upset here. Clemson isn’t playing well right now. The Tigers have lost four of their last eight games, including two losses to very bad Notre Dame and Boston College teams. New Mexico is surging after winning its conference tournament last week. Vegas also favors the Lobos in this matchup.

Winner: New Mexico

No. 14 Colgate (25-9) vs. No. 3 Baylor (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

Even though Colgate will be making its fourth-consecutive tournament appearance, I don’t take it that seriously. The Raiders have been outscored by a combined 44 points during that stretch. Baylor is one of the top offensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt Colgate will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada (26-7) vs. No. 7 Dayton (24-7) — Salt Lake City

I feel an upset brewing in this matchup. Dayton has to make a long trip west despite being the higher seed, which benefits Nevada. The Wolf Pack played well down the stretch — winning 11 of their last 14 games. I think the Flyers have been too inconsistent defensively all season. Nevada also ranks in the top 40 in the country in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency.

Winner: Nevada

No. 15 Long Beach State (21-14) vs. No. 2 Arizona (25-8) — Salt Lake City

I have a difficult time seeing Arizona getting bounced early in back-to-back seasons. The Wildcats shoot the ball very well and rank in the top 20 in the country in offensive rebounds. That ought to bode well in the tournament. Long Beach State is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. I think the Beach will have a difficult time slowing down Arizona’s offense.

Winner: Arizona

Houston Cougars guard L.J. Cryer (4) drives with the ball as Rice Owls guard Alem Huseinovic (23) defends during the second half at Fertitta Center. Mandatory Credit: Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 16 Longwood (21-13) vs. No. 1 Houston (30-4) — Memphis, Tenn.

I fully expect Houston to bounce back after getting blown out in the Big 12 championship. The Cougars are one of the more talented teams in this tournament and are excellent defensively. This is a very bad matchup for Longwood, which ranks near the bottom among tournament teams offensively. Houston shouldn’t have too many issues in this matchup.

Winner: Houston

No. 9 Texas A&M (20-14) vs. No. 8 Nebraska (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

I think this is a terrible matchup for Nebraska. The Cornhuskers rank in the bottom third in the country in offensive rebounds and total rebounds allowed per game. Texas A&M doesn’t shoot the ball that well, but getting second-chance opportunities will only improve its chances of winning. The Aggies are also playing well after winning five of their last six games.

Winner: Texas A&M

No. 12 James Madison (31-3) vs. No. 5 Wisconsin (22-13) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

James Madison poses a lot of problems for Wisconsin. The Dukes rank in the top five in defending 3-pointers. They’ve also won 13 straight games. I’m still picking the Badgers to win, though. They shoot the ball well and take care of the basketball. The difference in the game will likely be which team collects more offensive rebounds, and I give that advantage to Wisconsin.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 13 Vermont (28-6) vs. No. 4 Duke (24-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I’m to the point that I need to see Vermont pull off an upset in the tournament before I pick it to do so. The Catamounts have never advanced past the Round of 64 under head coach John Becker. That’s why I’ll take Duke to win this game. The Blue Devils will have a significant talent advantage, which will likely be the difference in this matchup.

Winner: Duke

No. 11 NC State (22-14) vs. No. 6 Texas Tech (23-10) — Pittsburgh

I think NC State will be gassed after winning five games in five days in the ACC tournament. The Wolfpack now have a quick turnaround and play on Thursday. I think that bodes well for Texas Tech, which KenPom considers to be a top 25 team in the country. The Red Raiders have been the far more consistent team all season. I like them to advance to the next round.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 14 Oakland (23-11) vs. No. 3 Kentucky (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Kentucky has been very inconsistent defensively, but I still expect it to win this game. Oakland isn’t a very good offensive team — ranking in the bottom 15 among tournament teams in adjusted offensive efficiency. I highly doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Wildcats. I expect Kentucky to advance to the Round of 32.

Winner: Kentucky

No. 10 Colorado vs. No. 7 Florida (24-11) — Indianapolis

This is a dangerous matchup for Florida. The Gators aren’t a great defensive team and will be shorthanded, and Colorado is a good offensive team. This will likely be a very high-scoring game, but I’ll still give the advantage to Florida. The Gators are elite offensively — ranking in the top 15 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, points per game, and offensive rebounding.

Winner: Florida

No. 15 Western Kentucky (22-11) vs. No. 2 Marquette (25-9) — Indianapolis

I think this is a very bad matchup for Western Kentucky, which struggles on the offensive end of the court. Marquette is one of the better defensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency. Points will be hard to come by for the Hilltoppers, which will make it incredibly difficult to pull off the upset.

Winner: Marquette

Purdue Boilermakers center Zach Edey (15) shoots the ball while Indiana Hoosiers center Kel’el Ware (1) defends in the second half at Mackey Arena. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 16 Montana State vs. No. 1 Purdue (29-4) — Indianapolis

I highly doubt Purdue will overlook its opponent this year. I fully expect last year’s loss to No. 16-seeded Fairleigh Dickinson to be in the back of its mind. The Boilermakers might have the best player in the tournament in Zach Edey, who averages 24.4 points per game. Like Arizona, I don’t think Purdue will be bounced early in back-to-back seasons.

Winner: Purdue

No. 9 TCU (21-12) vs. No. 8 Utah State (27-6) — Indianapolis

Given the Mountain West’s recent history in the tournament, there’s no way I’m picking against TCU. The Horned Frogs rank 15 spots ahead of Utah State in KenPom rankings, and in the top 50 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, adjusted defensive efficiency, and offensive rebounds. This feels like a very bad matchup for the Aggies.

Winner: TCU

No. 12 McNeese State (30-3) vs. No. 5 Gonzaga (25-7) — Salt Lake City

McNeese State will be a trendy pick because it’s one of the most improved teams in the country from last year, and this isn’t a great Gonzaga team. However, I’m not picking against Mark Few. He hasn’t been eliminated in the Round of 64 since 2008. KenPom also considers Gonzaga to be a top 15 team in the country, so it feels like a very underseeded team.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 13 Samford (29-5) vs. No. 4 Kansas (22-10) — Salt Lake City

I actually came close to picking the upset in this game. Kansas was hobbling at the end of the regular season — losing six of its last 10 games, including back-to-back losses by a combined 50 points. The Jayhawks have also sustained injuries to some of their better players. I still think Kansas has what it takes to beat Samford, which struggles on the defensive end of the court.

Winner: Kansas

No. 11 Oregon (23-11) vs. No. 6 South Carolina (26-7) — Pittsburgh

I’m not doubting Dana Altman in the tournament. He’s never lost in the Round of 64 as Oregon’s head coach. Altman has even made it past the first weekend five times in the last seven tournament appearances with the Ducks. South Carolina has been a good story to get to this point. I just think the Gamecocks are catching Oregon at the wrong time.

Winner: Oregon

No. 14 Akron (24-10) vs. No. 3 Creighton (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Akron managed to win the MAC tournament, but I’m not convinced it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. The Zips have been too inconsistent on both ends of the court all season. Creighton is an excellent offensive team — averaging 80.5 points per game. I have more trust in the Bluejays, who haven’t lost in the Round of 64 since 2018.

Winner: Creighton

No. 10 Colorado State vs. No. 7 Texas (20-12) — Charlotte, N.C.

I think Texas is a better team than what its record would indicate. The Longhorns had bad luck in Big 12 play (losing six games by fewer than 10 points). They should benefit by getting out of conference play. Texas will also have a significant talent advantage in this matchup. Colorado State struggles to defend 3-pointers and the Longhorns rank in the top 60 in 3-point shooting.

Winner: Texas

No. 15 Saint Peter’s (19-13) vs. No. 2 Tennessee (24-8) — Charlotte, N.C.

Don’t be so quick to rule out Saint Peter’s. The Peacocks have caught fire the last few weeks — winning eight of their last 10 games. I expect Tennessee to win this game comfortably, though. The Volunteers are one of the best defensive teams in this tournament. I think Saint Peter’s will have a difficult time scoring enough points to pull off the upset.

Winner: Tennessee

Round of 32

Iowa State Cyclones guard Keshon Gilbert (10) drives around Houston Cougars guard Ramon Walker Jr. (3) during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 8 Florida Atlantic vs. No. 1 UConn — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic’s defense is the main reason why I doubt it can make another deep run like last year. The Owls rank No. 109 in adjusted defensive efficiency. They also allow 10.8 offensive rebounds per game, which puts them in the bottom half of the country. This feels like a mismatch in favor of UConn. The Huskies have plenty of scoring depth and too much size in the post.

Winner: UConn

No. 5 San Diego State vs. No. 4 Auburn — Spokane, Wash.

I actually think Auburn matches up well against San Diego State’s defense. The Tigers shoot the ball well and do a good job collecting offensive rebounds. They also have scoring depth, with six different players averaging at least 7.1 points per game, and 11 different players to play in at least 28 games. I don’t think the Aztecs have the depth to keep up with Auburn.

Winner: Auburn

No. 6 BYU vs. No. 3 Illinois — Omaha, Neb.

This will likely be a difficult matchup for BYU to pull off the upset. Illinois has a lot of depth, with nine different players appearing in at least 24 games, and one of the best guards in the country in Terrence Shannon Jr. The Fighting Illini can also win in a variety of ways, which is always valuable in the tournament. I also think Brad Underwood is a better coach than Mark Pope.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake vs. No. 2 Iowa State — Omaha, Neb.

Having DeVries might be good enough to beat Washington State, but I doubt it’ll be enough to upset Iowa State. The Cyclones are arguably the best defensive team in the country — ranking in the top five in adjusted defensive efficiency and points allowed per game. I think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time winning if DeVries has limited scoring chances.

Winner: Iowa State

Arizona Wildcats guard Caleb Love (2) celebrates against the Southern California Trojans in the second half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 9 Michigan State vs. No. 1 North Carolina — Charlotte, N.C.

I have a ton of respect for Izzo, but this feels like the end of the road for Michigan State. The Spartans have been too inconsistent all season. I don’t think they’re good enough offensively to upset North Carolina, which ranks No. 6 in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Tar Heels are the more talented team, so I expect them to take care of business and advance to the next round.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 12 Grand Canyon vs. No. 4 Alabama — Spokane, Wash.

Grand Canyon might be good enough to upset Saint Mary’s, but I doubt that it can knock off Alabama. The Crimson Tide are one of the best offensive teams in the tournament. The Antelopes aren’t a great defensive team — ranking No. 51 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 106 in 3-point defense. I like Alabama to get to the Sweet 16 for a second-consecutive year.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico vs. No. 3 Baylor — Memphis, Tenn.

New Mexico is a good defensive team, but it’ll have a difficult time defending Baylor’s offense. The Bears rank in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency and 3-point shooting. They’re also a very physical team and do a good job of getting offensive rebounds. That’ll likely be a significant disadvantage for the Lobos. New Mexico ranks No. 153 in offensive rebounds allowed per game.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada vs. No. 2 Arizona — Salt Lake City

I don’t think Nevada is good enough on the glass to upset Arizona. The Wildcats average 13.2 offensive rebounds per game, and the Wolf Pack rank No. 106 in offensive rebounds allowed per game. I don’t think that matchup bodes well for Nevada because Arizona is an elite offensive team. If the Wildcats get second-chance opportunities, I don’t see how they lose this game.

Winner: Arizona

Marquette Golden Eagles head coach Shaka Smart talks to guard Stevie Mitchell (4) as he coaches against the Providence Friars during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 9 Texas A&M vs. No. 1 Houston — Memphis, Tenn.

This is a dangerous matchup for Houston. Texas A&M is one of the hottest teams in the country right now. The Aggies also played the Cougars very tough back in December. I think that’ll be in the back of Kelvin Sampson’s mind, though. Houston is an excellent defensive team — allowing just 57 points per game. I think Texas A&M will have a difficult time making shots.

Winner: Houston

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 4 Duke — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I didn’t like the way that Duke ended the regular season. The Blue Devils lost their last two games, including a pretty embarrassing loss to North Carolina on their own home court. This is a much different Wisconsin team than we’ve seen since the Bo Ryan era. The Badgers rank No. 13 in adjusted offensive efficiency and shoot nearly 35% from 3-point territory.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 3 Kentucky — Pittsburgh

Since 2008, only seven teams ranked outside the top 200 in defensive efficiency made it to the Sweet 16. That doesn’t bode well for Kentucky, which allows 79.7 points per game and 12 offensive rebounds per game. I think Texas Tech is good enough defensively to slow down the Wildcats’ offense. I also don’t have much trust in John Calipari, who hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2019.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 2 Marquette — Indianapolis

I actually think this is a favorable matchup for Florida. Marquette ranks in the bottom half of the country in 3-point defense and offensive rebounds allowed per game. The Gators are so good offensively. They’ll make the Golden Eagles pay if given second-chance opportunities. Lastly, I don’t trust Shaka Smart in the tournament. He hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2011.

Winner: Florida

Tennessee Volunteers head coach Rick Barnes during the second half against the South Carolina Gamecocks at Thompson-Boling Arena at Food City Center. Mandatory Credit: Randy Sartin-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 9 TCU vs. No. 1 Purdue — Indianapolis

This could be a problematic matchup for Purdue. TCU wants to speed the game up, whereas Purdue wants to slow the game down. Press defense gave the Boilermakers trouble last year, but they’ve done a better job taking care of the ball this year. Purdue is more experienced in the backcourt this year than it was last year, too. I also don’t have much trust in Jamie Dixon in the tournament.

Winner: Purdue

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 4 Kansas — Salt Lake City

If Kansas was healthy, I’d probably pick the Jayhawks to win this game. I don’t know how effective Kevin McCullar Jr. and Hunter Dickinson will be, even though they’re expected to be available. I’ll give the advantage to Gonzaga. Few has made it to the Sweet 16 in eight straight tournament appearances. Him and the Bulldogs are a safe bet in the first two rounds.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 11 Oregon vs. No. 3 Creighton — Pittsburgh

Creighton should win this game and advance to the next round. Oregon has been too inconsistent on both ends of the court. The Ducks rank No. 70 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 240 in 3-point defense. The Bluejays are one of the top offensive teams in the tournament — averaging 80.5 points per game. I expect Creighton will take advantage of that mismatch.

Winner: Creighton

No. 7 Texas vs. No. 2 Tennessee — Charlotte, N.C.

I’m not looking too much into the way Tennessee performed in the SEC tournament. KenPom has the Volunteers ranked in the top 10, and No. 3 in adjusted defensive efficiency. I think it’ll be difficult for Texas to make shots against in this matchup. The Longhorns have been too inconsistent on the defensive end of the court. I like the Volunteers to advance.

