2024 NCAA Tournament predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“The visions are clear now. I see possible futures, all at once. Our enemies are all around us, and in so many futures they prevail. But I do see a way, there is a narrow way through.”

— Paul Atreides, “Dune: Part Two” (2024)

It’s time to fill out brackets because March Madness is here. I won’t lie, I haven’t paid much attention to the college basketball regular season. That means that I’m either going to do horribly or get almost every pick correct. I’ve been cramming in research the last 40(ish) hours since the bracket was revealed Sunday. I now wish that my West Virginia Mountaineers had given me a reason to care about this college basketball season.

Two years ago was the worst I’ve ever done when it comes to predicting the NCAA Tournament. I lost two Final Four teams, including my national champion, on the first day of the tournament. I was a little better last year, but still wasn’t great thanks to Arizona and Purdue letting me down on, you guessed it, the first day of the tournament. I feel like my reputation is on the line this year, so I really need a good showing. That’s why I relied pretty heavily on KenPom rankings.

We saw so many upsets in the conference tournaments last week, which is why this was one of the craziest “on the bubble” debates in years. It certainly feels like we’re in for another very unpredictable NCAA tournament. However, the last two tournaments were two of the craziest that I’ve witnessed in my life. I also think we’re due for a tournament where we see mostly chalk.

As always, March Madness is a welcome sight at this point in the sports calendar. I need something to take my attention away from NFL free agency news, which is pretty dry right now. Keep your head on a swivel these next three weeks. I can already feel my bracket being busted.

Colorado Buffaloes forward Tristan da Silva (23) celebrates with guard K.J. Simpson (2) in the first half against the California Golden Bears at the CU Events Center. Mandatory Credit: Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

First Four — Dayton, Ohio

No. 16 Wagner (16-15) vs. No. 16 Howard (18-16)

I’ll give the advantage to Howard in this matchup. The Bison not only rank higher in KenPom rankings, but they’ve won nine of their last 11 games. They also have tournament experience after making an appearance last year. I doubt Wagner, which averages just 63.5 points per game, is good enough offensively to win in the tournament.

Winner: Howard

No. 10 Colorado State (24-10) vs. No. 10 Virginia (23-10)

Mountain West teams haven’t performed well in the tournament for the last decade — posting a record of 12-26 since 2013. However, I think Colorado State is an underseeded team. The Rams rank 31 spots higher than Virginia in KenPom rankings. That’s quite a disparity. The Cavaliers also lost five of their last nine games to end the regular season.

Winner: Colorado State

No. 16 Grambling State (20-14) vs. No. 16 Montana State (17-17)

There’s quite a disparity between these teams when it comes to KenPom rankings. Montana State ranks No. 213, whereas Grambling State ranks No. 267. I’ll give the advantage to to the Bobcats. I’m not convinced that the Tigers are good enough offensively — averaging just 67.6 points per game — to score on Montana State’s defense.

Winner: Montana State

No. 10 Colorado (24-10) vs. No. 10 Boise State (22-10)

Colorado is another team that I think is underseeded. The Buffaloes rank in the top 30 in the country, according to KenPom (Boise State ranks No. 39). They also ended the season on a positive note — winning eight of their last nine games. The Broncos have never won a tournament game in program history and I doubt that changes this year.

Winner: Colorado

Round of 64

Connecticut Huskies guard Tristen Newton (2) drives to the basket against St. John’s Red Storm guard Daniss Jenkins (5) during the second half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 16 Stetson (22-12) vs. No. 1 UConn (31-3) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I have a difficult time seeing UConn getting bounced early in this tournament. The Huskies have too much depth and have been the most consistent team in the country all season. No. 16 seeds have been more competitive against No. 1 seeds in recent years, but I don’t see an upset happening in this matchup. UConn should cruise to the next round.

Winner: UConn

No. 9 Northwestern (21-11) vs. No. 8 Florida Atlantic (25-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic hasn’t been as consistent this season as last season. The Owls are still a very good team, though. They rank in the top 45 in KenPom, and rank in the top 20 in adjusted offensive efficiency. Northwestern will have a very difficult time defensively in this matchup. I also think Florida Atlantic has the coaching advantage in Dusty May.

Winner: Florida Atlantic

No. 12 UAB (22-11) vs. No. 5 San Diego State (24-10) — Spokane, Wash.

We didn’t get a single No. 12 seed to upset a No. 5 seed last year. In the last 20 years, history says to expect at least two upsets the year after that happens. I’m not convinced there will be an upset in this matchup, though. San Diego State is an elite defensive team and UAB isn’t a great offensive team. I think the Blazers will have a difficult time scoring on the Aztecs.

Winner: San Diego State

No. 13 Yale (22-9) vs. No. 4 Auburn (27-7) — Spokane, Wash.

Ivy League schools are always tricky teams in the tournament. This won’t be an easy game for Auburn. I’m still picking the Tigers to win, though. They rank No. 4 in the country in KenPom rankings, so they might be the most underseeded team in this tournament field. Yale isn’t a terrific defensive team, which should bode well for Auburn, which averages 83.2 points per game.

Winner: Auburn

No. 11 Duquesne (24-11) vs. No. 6 BYU (23-10) — Omaha, Neb.

Duquesne is a hot team right now, but I doubt it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. BYU ranks No. 16 in the country, according to KenPom, so it’s a very underseeded team. The Cougars are also one of the top offensive teams in the country — ranking No. 11 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt the Dukes will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: BYU

No. 14 Morehead State (26-8) vs. No. 3 Illinois (26-8) — Omaha, Neb.

The Big Ten tournament champion hasn’t made it past the first weekend of the NCAA tournament since 2019. I wouldn’t be so quick to pick Illinois to win this game given that track record. I’ll still pick the Fighting Illini to win, though. They’ve been playing well since late January — winning 12 of their last 15 games, including seven of their last eight.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake (28-6) vs. No. 7 Washington State (24-9) — Omaha, Neb.

The line of this game has shifted quite a bit in favor of Drake since it opened. I think that’s pretty telling to take the Bulldogs seriously in this matchup. Drake will likely have the best player in this game in Tucker DeVries, who averages 21.8 points per game. I think Washington State’s defense will have its hands full with him. The Bulldogs also have more tournament experience.

Winner: Drake

No. 15 South Dakota State (22-12) vs. No. 2 Iowa State (27-7) — Omaha, Neb.

I can’t bring myself to pick against Iowa State in this matchup. The Cyclones are red hot right now after winning 11 of their last 13 games, including winning three Big 12 tournament games by a combined 61 points. This is one of the weaker South Dakota State teams in the last 15 years. I also expect this to essentially be a home game for Iowa State.

Winner: Iowa State

North Carolina Tar Heels guard R.J. Davis (4) shoots the ball against the North Carolina State Wolfpack during the second half at Capital One Arena. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 16 Howard vs. No. 1 North Carolina (27-7) — Charlotte, N.C.

North Carolina has played like one of the top teams in the country the last few weeks, even though it might be overseeded a bit. The Tar Heels have won 20 of their last 24 games. If not for an NC State team getting hot at the right time, North Carolina probably would’ve won the ACC tournament. I highly doubt Howard is good enough to pull off a historic upset.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 9 Michigan State (19-14) vs. No. 8 Mississippi State (21-13) — Charlotte, N.C.

Mississippi State is playing well right now, but I’ll give the advantage to Michigan State in this matchup. Tom Izzo has been one-and-done just six times in his previous 25 tournament appearances. I also think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time scoring on the Spartans’ defense, which ranks in the top 10 in adjusted defensive efficiency.

Winner: Michigan State

No. 12 Grand Canyon (29-4) vs. No. 5 Saint Mary’s (26-7) — Spokane, Wash.

I think this is the mostly likely 5/12 matchup to end in an upset. Grand Canyon is the highest ranking No. 12 seed in KenPom (No. 53). The Antelopes have lost only four games all season and they have a head coach with plenty of tournament experience in Bryce Drew. Saint Mary’s is one of those teams that I never trust in the tournament and I won’t start now.

Winner: Grand Canyon

No. 13 Charleston (27-7) vs. No. 4 Alabama (21-11) — Spokane, Wash.

Alabama didn’t end the regular season on a positive note — losing four of its last six games. I wouldn’t rule out a potential upset in this matchup, but I don’t see it happening. Charleston is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. You have to be a great defensive team in order to knock off the Crimson Tide, who average 90.8 points per game.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico (26-9) vs. No. 6 Clemson (21-11) — Memphis, Tenn.

I’ve mostly picked against Mountain West schools so far, but I’ll take the upset here. Clemson isn’t playing well right now. The Tigers have lost four of their last eight games, including two losses to very bad Notre Dame and Boston College teams. New Mexico is surging after winning its conference tournament last week. Vegas also favors the Lobos in this matchup.

Winner: New Mexico

No. 14 Colgate (25-9) vs. No. 3 Baylor (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

Even though Colgate will be making its fourth-consecutive tournament appearance, I don’t take it that seriously. The Raiders have been outscored by a combined 44 points during that stretch. Baylor is one of the top offensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency. I doubt Colgate will be able to keep up on the scoreboard.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada (26-7) vs. No. 7 Dayton (24-7) — Salt Lake City

I feel an upset brewing in this matchup. Dayton has to make a long trip west despite being the higher seed, which benefits Nevada. The Wolf Pack played well down the stretch — winning 11 of their last 14 games. I think the Flyers have been too inconsistent defensively all season. Nevada also ranks in the top 40 in the country in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency.

Winner: Nevada

No. 15 Long Beach State (21-14) vs. No. 2 Arizona (25-8) — Salt Lake City

I have a difficult time seeing Arizona getting bounced early in back-to-back seasons. The Wildcats shoot the ball very well and rank in the top 20 in the country in offensive rebounds. That ought to bode well in the tournament. Long Beach State is one of the worst defensive teams in this tournament field. I think the Beach will have a difficult time slowing down Arizona’s offense.

Winner: Arizona

Houston Cougars guard L.J. Cryer (4) drives with the ball as Rice Owls guard Alem Huseinovic (23) defends during the second half at Fertitta Center. Mandatory Credit: Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 16 Longwood (21-13) vs. No. 1 Houston (30-4) — Memphis, Tenn.

I fully expect Houston to bounce back after getting blown out in the Big 12 championship. The Cougars are one of the more talented teams in this tournament and are excellent defensively. This is a very bad matchup for Longwood, which ranks near the bottom among tournament teams offensively. Houston shouldn’t have too many issues in this matchup.

Winner: Houston

No. 9 Texas A&M (20-14) vs. No. 8 Nebraska (23-10) — Memphis, Tenn.

I think this is a terrible matchup for Nebraska. The Cornhuskers rank in the bottom third in the country in offensive rebounds and total rebounds allowed per game. Texas A&M doesn’t shoot the ball that well, but getting second-chance opportunities will only improve its chances of winning. The Aggies are also playing well after winning five of their last six games.

Winner: Texas A&M

No. 12 James Madison (31-3) vs. No. 5 Wisconsin (22-13) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

James Madison poses a lot of problems for Wisconsin. The Dukes rank in the top five in defending 3-pointers. They’ve also won 13 straight games. I’m still picking the Badgers to win, though. They shoot the ball well and take care of the basketball. The difference in the game will likely be which team collects more offensive rebounds, and I give that advantage to Wisconsin.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 13 Vermont (28-6) vs. No. 4 Duke (24-8) — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I’m to the point that I need to see Vermont pull off an upset in the tournament before I pick it to do so. The Catamounts have never advanced past the Round of 64 under head coach John Becker. That’s why I’ll take Duke to win this game. The Blue Devils will have a significant talent advantage, which will likely be the difference in this matchup.

Winner: Duke

No. 11 NC State (22-14) vs. No. 6 Texas Tech (23-10) — Pittsburgh

I think NC State will be gassed after winning five games in five days in the ACC tournament. The Wolfpack now have a quick turnaround and play on Thursday. I think that bodes well for Texas Tech, which KenPom considers to be a top 25 team in the country. The Red Raiders have been the far more consistent team all season. I like them to advance to the next round.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 14 Oakland (23-11) vs. No. 3 Kentucky (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Kentucky has been very inconsistent defensively, but I still expect it to win this game. Oakland isn’t a very good offensive team — ranking in the bottom 15 among tournament teams in adjusted offensive efficiency. I highly doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Wildcats. I expect Kentucky to advance to the Round of 32.

Winner: Kentucky

No. 10 Colorado vs. No. 7 Florida (24-11) — Indianapolis

This is a dangerous matchup for Florida. The Gators aren’t a great defensive team and will be shorthanded, and Colorado is a good offensive team. This will likely be a very high-scoring game, but I’ll still give the advantage to Florida. The Gators are elite offensively — ranking in the top 15 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, points per game, and offensive rebounding.

Winner: Florida

No. 15 Western Kentucky (22-11) vs. No. 2 Marquette (25-9) — Indianapolis

I think this is a very bad matchup for Western Kentucky, which struggles on the offensive end of the court. Marquette is one of the better defensive teams in this tournament — ranking in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency. Points will be hard to come by for the Hilltoppers, which will make it incredibly difficult to pull off the upset.

Winner: Marquette

Purdue Boilermakers center Zach Edey (15) shoots the ball while Indiana Hoosiers center Kel’el Ware (1) defends in the second half at Mackey Arena. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 16 Montana State vs. No. 1 Purdue (29-4) — Indianapolis

I highly doubt Purdue will overlook its opponent this year. I fully expect last year’s loss to No. 16-seeded Fairleigh Dickinson to be in the back of its mind. The Boilermakers might have the best player in the tournament in Zach Edey, who averages 24.4 points per game. Like Arizona, I don’t think Purdue will be bounced early in back-to-back seasons.

Winner: Purdue

No. 9 TCU (21-12) vs. No. 8 Utah State (27-6) — Indianapolis

Given the Mountain West’s recent history in the tournament, there’s no way I’m picking against TCU. The Horned Frogs rank 15 spots ahead of Utah State in KenPom rankings, and in the top 50 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, adjusted defensive efficiency, and offensive rebounds. This feels like a very bad matchup for the Aggies.

Winner: TCU

No. 12 McNeese State (30-3) vs. No. 5 Gonzaga (25-7) — Salt Lake City

McNeese State will be a trendy pick because it’s one of the most improved teams in the country from last year, and this isn’t a great Gonzaga team. However, I’m not picking against Mark Few. He hasn’t been eliminated in the Round of 64 since 2008. KenPom also considers Gonzaga to be a top 15 team in the country, so it feels like a very underseeded team.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 13 Samford (29-5) vs. No. 4 Kansas (22-10) — Salt Lake City

I actually came close to picking the upset in this game. Kansas was hobbling at the end of the regular season — losing six of its last 10 games, including back-to-back losses by a combined 50 points. The Jayhawks have also sustained injuries to some of their better players. I still think Kansas has what it takes to beat Samford, which struggles on the defensive end of the court.

Winner: Kansas

No. 11 Oregon (23-11) vs. No. 6 South Carolina (26-7) — Pittsburgh

I’m not doubting Dana Altman in the tournament. He’s never lost in the Round of 64 as Oregon’s head coach. Altman has even made it past the first weekend five times in the last seven tournament appearances with the Ducks. South Carolina has been a good story to get to this point. I just think the Gamecocks are catching Oregon at the wrong time.

Winner: Oregon

No. 14 Akron (24-10) vs. No. 3 Creighton (23-9) — Pittsburgh

Akron managed to win the MAC tournament, but I’m not convinced it’s good enough to pull off the upset in this matchup. The Zips have been too inconsistent on both ends of the court all season. Creighton is an excellent offensive team — averaging 80.5 points per game. I have more trust in the Bluejays, who haven’t lost in the Round of 64 since 2018.

Winner: Creighton

No. 10 Colorado State vs. No. 7 Texas (20-12) — Charlotte, N.C.

I think Texas is a better team than what its record would indicate. The Longhorns had bad luck in Big 12 play (losing six games by fewer than 10 points). They should benefit by getting out of conference play. Texas will also have a significant talent advantage in this matchup. Colorado State struggles to defend 3-pointers and the Longhorns rank in the top 60 in 3-point shooting.

Winner: Texas

No. 15 Saint Peter’s (19-13) vs. No. 2 Tennessee (24-8) — Charlotte, N.C.

Don’t be so quick to rule out Saint Peter’s. The Peacocks have caught fire the last few weeks — winning eight of their last 10 games. I expect Tennessee to win this game comfortably, though. The Volunteers are one of the best defensive teams in this tournament. I think Saint Peter’s will have a difficult time scoring enough points to pull off the upset.

Winner: Tennessee

Round of 32

Iowa State Cyclones guard Keshon Gilbert (10) drives around Houston Cougars guard Ramon Walker Jr. (3) during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 8 Florida Atlantic vs. No. 1 UConn — Brooklyn, N.Y.

Florida Atlantic’s defense is the main reason why I doubt it can make another deep run like last year. The Owls rank No. 109 in adjusted defensive efficiency. They also allow 10.8 offensive rebounds per game, which puts them in the bottom half of the country. This feels like a mismatch in favor of UConn. The Huskies have plenty of scoring depth and too much size in the post.

Winner: UConn

No. 5 San Diego State vs. No. 4 Auburn — Spokane, Wash.

I actually think Auburn matches up well against San Diego State’s defense. The Tigers shoot the ball well and do a good job collecting offensive rebounds. They also have scoring depth, with six different players averaging at least 7.1 points per game, and 11 different players to play in at least 28 games. I don’t think the Aztecs have the depth to keep up with Auburn.

Winner: Auburn

No. 6 BYU vs. No. 3 Illinois — Omaha, Neb.

This will likely be a difficult matchup for BYU to pull off the upset. Illinois has a lot of depth, with nine different players appearing in at least 24 games, and one of the best guards in the country in Terrence Shannon Jr. The Fighting Illini can also win in a variety of ways, which is always valuable in the tournament. I also think Brad Underwood is a better coach than Mark Pope.

Winner: Illinois

No. 10 Drake vs. No. 2 Iowa State — Omaha, Neb.

Having DeVries might be good enough to beat Washington State, but I doubt it’ll be enough to upset Iowa State. The Cyclones are arguably the best defensive team in the country — ranking in the top five in adjusted defensive efficiency and points allowed per game. I think the Bulldogs will have a difficult time winning if DeVries has limited scoring chances.

Winner: Iowa State

Arizona Wildcats guard Caleb Love (2) celebrates against the Southern California Trojans in the second half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 9 Michigan State vs. No. 1 North Carolina — Charlotte, N.C.

I have a ton of respect for Izzo, but this feels like the end of the road for Michigan State. The Spartans have been too inconsistent all season. I don’t think they’re good enough offensively to upset North Carolina, which ranks No. 6 in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Tar Heels are the more talented team, so I expect them to take care of business and advance to the next round.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 12 Grand Canyon vs. No. 4 Alabama — Spokane, Wash.

Grand Canyon might be good enough to upset Saint Mary’s, but I doubt that it can knock off Alabama. The Crimson Tide are one of the best offensive teams in the tournament. The Antelopes aren’t a great defensive team — ranking No. 51 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 106 in 3-point defense. I like Alabama to get to the Sweet 16 for a second-consecutive year.

Winner: Alabama

No. 11 New Mexico vs. No. 3 Baylor — Memphis, Tenn.

New Mexico is a good defensive team, but it’ll have a difficult time defending Baylor’s offense. The Bears rank in the top 10 in adjusted offensive efficiency and 3-point shooting. They’re also a very physical team and do a good job of getting offensive rebounds. That’ll likely be a significant disadvantage for the Lobos. New Mexico ranks No. 153 in offensive rebounds allowed per game.

Winner: Baylor

No. 10 Nevada vs. No. 2 Arizona — Salt Lake City

I don’t think Nevada is good enough on the glass to upset Arizona. The Wildcats average 13.2 offensive rebounds per game, and the Wolf Pack rank No. 106 in offensive rebounds allowed per game. I don’t think that matchup bodes well for Nevada because Arizona is an elite offensive team. If the Wildcats get second-chance opportunities, I don’t see how they lose this game.

Winner: Arizona

Marquette Golden Eagles head coach Shaka Smart talks to guard Stevie Mitchell (4) as he coaches against the Providence Friars during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 9 Texas A&M vs. No. 1 Houston — Memphis, Tenn.

This is a dangerous matchup for Houston. Texas A&M is one of the hottest teams in the country right now. The Aggies also played the Cougars very tough back in December. I think that’ll be in the back of Kelvin Sampson’s mind, though. Houston is an excellent defensive team — allowing just 57 points per game. I think Texas A&M will have a difficult time making shots.

Winner: Houston

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 4 Duke — Brooklyn, N.Y.

I didn’t like the way that Duke ended the regular season. The Blue Devils lost their last two games, including a pretty embarrassing loss to North Carolina on their own home court. This is a much different Wisconsin team than we’ve seen since the Bo Ryan era. The Badgers rank No. 13 in adjusted offensive efficiency and shoot nearly 35% from 3-point territory.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 3 Kentucky — Pittsburgh

Since 2008, only seven teams ranked outside the top 200 in defensive efficiency made it to the Sweet 16. That doesn’t bode well for Kentucky, which allows 79.7 points per game and 12 offensive rebounds per game. I think Texas Tech is good enough defensively to slow down the Wildcats’ offense. I also don’t have much trust in John Calipari, who hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2019.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 2 Marquette — Indianapolis

I actually think this is a favorable matchup for Florida. Marquette ranks in the bottom half of the country in 3-point defense and offensive rebounds allowed per game. The Gators are so good offensively. They’ll make the Golden Eagles pay if given second-chance opportunities. Lastly, I don’t trust Shaka Smart in the tournament. He hasn’t made it past the Round of 32 since 2011.