Winner: Tennessee

Sweet 16

Illinois Fighting Illini guard Terrence Shannon Jr. (0) dunks against the Ohio State Buckeyes during the first half at Target Center. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional semifinals — Boston

No. 4 Auburn vs. No. 1 UConn

If Auburn was in the West or Midwest regionals, I’d pick it to get to the Final Four. If any team can knock off UConn before the Elite Eight, I think it’s the Tigers. They match up very well with the Huskies. The problem is that UConn is really good, especially offensively. This will essentially be a home game for UConn, too. With almost a week to prepare, I give the advantage to Dan Hurley.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 2 Iowa State

Since 2000, Iowa State has won the Big 12 tournament five times and advanced to the Elite Eight just once after doing so. The Cyclones typically get up for the Big 12 tournament, but not the big dance. That’s part of the reason why I like Illinois in this matchup. I also think the Fighting Illini’s offense, which averages 84.4 points per game, poses a lot of problems for Iowa State’s defense.

Winner: Illinois

Baylor Bears forward Jalen Bridges (11) reacts after a made basket with guard Ja’Kobe Walter (4) against the TCU Horned Frogs during the first half at Ed and Rae Schollmaier Arena. Mandatory Credit: Raymond Carlin III-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional semifinals — Los Angeles

No. 4 Alabama vs. No. 1 North Carolina

As always, my biggest concern with Alabama is its defense. The Crimson Tide are one of the worst defensive teams in the tournament — ranking No. 112 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allowing 81.1 points per game. That’s not good enough. North Carolina is one of the top defensive teams in the country and I think it’ll be able to slow down Alabama’s offense.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 2 Arizona

I’ve been burned by Arizona too many times over the years. At this point, I need to see the Wildcats make a deep tournament run before I predict them to do so. I think Baylor poses trouble for Arizona. The Bears are a very good offensive team and won’t be afraid of Arizona’s size. With almost a week to prepare, I’ll give the advantage to the better head coach in Scott Drew.

Winner: Baylor

Texas Tech Red Raiders head coach Grant McCasland reacts during the second half against the Iowa State Cyclones at James H. Hilton Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Reese Strickland-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional semifinals — Dallas

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 1 Houston

Wisconsin is a great offensive team, but scoring points on Houston’s defense will be a tall order. The Cougars rank in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency, points allowed per game, 3-point defense, and turnovers forced. Houston will also have a significant talent advantage. A lot of things will have to break the Badgers’ way in order to pull off the upset.

Winner: Houston

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 6 Texas Tech

I think this matchup favors Texas Tech. Florida’s porous defense, which ranks No. 83 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allows 78.5 points per game, will likely prevent it from getting past the Sweet 16. The Red Raiders are solid offensive team and should be able to make shots against the Gators. I also think Grant McCasland is an ascending head coach, which benefits Texas Tech.

Winner: Texas Tech

Gonzaga Bulldogs head coach Mark Few looks on against the Santa Clara Broncos in the second half at McCarthey Athletic Center. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional semifinals — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 1 Purdue

This might be the weakest Gonzaga team that we’ve seen in recent years, but I’ll still take the upset. The Bulldogs have the coaching advantage with Few, who’ll have almost a week to prepare for this game. I also don’t trust Matt Painter and Purdue. The Boilermakers have made it to the Elite Eight just once in the previous 14 tournament appearances under Painter.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 2 Tennessee

Death, taxes, and Rick Barnes not getting past the Sweet 16. I just don’t trust Tennessee to make a deep tournament run, even though it’s an excellent defensive team. Creighton shoots the ball well, takes care of the ball, and should get second-chance opportunities against Tennessee. I think the Bluejays get back to the Elite 8 for a second-consecutive season.

Winner: Creighton

Elite Eight

Connecticut Huskies head coach Dan Hurley coaches against the Xavier Musketeers during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional final — Boston

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 1 UConn

I think this is a very favorable matchup for UConn. Illinois has struggled on the defensive end of the court — ranking No. 93 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 236 in 3-point defense. I doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Huskies, who might be the best offensive team in the tournament. The Fighting Illini will have a very difficult time defending UConn.

Winner: UConn

North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis reacts during the second half against the Duke Blue Devils at Cameron Indoor Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Kinnan-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional final — Los Angeles

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 1 North Carolina

Baylor’s inconsistent defense will likely be its downfall in the tournament. The Bears rank No. 64 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 189 in 3-point defense. North Carolina shoots the ball well and is just as aggressive as Baylor on the glass (maybe more so). The Tar Heels are also an elite defensive team. I don’t think they’re getting enough credit from the pundits.

Winner: North Carolina

Houston Cougars guard Jamal Shead (1) brings the ball up court during the first half against the Texas Tech Red Raiders at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional final — Dallas

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 1 Houston

These teams played twice in the regular season and Houston won both meetings by a combined 46 points. I expect the Cougars to win a third meeting. I don’t think Texas Tech has the horses to keep up with Houston. The Cougars might be the most athletic team in the tournament. They also have an experienced backcourt, which they didn’t have last year.

Winner: Houston

Creighton Bluejays guard Baylor Scheierman (55) controls the ball against Villanova Wildcats guard Jordan Longino (15) in the first half at Wells Fargo Center. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Ross-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional final — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 3 Creighton

I’m not crazy about any of the higher seeds in this regional, but one of them is likely going to win it. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll pick Creighton. I think the Bluejays have the least amount of baggage and they showed last year they can make a deep tournament run. Gonzaga’s defense, which has been good but not great, will have a difficult time slowing down Creighton’s offense.

Winner: Creighton

Final Four — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 North Carolina vs. No. 1 UConn

North Carolina is certainly capable of knocking off UConn. The Tar Heels are good enough defensively to contain the Huskies’ offense — holding opponents to shoot just 40.7% from the field and limiting second-chance opportunities. I’m not sure North Carolina is consistent enough offensively, though. I also think UConn has the more complete team and a better head coach.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 1 Houston

I expect Creighton’s run to come to an end in this game. The Bluejays will have a difficult time scoring against Houston’s defense, which holds its opponents to shoot just 37.9% from the field. I don’t know where Creighton’s points will come from if it can’t make shots because it’s not a great offensive rebounding team. I like the Cougars to advance to the national championship.

Winner: Houston

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball National Championship Trophy. Mandatory credit: Getty Images.

National Championship — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 Houston vs. No. 1 UConn

These just feel like the most complete teams in the tournament. They’re both athletic, talented, and well coached. My readers know how much I hate picking defending champions, but I think UConn is a wagon. The Huskies have won 21 of their last 22 games and have shown no sign of slowing down. That’s why I think UConn is the most likely team to defend its title since Florida in 2007.

I also think the Huskies can be effective offensively on Houston’s stout defense. UConn had six different players lead the team in scoring in a game in the regular season, including five different players to score at least 20 points in a game. That typically bodes well in the tournament. The Huskies are also aggressive on the boards and play great defense. I think they cut down the nets again.

Winner: UConn

Contact me

College football coaching carousel grades

Movie quote of the day:

“There’s nothing new in human experience, Mr. Tully. Each generation thinks it invented debauchery or suffering or rebellion, but man’s every impulse and appetite from the disgusting to the sublime is on display right here all around you. So, before you dismiss something as boring or irrelevant, remember, if you truly want to understand the present or yourself, you must begin in the past. You see, history is not simply the study of the past. It is an explanation of the present.”

— Paul Hunham, “The Holdovers” (2023)

Washington Huskies head coach Kalen DeBoer looks on against the Michigan Wolverines during the second quarter in the 2024 College Football Playoff national championship game at NRG Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Thomas Shea-USA TODAY Sports


This has easily been the craziest coaching carousel that I’ve ever witnessed, at both the collegiate and professional levels. I originally planned to publish this post closer to New Year’s Day and the main point that I was going to make was how this phase of conference realignment impacted this coaching carousel. Specifically, with Oregon State head coach Jonathan Smith, who’s also an alumnus of the school, leaving for the Michigan State vacancy. While that’s still a relevant takeaway, the bigger news was Nick Saban’s unexpected retirement.

Saban’s decision to retire shook up the college football landscape, which caused a ripple effect that created several new vacancies across the country. Then you had the ongoing question of whether or not Jim Harbaugh would return to the NFL. Those are the main reasons why this post is coming so much later than it has in the past. Now that Harbaugh is officially back in the NFL and Michigan has replaced him, I feel confident in (finally) publishing this post. I don’t see any reason to expect new vacancies.

This coaching carousel wasn’t only loaded with movement, but I think several schools hired quality coaches. That’s something we didn’t get last year. I’m curious to see how these coaches fare at their new schools these next few years

Washington Huskies head coach Kalen DeBoer runs onto the field for the game against the Michigan State Spartans at Spartan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Dale Young-USA TODAY Sports


Alabama Crimson Tide
Out: Nick Saban
In: Kalen DeBoer

I don’t know if DeBoer will be a good cultural fit at Alabama. He’s primarily coached in the Midwest and along the West Coast. However, DeBoer’s track record is outstanding. He has an overall record of 104-12 (yes, you’re reading that right) and just took Washington to the national championship. DeBoer’s offenses also haven’t ranked lower than No. 42 in scoring since 2018. It’ll be difficult to follow Saban, but I can see him having success.

Grade: A-

San Jose State Spartans head coach Brent Brennan reacts against the Wyoming Cowboys during the second quarter at Jonah Field at War Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Babbitt-USA TODAY Sports


Arizona Wildcats
Out: Jedd Fisch
In: Brent Brennan

This might be my least favorite hire of this coaching carousel. Arizona was heading into the 2024 with a lot of momentum after returning a lot of production from a team that won 10 games, along with the move to the Big 12 in July. Losing Fisch to Washington definitely hurts, but I don’t know if hiring Brennan to replace him is the right move. He’d been at San Jose State for seven years and his best season was during the shortened 2020 season.

Grade: C

Boise State Broncos head coach Spencer Danielson gestures in the second half against the UNLV Rebels during the Mountain West Championship at Allegiant Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports


Boise State Broncos
Out: Andy Avalos
In: Spencer Danielson

The job that Danielson did at Boise State this past season can’t be understated. The Broncos fired Andy Avalos after 10 games and Danielson led them to a fifth Mountain West championship as the interim head coach. Danielson has been at Boise State since 2017 — the last three seasons as defensive coordinator — and helped assemble some pretty good defenses. He also has roots on the West Coast, which will help with recruiting.

Grade: B

New England Patriots offensive coordinator/quarterbacks coach Bill O’Brien directs the office on a drill during training camp at Gillette Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Eric Canha-USA TODAY Sports


Boston College Eagles
Out: Jeff Hafley
In: Bill O’Brien

I realize that I’m in the minority, but I think O’Brien is a good coach. He was a successful head coach in the NFL. His downfall was when he also became the general manager in Houston. Don’t forget that he also had a winning record two seasons as Penn State’s head coach, when the program was coming off the Jerry Sandusky scandal and going through a tumultuous time. O’Brien is from the Boston area, too. I think this a great hire by Boston College.

Grade: B

Penn State Nittany Lions defensive coordinator Manny Diaz walks on the field during the fourth quarter of the Blue White spring game at Beaver Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matthew OHaren-USA TODAY Sports


Duke Blue Devils
Out: Mike Elko
In: Manny Diaz

I understand that Duke isn’t exactly the most attractive football job in the ACC, but this hire leaves a lot to be desired. Diaz doesn’t have a good track record as a head coach. He spent three seasons as the man in charge in Miami between 2019-21, where he posted a record of 21-15. Being from South Florida, I’m also not sure that he’s a good cultural fit for the Blue Devils. Diaz is a respected recruiter and defensive mind, though.

Grade: C+

Tulane Green Wave head coach Willie Fritz reacts to a pass interference call on Tulane Green Wave against the Southern Methodist Mustangs during the second half at Yulman Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports


Houston Cougars
Out: Dana Holgorsen
In: Willie Fritz

Fritz is exactly the type of coach that Houston needs now that it’s made the jump to the Power 5. He has plenty of experience building competitive programs at different levels of college football. Fritz managed to win at least nine games in a season at both Tulane and Georgia Southern, and won two FCS national championships at Sam Houston State. He also has coaching roots in Texas, so that should be beneficial at Houston when it comes to recruiting.

Grade: A-

Holy Cross football coach Bob Chesney talks to the team after a spring game. Mandatory credit: Worcester Telegram


James Madison
Out: Curt Cignetti
In: Bob Chesney

This is a very outside-the-box hire by James Madison. Chesney isn’t even 50 years old yet and has plenty of experience as a head coach. He made the FCS playoffs in four of his six seasons at Holy Cross, and even had success at Assumption and Salve Regina. Chesney has also spent the majority of his coaching career in the Mid-Atlantic and along the East Coast, so he should be familiar with the area in order to bring some talented recruits to the Dukes.

Grade: B+

James Madison Dukes head coach Curt Cignetti walks the sideline during a game against the Appalachian State Mountaineers at Kidd Brewer Stadium. Mandatory Credit: David Yeazell-USA TODAY Sports


Indiana Hoosiers
Out: Tom Allen
In: Curt Cignetti

Considering that Indiana has had just three winning seasons since 2000, I’m not sure it could’ve asked for a better hire than Cignetti. He did an incredible job at James Madison. He won an FCS national championship in 2019, and then won 19 games each of the last two seasons when the program made the jump to the FBS level. Cignetti also had success as a head coach at both IUP and Elon. We’ll see if he can be competitive in a loaded Big Ten East division.

Grade: A-

Michigan Wolverines interim head coach Sherrone Moore talks on the sideline during the NCAA football game against the Ohio State Buckeyes at Michigan Stadium. Ohio State lost 30-24. Mandatory Credit: Adam Cairns-USA TODAY Sports


Michigan Wolverines
Out: Jim Harbaugh
In: Sherrone Moore

I don’t blame Michigan for promoting internally. It’s awfully late in the coaching carousel to find a quality candidate and the school’s reported first choice was DeBoer, who was already off the board. Moore has done a great job as Michigan’s offensive line coach. He was also impressive this past season when Harbaugh was suspended and he had to fill in as the interim head coach. I think Moore is deserving of the opportunity.