Winner: Florida

Tennessee Volunteers head coach Rick Barnes during the second half against the South Carolina Gamecocks at Thompson-Boling Arena at Food City Center. Mandatory Credit: Randy Sartin-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 9 TCU vs. No. 1 Purdue — Indianapolis

This could be a problematic matchup for Purdue. TCU wants to speed the game up, whereas Purdue wants to slow the game down. Press defense gave the Boilermakers trouble last year, but they’ve done a better job taking care of the ball this year. Purdue is more experienced in the backcourt this year than it was last year, too. I also don’t have much trust in Jamie Dixon in the tournament.

Winner: Purdue

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 4 Kansas — Salt Lake City

If Kansas was healthy, I’d probably pick the Jayhawks to win this game. I don’t know how effective Kevin McCullar Jr. and Hunter Dickinson will be, even though they’re expected to be available. I’ll give the advantage to Gonzaga. Few has made it to the Sweet 16 in eight straight tournament appearances. Him and the Bulldogs are a safe bet in the first two rounds.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 11 Oregon vs. No. 3 Creighton — Pittsburgh

Creighton should win this game and advance to the next round. Oregon has been too inconsistent on both ends of the court. The Ducks rank No. 70 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 240 in 3-point defense. The Bluejays are one of the top offensive teams in the tournament — averaging 80.5 points per game. I expect Creighton will take advantage of that mismatch.

Winner: Creighton

No. 7 Texas vs. No. 2 Tennessee — Charlotte, N.C.

I’m not looking too much into the way Tennessee performed in the SEC tournament. KenPom has the Volunteers ranked in the top 10, and No. 3 in adjusted defensive efficiency. I think it’ll be difficult for Texas to make shots against in this matchup. The Longhorns have been too inconsistent on the defensive end of the court. I like the Volunteers to advance.

Winner: Tennessee

Sweet 16

Illinois Fighting Illini guard Terrence Shannon Jr. (0) dunks against the Ohio State Buckeyes during the first half at Target Center. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional semifinals — Boston

No. 4 Auburn vs. No. 1 UConn

If Auburn was in the West or Midwest regionals, I’d pick it to get to the Final Four. If any team can knock off UConn before the Elite Eight, I think it’s the Tigers. They match up very well with the Huskies. The problem is that UConn is really good, especially offensively. This will essentially be a home game for UConn, too. With almost a week to prepare, I give the advantage to Dan Hurley.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 2 Iowa State

Since 2000, Iowa State has won the Big 12 tournament five times and advanced to the Elite Eight just once after doing so. The Cyclones typically get up for the Big 12 tournament, but not the big dance. That’s part of the reason why I like Illinois in this matchup. I also think the Fighting Illini’s offense, which averages 84.4 points per game, poses a lot of problems for Iowa State’s defense.

Winner: Illinois

Baylor Bears forward Jalen Bridges (11) reacts after a made basket with guard Ja’Kobe Walter (4) against the TCU Horned Frogs during the first half at Ed and Rae Schollmaier Arena. Mandatory Credit: Raymond Carlin III-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional semifinals — Los Angeles

No. 4 Alabama vs. No. 1 North Carolina

As always, my biggest concern with Alabama is its defense. The Crimson Tide are one of the worst defensive teams in the tournament — ranking No. 112 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allowing 81.1 points per game. That’s not good enough. North Carolina is one of the top defensive teams in the country and I think it’ll be able to slow down Alabama’s offense.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 2 Arizona

I’ve been burned by Arizona too many times over the years. At this point, I need to see the Wildcats make a deep tournament run before I predict them to do so. I think Baylor poses trouble for Arizona. The Bears are a very good offensive team and won’t be afraid of Arizona’s size. With almost a week to prepare, I’ll give the advantage to the better head coach in Scott Drew.

Winner: Baylor

Texas Tech Red Raiders head coach Grant McCasland reacts during the second half against the Iowa State Cyclones at James H. Hilton Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Reese Strickland-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional semifinals — Dallas

No. 5 Wisconsin vs. No. 1 Houston

Wisconsin is a great offensive team, but scoring points on Houston’s defense will be a tall order. The Cougars rank in the top 20 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency, points allowed per game, 3-point defense, and turnovers forced. Houston will also have a significant talent advantage. A lot of things will have to break the Badgers’ way in order to pull off the upset.

Winner: Houston

No. 7 Florida vs. No. 6 Texas Tech

I think this matchup favors Texas Tech. Florida’s porous defense, which ranks No. 83 in adjusted defensive efficiency and allows 78.5 points per game, will likely prevent it from getting past the Sweet 16. The Red Raiders are solid offensive team and should be able to make shots against the Gators. I also think Grant McCasland is an ascending head coach, which benefits Texas Tech.

Winner: Texas Tech

Gonzaga Bulldogs head coach Mark Few looks on against the Santa Clara Broncos in the second half at McCarthey Athletic Center. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional semifinals — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 1 Purdue

This might be the weakest Gonzaga team that we’ve seen in recent years, but I’ll still take the upset. The Bulldogs have the coaching advantage with Few, who’ll have almost a week to prepare for this game. I also don’t trust Matt Painter and Purdue. The Boilermakers have made it to the Elite Eight just once in the previous 14 tournament appearances under Painter.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 2 Tennessee

Death, taxes, and Rick Barnes not getting past the Sweet 16. I just don’t trust Tennessee to make a deep tournament run, even though it’s an excellent defensive team. Creighton shoots the ball well, takes care of the ball, and should get second-chance opportunities against Tennessee. I think the Bluejays get back to the Elite 8 for a second-consecutive season.

Winner: Creighton

Elite Eight

Connecticut Huskies head coach Dan Hurley coaches against the Xavier Musketeers during the first half at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional final — Boston

No. 3 Illinois vs. No. 1 UConn

I think this is a very favorable matchup for UConn. Illinois has struggled on the defensive end of the court — ranking No. 93 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 236 in 3-point defense. I doubt that’ll be good enough to knock off the Huskies, who might be the best offensive team in the tournament. The Fighting Illini will have a very difficult time defending UConn.

Winner: UConn

North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis reacts during the second half against the Duke Blue Devils at Cameron Indoor Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Kinnan-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional final — Los Angeles

No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 1 North Carolina

Baylor’s inconsistent defense will likely be its downfall in the tournament. The Bears rank No. 64 in adjusted defensive efficiency and No. 189 in 3-point defense. North Carolina shoots the ball well and is just as aggressive as Baylor on the glass (maybe more so). The Tar Heels are also an elite defensive team. I don’t think they’re getting enough credit from the pundits.

Winner: North Carolina

Houston Cougars guard Jamal Shead (1) brings the ball up court during the first half against the Texas Tech Red Raiders at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional final — Dallas

No. 6 Texas Tech vs. No. 1 Houston

These teams played twice in the regular season and Houston won both meetings by a combined 46 points. I expect the Cougars to win a third meeting. I don’t think Texas Tech has the horses to keep up with Houston. The Cougars might be the most athletic team in the tournament. They also have an experienced backcourt, which they didn’t have last year.

Winner: Houston

Creighton Bluejays guard Baylor Scheierman (55) controls the ball against Villanova Wildcats guard Jordan Longino (15) in the first half at Wells Fargo Center. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Ross-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional final — Detroit

No. 5 Gonzaga vs. No. 3 Creighton

I’m not crazy about any of the higher seeds in this regional, but one of them is likely going to win it. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll pick Creighton. I think the Bluejays have the least amount of baggage and they showed last year they can make a deep tournament run. Gonzaga’s defense, which has been good but not great, will have a difficult time slowing down Creighton’s offense.

Winner: Creighton

Final Four — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 North Carolina vs. No. 1 UConn

North Carolina is certainly capable of knocking off UConn. The Tar Heels are good enough defensively to contain the Huskies’ offense — holding opponents to shoot just 40.7% from the field and limiting second-chance opportunities. I’m not sure North Carolina is consistent enough offensively, though. I also think UConn has the more complete team and a better head coach.

Winner: UConn

No. 3 Creighton vs. No. 1 Houston

I expect Creighton’s run to come to an end in this game. The Bluejays will have a difficult time scoring against Houston’s defense, which holds its opponents to shoot just 37.9% from the field. I don’t know where Creighton’s points will come from if it can’t make shots because it’s not a great offensive rebounding team. I like the Cougars to advance to the national championship.

Winner: Houston

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball National Championship Trophy. Mandatory credit: Getty Images.

National Championship — Glendale, Ariz.

No. 1 Houston vs. No. 1 UConn

These just feel like the most complete teams in the tournament. They’re both athletic, talented, and well coached. My readers know how much I hate picking defending champions, but I think UConn is a wagon. The Huskies have won 21 of their last 22 games and have shown no sign of slowing down. That’s why I think UConn is the most likely team to defend its title since Florida in 2007.

I also think the Huskies can be effective offensively on Houston’s stout defense. UConn had six different players lead the team in scoring in a game in the regular season, including five different players to score at least 20 points in a game. That typically bodes well in the tournament. The Huskies are also aggressive on the boards and play great defense. I think they cut down the nets again.

Winner: UConn

Contact me

Name(required)

Email(required)

Message

Submit

Δ

• X
• LinkedIn

Don’t rule out Oregon State, Washington State joining the Big 12 and changing the college football landscape forever

Movie quote of the day:

“I hate her. In fact, the day you broke up with her I marked that down on my calendar as a day of rejoicement. I’m going to celebrate it with a cake with her face on it, but instead of eating it, we smash it.”

– Stainer, “She’s Out of My League” (2010)

Oregon State Beavers running back Damien Martinez (6) carries the ball against the Washington State Cougars in the first half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

I was ready to believe that the conference realignment buzz was slowing down. I was under the impression that all that was left to determine was which school The American would add to replace SMU and the fate of Oregon State and Washington State.

However, the conference realignment buzz has cranked back up again, specifically in regards to Oregon State and Washington State. 

The next hearing in the Oregon State/Washington State lawsuit against the Pac-12 is officially set for Nov 14. The hearing will be about who gets control of the Pac-12 while the parties prepare for trial. It could be pivotal for the fate of OSU/WSU.https://t.co/gxnZ4DDITN

— Amanda Christovich (@achristovichh) September 29, 2023

A few weeks ago, those two schools filed a legal complaint against the Pac-12 and commissioner George Kliavkoff, seeking a temporary restraining order to protect the future of the conference. The basis for this decision comes because Oregon State and Washington State believe that the 10 members that are leaving won’t have the conference’s best interest at heart, even going so far as to believe that those members will vote to dissolve the Pac-12. Basically, Oregon State and Washington State want full control of the conference’s future. A hearing on the matter is slated for Nov. 14. 

This puts those two schools in a precarious situation. As it stands, the Pac-12 champion is going to have a guaranteed spot in the 12-team College Football Playoff next year. The new format is going to have six guaranteed spots for conference champions (each of the Power 5 conference champions and the highest-ranked Group of 5 conference champion) and six wild cards. It’s important to know that the 6+6 format isn’t set after next season, and the the CFP management committee has yet to determine if the format will stay the same or change after the Pac-12 lost 10 of its members back in the summer. In fact, the committee punted on making a decision the issue recently. 

Oregon State Beavers defensive back Jaden Robinson (4) breaks up a pass intended for Washington State Cougars wide receiver Josh Kelly (3) in the second half at Gesa Field at Martin Stadium. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-USA TODAY Sports

Oregon State and Washington State have a clear path to the CFP unless the format changes, even though they’re the only remaining members in the Pac-12. That will eventually change because the NCAA has a requirement that an FBS conference needs at least eight members, but there’s a two-year grace period. That means ESPN might have to pay about $320 million to Oregon State and Washington State, and potentially to schools like Boise State, Colorado State, San Diego State, UNLV, etc. 

Things could obviously change, though. The committee could eventually determine that the Pac-12 will lose its guaranteed spot in the CFP. The problem with that is that there’s no precedent for it. Remember, the old Big East/The American lost its guaranteed spot only because the BCS was scrapped and the CFP was formed, and the powers that be determined there wouldn’t be guaranteed spots in the new postseason format.

There’s also no technical explanation of the differences between the Power 5 and Group of 5 entities, which is a big problem for the committee. It’s likely not going to be able to explain it without referencing the colloquial expression “I know it when I see it” from Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in 1964.

The main difference between the different levels of competition in the NCAA (FBS, FCS, Division II, Division III) is mostly the number of scholarships. However, Power 5 and Group of 5 schools have the same number of football scholarships (85). That’s why those schools are considered to be on the same level and are told that they’re competing for the same national championship, even though we all know that’s not true. 

The College Football Playoff national championship trophy is displayed during Big Ten media days at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Robert Goddin-USA TODAY Sports

This is a significant development. I don’t expect ESPN to willingly pay $320 million to Oregon State and Washington State if the CFP format doesn’t change, and especially if the Pac-12 ever merges with the Mountain West and/or The American.

Oregon State and Washington State are in a pretty strong position, which is why I expect them to use it as leverage for ESPN to pull strings to get them in a Power 5 conference. The most like destination is the Big 12. Oregon State and Washington State are much better fits in that conference than the ACC, Big Ten, or the SEC. The two schools would also be quality additions to the Big 12. Oregon State has a solid football program right now and its baseball team has made it to Omaha, Neb., for the College World Series six times since 2005. Washington State has had a respectable football program for the last 30 years, and has its cool College Gameday tradition.

I think it’s more likely than not that Oregon State and Washington State end up in the Big 12. It’ll be much cheaper for ESPN to broadcast their games in the conference at a reduced share (roughly $20 million per school) than it would be to give them a share of the CFP revenue. It would also benefit Oregon State and Washington State in the long-term future to join the Big 12, instead of potentially joining the American or Mountain West.

Another hurdle of a CFP format change: Washington St. & Oregon St. are exploring ways to operate as a 2-school league for 1-2 yrs via NCAA grace period.

CFP must answer:
1 Would their "champion" be eligible for an AQ?
2 Do they each get CFP P5 revenue?https://t.co/vbBNfqXbRy

— Ross Dellenger (@RossDellenger) September 27, 2023

I also wouldn’t be surprised if ESPN waited for the committee to come to a decision on the format for the expanded CFP. If the Pac-12 loses its guaranteed spot, it’ll cost ESPN even less money to broadcast Oregon State and Washington State games in either the Mountain West or The American. That could be problematic, though, because the committee won’t meet again for a while and the clock is ticking. Plus, in order to change the CFP format, there has to be a unanimous decision by the committee, and The American commissioner Mike Aresco has said he won’t vote to change the format. So, that might not be the best course of action.

There could be a lot more riding on this development than just which conference Oregon State and Washington State join. The committee has a huge decision to make these next few weeks when it comes to the CFP format. I don’t think anyone wants to see more substantial changes to the highest level of college football, but I can’t help but see the writing on the wall. It feels like this will be the first step in the Power 5 conferences separating from the Group of 5 conferences or vice versa, which will completely change the college football landscape forever.

There’s been so much tension between the two entities since the CFP was established. The Group of 5 schools only receive 20% of the revenue, and there have even been rumblings of them starting their own playoff format. Unless the committee decides to give more than one Group of 5 conference champion a guaranteed spot in the CFP, which I highly doubt will happen, I think there’s only going to be more division. Regardless of how the committee handles the Pac-12’s situation.

Contact me

Name(required)

Email(required)

Message

Submit

Δ

• Twitter
• LinkedIn

2023 college football season predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“Musn’t be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.”

– Eames, “Inception” (2010)

Georgia Bulldogs head coach Kirby Smart holds the trophy after winning the CFP national championship game against the TCU Horned Frogs at SoFi Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

I’m not sure I’d be prepared to make my college football season predictions if it wasn’t for the recent conference realignment news. Truthfully, this season has snuck up on me. The news of Oregon and Washington heading to the Big Ten, and Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah going to the Big 12, got the juices flowing and made me eager for the start of the season. I’ve been hustling to get my research done for all Power 5 programs, and the top Group of 5 programs.  

The wait is finally over, though, because Week 1 technically starts this weekend. Even though the matchups aren’t particularly intriguing (aside from Notre Dame facing Navy in Ireland and Ohio playing San Diego State), I wanted to get my predictions finalized before any games were played. I didn’t want any of the results from this weekend to impact my outlook.

My immediate impression for this season is that there are some excellent storylines: Georgia is trying to become the first program to win three-consecutive national championships since Minnesota did it between 1934-36; the Pac-12 is arguably the most compelling Power 5 conference in the wake of its demise; Texas could really be back; Ohio State is trying to get back to being the top dog in the Big Ten; and many others. There’s also a lot of uncertainty at the top of college football, with several programs breaking in new starting quarterbacks.

Remember, we’ve also had plenty of conference realignment beginning this year at both the Power 5 and Group of 5 levels: BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF are now in the Big 12; Charlotte, FAU, North Texas, Rice, UAB, and UTSA joined the American; and Liberty, Jacksonville State, New Mexico State, and Sam Houston State joined the Conference USA. I don’t think we’re done with conference realignment either because we still haven’t seen the ramifications of the Pac-12’s demise trickle down to the Group of 5 level. 

There shouldn’t be any shortage of entertainment this season. 

Southern California Trojans quarterback Caleb Williams (13) throws the ball against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish in the first half at United Airlines Field at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

Major award winners

Award	Winner
Heisman (most outstanding player)	QB Caleb Williams, USC
Maxwell (best player)	Caleb Williams, USC
Davey O’Brien (best quarterback)	Caleb Williams, USC
Doak Walker (best running back)	Blake Corum, Michigan
Fred Biletnikoff (best wide receiver)	Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State
Bronko Nagurski (defensive player of the year)	Edge Jared Verse, Florida State
Outland (best lineman)	T Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State
Butkus (best linebacker)	Jeremiah Trotter, Clemson
Jim Thorpe (best defensive back)	CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama
Lou Groza (best kicker)	Ryan Coe, North Carolina

Price’s predicted major award winners

I know, I know, no player has won the Heisman Trophy twice since Archie Griffin won it in 1974 and 1975. My readers know that I hate picking chalk, but I think Williams is due to make history this season. Every quarterback in Lincoln Riley’s system has either put up better numbers each year in the system or the best numbers of their college careers. Williams is entering his third year in Riley’s system, dating back to their time at Oklahoma. The last quarterback we saw do that was Baker Mayfield, who won the Heisman in that third year. Williams is also a heavy favorite to win the award.

Michigan has relied heavily on its run game the last two seasons, with its top two rushers accounting for a combined 801 carries. I expect the same to happen this season. Remember, Corum rushed for almost 1,500 yards and 18 touchdowns last season. The only way he might not win the Doak Walker Award is if Michigan manages his workload and gives his backup the same amount of carries. There might be a new quarterback at Ohio State, but I don’t think that’s going to prevent Harrison Jr. from winning the Biletnikoff Award. He’s regarded as the best wide receiver prospect in the 2024 NFL Draft and I think the Ohio State coaching staff is going to find ways to get him the ball.

I had a difficult time giving the Outland Trophy to anyone but Fashanu. Not only is he expected to be the best offensive lineman in the country, but he’s going to pave the way for what should be an excellent rushing attack for Penn State. I struggled with the Lou Groza Award, but I eventually landed on Coe. North Carolina ought to have one of the best offenses in the country and should move the ball with ease, so Coe should see plenty of kicking opportunities.

As for the Nagurski Trophy, I think Verse should be considered the favorite. He’s arguably the best pass rusher in college football after accumulating nine sacks and 17 tackles for loss last season. I couldn’t think of any linebackers with a better chance of winning the Butkus Award than Trotter. He showed a lot of promise last year and I expect him to improve. The best defensive back in the country is arguably McKinstry, so he had to be my pick to win the Jim Thorpe Award. When it comes to defensive backs, I have a lot of trust in Nick Saban to develop them.

Clemson Tigers quarterback Cade Klubnik (2) throws a pass during the first half of the 2022 Orange Bowl against the Tennessee Volunteers at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jasen Vinlove-USA TODAY Sports

ACC

	Team	Record
1	Clemson*	11-2 (7-1)
2	Florida State	10-3 (7-1)
3	North Carolina	10-2 (6-2)
4	Duke	9-3 (5-3)
5	Miami	8-4 (5-3)
6	Louisville	7-5 (5-3)
7	Syracuse	7-5 (4-4)
8	NC State	7-5 (4-4)
9	Pitt	6-6 (4-4)
10	Virginia Tech	7-5 (3-5)
11	Wake Forest	5-7 (3-5)
12	Georgia Tech	4-8 (2-6)
13	Boston College	5-7 (1-7)
14	Virginia	2-10 (0-8)

Price’s ACC projections (* conference championship winner)

It actually wasn’t as easy to pick Clemson to win the ACC this season as opposed to previous seasons. There’s a lot of uncertainty facing the Tigers. Mainly, how much will Cade Klubnik improve as a quarterback and whether he’ll mesh with new offensive coordinator Garrett Riley. However, Clemson should still have the most talented team in the conference. The Tigers also benefit from playing Florida State, North Carolina, and Notre Dame at home. I’m not convinced Clemson can make the College Football Playoff, but a trip to the Orange Bowl is a reasonable expectation. 