Grade: B

Oregon State Beavers head coach Jonathan Smith against the Arizona State Sun Devils at Sun Devil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports


Michigan State Spartans
Out: Mel Tucker
In: Jonathan Smith

Like DeBoer, I don’t know if Smith will be a cultural fit at Michigan State. He’s from California and has never had a coaching job east of Montana. Smith’s track record is excellent, though. He worked under Chris Petersen before becoming the head coach at Oregon State, where he resurrected a program that had won just 12 games between 2014-17. Smith knows how to develop talent, which should go a long way to making the Spartans competitive again.

Grade: A-

Oklahoma Sooners offensive coordinator Jeff Lebby before the game against the Kent State Golden Flashes at Gaylord Family-Oklahoma Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports


Mississippi State Bulldogs
Out: Zach Arnett
In: Jeff Lebby

I was underwhelmed with Mississippi State’s decision to hire Lebby. He’s had success as an offensive coordinator, but there was tension between him and the Oklahoma fanbase. Lebby’s tenure with the Sooners ended poorly because of that. With the Bulldogs being an attractive SEC job, I just have a hard time believing Lebby was the best they could do. Hiring Lebby could set them back with the conference adding Oklahoma and Texas in 2024.

Grade: C

Texas co-defensive coordinator Jeff Choate (right) speaks with linebacker David Gbenda (33) during an open practice session for fans at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium, Wednesday, Aug., 18, 2021. Mandatory Credit: Stephen Spillman-USA TODAY NETWORK


Nevada Wolf Pack
Out: Ken Wilson
In: Jeff Choate

I actually think hiring Choate was a good decision by Nevada. He grew up in Idaho and played college ball in Montana. Choate has spent a good chunk of his career coaching at western schools. He feels like a very good cultural fit for Nevada, and he should be familiar with the recruiting area. Choate also had success as a head coach at Montana State between 2016-19, where he posted a record of 19-9 in his last two seasons.

Grade: B+

Virginia Cavaliers head coach Bronco Mendenhall looks on from the sidelines against the Pittsburgh Panthers during the second quarter at Heinz Field. Mandatory Credit: Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports


New Mexico Lobos
Out: Danny Gonzales
In: Bronco Mendenhall

Hiring Mendenhall could be the biggest steal of this coaching carousel. Mendenhall has been a successful head coach at both BYU and Virginia. He’s from Utah and spent a lot of time coaching at western schools, including five seasons at New Mexico. Mendenhall ought to know the recruiting area well enough to revive a Lobos program that has posted a record of 47-119 since 2008. My only concern is that he hasn’t been a head coach since 2021.

Grade: B+

Northwestern Wildcats head coach David Braun celebrates a touchdown against the Maryland Terrapins during the first half at Ryan Field. Mandatory Credit: David Banks-USA TODAY Sports


Northwestern Wildcats
Out: Pat Fitzgerald
In: David Braun

I was very impressed with what Braun was able to do at Northwestern this past season. The Wildcats haven’t been competitive recently — posting a record of 14-31 since 2019 — and were in a terrible spot as a program entering this season. Nobody, myself included, expected Northwestern to be competitive and Braun managed to win eight games as the interim head coach. Being from Wisconsin, I also think he’s a great cultural fit for Northwestern.

Grade: B

Oregon State interim defensive coordinator Trent Bray looks on during the Oregon State spring football game at Reser Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Soobum Im-USA TODAY Sports


Oregon State Beavers
Out: Jonathan Smith
In: Trent Bray

It’s a shame that conference realignment all but forced Smith to leave Oregon State for Michigan State. However, I’m not sure that the Beavers could’ve hired a better replacement for Smith. Bray had been on Smith’s staff since 2018, spending the last two seasons as defensive coordinator. Bray will be able to bring continuity to a program that’s had some success in recent years. He’s also an Oregon State alumnus, so he’ll be a great cultural fit.

Grade: B+

Kent State Golden Flashes head coach Sean Lewis reacts following a penalty in favor of the Washington Huskies during the second quarter at Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-USA TODAY Sports


San Diego State Aztecs
Out: Brady Hoke
In: Sean Lewis

I’m not as high on Lewis as other people. I wasn’t impressed with him as a head coach during his time at Kent State, where he posted a record of just 24-31 in five seasons. He wasn’t even impressive as Colorado’s offensive coordinator this past season — averaging just 28.2 points per game and 4.9 yards per play. Considering Lewis is from the Midwest, I also don’t think he’s a very good cultural fit for San Diego State.

Grade: C+

New Syracuse Orange head coach Fran Brown speaks during a press conference at the John A. Lally Athletics Complex. Mandatory Credit: Rich Barnes-USA TODAY Sports


Syracuse Orange
Out: Dino Babers
In: Fran Brown

This is an interesting decision by Syracuse. Brown has been a position coach for the majority of his career, and he spent only one season as a defensive coordinator in 2019. Going from being a position coach to a head coach is quite the jump for a young coach like Brown. The good news is that he’s from New Jersey and has deep ties to the recruiting area, which will be beneficial to the Orange. I’m just not sure Brown is ready to be a head coach.

Grade: C+

Duke Blue Devils head coach Mike Elko leads his team out prior to the first quarter against the Northwestern Wildcats at Ryan Field. Mandatory Credit: Patrick Gorski-USA TODAY Sports


Texas A&M Aggies
Out: Jimbo Fisher
In: Mike Elko

Texas A&M wanted to make a big splash and I think it made one by hiring Elko. As a coordinator, he worked for quality head coaches like Dave Clawson, Brian Kelly, and Jimbo Fisher before becoming the head coach at Duke, where he won 16 games in two seasons. If Elko’s starting quarterback hadn’t gotten hurt this past season, he might’ve won 10 games. The Aggies have deep NIL pockets, so I expect Elko to continue to lure high-profile recruits.

Grade: B+

Notre Dame Fighting Irish offensive coordinator Gerad Parker talks to players during warmups before the game against the Wake Forest Demon Deacons at Notre Dame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports


Troy Trojans
Out: Jon Sumrall
In: Gerad Parker

Hiring from the same coaching tree has benefitted Troy in recent years (Neal Brown and Jon Sumrall). I’m not convinced that Parker is ready to be a head coach, though. His track record as an offensive coordinator has been mixed during his tenures at both West Virginia and Notre Dame. With Parker being from the south, he should be a good cultural fit with the Trojans. He also has a good reputation as a recruiter.

Grade: C+

Troy Trojans head coach Jon Sumrall (middle) runs on the field before the game against the Appalachian State Mountaineers at Kidd Brewer Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Reinhold Matay-USA TODAY Sports


Tulane Green Wave
Out: Willie Fritz
In: Jon Sumrall

Sumrall has struck me as a rising coach for the last few years. He’s spent a lot of time as an assistant in the SEC at both Kentucky and Ole Miss. Sumrall was also impressive as Troy’s head coach the last two seasons — posting a record of 23-4. He’s from the south and coached primarily in the south, including at Tulane between 2012-14, so I expect him to be a great cultural fit. I’m very surprised that Power 5 programs didn’t give him a look this coaching carousel.

Grade: A-

DeShaun Foster answers questions from media after he was introduced as the new head football coach of UCLA Bruins during a press conference at Pauley Pavilion. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports


UCLA Bruins
Out: Chip Kelly
In: DeShaun Foster

It’s clear why Chip Kelly was trying to leave UCLA. It seems like he put minimal effort in recruiting and on-field preparation, which caused his relationship with the administration to deteriorate. I understand why the Bruins hired Foster, who’s an alumnus of the school. Foster should be a great cultural fit at UCLA and will actually care about the program. My issue is that he’s only been a position coach, so I’m not sure he’s ready to be a head coach.

Grade: C+

Arizona Wildcats head coach Jedd Fisch on the sideline during the second half at Arizona Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Zachary BonDurant-USA TODAY Sports


Washington Huskies
Out: Kalen DeBoer
In: Jedd Fisch

Fisch worked primarily in the NFL and the East Coast before arriving at Arizona, so I wasn’t convinced he’d have much success there. Fisch did an incredible job with the Wildcats, though. He inherited a program that had just one winning season between 2016-20 and turned things around just three seasons — winning 10 games in 2023 and making an impact in recruiting. I think hiring Fisch is a great decision by Washington.

Grade: A-

Contact me

College football Week 12 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“Two little mice fell in a bucket of cream. The first mouse quickly gave up and drowned. The second mouse, wouldn’t quit. He struggled so hard that eventually he churned that cream into butter and crawled out. Gentlemen, as of this moment, I am that second mouse.”

– Frank Abagnale, Sr., “Catch Me If You Can” (2002)

Week 11 record: 10-2 (83.3%)
2023 record: 94-38 (71.2%)
All-time record: 1,030-499 (67.3%)

Saturday:

Michigan Wolverines running back Blake Corum (2) runs the ball against the Penn State Nittany Lions during the second quarter at Beaver Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matthew O’Haren-USA TODAY Sports


No. 3 Michigan (10-0) at Maryland (6-4)
SECU Stadium
College Park, Md.
Line: Michigan -19.5
Over/under: 50.5

Maryland hasn’t played well the last few weeks. The Terrapins have lost four of their last five games, and even struggled in their win over Nebraska last week. Maryland’s offense has also been bad during that stretch – averaging just 19.2 points per game. I’m not picking against Michigan after the way it played last week. I doubt the Terrapins will be able to slow down the Wolverines’ run game.

Prediction: Michigan 35, Maryland 14

Penn State Nittany Lions quarterback Drew Allar (15) throws a pass against the Michigan Wolverines during the second quarter at Beaver Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matthew O’Haren-USA TODAY Sports


Rutgers (6-4) at No. 12 Penn State (8-2)
Beaver Stadium
University Park, Pa.
Line: Penn State -20.5
Over/under: 41.5

Penn State was a mess offensively last week, but firing offensive coordinator Mike Yurcich might bring some rejuvenation. I expect the Nittany Lions to play much better this week. I also doubt Rutgers’ offense, which has averaged 15.6 points per game and 4.7 yards per play in Big Ten play, will be able to score points on Penn State’s defense. This feels like a bad matchup for the Scarlet Knights.

Prediction: Penn State 34, Rutgers 13

Louisville Cardinals head coach Jeff Brohm looks on from the sideline during the first half against the Virginia Cavaliers at L&N Federal Credit Union Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Rhodes-USA TODAY Sports


No. 10 Louisville (9-1) at Miami (6-4)
Hard Rock Stadium
Miami
Line: Louisville -1.5
Over/under: 46.5

I wouldn’t be surprised if Miami manages to keep Louisville’s offense in check. The Hurricanes have a good defense. However, I doubt their offense can score enough points to win. Miami’s offense has averaged just 22.3 points per game and 5.2 yards per play in its last six games. I think Louisville’s offense, which is one of the best in the country, will eventually take over in this game.

Prediction: Louisville 28, Miami 20

SMU Mustangs running back Camar Wheaton (0) runs with the ball against the Temple Owls during the second half at Lincoln Financial Field. Mandatory Credit: Gregory Fisher-USA TODAY Sports


SMU (8-2) at Memphis (8-2)
Simmons Bank Liberty Stadium
Memphis, Tenn.
Line: SMU -8.5
Over/under: 65.5

This game will likely decide a spot in The American championship, and potentially in the New Year’s Six. I’ll give the advantage to SMU. The Mustangs have been impressive the last few weeks – winning six games in a row by a combined score of 270-88. I don’t think Memphis is good enough defensively to win this game. The Tigers are allowing 30.5 points per game against FBS competition.

Prediction: SMU 41, Memphis 31

Utah Utes head coach Kyle Whittingham during the first half against the Washington Huskies at Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Steven Bisig-USA TODAY Sports


No. 22 Utah (7-3) at No. 17 Arizona (7-3)
Arizona Stadium
Tucson, Ariz.
Line: Utah -1.5
Over/under: 45.5

I’m surprised that the line on this game has shifted so much in Utah’s favor. The Utes have been too inconsistent offensively on the road – averaging just 22.2 points per game and 5.3 yards per play. I just don’t think Utah is good enough on that side of the ball to win this game. Arizona has played well in its last six games – winning four of them. I expect the Wildcats to find a way to win.

Prediction: Arizona 27, Utah 21

Georgia Bulldogs offensive lineman Noah Kahapea (55) and offensive lineman Sedrick Van Pran (63) celebrate after a touchdown against the Mississippi Rebels in the fourth quarter at Sanford Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports


No. 1 Georgia (10-0) at No. 18 Tennessee (7-3)
Neyland Stadium
Knoxville, Tenn.
Line: Georgia -10.5
Over/under: 58.5

I’m sure Tennessee will get up for this game, but I really like the way Georgia has been playing. The Bulldogs have won their last five games by a combined score of 213-91. Brock Bowers, who’s Georgia’s best offensively playmaker, is healthy, too. This feels like a game the Bulldogs should win. I also think the Volunteers’ run game will have a difficult time being effective against Georgia’s defense.

Prediction: Georgia 31, Tennessee 20

Iowa Hawkeyes wide receiver Nico Ragaini (89) gets yards after catch as Rutgers Scarlet Knights linebacker Mohamed Toure (1) moves in for the tackle during the second quarter at Kinnick Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeffrey Becker-USA TODAY Sports


Illinois (5-5) at No. 16 Iowa (8-2)
Kinnick Stadium
Iowa City, Iowa
Line: Iowa -3.5
Over/under: 30.5

I’m really tempted to pick Illinois. The Fighting Illini are playing well – winners of three of their last four games, and averaging 30.7 points per game during that stretch. I’m not convinced they can have that kind of success this week, though. Iowa’s defense is one of the best in the country. The Hawkeyes allow just 11 points per game and 4.1 yards per play at home. I’m banking on the better defense.

Prediction: Iowa 17, Illinois 13

Clemson running back Will Shipley (1) takes a handoff from quarterback Cade Klubnik (2) behind running back Phil Mafah (7) against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets during the third quarter at Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Ken Ruinard-USA TODAY Sports


No. 20 North Carolina (8-2) at Clemson (6-4)
Memorial Stadium
Clemson, S.C.
Line: Clemson -6.5
Over/under: 59.5

I see no reason to pick against Clemson right now. The Tigers have been impressive the last two weeks, with wins over Notre Dame and Georgia Tech. I think they’ve turned a corner as a team. North Carolina will be able to score points, but I don’t trust its defense. The Tar Heels are allowing 30.6 points per game in ACC play. Scoring opportunities will be there for Clemson, which is I’m picking the upset.