If any team is going to beat out Clemson to win the ACC, I think it’s Florida State. The Seminoles are returning a lot of talent from a team that won 10 games last year. However, I’m not ready to believe that head coach Mike Norvell has the program ready to take the next step. North Carolina is certainly talented enough to win the conference, but I have reservations about its defense, which allowed 31.3 points per game last year against FBS competition. Having Drake Maye at quarterback will put the Tar Heels in a good spot to win a lot of games, though. 

I’m going out on a limb and picking Duke to improve from last year, even though its schedule is going to be incredibly difficult. I think head coach Mike Elko has the Blue Devils heading in the right direction. We’re going to find out just how good of a coach Mario Cristobal is, but there’s too much talent on Miami’s roster for the team to be as bad as it was last year. Even though I’m high on Jeff Brohm as a head coach, I think Louisville’s quarterback situation could hold the team back. I’m not convinced that Syracuse is going to improve much after sneaking up on the ACC last year.

I don’t know how good NC State or Virginia Tech are going to be, but both teams have manageable non-conference schedules. I think that’ll propel them to bowl eligibility. This could be a long season for Pitt. The Panthers have a brutal non-conference schedule and are losing a lot of production from last year. I think Pat Narduzzi deserves the benefit of the doubt, though. Dave Clawson and Wake Forest will likely have a difficult time getting to an eighth-straight bowl game without quarterback Sam Hartman.

Texas Longhorns quarterback Quinn Ewers (3) throws a pass during the first half against the Kansas Jayhawks at David Booth Kansas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Big 12

	Team	Record
1	Texas*	11-2 (8-1)
2	Texas Tech	9-4 (7-2)
3	Kansas State	9-3 (6-3)
4	Oklahoma	9-3 (6-3)
5	TCU	8-4 (5-4)
6	UCF	7-5 (5-4)
7	Baylor	7-5 (5-4)
8	Oklahoma State	8-4 (5-4)
9	Kansas	7-5 (4-5)
10	West Virginia	6-6 (4-5)
11	BYU	5-7 (3-6)
12	Houston	4-8 (2-7)
13	Cincinnati	4-8 (2-7)
14	Iowa State	3-9 (1-8)

Price’s Big 12 projections (* conference championship winner)

I realize that college football fans are fatigued with Texas. Time and time again the Longhorns have entered the season with so much hype only to fall on their faces by the end. However, I think this team is different. Steve Sarkisian has done an excellent job assembling talent. I think Texas has the right pieces both on the perimeter and in the trenches to make a run at the Big 12 championship. I also like the options the Longhorns have at quarterback in Quinn Ewers or Arch Manning. If either of them play at a high level, Texas has a chance to make the Playoff. 

I’ve been talking myself into Texas Tech recently. The Red Raiders are returning a lot of production from last year. They also benefit from playing Kansas State and TCU at home. This will likely be Texas Tech’s best chance to win the Big 12 since the Mike Leach era. I expect Kansas State to be near the top of the conference despite the departure of running back Deuce Vaughn. The Wildcats might have the best offensive line and defensive line combination in the Big 12, besides Texas. Quarterback Will Howard improved a lot last year, too. Kansas State has a good chance to defend the conference title. 

I expect Oklahoma to show improvement in Brent Venables’ second season. The Sooners have too much talent to finish below .500 again. TCU likely takes a step back (maybe even further than I think) after so much going its way last year and losing a lot of production from that team. UCF will have its growing pains in Year 1 in the Big 12. The Knights are a talented team and Gus Malzahn is a proven head coach, though. I wouldn’t be surprised if Baylor finishes lower than seventh, but I’m banking on Dave Aranda to turn things around. I’m very uncertain about Oklahoma State, but its non-conference schedule is manageable. Mike Gundy also seems to surprise everyone when expectations are low.

Kansas won’t be able to surprise anyone this year. However, I doubt the Jayhawks regress much. Jalon Daniels is a very underrated quarterback and Kansas is returning a lot of production from last year. I’m more optimistic about West Virginia than I should be, even though I have no trust in Neal Brown and his staff. The Mountaineers are returning several key players in the trenches and have a good backfield. I feel like that should be enough to get WVU to bowl eligibility. After the recent news out of the program, I’ll be very surprised if Iowa State doesn’t finish near the bottom of the Big 12.

Michigan Wolverines running back Blake Corum (2) stiff arms Nebraska Cornhuskers defensive back Malcolm Hartzog (13) in the first half at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports

Big Ten

	East Division	Record	West Division	Record
1	Michigan*	12-1 (8-1)	Wisconsin	10-3 (7-2)
2	Ohio State	11-1 (8-1)	Iowa	9-3 (6-3)
3	Penn State	10-2 (7-2)	Minnesota	7-5 (5-4)
4	Maryland	8-4 (5-4)	Illinois	6-6 (4-5)
5	Michigan State	6-6 (4-5)	Nebraska	6-6 (4-5)
6	Indiana	3-9 (1-8)	Purdue	5-7 (3-6)
7	Rutgers	3-9 (1-8)	Northwestern	2-10 (0-9)

Price’s Big Ten projections (* conference championship winner)

Michigan has proven the last two seasons that it runs the Big Ten. I see no reason to think otherwise this season. The Wolverines are returning a lot of production on both sides of the ball, including starting quarterback J.J. McCarthy and leading rusher Corum. They also have the right pieces in the trenches on both sides of the ball. Michigan benefits from playing Ohio State at home, too. I’m not convinced that the Wolverines will finish the regular season undefeated like last year, but I expect them to win the Big Ten and be in the Playoff conversation for a third-straight season. 

Ohio State has what it takes to win the Big Ten from a talent standpoint. I’m not sure I trust Ryan Day to do it, though. The Buckeyes have been passed over by Michigan recently. Plus, Ohio State is breaking in a new quarterback and I don’t know what to expect. The next team that I think can win the Big Ten is Penn State. This could be the best collection of talent the Nittany Lions have had in recent years. Penn State is in great shape in the trenches, backfield, and secondary. My concern with the Nittany Lions is their uncertainty at the quarterback and wide receiver positions.

I’m expecting Luke Fickell to have a smooth transition in his first year at Wisconsin. There will be growing pains, but Fickell brought in a nice haul of players from the transfer portal. The Badgers also benefit from being in the West division. Maryland actually has some talent on its roster, but it’s in one of the most difficult divisions in college football. The Terrapins should consider it a success if they get to eight wins. I’m not sure how good Iowa or Minnesota will be this season, but their schedules are manageable. 

I’m tired of Bret Bielema proving me wrong every year, which is why I have Illinois getting to bowl eligibility. I’m very curious to see how much success Matt Rhule has in his first year at Nebraska. I think he’s inheriting some talent and he brought in a good transfer portal class. Mel Tucker likely has to get Michigan State to bowl eligibility to have a chance to keep his job. That’s not out of the question since the Spartans face Washington, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, and Penn State all at home. I expect Purdue to struggle in Ryan Walters’ first season as head coach. 

USC Trojans head coach Lincoln Riley reacts to a touchdown against the Utah Utes in the first quarter at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-USA TODAY Sports

Pac-12 (RIP)

	Team	Record
1	USC*	11-2 (8-1)
2	Washington	10-3 (7-2)
3	Utah	10-2 (7-2)
4	Oregon	10-2 (7-2)
5	Oregon State	9-3 (6-3)
6	UCLA	8-4 (5-4)
7	Washington State	6-6 (4-5)
8	Arizona	6-6 (4-5)
9	Cal	5-7 (3-6)
10	Arizona State	4-8 (2-7)
11	Colorado	3-9 (1-8)
12	Stanford	2-10 (0-9)

Price’s Pac-12 projections (* conference championship winner)

It’s a shame that in the last year of the Pac-12 (as we know it) the conference is at its most interesting. I had a difficult time picking against USC to win the Pac-12 this season. The Trojans are returning the Heisman Trophy winner from last year in Williams. They also return a lot of production and brought in a strong transfer portal class. My only reservation is USC’s defense, which struggled at times a season ago. At the end of the day, the Trojans are going to be a talented team. I also trust Riley, who’s never won fewer than 10 games in a full season as a head coach. 

The top of the Pac-12 is loaded with quality teams in Washington, Utah, and Oregon. Each of those teams are returning great quarterbacks and have enough talent to win a lot of games. Each of those teams also play each other, too, including USC. It’s going to be a gauntlet for the teams at the top of the conference. I give the slight edge to the Huskies as the team that’s going to be in the Pac-12 Championship because they get Oregon and Utah at home. However, if either the Utes or Ducks are in the conference championship, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised. 

I also wouldn’t sleep on Oregon State as a team that could win the Pac-12. Jonathan Smith has done an excellent job building up the Beavers, and they made an upgrade at quarterback by grabbing D.J. Uiagalelei from the transfer portal. I expect UCLA to regress a little bit, but Chip Kelly has that program in a good spot. I think the Bruins will be fine. Arizona and Washington State have what it takes to finish higher in the Pac-12 standings. Both teams are going to be scrappy, but I’m not convinced they have the horses on their roster to hang with the top teams in the conference.

With the exception of Stanford, I think the bottom of the Pac-12 is somewhat strong. Cal and Arizona State have enough talent to get to bowl eligibility, but I need to see it happen. Everyone is going to be interested in watching Deion Sanders in his first year as Colorado’s head coach. The Buffaloes have some talent after hauling in the No. 1 transfer portal class. I just have a hard time seeing Sanders turning things around there in a single offseason after the program went 1-11 last year. 

Alabama Crimson Tide running back Jase McClellan (2) runs the ball against Kansas State Wildcats Kansas State Wildcats safety VJ Payne (19) during the second half in the 2022 Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome. Mandatory Credit: Andrew Wevers-USA TODAY Sports

SEC

	East Division	Record	West Division	Record
1	Georgia	12-1 (8-0)	Alabama*	12-1 (7-1)
2	Tennessee	9-3 (5-3)	LSU	10-2 (6-2)
3	Florida	6-6 (4-4)	Texas A&M	10-2 (6-2)
4	Kentucky	7-5 (3-5)	Ole Miss	8-4 (4-4)
5	South Carolina	6-6 (3-5)	Arkansas	7-5 (3-5)
6	Missouri	4-8 (1-7)	Mississippi State	7-5 (3-5)
7	Vanderbilt	5-7 (1-7)	Auburn	6-6 (2-6)

Price’s SEC projections (* conference championship winner)

I went back and forth on which team to pick to win the SEC. I eventually landed on Alabama. Contrary to what some people think, I don’t believe the Nick Saban dynasty is over. The Crimson Tide had some bad luck last year — losing two games by a total of four points. This Alabama team will likely have a formidable rushing attack, which shouldn’t be overlooked. The best Saban-coached teams had run-heavy offenses. I also think Saban revamping his coaching staff by hiring Tommy Rees and Kevin Steele as his coordinators could rejuvenate the Crimson Tide. 