Prediction: Clemson 34, North Carolina 28

USC Trojans quarterback Caleb Williams (13) throws a pass during the first half against the Oregon Ducks at Autzen Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Wayrynen-USA TODAY Sports


UCLA (6-4) at USC (7-4)
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
Los Angeles
Line: USC -6.5
Over/under: 65.5

Since this game will likely be a shootout, I’m giving the advantage to USC because it has the better offense. The Trojans are averaging 49.1 points per game and 8.0 yards per play at home. I doubt UCLA will be able to keep up, even though USC’s defense is terrible. The Bruins have been bad offensively the last two weeks – averaging 8.5 points per game and 4.7 yards per play.

Prediction: USC 38, UCLA 31

Kansas State Wildcats quarterback Will Howard (18) pitches the ball to running back D.J. Giddens (31) during the first quarter at Bill Snyder Family Football Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Sewell-USA TODAY Sports


No. 21 Kansas State (7-3) at No. 25 Kansas (7-3)
David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, Kan.
Line: Kansas State -8.5
Over/under: 56.5

Even with this being a home game for Kansas, it’ll be difficult for it to win this week. The Jayhawks have sustained too many injuries at the quarterback position and are now down to their third-string quarterback. Kansas State has played well in recent weeks – winning four of its last five games and averaging 41.8 points per game during that stretch. I have to pick the Wildcats.

Prediction: Kansas State 31, Kansas 24

Texas Longhorns wide receiver Adonai Mitchell (5) and running back Jonathon Brooks (24) and tight end Gunnar Helm (85) celebrates after Mitchell scores a touchdown against the TCU Horned Frogs during the first half at Amon G. Carter Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports


No. 7 Texas (9-1) at Iowa State (6-4)
Jack Trice Stadium
Ames, Iowa
Line: Texas -7.5
Over/under: 47.5

I was tempted to pick the upset in this game. Bad things happen at night in Ames. Texas is also banged up and will be without Jonathan Brooks. However, the Longhorns still have some good running backs that can step in for him. Vegas considering Texas to be a 7.5-point favorite on the road makes me think it knows something I don’t, too. I’ll go with the Longhorns to squeak out a victory.

Prediction: Texas 27, Iowa State 20

Game of the week:

Oregon State Beavers tight end Jack Velling (88) runs after a catch against during the first half against the Stanford Cardinal at Reser Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Soobum Im-USA TODAY Sports


No. 5 Washington (10-0) at No. 11 Oregon State (8-2)
Reser Stadium
Corvallis, Ore.
Line: Oregon State -2.5
Over/under: 62.5

I’m taking the upset in this matchup. I think Washington has been playing with fire the last few weeks. The Huskies have won their last six games by a combined 44 points. This will also be the third week in a row that Washington has played a ranked opponent. It just feels like the Huskies are due for a loss. Oregon State has played well at home – averaging 40 points per game and 7.4 yards per play.

Prediction: Oregon State 34, Washington 31

Contact me

College football Week 10 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“I’m gonna go see Dr. Finklestein and I’m gonna tell him we have a whole new bag of issues. We can forget about mom for a while.”

– Jeremy Grey, “Wedding Crashers” (2005)

Week 9 record: 9-3 (75%)
2023 record: 76-32 (70.3%)
All-time record: 1,012-493 (67.2%)

Saturday:

Ohio State Buckeyes running back TreVeyon Henderson (32) celebrates after scoring a touchdown during the fourth quarter against the Wisconsin Badgers at Camp Randall Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-USA TODAY Sports


No. 1 Ohio State (8-0) at Rutgers (6-2)
SHI Stadium
Piscataway, N.J.
Line: Ohio State -18.5
Over/under: 42.5

Since joining the Big Ten in 2014, Rutgers has a record of 1-27 against Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State. The Scarlet Knights have been outscored 1,176-289 in those games, including getting shutout six times. Rutgers just isn’t on the same level as a program as the Buckeyes. I also like the way Ohio State has played in recent weeks – winning its last five games by a combined score of 122-46.

Prediction: Ohio State 35, Rutgers 14

Texas Longhorns quarterback Maalik Murphy (6) hands off to running back C.J. Baxter (4) during the second half against the Brigham Young Cougars at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Wachter-USA TODAY Sports


No. 23 Kansas State (6-2) at No. 7 Texas (7-1)
DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium
Austin, Texas
Line: Texas -4.5
Over/under: 49.5

I’m not expecting Quinn Ewers to play, which is bad news for Texas. The Longhorns haven’t looked the same without him these last two weeks. That’s why I’m picking Kansas State to win this game. The Wildcats have looked like a completely different team recently – winning their last three games by a combined score of 120-24. I also think Kansas State’s defense can contain Texas’ run game.

Prediction: Kansas State 27, Texas 23

Mississippi Rebels head coach Lane Kiffin watches from the sidelines after an interception during the first half against the Vanderbilt Commodores at Vaught-Hemingway Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Petre Thomas-USA TODAY Sports


Texas A&M (5-3) at No. 10 Ole Miss (7-1)
Vaught-Hemingway Stadium
Oxford, Miss.
Line: Ole Miss -3
Over/under: 52.5

Texas A&M might be the more physical team in this matchup, which could be problematic for Ole Miss. However, I’m not sure the Aggies have the offense to win this game. They’ve averaged just 21 points per game and 4.6 yards per play in their last three games. I doubt that’ll be good enough to go on the road and knock off Ole Miss, which is averaging 47.2 points per game and 7.0 yards per play at home.

Prediction: Ole Miss 34, Texas A&M 24

Notre Dame Fighting Irish head coach Marcus Freeman calls a timeout in the second quarter against the Pittsburgh Panthers at Notre Dame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports


No. 15 Notre Dame (7-2) at Clemson (4-4)
Memorial Stadium
Clemson, S.C.
Line: Notre Dame -3.5
Over/under: 44.5

Even with this being a home game for Clemson, I can’t trust it to pull off the upset. The Tigers have struggled offensively against Power 5 competition – averaging 19.3 points per game and 5.0 yards per play. That isn’t going to bode well against Notre Dame’s defense, which is allowing just 15.3 points per game. I think the Fighting Irish are the much better team right now and should get the win.

Prediction: Notre Dame 27, Clemson 17

Georgia Bulldogs running back Kendall Milton (2) is congratulated by wide receiver Marcus Rosemy-Jacksaint (1) for his touchdown in the second half against the Florida Gators at EverBank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Swinger-USA TODAY Sports


No. 12 Missouri (7-1) at No. 2 Georgia (8-0)
Sanford Stadium
Athens, Ga.
Line: Georgia -15.5
Over/under: 55.5

I’ve been burned by Missouri a couple times this season, but I’m not convinced it’s capable of pulling off the upset this week. The Tigers don’t have as much talent as Georgia. I think that the Bulldogs have hit their stride in recent weeks – winning their last three games by a combined score of 131-53. Georgia also has the much better head coach in Kirby Smart, along with home-field advantage.

Prediction: Georgia 38, Missouri 20

Penn State Nittany Lions head coach James Franklin talks with quarterback Drew Allar (15) on the sideline during the first quarter against the Indiana Hoosiers at Beaver Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matthew O’Haren-USA TODAY Sports


No. 11 Penn State (7-1) at Maryland (5-3)
SECU Stadium
College Park, Md.
Line: Penn State -8.5
Over/under: 49.5

Similar to Rutgers, since joining the Big Ten in 2014, Maryland has a record of 3-23 against Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State. I have to pick Penn State to win this game. The Nittany Lions have one of the best defenses in the country – allowing 14.1 points per game against Power 5 competition. I also don’t think the Terrapins are physical enough to pull off the upset.

Prediction: Penn State 31, Maryland 21

Oklahoma Sooners quarterback Dillon Gabriel (8) throws a pass against the Kansas Jayhawks during the first half at David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Denny Medley-USA TODAY Sports


No. 9 Oklahoma (7-1) at No. 22 Oklahoma State (6-2)
Boone Pickens Stadium
Stillwater, Okla.
Line: Oklahoma -5.5
Over/under: 61.5

This is the last time Bedlam will be played for the foreseeable future, so I expect Oklahoma State to be ready to play. I’m tempted to pick the Cowboys, but I’m going with Oklahoma. The Sooners have dominated this rivalry – winning 17 of the last 20 meetings. I also think Oklahoma’s defense, which allows just 3.7 yards per rush, can slow down Ollie Gordon and Oklahoma State’s run game.

Prediction: Oklahoma 30, Oklahoma State 27

Iowa State Cyclones wide receiver Jaylin Noel (13) runs the ball upfield after making a catch against the Baylor Bears during the first half at McLane Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Chris Jones-USA TODAY Sports


No. 21 Kansas (6-2) at Iowa State (5-3)
Jack Trice Stadium
Ames, Iowa
Line: Iowa State -2.5
Over/under: 52.5

I’ll take the upset in this matchup. Iowa State has played very well since Rocco Becht became the team’s starting quarterback. The Cyclones have averaged 28.2 points per game and 5.7 yards per play in their last five games. I also think Iowa State is catching Kansas at the right time. The Jayhawks are coming off their biggest win as a program in over a decade, so I think they come out flat this week.

Prediction: Iowa State 31, Kansas 24

Washington Huskies running back Dillon Johnson (7) runs the ball from scrimmage against the Stanford Cardinal during the first quarter at Stanford Stadium. Mandatory Credit: D. Ross Cameron-USA TODAY Sports


No. 5 Washington (8-0) at No. 20 USC (7-2)
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
Los Angeles
Line: Washington -3
Over/under: 76.5

I wouldn’t be so quick to rule out USC in this game. I still think the Trojans are a good team, and they’ve heard how bad they are for the last few weeks. I expect Lincoln Riley to have them ready to play. However, I don’t trust USC’s defense to get stops against Washington’s offense, which averages 40.3 points per game and 7.9 yards per play. I’ll go with the Huskies to win in a shootout.

Prediction: Washington 41, USC 38

Oregon State Beavers head coach Jonathan Smith on the sidelines during the second half at Arizona Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Zachary BonDurant-USA TODAY Sports


No. 16 Oregon State (6-2) at Colorado (4-4)
Folsom Field
Boulder, Colo.
Line: Oregon State -13.5
Over/under: 62.5

I don’t trust Colorado to win this game. The Buffaloes have lost four of its last five games, and have allowed 37.6 points per game, 6.4 yards per play, and 146.8 rushing yards per game during that stretch. I think Oregon State’s offense, which averages 36.3 points per game and 6.7 yards per play, to move the ball at will this week. This is a very favorable matchup for the Beavers.

Prediction: Oregon State 38, Colorado 27

UCLA Bruins running back Carson Steele (33) celebrates with offensive lineman Jake Wiley (71) after scoring on a 3-yard touchdown pass against the Colorado Buffaloes in the first half at Rose Bowl. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports


No. 19 UCLA (6-2) at Arizona (5-3)
Arizona Stadium
Tucson, Ariz.
Line: UCLA -2.5
Over/under: 50.5

I feel an upset brewing in this game. Arizona has played well in its last four games. The Wildcats have hung tough against Washington, USC, and Oregon State, along with averaging 34 points per game and 5.9 yards per play during that stretch. UCLA’s offense has been inconsistent against Power 5 competition. I think the Bruins will have a difficult time outscoring Arizona on the road.

Prediction: Arizona 28, UCLA 24

Game of the week:

Alabama Crimson Tide linebacker Jihaad Campbell (30) picks up a fumble and ran it back for a touchdown against the Tennessee Volunteers during the second half at Bryant-Denny Stadium. Mandatory Credit: John David Mercer-USA TODAY Sports


No. 14 LSU (6-2) at No. 8 Alabama (7-1)
Bryant-Denny Stadium
Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Line: Alabama -3
Over/under: 61.5

With this game in Tuscaloosa, I have to give the advantage to Nick Saban and Alabama. The Crimson Tide have a record of 102-6 at home since 2008. LSU won this game in overtime last season and that should be in the back of Alabama’s mind, too. The Crimson Tide’s offense will have scoring opportunities against the Tigers’ defense, which is allowing 33.6 points per game and 6.6 yards per play.

Prediction: Alabama 34, LSU 31

Contact me

College football Week 9 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“You want a prediction about the weather, you’re asking the wrong Phil. I’ll give you a winter prediction: It’s gonna be cold, it’s gonna be grey, and it’s gonna last you for the rest of your life.”

– Phil Connors, “Groundhog Day” (1993)

Week 8 record: 8-4 (66.7%)
2023 record: 67-29 (69.7%)
All-time record: 1,003-490 (67.1%)

Saturday:

Florida State Seminoles defensive lineman Fabien Lovett (0) celebrates a defensive stop against the Duke Blue Devils in the second half at Doak S. Campbell Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Melina Myers-USA TODAY Sports


No. 4 Florida State (7-0) at Wake Forest (4-3)
Allegacy Federal Credit Union Stadium
Winston-Salem, N.C.
Line: Florida State -20.5
Over/under: 50.5

Dave Clawson doesn’t get enough credit as a head coach, but this is will be a tough matchup for Wake Forest. The Demon Deacons have struggled offensively against FBS competition – averaging 20.8 points per game and 4.8 yards per play. I have to pick Florida State to win. The Seminoles have too much talent, especially on the offensive side of the ball. They shouldn’t have too many problems this week.

Prediction: Florida State 35, Wake Forest 14

Oklahoma Sooners linebacker Kip Lewis (10) celebrates with Oklahoma Sooners defensive back Robert Spears-Jennings (3) during the first half against the UCF Knights at Gaylord Family-Oklahoma Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports


No. 6 Oklahoma (7-0) at Kansas (5-2)
David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, Kan.
Line: Oklahoma -10
Over/under: 65.5

Kansas is coming off a bye week and Jalon Daniels is expected to start this week, which makes me want to take the upset. However, I think Oklahoma is going to be more buttoned up after surviving a scare against UCF last week. I also don’t trust the Jayhawks’ defense, which is allowing 27.4 points per game and 161.1 rushing yards per game. Scoring opportunities should be there for the Sooners.

Prediction: Oklahoma 38, Kansas 31

Georgia Bulldogs running back Daijun Edwards (30) runs the ball against the Vanderbilt Commodores during the first half at FirstBank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Steve Roberts-USA TODAY Sports


No. 1 Georgia (7-0) vs. Florida (5-2)
EverBank Stadium
Jacksonville, Fla.
Line: Georgia -14.5
Over/under: 47.5

I wouldn’t rule out Florida this week. The Gators have played better in recent weeks – winning five of their last six games, including three conference games. They’ve also averaged 30.5 points per game against SEC teams. Georgia will be shorthanded offensively without Brock Bowers, too, who’s the driving force of its offense. I’ll still pick the Bulldogs to win, but I think Florida keeps it close.

Prediction: Georgia 27, Florida 20

Texas Longhorns running back C.J. Baxter (4) runs the ball into the end zone for a touchdown during the fourth quarter against the Houston Cougars at TDECU Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Maria Lysaker-USA TODAY Sports


BYU (5-2) at No. 7 Texas (6-1)
DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium
Austin, Texas
Line: Texas -17.5
Over/under: 50.5

BYU hasn’t played well on the road. The Cougars have been outscored 113-76, and averaged 4.3 yards per play, in three games away from home. I doubt that’s going to be good enough to knock off Texas. The Longhorns are the more talented team, and I think BYU’s defense will have a difficult time defending their offense. Texas should win this game even without Quinn Ewers under center.

Prediction: Texas 27, BYU 13

Louisville Cardinals wide receiver Chris Bell (0) and quarterback Jack Plummer (13) react after combining for a seven yard touchdown pass against the Pittsburgh Panthers during the first quarter at Acrisure Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports


No. 20 Duke (5-2) at No. 18 Louisville (6-1)
Cardinal Stadium
Louisville, Ky.
Line: Louisville -4.5
Over/under: 46.5

Riley Leonard’s status is uncertain for this game. I’m not sure how effective he’ll be even if he plays, which is going to hurt Duke’s chances of winning. I feel like I need to pick Louisville. The Cardinals have a very explosive offense, especially at home – averaging 48.3 points per game and 7.0 yards per play in three games. I think the Blue Devils are going to have a difficult time keeping up on the scoreboard.

Prediction: Louisville 27, Duke 17

Tennessee Volunteers quarterback Joe Milton III (7) passing against the Alabama Crimson Tide during the first half at Bryant-Denny Stadium. Mandatory Credit: John David Mercer-USA TODAY Sports


No. 21 Tennessee (5-2) at Kentucky (5-2)
Kroger Field
Lexington, Ky.
Line: Tennessee -3.5
Over/under: 51.5

Kentucky’s defense has been vulnerable against the run in its last two games – allowing 145.5 yards per game and 4.2 yards per carry. Tennessee’s offense likes to lean on its run game, which averages 217.3 yards per game and 5.6 yards per carry. I also think the Wildcats will have a difficult time winning the line of scrimmage against the Volunteers’ defensive front. This is a favorable matchup for Tennessee.

Prediction: Tennessee 27, Kentucky 23

Ohio State Buckeyes running back Miyan Williams (3) celebrates with offensive lineman Donovan Jackson (74) after a touchdown run against the Penn State Nittany Lions during the second quarter at Ohio Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Joseph Maiorana-USA TODAY Sports


No. 3 Ohio State (7-0) at Wisconsin (5-2)
Camp Randall Stadium
Madison, Wis.
Line: Ohio State -14.5
Over/under: 45.5

Wisconsin is another team that I wouldn’t count out this week. Ohio State is coming off a big win over Penn State and could come out flat. You also have the Luke Fickell, who has a deep background with the Buckeyes, aspect of this matchup. I expect the Badgers to lean on Braelon Allen and their run game, but I doubt it’ll be enough to pull off the upset. I think Ohio State wins in a close game.

Prediction: Ohio State 24, Wisconsin 17

UCLA Bruins defensive lineman Gabriel Murphy (11) celebrates with defensive lineman Jay Toia (93) after recording a sack against the Stanford Cardinal during the first quarter at Stanford Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Darren Yamashita-USA TODAY Sports


Colorado (4-3) at No. 23 UCLA (5-2)
Rose Bowl
Pasadena, Calif.
Line: UCLA -17.5
Over/under: 62.5

This feels like a bad matchup for Colorado. UCLA has the best defense in the Pac-12 – allowing just 14.9 points per game 282.6 yards per game. The Buffaloes will likely have to play an excellent game offensively in order to win. The Bruins also have a very effective run game. That’ll be problematic for Colorado’s defense, which allows 157.4 rushing yards per game and 4.4 yards per carry.

Prediction: UCLA 41, Colorado 24

North Carolina Tar Heels defensive back Armani Chatman (9) celebrates with defensive back Antavious Lane (1) after intercepting a Virginia Cavaliers pass in the end zone in the first half at Kenan Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Nell Redmond-USA TODAY Sports


No. 17 North Carolina (6-1) at Georgia Tech (3-4)
Bobby Dodd Stadium
Atlanta
Line: North Carolina -11.5
Over/under: 63.5

I expect North Carolina to bounce back after losing to a bad Virginia team last week. This is a favorable matchup for the Tar Heels, too. Georgia Tech’s defense is terrible. The Yellow Jackets allow 30.3 points per game, and struggle to defend the pass. They rank near the bottom of college football in sacks and yards allowed per attempt. Drake Maye should be comfortable and make plays through the air.

Prediction: North Carolina 37, Georgia Tech 27

Oregon State Beavers tight end Jack Velling (88) runs into the end zone for a touchdown during the second half against the UCLA Bruins at Reser Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Soobum Im-USA TODAY Sports


No. 11 Oregon State (6-1) at Arizona (4-3)
Arizona Stadium
Tucson, Ariz.
Line: Oregon State -3.5
Over/under: 56.5

I actually came close to picking Arizona to pull off the upset. The Wildcats have been playing well recently. I’m just not convinced it’s going to be enough to beat Oregon State. The Beavers have one of the best offenses in the country – averaging 43 points per game and 6.7 yards per play on the road. Arizona’s defense will have a difficult time keeping Oregon State out of the end zone.

Prediction: Oregon State 34, Arizona 27

Fresno State Bulldogs quarterback Mikey Keene (1) runs with the ball against the Wyoming Cowboys during the first quarter at Jonah Field at War Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Babbitt-USA TODAY Sports


UNLV (6-1) at Fresno State (6-1)
Bulldog Stadium
Fresno, Calif.
Line: Fresno State -7.5
Over/under: 57.5

I’m not sure if UNLV is good enough to win this game. The Rebels haven’t defeated a team higher than No. 91 in Bill Connelly’s SP+ rankings. This will be their toughest game since Michigan in Week 2. I have to go with Fresno State. The Bulldogs are in a much better spot as a program. Fresno State’s offense has also played well at home – averaging 38 points per game and 7.2 yards per play.

Prediction: Fresno State 35, UNLV 24

Game of the week:

Oregon Ducks running back Bucky Irving (0) celebrates scoring a touchdown during the second half against the Washington State Cougars at Autzen Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Soobum Im-USA TODAY Sports


No. 8 Oregon (6-1) at No. 13 Utah (6-1)
Rice-Eccles Stadium
Salt Lake City
Line: Oregon -6.5
Over/under: 47.5

I’m not convinced that Oregon’s defense is as good against the run as the numbers indicate. That’ll be to Utah’s benefit, which will lean heavily on its run game going forward now that Cam Rising is out for the rest of the season. I highly doubt the Utes are capable of outscoring the Ducks’ offense, though, which is averaging 47 points per game, 7.5 yards per play, and 226.9 rushing yards per game.

Prediction: Oregon 31, Utah 21

Contact me

College football Week 7 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“War is young men dying and old men talking. You know this. Ignore the politics.”

– Odysseus, “Troy” (2004)

Week 6 record: 7-5 (58.3%)
2023 record: 53-19 (73.6%)
All-time record: 989-480 (67.3%)

Friday:

Tulane Green Wave quarterback Kai Horton (12) makes a throw in the first half against the Southern Miss Golden Eagles at M.M. Roberts Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Chuck Cook-USA TODAY Sports


Tulane (4-1) at Memphis (4-1)
Simmons Bank Liberty Stadium
Memphis, Tenn.
Line: Tulane -4.5
Over/under: 55.5

I’m tempted to pick Memphis, but Vegas considers Tulane too much of a favorite. The Green Wave have a very balanced offense, which ranks in the top half of college football in both rushing yards per game and passing efficiency. The Tigers have been vulnerable defensively against both the run and pass. This will likely be a close game, but I think Tulane squeaks out a victory.

Prediction: Tulane 30, Memphis 27

Saturday:

Florida State Seminoles defensive end Jared Verse (5) celebrates after a sack against the Virginia Tech Hokies during the second half at Doak S. Campbell Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Melina Myers-USA TODAY Sports


Syracuse (4-2) at No. 4 Florida State (5-0)
Doak Campbell Stadium
Tallahassee, Fla.
Line: Florida State -17.5
Over/under: 55.5

Syracuse hasn’t played well the last two weeks. The Orange were outscored 71-21, averaged 4.3 yards per play, and allowed six sacks. They’re not playing their best football before playing Florida State, which will make it difficult for them to pull off the upset. The Seminoles are the significantly better team with the better head coach/quarterback combination. I expect them to win comfortably.

Prediction: Florida State 38, Syracuse 20

Tennessee Volunteers wide receiver Squirrel White (10) runs the ball against the South Carolina Gamecocks during the first half at Neyland Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Randy Sartin-USA TODAY Sports


Texas A&M (4-2) at No. 19 Tennessee (4-1)
Neyland Stadium
Knoxville, Tenn.
Line: Tennessee -3
Over/under: 55.5

I’m not confident in it, but I’ll pick Tennessee to win. I think the Volunteers have the better head coach/quarterback combination in Josh Heupel and Joe Milton. Texas A&M’s defense has been vulnerable in two games away from home. I think the Aggies will have a difficult time defending Tennessee’s rushing attack, which averages 230 yards per game and 6.1 yards per carry.

Prediction: Tennessee 27, Texas A&M 23

Kansas Jayhawks running back Dylan McDuffie (25) runs up field during the second half against the UCF Knights at David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Peter Aiken-USA TODAY Sports


No. 23 Kansas (5-1) at Oklahoma State (3-2)
Boone Pickens Stadium
Stillwater, Okla.
Line: Kansas -2.5
Over/under: 55.5

Despite defeating Kansas State last week, I’m not convinced that Oklahoma State has improved. I think Kansas will win even without Jalon Daniels. The Cowboys’ defense has struggled to defend the run – allowing 154 yards per game and 4.3 yards per carry. I expect the Jayhawks to lean heavily on their run game, which averages 232.3 yards per game and 5.9 yards per carry.

Prediction: Kansas 34, Oklahoma State 24

Wisconsin Badgers tight end Tucker Ashcraft (38) celebrates with wide receiver Skyler Bell (11) after scoring a touchdown during the fourth quarter against the Rutgers Scarlet Knights at Camp Randall Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-USA TODAY Sports


Iowa (5-1) at Wisconsin (4-1)
Camp Randall Stadium
Madison, Wis.
Line: Wisconsin -10
Over/under: 34.5

I don’t trust Iowa’s offense to score enough points to win this game. The Hawkeyes have one of the worst offenses in the country. They’ve also averaged just 19.1 points per game and 4.4 yards per play in their last 12 road games. Even with a first-year coaching staff, Wisconsin’s offense is in a slightly better spot. The Badgers are going to have the better quarterback, too, in Tanner Mordecai.

Prediction: Wisconsin 20, Iowa 13

Washington State Cougars quarterback Cameron Ward (1) throws against the UCLA Bruins during the first half at Rose Bowl. Mandatory Credit: Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports


Arizona (3-3) at No. 19 Washington State (4-1)
Gesa Field
Pullman, Wash.
Line: Washington State -7.5
Over/under: 57.5

I’m not convinced that Arizona is good enough defensively to win this game. The Wildcats have allowed 31.2 points per game against Power 5 competition. They also rank No. 87 in the country in passing efficiency defense. That’s not a good combination before playing Washington State. The Cougars’ offense is averaging 40 points per game and 5.6 yards per play.

Prediction: Washington State 37, Arizona 27

Texas Tech Red Raiders quarterback Behren Morton (2) hands the ball off to Texas Tech Red Raiders running back Tahj Brooks (28) against the Baylor Bears during the second half at McLane Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Chris Jones-USA TODAY Sports


Kansas State (3-2) at Texas Tech (3-3)
Jones AT&T Stadium
Lubbock, Texas
Line: Texas Tech -1.5
Over/under: 56.5

Kansas State just hasn’t been as good on the road as opposed to at home. The Wildcats’ offense is averaging just 24 points per game and 5.2 yards per play on the road. I like the way Texas Tech has played the last two weeks – outscoring its competition 88-42. I also think the Red Raiders are better defensively than people think. Kansas State might have a difficult time scoring points.

Prediction: Texas Tech 28, Kansas State 21

Notre Dame Fighting Irish running back Audric Estime (7) runs the ball against the Louisville Cardinals during the first half at L&N Federal Credit Union Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Rhodes-USA TODAY Sports


No. 10 USC (6-0) at No. 21 Notre Dame (5-2)
Notre Dame Stadium
Notre Dame, Ind.
Line: Notre Dame -2.5
Over/under: 60.5

I don’t like picking against the best player in college football, but I think this is a bad matchup for USC. The Trojans rank in the bottom third in the country in both red zone defense and run defense. That won’t bode well on the road. Notre Dame will have opportunities to score touchdowns. I expect the Fighting Irish to lean on their run game, which averages 171 yards per game and 5.0 yards per carry.

Prediction: Notre Dame 31, USC 24

North Carolina Tar Heels quarterback Drake Maye (10) runs the ball during the first half of the game against the Syracuse Orange at Kenan Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jaylynn Nash-USA TODAY Sports


No. 25 Miami (4-1) at No. 12 North Carolina (5-0)
Kenan Stadium
Chapel Hill, N.C.
Line: North Carolina -3.5
Over/under: 56.5

Miami’s defense has actually played well so far, but I really like what I saw from North Carolina last week. That was the best the Tar Heels have looked yet this season, and it came when Tez Walker was ruled eligible by the NCAA. I think the Hurricanes are going to have a difficult time defending North Carolina’s offense, which has averaged 36.2 points per game at home with Drake Maye under center.

Prediction: North Carolina 34, Miami 27

Kentucky Wildcats running back Ray Davis (1) runs against the Georgia Bulldogs at Sanford Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Dale Zanine-USA TODAY Sports


Missouri (5-1) at No. 24 Kentucky (5-1)
Kroger Field
Lexington, Ky.
Line: Kentucky -2.5
Over/under: 50.5

I expect Kentucky to bounce back this week. The Wildcats’ defense has been very good in three home games – allowing 10.3 points per game, 4.3 yards per play, 2.0 yards per rush, and forcing four turnovers. It’s going to be difficult for Missouri to move the ball, and I don’t trust Eli Drinkwitz to prove me wrong. The Tigers have also struggled on the road under Drinkwitz – posting a record of 5-11.