I might not have Georgia winning the SEC, but I’m still very high on the Bulldogs. They have a roster loaded with talent. I have no doubt that Kirby Smart will just reload after losing so many players to the NFL last year. I think the pundits are a little too high on LSU entering this season. The Tigers were eight points away from being a 7-5 team last year. I expect LSU to progress under Brian Kelly, but I think the program is at least another year from potentially being a national championship contender. 

I’m going to bet on Jimbo Fisher to get Texas A&M back on track this season. He’s too good of a head coach and the Aggies have too much talent to have another disastrous season like they did last year. I don’t anticipate Tennessee to drop off too much despite losing some highly-regarded players to the NFL. Josh Heupel has the Volunteers in a good spot right now, and I think Joe Milton will be a solid quarterback. Ole Miss has a chance to finish higher in the West. The Rebels lost some close games last year and return a lot of production from that team. I also wouldn’t doubt Lane Kiffin.

Arkansas, Florida, and South Carolina are all in the same boat. They’re teams with enough talent to win a lot of games, but have incredibly difficult schedules. I wanted to give each of those teams more wins, but struggled to find them. Getting quarterback Devin Leary out of the transfer portal is going to help Kentucky a lot this season. He’s a solid player that should help the Wildcats be competitive. I expect both Mississippi State and Auburn to have growing pains this season since they both have first-year head coaches. 

Notre Dame Fighting Irish head coach Marcus Freeman sings the Notre Dame Alma Mater with his players after the Notre Dame Fighting Irish defeated the UNLV Rebels at Notre Dame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Cashore-USA TODAY Sports

Notre Dame

Projected record: 9-3

I don’t think Notre Dame has received enough credit for how it finished last season. Remember, the Fighting Irish started 0-2, with losses to Ohio State and Marshall, and it felt like they were in for a long season. However, they rebounded and won nine of their last 11 games. Notre Dame is returning a lot of production from last year, and also made a big splash in the transfer portal by landing Hartman. The Fighting Irish have a good chance of making an appearance in a New Year’s Six bowl game, but they have a difficult schedule. They have road games at NC State, Duke, Louisville, and Clemson, along with home games against Ohio State and USC. I think this could be a scenario where Notre Dame is a better team than it was last season, but it doesn’t show up in the win column. 

UTSA Roadrunners quarterback Frank Harris (0) celebrates a touchdown in the first half against the North Texas Mean Green at the Alamodome. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Dunn-USA TODAY Sports

Group of 5 representative in the New Year’s Six

Pick: UTSA
Projected record: 11-2

Everyone is going to pick Tulane to be the Group of 5 representative in a New Year’s Six bowl game this season. I wanted to go against the grain and pick UTSA, though. Jeff Traylor has done an excellent job building up the Roadrunners – winning 30 games the last three seasons. UTSA also returns a lot of experience and production on both sides of the ball. The Roadrunners might also have the best quarterback at the Group of 5 level in Frank Harris, who’s thrown for 71 touchdowns and ran for over 1,600 yards the last three years. Another reason why I like UTSA’s chances of making it to a New Year’s Six bowl game is its move to the American, which will garner more respect from the playoff committee. Seven times in the last nine years has the Group of 5 representative been from the American.

New Year’s Six projections

Bowl game	Team	Team
Sugar (College Football Playoff semifinal)	No. 4 Ohio State	No. 1 Alabama
Rose (College Football Playoff semifinal)	No. 3 Georgia	No. 2 Michigan
Cotton (at-large vs at-large)	Oregon	Texas
Orange (ACC vs. Big Ten/Notre Dame/SEC	LSU	Clemson
Fiesta (at-large vs at-large)	Penn State	USC
Peach (at-large vs at-large)	UTSA	Florida State

Price’s projections for the New Year’s Six bowl games

College Football Playoff National Championship

No. 2 Michigan vs. No. 1 Alabama

Since not many teams at the top of college football are returning quality starting quarterbacks, I think that means that the teams that run the ball effectively will be in a better position to win. The two teams that I think will be the best in that department are Alabama and Michigan. They’re two of the most complete teams heading into the season. The Crimson Tide and the Wolverines should have imposing rushing attacks, solid defenses, and plenty of talent elsewhere on their rosters. I’m also not going to shortchange either team at the quarterback position. McCarthy performed well for Michigan last year as a sophomore. Alabama has yet to name a starter, but I think it’ll be fine wither either Jalen Milroe or Tyler Buchner. Both players were highly recruited out of high school.

Alabama Crimson Tide head coach Nick Saban looks on against the LSU Tigers during the first half at Tiger Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports

Let me take you back to late Sept. 2015. Alabama hadn’t won a national championship in two years and sustained a loss to Ole Miss at home in Week 3. Everyone thought the Saban dynasty was over at the time. The Crimson Tide then won 12 games in a row, including the national championship. This year feels similar to 2015. Alabama hasn’t won a national championship in two years and everyone, again, thinks the Saban dynasty is over. I, obviously, don’t share that opinion.

I think the pundits are putting too much stock in the Crimson Tide’s quarterback battle. They’re not the only team at the top of college football breaking in a new starter. Plus, Alabama has won national championships in the Saban era despite not having a great quarterback. Those teams ran the ball effectively, controlled the time of possession, prevented opponents from scoring too many points, and had a quarterback that limited turnovers. I expect the Crimson Tide to return to their roots and play that way this season, which is why I’m picking them to win it all.

Winner: Alabama

Contact me

Name(required)

Email(required)

Message

Submit

Δ

• Twitter
• LinkedIn

9 Group of 5 teams that could make a New Year’s Six bowl game in 2023

Movie quote of the day:

“I’m not following you, I’m looking for you. There’s a big difference.”

– Martin Stett, “The Conversation” (1974)

Tulane Green Wave quarterback Michael Pratt (7) throws a pass against the Cincinnati Bearcats in the first half at Nippert Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Katie Stratman-USA TODAY Sports

We’ve had a tumultuous last few weeks in regards to conference realignment, leading to the demise of the Pac-12. That’s where everyone’s attention, including myself, has been recently. It’s to the point that I think people have forgotten that college football games will be played a little over a week from now. It’s hard to believe, right? 

I wanted to start previewing the season by writing a blog post about which Group of 5 teams have a legitimate chance to make a New Year’s Six bowl game this season. 

This topic might not draw a lot of interest, but Group of 5 teams have actually had success in the New Year’s Six since getting a guaranteed spot in 2014. Boise State beat Arizona in the Fiesta Bowl in 2014, Houston beat Florida State in the Peach Bowl in 2015, UCF beat Auburn in the Peach Bowl in 2017, and Tulane beat USC in the Cotton Bowl last year. Cincinnati even snuck into the College Football Playoff in 2021, and almost beat Georgia in the Sugar Bowl in 2020. 

So, which Group of 5 teams could find themselves in the New Year’s Six? I did my best to narrow it down to nine teams (of 64) Remember, BYU, Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF are now Power 5 schools, but Jacksonville State and Sam Houston State are making the jump from FCS to Group of 5. 

American Athletic Conference

Florida Atlantic Owls wide receiver LaJohntay Wester (1) celebrates a touchdown with wide receiver Tony Johnson (16) during the second quarter against the Purdue Boilermakers at Ross-Ade Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Marc Lebryk-USA TODAY Sports

Florida Atlantic Owls
2022 record: 5-7
Returning production: 83% (68% offensively, 99% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 83
Transfer portal rank: No. 79
Vegas projected win total: 7.5

Say what you want about Tom Herman as a head coach, but he had a lot of success when he was previously at the Group of 5 level at Houston. Florida Atlantic also ranks in the top five in all of college football in returning production, which includes its top two rushers, four of its top five pass catchers, and a stout offensive line. One question mark is the quarterback position, but the Owls picked up two Power 5 quarterbacks in the transfer portal in Michael Johnson (Penn State) and Casey Thompson (Nebraska and Texas). FAU has also recruited well in recent years, so Herman should have a talented roster. The Owls have a difficult schedule, featuring non-conference road games against Clemson and Illinois, but I think their conference slate is manageable. I wouldn’t count this team out.

Memphis Tigers tight end Caden Prieskorn (86) and wide receiver Eddie Lewis (18) react after a touchdown during the first half against the North Alabama Lions at Simmons Bank Liberty Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Petre Thomas-USA TODAY Sports

Memphis Tigers
2022 record: 7-6
Returning production: 63% (67% offensively, 59% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 84.52
Transfer portal rank: No. 73
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

Memphis has fallen off since Mike Norvell’s departure since 2020 – posting a record of 21-15 the last three seasons. I’m not ready to start doubting the Tigers, who’ve ranked near the top of The American almost every season since the conference was formed in 2013. One of the main reasons why I like Memphis’ chances to be competitive is because it’s one of 17 teams at the Group of 5 level that returns its head coach, both coordinators, and starting quarterback. Not other team in The American can say that. I think that’s significant because the Tigers also return a good amount of production on both sides of the ball. Memphis has a winnable game against Missouri at a neutral site in Week 4, and get Tulane at home a few weeks later. Those two games will likely determine the Tigers’ season.

Southern Methodist Mustangs tight end RJ Maryland (82) celebrates a touchdown against the Tulane Green Wave during the first half at Yulman Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Andrew Wevers-USA TODAY Sports

SMU Mustangs
2022 record: 7-6
Returning production: 52% (56% offensively, 48% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 85.32
Transfer portal rank: No. 15
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

I think SMU was much better last season than its record would indicate. The Mustangs lost four games by a combined 18 points despite averaging 37.2 points per game. SMU lost a bit of production, including quarterback Tanner Mordecai, but it also brought in one of the top transfer portal classes. There’s a lot riding on presumed starting quarterback Preston Stone, but he ought to have a good supporting class around him. The Mustangs return their top three rushers and five of their top seven pass catchers. They also bolstered their offensive line by bringing in four transfers from the Power 5 level. SMU’s schedule won’t make things easy, though. The Mustangs have road games against Oklahoma, TCU, and Memphis. This team still has enough talent to make some noise, though.