Prediction: Kentucky 27, Missouri 20

Oregon State Beavers running back Damien Martinez (6) is congratulated by offensive lineman Joshua Gray (67) for scoring a touchdown against the California Golden Bears during the fourth quarter at California Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports


No. 18 UCLA (4-1) at No. 15 Oregon State (5-1)
Reser Stadium
Corvallis, Ore.
Line: Oregon State -3.5
Over/under: 54.5

UCLA’s defense might be the best in the Pac-12 and poses a lot of problems for Oregon State. However, I’m not convinced that the Bruins have an offense capable of outscoring the Beavers. Oregon State has averaged 38.5 points per game and 6.6 yards per play at home. UCLA will have to force turnovers, but the Beavers have done a good job taking care of the ball – committing just five turnovers in six games.

Prediction: Oregon State 31, UCLA 28

Game of the week:

Washington Huskies running back Will Nixon (8) scores a touchdown agaisnt Arizona Wildcats defensive lineman Tyler Manoa (92) in the first half at Arizona Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Zachary BonDurant-USA TODAY Sports


No. 8 Oregon (5-0) at No. 7 Washington (5-0)
Husky Stadium
Seattle
Line: Washington -3
Over/under: 66.5

I think Washington’s defense will have a difficult time defending Oregon’s offense. The Ducks have one of the best rushing attacks in college football – averaging 227.2 yards per game and 7.1 yards per carry. Bo Nix can make plays through the air, too. I expect Oregon’s offense to run the ball effectively and control the clock, which will give the Huskies’ offense fewer possessions.

Prediction: Oregon 34, Washington 28

Contact me

Don’t rule out Oregon State, Washington State joining the Big 12 and changing the college football landscape forever

Movie quote of the day:

“I hate her. In fact, the day you broke up with her I marked that down on my calendar as a day of rejoicement. I’m going to celebrate it with a cake with her face on it, but instead of eating it, we smash it.”

– Stainer, “She’s Out of My League” (2010)

Oregon State Beavers running back Damien Martinez (6) carries the ball against the Washington State Cougars in the first half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports


I was ready to believe that the conference realignment buzz was slowing down. I was under the impression that all that was left to determine was which school The American would add to replace SMU and the fate of Oregon State and Washington State.

However, the conference realignment buzz has cranked back up again, specifically in regards to Oregon State and Washington State. 

A few weeks ago, those two schools filed a legal complaint against the Pac-12 and commissioner George Kliavkoff, seeking a temporary restraining order to protect the future of the conference. The basis for this decision comes because Oregon State and Washington State believe that the 10 members that are leaving won’t have the conference’s best interest at heart, even going so far as to believe that those members will vote to dissolve the Pac-12. Basically, Oregon State and Washington State want full control of the conference’s future. A hearing on the matter is slated for Nov. 14. 

This puts those two schools in a precarious situation. As it stands, the Pac-12 champion is going to have a guaranteed spot in the 12-team College Football Playoff next year. The new format is going to have six guaranteed spots for conference champions (each of the Power 5 conference champions and the highest-ranked Group of 5 conference champion) and six wild cards. It’s important to know that the 6+6 format isn’t set after next season, and the the CFP management committee has yet to determine if the format will stay the same or change after the Pac-12 lost 10 of its members back in the summer. In fact, the committee punted on making a decision the issue recently

Oregon State Beavers defensive back Jaden Robinson (4) breaks up a pass intended for Washington State Cougars wide receiver Josh Kelly (3) in the second half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports


Oregon State and Washington State have a clear path to the CFP unless the format changes, even though they’re the only remaining members in the Pac-12. That will eventually change because the NCAA has a requirement that an FBS conference needs at least eight members, but there’s a two-year grace period. That means ESPN might have to pay about $320 million to Oregon State and Washington State, and potentially to schools like Boise State, Colorado State, San Diego State, UNLV, etc. 

Things could obviously change, though. The committee could eventually determine that the Pac-12 will lose its guaranteed spot in the CFP. The problem with that is that there’s no precedent for it. Remember, the old Big East/The American lost its guaranteed spot only because the BCS was scrapped and the CFP was formed, and the powers that be determined there wouldn’t be guaranteed spots in the new postseason format.

There’s also no technical explanation of the differences between the Power 5 and Group of 5 entities, which is a big problem for the committee. It’s likely not going to be able to explain it without referencing the colloquial expression “I know it when I see it” from Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in 1964.

The main difference between the different levels of competition in the NCAA (FBS, FCS, Division II, Division III) is mostly the number of scholarships. However, Power 5 and Group of 5 schools have the same number of football scholarships (85). That’s why those schools are considered to be on the same level and are told that they’re competing for the same national championship, even though we all know that’s not true. 

The College Football Playoff national championship trophy is displayed during Big Ten media days at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Robert Goddin-USA TODAY Sports


This is a significant development. I don’t expect ESPN to willingly pay $320 million to Oregon State and Washington State if the CFP format doesn’t change, and especially if the Pac-12 ever merges with the Mountain West and/or The American.

Oregon State and Washington State are in a pretty strong position, which is why I expect them to use it as leverage for ESPN to pull strings to get them in a Power 5 conference. The most like destination is the Big 12. Oregon State and Washington State are much better fits in that conference than the ACC, Big Ten, or the SEC. The two schools would also be quality additions to the Big 12. Oregon State has a solid football program right now and its baseball team has made it to Omaha, Neb., for the College World Series six times since 2005. Washington State has had a respectable football program for the last 30 years, and has its cool College Gameday tradition.

I think it’s more likely than not that Oregon State and Washington State end up in the Big 12. It’ll be much cheaper for ESPN to broadcast their games in the conference at a reduced share (roughly $20 million per school) than it would be to give them a share of the CFP revenue. It would also benefit Oregon State and Washington State in the long-term future to join the Big 12, instead of potentially joining the American or Mountain West.

I also wouldn’t be surprised if ESPN waited for the committee to come to a decision on the format for the expanded CFP. If the Pac-12 loses its guaranteed spot, it’ll cost ESPN even less money to broadcast Oregon State and Washington State games in either the Mountain West or The American. That could be problematic, though, because the committee won’t meet again for a while and the clock is ticking. Plus, in order to change the CFP format, there has to be a unanimous decision by the committee, and The American commissioner Mike Aresco has said he won’t vote to change the format. So, that might not be the best course of action.

There could be a lot more riding on this development than just which conference Oregon State and Washington State join. The committee has a huge decision to make these next few weeks when it comes to the CFP format. I don’t think anyone wants to see more substantial changes to the highest level of college football, but I can’t help but see the writing on the wall. It feels like this will be the first step in the Power 5 conferences separating from the Group of 5 conferences or vice versa, which will completely change the college football landscape forever.

There’s been so much tension between the two entities since the CFP was established. The Group of 5 schools only receive 20% of the revenue, and there have even been rumblings of them starting their own playoff format. Unless the committee decides to give more than one Group of 5 conference champion a guaranteed spot in the CFP, which I highly doubt will happen, I think there’s only going to be more division. Regardless of how the committee handles the Pac-12’s situation.

Contact me

College football Week 5 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“Ain’t gonna be no rematch.”

– Apollo Creed, “Rocky” (1976)

Week 4 record: 12-0 (100%)
2023 record: 36-12 (75%)
All-time record: 972-473 (67.2%)

Friday:

Louisville Cardinals running back Maurice Turner (4) runs the ball against the Boston College Eagles during the first half at L&N Federal Credit Union Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Rhodes-USA TODAY Sports


Louisville (4-0) at NC State (3-1)
Carter-Finley Stadium
Raleigh, N.C.
Line: Louisville -3.5
Over/under: 55.5

I haven’t been impressed with NC State. The Wolfpack struggled UConn and Virginia. The only team with a pulse that they’ve played has been Notre Dame, and they lost by three touchdowns. I’m picking Louisville to win this game. The Cardinals have played well offensively – averaging 38.6 points per game. I think NC State will have a difficult time outscoring Louisville.

Prediction: Louisville 34, NC State 27

Oregon State Beavers head coach Jonathan Smith talks with an official during a game against the Washington State Cougars in the first half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports


No. 10 Utah (4-0) at No. 19 Oregon State (3-1)
Reser Stadium
Corvallis, Ore.
Line: Oregon State -3.5
Over/under: 44.5

I’m not convinced quarterback Cam Rising will return this week for Utah. That’ll be problematic because the Utes’ offense has struggled the last few weeks. I doubt Utah can outscore Oregon State’s offense, which averages 39.5 points per game and 6.9 yards per play, without Rising. The Beavers have played very well at home since 2021 – winning 13 of 14 games by an average margin of victory of 18.8 points.

Prediction: Oregon State 27, Utah 20

Saturday:

USC Trojans wide receiver Brenden Rice (2) celebrates his touchdown catch with USC Trojans wide receiver Tahj Washington (16) during the first half against the Arizona State Sun Devils at Mountain America Stadium, Home of the ASU Sun Devils. Mandatory Credit: Joe Camporeale-USA TODAY Sports


No. 8 USC (4-0) at Colorado (3-1)
Folsom Field
Boulder, Colo.
Line: USC -21.5
Over/under: 71.5

I expect Colorado to bounce back after last week’s disappointing performance. I’m not convinced it’ll be enough to win, though. USC’s offense averages 55 points per game and 9.0 yards per play. While the Buffaloes have the ability to win shootouts, outscoring the Trojans is going to be a difficult task. I think Colorado keeps the game within the spread, but USC should win comfortably.

Prediction: USC 48, Colorado 28

Kentucky Wildcats defensive back Maxwell Hairston (31) celebrates after returning an interception for a touchdown against the Vanderbilt Commodores during the first half at FirstBank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Christopher Hanewinckel-USA TODAY Sports


No. 22 Florida (3-1) at Kentucky (4-0)
Kroger Field
Lexington, Ky.
Line: Kentucky -1.5
Over/under: 44.5

I’m surprised that Vegas isn’t giving Kentucky more credit. I understand that Florida knocked off Tennessee a few weeks ago, but I haven’t been that impressed with the Gators. I still think they’re closer to the team we saw against Utah back in Week 1. The Wildcats have outscored FBS competition by a combined score of 124-45. I’ll go with Kentucky to pull off the minor upset.

Prediction: Kentucky 24, Florida 20

Georgia Bulldogs defensive back Dan Jackson (17) and linebacker Xavian Sorey Jr. (18) celebrate against the UAB Blazers in the second half at Sanford Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports


No. 1 Georgia (4-0) at Auburn (3-1)
Jordan-Hare Stadium
Auburn, Ala.
Line: Georgia -14.5
Over/under: 45.5

Auburn’s defense, which is allowing 17 points per game against FBS competition, is going to give the Tigers a chance to win. However, I don’t trust Auburn’s offense. The Tigers have struggled on that side of the ball – averaging 27.6 points per game and 4.7 yards per play. I expect Georgia’s offense to wear down Auburn’s defense, allowing the Bulldogs to pull away in the second half.

Prediction: Georgia 31, Auburn 14

Texas Longhorns running back Jonathon Brooks (24) celebrates with teammates after scoring a touchdown run against the Baylor Bears during the first half at McLane Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Chris Jones-USA TODAY Sports


No. 24 Kansas (4-0) at No. 3 Texas (4-0)
DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium
Austin, Texas
Line: Texas -16.5
Over/under: 61.5

I understand that Texas has looked good and this game is in Austin, but I’m surprised Kansas is a 16.5-point underdog. The Jayhawks have one of the better offenses in college football – averaging 37.7 points per game and 6.7 yards per play. I’m still picking the Longhorns to win, though. They’ll have a significant talent advantage and should be able to move the ball on Kansas’ defense.

Prediction: Texas 38, Kansas 24

Notre Dame Fighting Irish quarterback Sam Hartman (10) celebrates after throwing a fourth quarter touchdown pass against the Ohio State Buckeyes at Notre Dame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports


No. 11 Notre Dame (4-1) at No. 17 Duke (4-0)
Wallace Wade Stadium
Durham, N.C.
Line: Notre Dame -5.5
Over/under: 52.5

Notre Dame had the opportunity to get the biggest win it’s had in recent years last week, and it slipped through its fingertips. I’m very concerned that the Fighting Irish are going to come out flat this week, which is why I’m picking Duke to get the upset. The Blue Devils have shown no sign of slowing down since they knocked off Clemson back in Week 1. I don’t see any reason to pick against Duke.

Prediction: Duke 26, Notre Dame 23

Tennessee Volunteers running back Dylan Sampson (6) runs the ball against the UTSA Roadrunners during the first half at Neyland Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Randy Sartin-USA TODAY Sports


South Carolina (2-2) at No. 21 Tennessee (3-1)
Neyland Stadium
Knoxville, Tenn.
Line: Tennessee -11.5
Over/under: 61.5

This feels like a game Tennessee has had circled since last year. Everything went wrong for the Volunteers in last year’s game, including Hendon Hooker getting hurt. South Carolina went on to score 63 points and winning by 25. I think Tennessee’s defensive front, which has tallied 16 sacks in four games, poses a lot of problems for the Gamecocks’ porous offensive line.

Prediction: Tennessee 41, South Carolina 27

TCU Horned Frogs wide receiver Jaylon Robinson (13) and tight end Jared Wiley (19) celebrates after Wiley scores a touchdown against the SMU Mustangs during the first half at Amon G. Carter Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports


West Virginia (3-1) at TCU (3-1)
Amon G. Carter Stadium
Fort Worth, Texas
Line: TCU -13.5
Over/under: 51.5

This should be a favorable matchup for TCU. West Virginia’s offense has averaged 17.3 points per game and 4.0 yards per play against Power 5 competition. The Horned Frogs are the much better offensive team – averaging 38.2 points per game and 6.3 yards per play. I just don’t think the Mountaineers are good enough offensively to keep up with TCU on the scoreboard.

Prediction: TCU 34, West Virginia 17

Alabama Crimson Tide running back Jase McClellan (2) scores a touchdown on a run up the middle against Mississippi at Bryant-Denny Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Gary Cosby Jr.-USA TODAY Sports


No. 12 Alabama (3-1) at Mississippi State (2-2)
Davis Wade Stadium
Starkville, Miss.
Line: Alabama -15.5
Over/under: 46.5

Even with this game being in Starkville, I don’t trust Mississippi State to pull off the upset. The Bulldogs have looked vulnerable the last three weeks. They’ve also struggled defensively during that stretch – allowing 34 points per game and 6.4 yards per play. The Crimson Tide aren’t exactly trustworthy, but I think they’ll be able to move the ball against Mississippi State’s defense.

Prediction: Alabama 30, Mississippi State 13

Washington Huskies wide receiver JaLynn Polk (2) celebrates with tight end Devin Culp (83), offensive lineman Geirean Hatchett (56) and quarterback Michael Penix Jr. (9) after catching a touchdown pass against the California Golden Bears during the second quarter at Alaska Airlines Field at Husky Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-USA TODAY Sports


No. 7 Washington (4-0) at Arizona (3-1)
Arizona Stadium
Tucson, Ariz.
Line: Washington -19.5
Over/under: 65.5

Arizona might be able to make this a competitive game. The Wildcats have the ability to score points. However, they haven’t been that impressive the last three weeks. I also don’t trust Arizona to be able to slow down Washington’s offense, which is averaging 49.7 points per game and 9.2 yards per play. The Huskies should get the win, but I think the Wildcats find a way to cover the spread.

Prediction: Washington 45, Arizona 27

Game of the week:

LSU Tigers safety Andre’ Sam (14) celebrates his interception against the Arkansas Razorbacks at Tiger Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Clause-USA TODAY Sports


No. 13 LSU (3-1) at No. 20 Ole Miss (3-1)
Vaught-Hemingway Stadium
Oxford, Miss.
Line: LSU -2.5
Over/under: 66.5

I feel an upset brewing in this game. I don’t trust LSU’s defense, which is allowing 25 points per game and 5.9 yards per play, to get stops. Ole Miss has one of the better offenses in the country – averaging 42 points per game and 6.3 yards per play. This game is likely going to be a shootout, and with it being in Oxford, I’m going to give the slight advantage to Lane Kiffin and the Rebels.

Prediction: Ole Miss 38, LSU 35

Contact me

Adding Cal, Stanford, SMU isn’t going to save the ACC

Movie quote of the day:

“If in doubt, Meriadoc, always follow your nose.”

– Gandalf, “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” (2001)

ACC commissioner Jim Phillips speaks to the media during ACC Media Days at the Westin Hotel in Charlotte. Mandatory Credit: Jim Dedmon-USA TODAY Sports


I realize how late I am to write about the recent conference realignment news from the ACC, but I’ve been swamped with other projects. I finally found the time to write my thoughts. 

Even though the news the last few weeks has been devoted to the Big 12, Big Ten, and Pac-12 (RIP), the ACC found itself in the news for the wrong reasons. Florida State has been vocal about how unhappy it is in the ACC, specifically with the conference’s current revenue distribution and media rights agreement. The Seminoles have even threatened to pay the $120 million exit fee to leave the conference — going so far as to work with a private equity firm to help with costs.

Everyone was so caught up with the exit fee that they ignored the biggest issue facing Florida State, which was the ACC’s grant of rights that doesn’t expire until 2036. The Seminoles were free to pay the exit fee and leave the conference, but it’d be pointless to do so if they couldn’t get out of the grant of rights. If Florida State had left the ACC without getting out of the grant of rights, it’d mean that any media revenue that the school generated would still go to the ACC for the next 13 years. That’s why I never believed the Seminoles were going to leave the conference any time soon. 

The other issue was that there likely wasn’t a conference that would take Florida State right now. I doubt the Big Ten would be interested because the school isn’t a member of the Association of American Universities. Every member of the Big Ten is an AAU member except Nebraska, which was an AAU member at the time it joined the conference. I also think the Big 12 and SEC are content at 16 members…for now. It seems like the Seminoles are stuck.

I bring all that up because I don’t think Florida State is going to stop trying to get out of the ACC. The conference makes substantially less money in media revenue than the Big Ten and SEC. The Seminoles view themselves on the same competitive level as some of the institutions in those conferences. Florida State isn’t going to tolerate the ACC for much longer. If the Seminoles are looking elsewhere, it’s safe to assume that Clemson, Miami, North Carolina, and even Notre Dame are doing the same. 

In an effort to either put off the day that those schools leave the conference (or avoid it altogether), the ACC made the decision to expand west by adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU. 

On the surface, I can see why the conference made this decision. Cal and Stanford are excellent academic institutions and are great fits in the ACC because of that. SMU also isn’t an academic slouch and gives the conference a footprint in Texas. Adding those three schools will also lead to $72 million in extra revenue from the TV networks. Cal and Stanford are going to take a significantly reduced share of revenue distribution, and SMU will forgo any revenue for almost a decade. That means more money in the pockets of the other ACC members, so it was a win for all parties. 

The problem with adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU is that they don’t bring much to the table. When was the last time Cal was relevant in a revenue-generating sport? Probably since Aaron Rodgers or Marshawn Lynch played football there. Stanford has pretty much been irrelevant historically in revenue-generating sports, with the exception of the Jim Harbaugh and David Shaw years in football. SMU has plenty of boosters with deep pockets, but that’s about all it brings to the table. The Mustangs haven’t even been able to win The American since joining the conference in 2013. 

The other commonality with all three institutions is that, while located in large markets, none of them control their market. TCU has more of a footprint in Dallas than SMU, and even the Horned Frogs are likely behind Texas. For years, Larry Scott and the Pac-12 tried to establish a footprint in the San Francisco Bay Area, but to no avail. 

I just don’t see how these additions are going to lead to anything good for the ACC. I don’t think Cal, Stanford, or SMU will compete in the conference. They’re also not geographic fits and travel costs will be through the roof. For the time being, it probably won’t mean much with those institutions accepting reduced shares of media revenue for the next few years. That’ll send a larger chunk of the metaphorical pie to Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina’s pockets, which should appease everyone in the short term. 

However, when the western schools start receiving larger shares, that’s not going to make Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina very happy. Remember, those were the four ACC members that were vehemently opposed to adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU. It wasn’t until a last-minute switch from NC State that the three western schools even had the votes to be accepted into the conference. 

Adding Cal, Stanford, and SMU feels like the beginning of the end for the ACC. Once Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina leave for either the Big Ten or SEC, I can’t imagine the ACC survives. The conference doesn’t have much to offer outside of those four schools. The majority of the members that would be left behind are small, private institutions that aren’t big brands or that competitive in athletics. They’re just along for the ride to collect a $30 million check from media partners.

What I’m seeing develop in the ACC is awfully close to what we just saw happen in the Pac-12. For years, the ACC has placed too much of an emphasis on academics. That’s part of the reason why the conference has ranked dead last among Power 5 (4?) conferences in TV viewership for the last few years. The ACC also hasn’t wanted to be associated with conferences/institutions that don’t share the same academic values. That’s why it partnered with the Big Ten and Pac-12 in The Alliance and why the ACC explored a merger with the Pac-12 about a year ago.

Without big brands like Clemson, Florida State, Miami, and North Carolina, I have a difficult time seeing any TV network paying top dollar to broadcast Boston College, Stanford, SMU, Syracuse, Wake Forest, etc. Keep in mind that the Big 12, Big Ten, and SEC will likely get the opportunity to re-negotiate new media rights agreements before the ACC can re-negotiate the one that it agreed to in 2016. The conference is going to have to think outside the box to find other revenue streams, which it has started to do, but I’m not convinced it’s going to be enough.

I don’t expect any schools to leave the ACC for at least a few years, and a lot can change in that time, but things don’t look good for the conference right now.

Contact me

2023 college football season predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“Musn’t be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.”

– Eames, “Inception” (2010)

Georgia Bulldogs head coach Kirby Smart holds the trophy after winning the CFP national championship game against the TCU Horned Frogs at SoFi Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports


I’m not sure I’d be prepared to make my college football season predictions if it wasn’t for the recent conference realignment news. Truthfully, this season has snuck up on me. The news of Oregon and Washington heading to the Big Ten, and Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah going to the Big 12, got the juices flowing and made me eager for the start of the season. I’ve been hustling to get my research done for all Power 5 programs, and the top Group of 5 programs.  

The wait is finally over, though, because Week 1 technically starts this weekend. Even though the matchups aren’t particularly intriguing (aside from Notre Dame facing Navy in Ireland and Ohio playing San Diego State), I wanted to get my predictions finalized before any games were played. I didn’t want any of the results from this weekend to impact my outlook.

My immediate impression for this season is that there are some excellent storylines: Georgia is trying to become the first program to win three-consecutive national championships since Minnesota did it between 1934-36; the Pac-12 is arguably the most compelling Power 5 conference in the wake of its demise; Texas could really be back; Ohio State is trying to get back to being the top dog in the Big Ten; and many others. There’s also a lot of uncertainty at the top of college football, with several programs breaking in new starting quarterbacks.

Remember, we’ve also had plenty of conference realignment beginning this year at both the Power 5 and Group of 5 levels: BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF are now in the Big 12; Charlotte, FAU, North Texas, Rice, UAB, and UTSA joined the American; and Liberty, Jacksonville State, New Mexico State, and Sam Houston State joined the Conference USA. I don’t think we’re done with conference realignment either because we still haven’t seen the ramifications of the Pac-12’s demise trickle down to the Group of 5 level. 

There shouldn’t be any shortage of entertainment this season. 

Southern California Trojans quarterback Caleb Williams (13) throws the ball against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish in the first half at United Airlines Field at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Major award winners

AwardWinner
Heisman (most outstanding player)QB Caleb Williams, USC
Maxwell (best player)Caleb Williams, USC
Davey O’Brien (best quarterback)Caleb Williams, USC
Doak Walker (best running back)Blake Corum, Michigan
Fred Biletnikoff (best wide receiver)Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State
Bronko Nagurski (defensive player of the year)Edge Jared Verse, Florida State
Outland (best lineman)T Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State
Butkus (best linebacker)Jeremiah Trotter, Clemson
Jim Thorpe (best defensive back)CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama
Lou Groza (best kicker)Ryan Coe, North Carolina
Price’s predicted major award winners


I know, I know, no player has won the Heisman Trophy twice since Archie Griffin won it in 1974 and 1975. My readers know that I hate picking chalk, but I think Williams is due to make history this season. Every quarterback in Lincoln Riley’s system has either put up better numbers each year in the system or the best numbers of their college careers. Williams is entering his third year in Riley’s system, dating back to their time at Oklahoma. The last quarterback we saw do that was Baker Mayfield, who won the Heisman in that third year. Williams is also a heavy favorite to win the award.

Michigan has relied heavily on its run game the last two seasons, with its top two rushers accounting for a combined 801 carries. I expect the same to happen this season. Remember, Corum rushed for almost 1,500 yards and 18 touchdowns last season. The only way he might not win the Doak Walker Award is if Michigan manages his workload and gives his backup the same amount of carries. There might be a new quarterback at Ohio State, but I don’t think that’s going to prevent Harrison Jr. from winning the Biletnikoff Award. He’s regarded as the best wide receiver prospect in the 2024 NFL Draft and I think the Ohio State coaching staff is going to find ways to get him the ball.

I had a difficult time giving the Outland Trophy to anyone but Fashanu. Not only is he expected to be the best offensive lineman in the country, but he’s going to pave the way for what should be an excellent rushing attack for Penn State. I struggled with the Lou Groza Award, but I eventually landed on Coe. North Carolina ought to have one of the best offenses in the country and should move the ball with ease, so Coe should see plenty of kicking opportunities.

As for the Nagurski Trophy, I think Verse should be considered the favorite. He’s arguably the best pass rusher in college football after accumulating nine sacks and 17 tackles for loss last season. I couldn’t think of any linebackers with a better chance of winning the Butkus Award than Trotter. He showed a lot of promise last year and I expect him to improve. The best defensive back in the country is arguably McKinstry, so he had to be my pick to win the Jim Thorpe Award. When it comes to defensive backs, I have a lot of trust in Nick Saban to develop them.

Clemson Tigers quarterback Cade Klubnik (2) throws a pass during the first half of the 2022 Orange Bowl against the Tennessee Volunteers at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jasen Vinlove-USA TODAY Sports

ACC

TeamRecord
1Clemson*11-2 (7-1)
2Florida State10-3 (7-1)
3North Carolina10-2 (6-2)
4Duke9-3 (5-3)
5Miami8-4 (5-3)
6Louisville7-5 (5-3)
7Syracuse7-5 (4-4)
8NC State7-5 (4-4)
9Pitt6-6 (4-4)
10Virginia Tech7-5 (3-5)
11Wake Forest5-7 (3-5)
12Georgia Tech4-8 (2-6)
13Boston College5-7 (1-7)
14Virginia2-10 (0-8)
Price’s ACC projections (* conference championship winner)


It actually wasn’t as easy to pick Clemson to win the ACC this season as opposed to previous seasons. There’s a lot of uncertainty facing the Tigers. Mainly, how much will Cade Klubnik improve as a quarterback and whether he’ll mesh with new offensive coordinator Garrett Riley. However, Clemson should still have the most talented team in the conference. The Tigers also benefit from playing Florida State, North Carolina, and Notre Dame at home. I’m not convinced Clemson can make the College Football Playoff, but a trip to the Orange Bowl is a reasonable expectation. 

If any team is going to beat out Clemson to win the ACC, I think it’s Florida State. The Seminoles are returning a lot of talent from a team that won 10 games last year. However, I’m not ready to believe that head coach Mike Norvell has the program ready to take the next step. North Carolina is certainly talented enough to win the conference, but I have reservations about its defense, which allowed 31.3 points per game last year against FBS competition. Having Drake Maye at quarterback will put the Tar Heels in a good spot to win a lot of games, though. 

I’m going out on a limb and picking Duke to improve from last year, even though its schedule is going to be incredibly difficult. I think head coach Mike Elko has the Blue Devils heading in the right direction. We’re going to find out just how good of a coach Mario Cristobal is, but there’s too much talent on Miami’s roster for the team to be as bad as it was last year. Even though I’m high on Jeff Brohm as a head coach, I think Louisville’s quarterback situation could hold the team back. I’m not convinced that Syracuse is going to improve much after sneaking up on the ACC last year.

I don’t know how good NC State or Virginia Tech are going to be, but both teams have manageable non-conference schedules. I think that’ll propel them to bowl eligibility. This could be a long season for Pitt. The Panthers have a brutal non-conference schedule and are losing a lot of production from last year. I think Pat Narduzzi deserves the benefit of the doubt, though. Dave Clawson and Wake Forest will likely have a difficult time getting to an eighth-straight bowl game without quarterback Sam Hartman.