Tulane Green Wave head coach Willie Fritz during the first quarter against the Tulsa Golden Hurricane at Skelly Field at H.A. Chapman Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brett Rojo-USA TODAY Sports

Tulane Mean Green
2022 record: 12-2
Returning production: 71% (73% offensively, 68% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 83.93
Transfer portal rank: No. 83
Vegas projected win total: 9.5

With Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF now in the Big 12, I think Tulane is prepared to take the mantle as the team to beat in The American. We actually saw it happen last year. The Green Wave finished 12-2, won The American, and even defeated USC in the Cotton Bowl. They lost their leading rusher, top two wide receivers, and tackler from last year’s team, but they still have a lot of production returning, including quarterback Michael Pratt and four starters on the offensive line. I also think Tulane’s schedule is manageable. The Green Wave get Ole Miss, UAB, and UTSA at home, and the only road game they won’t have a talent advantage will likely be against Memphis. If they can beat Ole Miss in Week 2, they’re going to be in a good spot to return to a New Year’s Six bowl game.

UTSA Roadrunners wide receiver Zakhari Franklin (4) runs for a touchdown in the second half against the North Texas Mean Green at the Alamodome. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Dunn-USA TODAY Sports

UTSA Roadrunners
2022 record: 11-3
Returning production: 52% (56% offensively, 48% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 83.82
Transfer portal rank: No. 93
Vegas projected win total: 7.5

UTSA might not return much overall production, but there’s a strong argument to be made that this team has the best quarterback/head coach combination in The American. Jeff Traylor has a record of 30-10 in three seasons with the Roadrunners, including winning at least 11 games each of the last two years. Three-year starting quarterback Frank Harris has also completed 67% of his passes, averaged 7.9 yards per pass attempt, and thrown 71 touchdowns in his career. That’s not even counting leading rusher Kevorian Barnes and three of the team’s top four receivers also return. UTSA has a brutal schedule, though, with road games at Houston, Tennessee, FAU, and Tulane. As long as the Roadrunners have Traylor and Harris, they’re going to have a chance to win a lot of games.

MAC

Toledo Rockets quarterback Dequan Finn (7) throws a pass against the San Diego State Aztecs during the first half at Snapdragon Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Orlando Ramirez-USA TODAY Sports

Toledo Rockets
2022 record: 9-5
Returning production: 77% (82% offensively, 72% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 82.99
Transfer portal rank: No. 108 (tied)
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

I’d keep an eye on Toledo this season. The Rockets finished last season on a high note – winning seven of their last 10 games – and averaged 31.1 points per game during that stretch. Toledo ranks No. 11 in the country in returning production, including its starting quarterback Dequan Finn, top four leading rushers, top two pass catchers, four starters along the offensive line, and good players from a solid defense. Head coach Jason Candle has also had continuity on his staff, with all of his coordinators entering their fourth season. I also think the Rockets have a manageable schedule. They get Buffalo, Eastern Michigan, and Northern Illinois at home, and have a winnable road game against Illinois in Week 1. It feels like this is going to be Candle’s best team since he took over at Toledo.

Mountain West

Boise State Broncos quarterback Taylen Green (10) hands off to running back George Holani (24) during the first half against the Utah State Aggies at Albertsons Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brian Losness-USA TODAY Sports

Boise State Broncos
2022 record: 10-4
Returning production: 67% (78% offensively, 55% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 84.36
Transfer portal rank: No. 85
Vegas projected win total: 7.5

I don’t care how long it’s been since Boise State was on the national stage. I’m always going to include the Broncos on this list. Boise State actually had a very quiet 10-win season last year, with wins over San Diego State, Fresno State, and Air Force, before losing to Fresno State in a rematch in the Mountain West championship. The Broncos also return a good amount of production, including starting quarterback Taylen Green, their top three rushers, four of their top five receivers, and three starters on the offensive line. Head coach Andy Avalos has also proven that he can field a solid defense. The problem for Boise State is its schedule, which features road trips to Washington, San Diego State, and Memphis, and a home game against UCF just in the first half of the season.

Sun Belt

South Alabama Jaguars quarterback Carter Bradley (2) sets to pass in the first half against the UCLA Bruins at the Rose Bowl. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports

South Alabama Jaguars
2022 record: 10-3
Returning production: 77% (71% offensively, 82% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 82.48
Transfer portal rank: No. 78
Vegas projected win total: 7.5

South Alabama has a chance to have a special season in head coach Kane Wommack’s third year with the program. The Jaguars rank No. 13 in returning production from a team that won 10 games last year. That includes their starting quarterback, top three leading rushers, five of their top seven pass catchers, and six of their best defensive players. South Alabama is going to have one of the tougher schedules in college football, though. The Jaguars have road games at Tulane, Oklahoma State, James Madison, and Troy, and then get Louisiana and Marshall at home. It’s going to be difficult for South Alabama to repeat its success from last season, but it’s going to have opportunities to impress the College Football Playoff Selection Committee with that schedule. That shouldn’t be overlooked.

Troy Trojans linebacker K.J. Robertson (7) runs after the interception against UTSA Roadrunners in the third quarter at Exploria Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeremy Reper-USA TODAY Sports

Troy Trojans
2022 record: 12-2
Returning production: 60% (64% offensively, 55% defensively)
Average rating per recruit in last four recruiting classes: 82.27
Transfer portal rank: No. 82
Vegas projected win total: 8.5

Troy is considered the favorite to win the Sun Belt and rightfully so. The Trojans won 12 games last year in Jon Sumrall’s first season as head coach, and hung tough against Ole Miss and Appalachian State. They could’ve finished with an even better record. Troy also returns a lot of production on both sides of the ball, including starting quarterback Gunnar Watson and two of its top three rushers. The main reason why I think the Trojans have a chance to get to a New Year’s Six bowl game is their schedule. They have two tough road games at Kansas State and Army in non-conference play, but they get James Madison, South Alabama, and Louisiana at home. Those last three games will likely decide the Sun Belt championship, which is played at the home stadium of the top team in the conference.

Contact me

Name(required)

Email(required)

Message

Submit

Δ

• Twitter
• LinkedIn

Unpopular opinion: College Football Playoff expansion isn’t necessary

Movie quote of the day:

“What about my prime, Mick? At least you had a prime! I had no prime, I had nothin’!”

– Rocky Balboa, “Rocky” (1976)

Georgia Bulldogs head coach Kirby Smart holds the National Championship trophy after defeating the Alabama Crimson Tide in the 2022 CFP college football national championship game at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

It’s been in the works for a little over a year, but it’s now official that the College Football Playoff will expand to 12 teams starting in 2024.

Under the new format, the first round of the Playoff will be held at either the home field of the higher-seeded team or at another site designated by the higher-seeded team. The quarterfinal and semifinal games will be played in bowls (Cotton Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, Orange Bowl, Peach Bowl, Rose Bowl, and Sugar Bowl) on a rotating basis. Cities around the country will continue to bid to host the national championship.

The top four seeds, and the teams that will get first-round bye weeks, will be determined by the highest ranked conference champions in the selection committee’s rankings. The other eight spots will be determined by the next highest ranked teams, including a guaranteed spot for a Group of 5 representative.

The College Football Playoff will include 12 teams , starting with the 2024 season. https://t.co/scVp5MyLOH

— The Associated Press (@AP) December 2, 2022

If the new format was implemented this year, this is what the Playoff seeding/matchups would look like:

Top four teams:

No. 1 Georgia (13-0)
No. 2 Michigan (13-0)
No. 3 Clemson (11-2)
No. 4 Utah (10-3)

First round matchups:

No. 9 Kansas State (10-3) at No. 8 Tennessee (10-2)
No. 12 Tulane (11-2) at No. 5 TCU (12-1)
No. 11 Penn State (10-2) at No. 6 Ohio State (11-1)
No. 10 USC (11-2) at No. 7 Alabama (10-2)

College football fans have been pounding the table for changes to the postseason for decades. It started with a simple structured format, which is how we got the BCS. Then, we wanted more of the pro model, which is how we got the Playoff. Unlike most college football fans, though, I haven’t been one to argue for an expanded playoff. It’s not because I don’t want the chance to watch more football (I do), nor that I’m worried that it might lessen the regular season (I’m not convinced that it will), nor that I’m against making money (I’m a capitalist).

So, what’s my issue with an expanded postseason? It comes down to the lack of parity in college football.

College Football Playoff executive director Bill Hancock during a CFP press conference at Banc of California Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

We’ve had a four-team playoff since 2014. During that time, we’ve had only 14 schools make an appearance. For context, there are currently 131 schools at the FBS level, which includes the Power 5 and Group of 5 conferences, and 65 of those schools (including Notre Dame) are members of Power 5 conferences. Thirteen of the 14 schools that have appeared in the Playoff have come from the Power 5 conferences and one from a Group of 5 conference (until next year).

That’s a mere 20% of Power 5 schools and 10.6% of FBS schools have made an appearance in the Playoff, which obviously isn’t a high percentage. Plus, five of those 13 Power 5 schools have made at least three appearances in nine years. So, close to 40% of the teams that have made the Playoff have been there more than once.

I realize that having a four-team playoff means fewer teams getting opportunities. However, when you factor in that five schools have used up 25 of the 36 playoff spots, the list of schools actually competing to win the national championship is very exclusive.

On top of that, the Playoff games haven’t been that competitive. The winning teams in the semifinal games have outscored the losing teams 617-280. Only three of the 16 semifinal games have been decided by one possession. The losing team in nine of those 16 games has been held to 20 or fewer points.

Yes, you’re reading those numbers right. Just take a look:

Year	Winner	Points	Loser	Points
2014	No. 2 Oregon	59	No. 3 Florida State	20
	No. 4 Ohio State	42	No. 1 Alabama	35
2015	No. 1 Clemson	37	No. 4 Oklahoma	17
	No. 2 Alabama	38	No. 3 Michigan State	0
2016	No. 1 Alabama	24	No. 4 Washington	7
	No. 2 Clemson	31	No. 3 Ohio State	0
2017	No. 3 Georgia	54 (OT)	No. 2 Oklahoma	48 (OT)
	No. 4 Alabama	24	No. 1 Clemson	6
2018	No. 1 Alabama	45	No. 4 Oklahoma	34
	No. 2 Clemson	30	No. 3 Notre Dame	3
2019	No. 1 LSU	63	No. 4 Oklahoma	28
	No. 3 Clemson	29	No. 2 Ohio State	23
2020	No. 1 Alabama	31	No. 4 Notre Dame	14
	No. 3 Ohio State	49	No. 2 Clemson	28
2021	No. 1 Alabama	27	No. 4 Cincinnati	6
	No. 3 Georgia	34	No. 2 Michigan	11
Point total		617		280

The outcomes of each of the College Football Playoff semifinal games since 2014

The national championships haven’t been that competitive either:

Year	Winner	Points	Loser	Points
2014	No. 4 Ohio State	42	No. 2 Oregon	20
2015	No. 2 Alabama	45	No. 1 Clemson	40
2016	No. 2 Clemson	35	No. 1 Alabama	31
2017	No. 4 Alabama	26 (OT)	No. 3 Georgia	23 (OT)
2018	No. 2 Clemson	44	No. 1 Alabama	16
2019	No. 1 LSU	42	No. 3 Clemson	25
2020	No. 1 Alabama	52	No. 3 Ohio State	24
2021	No. 3 Georgia	33	No. 1 Alabama	18
Point total		319		197

The outcomes of each of the College Football Playoff national championships since 2014

Remember back in the days of the BCS when we thought there were plenty of teams good enough to win the national championship? That’s why the four-team playoff was created, so that the schools that we thought weren’t getting a fair shake from the computer would get an opportunity. The four-team playoff format was designed to include the best of the best teams in college football on a yearly basis. However, I think the four-team playoff format has demonstrated is that there is a clear gap between the top programs with the rest of the country. That’s why only six of the 24 semifinal games/national championships that have been played have been decided by one possession.