Texas Longhorns quarterback Quinn Ewers (3) throws a pass during the first half against the Kansas Jayhawks at David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Big 12

TeamRecord
1Texas*11-2 (8-1)
2Texas Tech9-4 (7-2)
3Kansas State9-3 (6-3)
4Oklahoma9-3 (6-3)
5TCU8-4 (5-4)
6UCF7-5 (5-4)
7Baylor7-5 (5-4)
8Oklahoma State8-4 (5-4)
9Kansas7-5 (4-5)
10West Virginia6-6 (4-5)
11BYU5-7 (3-6)
12Houston4-8 (2-7)
13Cincinnati4-8 (2-7)
14Iowa State3-9 (1-8)
Price’s Big 12 projections (* conference championship winner)


I realize that college football fans are fatigued with Texas. Time and time again the Longhorns have entered the season with so much hype only to fall on their faces by the end. However, I think this team is different. Steve Sarkisian has done an excellent job assembling talent. I think Texas has the right pieces both on the perimeter and in the trenches to make a run at the Big 12 championship. I also like the options the Longhorns have at quarterback in Quinn Ewers or Arch Manning. If either of them play at a high level, Texas has a chance to make the Playoff. 

I’ve been talking myself into Texas Tech recently. The Red Raiders are returning a lot of production from last year. They also benefit from playing Kansas State and TCU at home. This will likely be Texas Tech’s best chance to win the Big 12 since the Mike Leach era. I expect Kansas State to be near the top of the conference despite the departure of running back Deuce Vaughn. The Wildcats might have the best offensive line and defensive line combination in the Big 12, besides Texas. Quarterback Will Howard improved a lot last year, too. Kansas State has a good chance to defend the conference title. 

I expect Oklahoma to show improvement in Brent Venables’ second season. The Sooners have too much talent to finish below .500 again. TCU likely takes a step back (maybe even further than I think) after so much going its way last year and losing a lot of production from that team. UCF will have its growing pains in Year 1 in the Big 12. The Knights are a talented team and Gus Malzahn is a proven head coach, though. I wouldn’t be surprised if Baylor finishes lower than seventh, but I’m banking on Dave Aranda to turn things around. I’m very uncertain about Oklahoma State, but its non-conference schedule is manageable. Mike Gundy also seems to surprise everyone when expectations are low.

Kansas won’t be able to surprise anyone this year. However, I doubt the Jayhawks regress much. Jalon Daniels is a very underrated quarterback and Kansas is returning a lot of production from last year. I’m more optimistic about West Virginia than I should be, even though I have no trust in Neal Brown and his staff. The Mountaineers are returning several key players in the trenches and have a good backfield. I feel like that should be enough to get WVU to bowl eligibility. After the recent news out of the program, I’ll be very surprised if Iowa State doesn’t finish near the bottom of the Big 12.

Michigan Wolverines running back Blake Corum (2) stiff arms Nebraska Cornhuskers defensive back Malcolm Hartzog (13) in the first half at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports

Big Ten

East DivisionRecordWest DivisionRecord
1Michigan*12-1 (8-1)Wisconsin10-3 (7-2)
2Ohio State11-1 (8-1)Iowa9-3 (6-3)
3Penn State10-2 (7-2)Minnesota7-5 (5-4)
4Maryland8-4 (5-4)Illinois6-6 (4-5)
5Michigan State6-6 (4-5)Nebraska6-6 (4-5)
6Indiana3-9 (1-8)Purdue5-7 (3-6)
7Rutgers3-9 (1-8)Northwestern2-10 (0-9)
Price’s Big Ten projections (* conference championship winner)


Michigan has proven the last two seasons that it runs the Big Ten. I see no reason to think otherwise this season. The Wolverines are returning a lot of production on both sides of the ball, including starting quarterback J.J. McCarthy and leading rusher Corum. They also have the right pieces in the trenches on both sides of the ball. Michigan benefits from playing Ohio State at home, too. I’m not convinced that the Wolverines will finish the regular season undefeated like last year, but I expect them to win the Big Ten and be in the Playoff conversation for a third-straight season. 

Ohio State has what it takes to win the Big Ten from a talent standpoint. I’m not sure I trust Ryan Day to do it, though. The Buckeyes have been passed over by Michigan recently. Plus, Ohio State is breaking in a new quarterback and I don’t know what to expect. The next team that I think can win the Big Ten is Penn State. This could be the best collection of talent the Nittany Lions have had in recent years. Penn State is in great shape in the trenches, backfield, and secondary. My concern with the Nittany Lions is their uncertainty at the quarterback and wide receiver positions.

I’m expecting Luke Fickell to have a smooth transition in his first year at Wisconsin. There will be growing pains, but Fickell brought in a nice haul of players from the transfer portal. The Badgers also benefit from being in the West division. Maryland actually has some talent on its roster, but it’s in one of the most difficult divisions in college football. The Terrapins should consider it a success if they get to eight wins. I’m not sure how good Iowa or Minnesota will be this season, but their schedules are manageable. 

I’m tired of Bret Bielema proving me wrong every year, which is why I have Illinois getting to bowl eligibility. I’m very curious to see how much success Matt Rhule has in his first year at Nebraska. I think he’s inheriting some talent and he brought in a good transfer portal class. Mel Tucker likely has to get Michigan State to bowl eligibility to have a chance to keep his job. That’s not out of the question since the Spartans face Washington, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, and Penn State all at home. I expect Purdue to struggle in Ryan Walters’ first season as head coach. 

USC Trojans head coach Lincoln Riley reacts to a touchdown against the Utah Utes in the first quarter at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-USA TODAY Sports

Pac-12 (RIP)

TeamRecord
1USC*11-2 (8-1)
2Washington10-3 (7-2)
3Utah10-2 (7-2)
4Oregon10-2 (7-2)
5Oregon State9-3 (6-3)
6UCLA8-4 (5-4)
7Washington State6-6 (4-5)
8Arizona6-6 (4-5)
9Cal5-7 (3-6)
10Arizona State4-8 (2-7)
11Colorado3-9 (1-8)
12Stanford2-10 (0-9)
Price’s Pac-12 projections (* conference championship winner)


It’s a shame that in the last year of the Pac-12 (as we know it) the conference is at its most interesting. I had a difficult time picking against USC to win the Pac-12 this season. The Trojans are returning the Heisman Trophy winner from last year in Williams. They also return a lot of production and brought in a strong transfer portal class. My only reservation is USC’s defense, which struggled at times a season ago. At the end of the day, the Trojans are going to be a talented team. I also trust Riley, who’s never won fewer than 10 games in a full season as a head coach. 

The top of the Pac-12 is loaded with quality teams in Washington, Utah, and Oregon. Each of those teams are returning great quarterbacks and have enough talent to win a lot of games. Each of those teams also play each other, too, including USC. It’s going to be a gauntlet for the teams at the top of the conference. I give the slight edge to the Huskies as the team that’s going to be in the Pac-12 Championship because they get Oregon and Utah at home. However, if either the Utes or Ducks are in the conference championship, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised. 

I also wouldn’t sleep on Oregon State as a team that could win the Pac-12. Jonathan Smith has done an excellent job building up the Beavers, and they made an upgrade at quarterback by grabbing D.J. Uiagalelei from the transfer portal. I expect UCLA to regress a little bit, but Chip Kelly has that program in a good spot. I think the Bruins will be fine. Arizona and Washington State have what it takes to finish higher in the Pac-12 standings. Both teams are going to be scrappy, but I’m not convinced they have the horses on their roster to hang with the top teams in the conference.

With the exception of Stanford, I think the bottom of the Pac-12 is somewhat strong. Cal and Arizona State have enough talent to get to bowl eligibility, but I need to see it happen. Everyone is going to be interested in watching Deion Sanders in his first year as Colorado’s head coach. The Buffaloes have some talent after hauling in the No. 1 transfer portal class. I just have a hard time seeing Sanders turning things around there in a single offseason after the program went 1-11 last year. 

Alabama Crimson Tide running back Jase McClellan (2) runs the ball against Kansas State Wildcats Kansas State Wildcats safety VJ Payne (19) during the second half in the 2022 Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome. Mandatory Credit: Andrew Wevers-USA TODAY Sports

SEC

East DivisionRecordWest DivisionRecord
1Georgia12-1 (8-0)Alabama*12-1 (7-1)
2Tennessee9-3 (5-3)LSU10-2 (6-2)
3Florida6-6 (4-4)Texas A&M10-2 (6-2)
4Kentucky7-5 (3-5)Ole Miss8-4 (4-4)
5South Carolina6-6 (3-5)Arkansas7-5 (3-5)
6Missouri4-8 (1-7)Mississippi State7-5 (3-5)
7Vanderbilt5-7 (1-7)Auburn6-6 (2-6)
Price’s SEC projections (* conference championship winner)


I went back and forth on which team to pick to win the SEC. I eventually landed on Alabama. Contrary to what some people think, I don’t believe the Nick Saban dynasty is over. The Crimson Tide had some bad luck last year — losing two games by a total of four points. This Alabama team will likely have a formidable rushing attack, which shouldn’t be overlooked. The best Saban-coached teams had run-heavy offenses. I also think Saban revamping his coaching staff by hiring Tommy Rees and Kevin Steele as his coordinators could rejuvenate the Crimson Tide. 

I might not have Georgia winning the SEC, but I’m still very high on the Bulldogs. They have a roster loaded with talent. I have no doubt that Kirby Smart will just reload after losing so many players to the NFL last year. I think the pundits are a little too high on LSU entering this season. The Tigers were eight points away from being a 7-5 team last year. I expect LSU to progress under Brian Kelly, but I think the program is at least another year from potentially being a national championship contender. 

I’m going to bet on Jimbo Fisher to get Texas A&M back on track this season. He’s too good of a head coach and the Aggies have too much talent to have another disastrous season like they did last year. I don’t anticipate Tennessee to drop off too much despite losing some highly-regarded players to the NFL. Josh Heupel has the Volunteers in a good spot right now, and I think Joe Milton will be a solid quarterback. Ole Miss has a chance to finish higher in the West. The Rebels lost some close games last year and return a lot of production from that team. I also wouldn’t doubt Lane Kiffin.

Arkansas, Florida, and South Carolina are all in the same boat. They’re teams with enough talent to win a lot of games, but have incredibly difficult schedules. I wanted to give each of those teams more wins, but struggled to find them. Getting quarterback Devin Leary out of the transfer portal is going to help Kentucky a lot this season. He’s a solid player that should help the Wildcats be competitive. I expect both Mississippi State and Auburn to have growing pains this season since they both have first-year head coaches. 

Notre Dame Fighting Irish head coach Marcus Freeman sings the Notre Dame Alma Mater with his players after the Notre Dame Fighting Irish defeated the UNLV Rebels at Notre Dame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports

Notre Dame

Projected record: 9-3

I don’t think Notre Dame has received enough credit for how it finished last season. Remember, the Fighting Irish started 0-2, with losses to Ohio State and Marshall, and it felt like they were in for a long season. However, they rebounded and won nine of their last 11 games. Notre Dame is returning a lot of production from last year, and also made a big splash in the transfer portal by landing Hartman. The Fighting Irish have a good chance of making an appearance in a New Year’s Six bowl game, but they have a difficult schedule. They have road games at NC State, Duke, Louisville, and Clemson, along with home games against Ohio State and USC. I think this could be a scenario where Notre Dame is a better team than it was last season, but it doesn’t show up in the win column. 

UTSA Roadrunners quarterback Frank Harris (0) celebrates a touchdown in the first half against the North Texas Mean Green at the Alamodome. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Dunn-USA TODAY Sports

Group of 5 representative in the New Year’s Six

Pick: UTSA
Projected record: 11-2

Everyone is going to pick Tulane to be the Group of 5 representative in a New Year’s Six bowl game this season. I wanted to go against the grain and pick UTSA, though. Jeff Traylor has done an excellent job building up the Roadrunners – winning 30 games the last three seasons. UTSA also returns a lot of experience and production on both sides of the ball. The Roadrunners might also have the best quarterback at the Group of 5 level in Frank Harris, who’s thrown for 71 touchdowns and ran for over 1,600 yards the last three years. Another reason why I like UTSA’s chances of making it to a New Year’s Six bowl game is its move to the American, which will garner more respect from the playoff committee. Seven times in the last nine years has the Group of 5 representative been from the American.

New Year’s Six projections

Bowl gameTeamTeam
Sugar (College Football Playoff semifinal)No. 4 Ohio StateNo. 1 Alabama
Rose (College Football Playoff semifinal)No. 3 GeorgiaNo. 2 Michigan
Cotton (at-large vs at-large)OregonTexas
Orange (ACC vs. Big Ten/Notre Dame/SECLSUClemson
Fiesta (at-large vs at-large)Penn StateUSC
Peach (at-large vs at-large)UTSAFlorida State
Price’s projections for the New Year’s Six bowl games

College Football Playoff National Championship

No. 2 Michigan vs. No. 1 Alabama

Since not many teams at the top of college football are returning quality starting quarterbacks, I think that means that the teams that run the ball effectively will be in a better position to win. The two teams that I think will be the best in that department are Alabama and Michigan. They’re two of the most complete teams heading into the season. The Crimson Tide and the Wolverines should have imposing rushing attacks, solid defenses, and plenty of talent elsewhere on their rosters. I’m also not going to shortchange either team at the quarterback position. McCarthy performed well for Michigan last year as a sophomore. Alabama has yet to name a starter, but I think it’ll be fine wither either Jalen Milroe or Tyler Buchner. Both players were highly recruited out of high school.

Alabama Crimson Tide head coach Nick Saban looks on against the LSU Tigers during the first half at Tiger Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports


Let me take you back to late Sept. 2015. Alabama hadn’t won a national championship in two years and sustained a loss to Ole Miss at home in Week 3. Everyone thought the Saban dynasty was over at the time. The Crimson Tide then won 12 games in a row, including the national championship. This year feels similar to 2015. Alabama hasn’t won a national championship in two years and everyone, again, thinks the Saban dynasty is over. I, obviously, don’t share that opinion.

I think the pundits are putting too much stock in the Crimson Tide’s quarterback battle. They’re not the only team at the top of college football breaking in a new starter. Plus, Alabama has won national championships in the Saban era despite not having a great quarterback. Those teams ran the ball effectively, controlled the time of possession, prevented opponents from scoring too many points, and had a quarterback that limited turnovers. I expect the Crimson Tide to return to their roots and play that way this season, which is why I’m picking them to win it all.

Winner: Alabama

Contact me