Is the selection committee to blame for the lopsided results in the Playoff and national championships? Is it not getting the right four teams on a yearly basis? Possibly. I’ve had my issues with the committee over the years, but I actually think it’s been right more times than it’s been wrong when it comes to choosing the top four teams. My criticism of the committee has usually come from how it’s ranked teams outside of the top four spots.

Now, I want to be clear that I think some good can come from expanding the Playoff to 12 teams:

1. More opportunities for schools: As a lifelong fan and alumnus of a Tier 2 school, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t want to see it have a better chance to compete in the Playoff every season.
2. It should all but guarantee that the committee will get the teams right on a yearly basis: The argument every year is if the committee got the top four teams right and if the fifth- or sixth-best team in the rankings were snubbed. With 12 teams now getting in, that argument should be put to rest. However, there will still be the argument if the teams outside the top 10 were snubbed.
3. No more punishing teams for playing in a conference championship: One of the dumbest customs that we’ve accepted over the years is to punish schools for losing a conference championship. One of the best examples of this came in 2017. That year, Auburn beat Alabama in the Iron Bowl, rose to No. 2 in the committee’s rankings, and represented the SEC West division in the conference championship. Auburn went on to lose to Georgia – a team it beat in the regular season – in the SEC Championship. The committee dropped Auburn five spots the following week and put Alabama in the Playoff. Auburn then had to compete in the Peach Bowl and watch Alabama go on to win the national championship. I’ve always hated that custom because it makes zero sense. A team shouldn’t be punished for playing in a 13th game, and another team shouldn’t be rewarded because it didn’t have to play a 13th game. With the committee keeping TCU in the Playoff this year despite losing its conference championship, I think we might be seeing the end to that custom. That’s especially going to be true with an expanded playoff.

The College Football Playoff National Championship trophy on display during a 2023 CFP National Championship Kickoff press conference at SoFi Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

I’ll wrap this post up by saying that there isn’t enough talent spread out to justify expanding the Playoff. There’s a parity problem in college football right now. The lopsided results of the semifinal games/national championships prove that. Do you think the lower seeded teams have a realistic chance of knocking off the No. 1 or No. 2 team in the quarterfinal round on a yearly basis? The evidence shows that the answer to that question is no.

With college football being so top heavy, why would the powers that be choose to expand the Playoff? We all know the answer to that is money. Adding more schools means more games, which means more money lining everyone’s pockets.

Yes, an expanded playoff will lead to more opportunities for the Tier 2 and Tier 3 schools to crack the Playoff. However, it’s also going to lead to more opportunities for the Tier 1 schools that haven’t been able to crack the four-team playoff so far. Let’s not kid ourselves, those are the schools that have the most to gain from this decision. The committee is much more likely to choose Tier 1 schools with large alumni bases that can move the needle, which will lead to even more money, over the Tier 2 or Tier 3 that don’t have the same amount of resources.

My thought process has always been that, if you want to expand the Playoff, add two more teams and give bye weeks to the two highest-ranked teams. Instead, we’re diving headfirst into the deep end by adding eight schools. I’m not convinced that that’s necessary and will only lead to more lopsided results.

Like everyone else, though, I’ll still tune in to watch.

Contact me

Name(required)

Email(required)

Message

Submit

Δ

• Twitter
• LinkedIn

This has to be the worst I’ve done predicting a NCAA tournament bracket

Movie quote of the day:

“I’m embarrassed. I really thought I could feel it.”

– Ricky Bobby, “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby” (2006)

Kentucky Wildcats forward Keion Brooks Jr. (12) reacts after losing to the Saint Peter’s Peacocks during the first round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

All I saw this past weekend was people complaining about the state of their NCAA tournament brackets, claiming how their brackets were “busted.”

I want to make it clear that losing one or two of your predicted Sweet 16 teams, or even one or two of your predicted Elite Eight teams isn’t considered a “busted” bracket. That’s just March. It’s time we redefined the term “busted bracket” because some of us are in much worse shape, like myself. So, I really don’t want to hear your complaints.

I strongly debated printing off a copy of my bracket and setting it on fire after the first day of the tournament was completed. Regardless of what happens the rest of this tournament, it’s going to take some time to get the stink off the way I predicted this year’s bracket.

If you think I’m exaggerating, allow me to recap.

Richmond Spiders forward Tyler Burton (3) celebrates with teammates after defeating the Iowa Hawkeyes during the first round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at KeyBank Center. Mandatory Credit: Gregory Fisher-USA TODAY Sports

By the end of Thursday evening, No. 2-seeded Kentucky fell to No. 15-seeded Saint Peter’s and No. 5-seeded Iowa lost to No. 12-seeded Richmond. Keep in mind, I picked both of those teams to go to the Final Four, and I had Kentucky cutting down the nets.

Those results came on the first day of the tournament.

I have no idea how the Hawkeyes, who were shooting 47.8% from the field and 41% from 3-point territory in their last 14 games, all of a sudden couldn’t make shots. Richmond wasn’t a very good defensive team, yet Iowa finished the game shooting 36.4% from the field and 20.7% from 3-point range. I know that eventually the shots aren’t going to fall, but how can you not carry over the momentum from winning the Big Ten tournament?

Kentucky’s loss to Saint Peter’s left me dumbfounded. All I heard was how experienced the Wildcats were and how much scoring depth they had this year. Well, that talent and experience certainly didn’t show up against a team that looks like it plays in a high school gym. No offense to Saint Peter’s. I don’t want to hear anymore from the talking heads about how much talent Kentucky has or how great of a head coach John Calipari is, even though the evidence might prove otherwise. As far as I’m concerned, I can’t trust the Wildcats anymore in the tournament.

I’m done picking either of those teams to make deep tournament runs again. If you think my bad luck ends there, I assure you that it doesn’t.

Miami (Fl) Hurricanes guard Bensley Joseph (4) and teammates react from the bench against the Auburn Tigers in the second half during the second round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at Bon Secours Wellness Arena. Mandatory Credit: Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports

The other teams that “busted” my bracket at least waited until the Round of 32 to let me down. So, I guess thank you? I can also stomach their disappointing losses because they lost to fellow Power 5 institutions.

Unlike Kentucky and Iowa, I actually blame myself for picking Auburn and Tennessee to get to the Elite Eight. Both coaches don’t have the best track records in the NCAA tournament. I’ve told myself for years to not trust Bruce Pearl and Rick Barnes, especially Barnes, come tournament time. I’ve even warned my Auburn friends that Pearl is going to disappoint you probably more than once in the tournament.

Like I said, I can tolerate Auburn and Tennessee losing to the likes of Miami and Michigan. Both Jim Larrañaga and Juwan Howard have proven themselves to be good coaches, and both programs have talented players. Michigan also strikes me as a team that was destined for a deep postseason run after playing one of the toughest schedules in college basketball and losing a lot of close games.

Regardless, I didn’t take my own advice when it comes to Pearl and Barnes in the tournament. So, the current humiliation is totally on me.

I could also throw in other schools like UConn, Virginia Tech, and Wisconsin as total disappointments.

Michigan Wolverines center Hunter Dickinson (1) celebrates defeating the Tennessee Volunteers during the second round of the 2022 NCAA Tournament at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

Through the first two rounds this year, I’ve collected 38 points. I don’t have a history of all my March Madness picks since I started filling out brackets in 2005. Thanks to this blog, though, I can go back as far as 2017 and track my picks. Believe it or not, those 38 points aren’t the worst I’ve done after the first weekend.

Last year, I had 34 points after the first weekend. However, I didn’t lose two Final Four teams, and my national champion, on the first day of the tournament like I did this year. So, I still think that this year takes the cake for the worst bracket that I’ve predicted.

I’m not going to blame myself, though. Unlike previous years, I don’t think I picked too many upsets. I also didn’t follow college basketball that closely this year. I relied way too much on the word of the so called “experts” on TV/podcasts when I did my research. On top of that, I knew going in that this was going to be an unpredictable tournament. There weren’t many clear favorites in college basketball this season and we’re seeing that in the thick of March Madness.

I love this time of year and I have higher expectations for myself when it comes to filling out brackets. I don’t know about you guys, but I can get tired of the madness quickly.

Contact Me

Name(required)

Email(required)

Message

Submit

Δ

• Twitter
• LinkedIn

2022 NCAA Tournament predictions

Movie quote of the day:

“I have been falling…for 30 minutes!”

– Loki, “Thor: Ragnarok” (2017)

I can only speak for myself, but March Madness is coming at a good point in my life. I’m getting somewhat tired of the NFL offseason, specifically the drama that occurred between my Green Bay Packers and quarterback Aaron Rodgers. I’m always excited for March Madness, but that feels particularly true this year. I not only need to consume a sport that isn’t football, but I need to write about a sport that isn’t football on this blog.

For the first time since 2019, we’re getting a normal NCAA tournament. Keep in mind that last year’s tournament was played exclusively in Indiana and the tournament was cancelled the year before that. That won’t be the case this year. Fourteen cities across the country will be hosting tournament games and teams won’t be contained to a bubble. It feels good to get back to this point. Let’s hope it stays this way for a long time.

It feels like I say this every year, but this feels like a wide-open tournament. There have been five different teams to hold the No. 1 rank by the Associated Press. That’s not even counting all the other shakeups in the rankings throughout the season. This feels like a tournament that could either be loaded with first-round upsets, or could get wild near the end and have a bunch of No. 1 or No. 2 seeds lose in the Sweet 16 or Elite Eight. My guess is the latter. I’d completely throw out the seeds when filling out your brackets. This has a chance to be a wild tournament and I did the best I could to try to make predictions.

Round of 64

Gonzaga Bulldogs forward Drew Timme (2) dribbles the basketball against Saint Mary’s Gaels center Mitchell Saxen (10) during the first half in the finals of the WCC Basketball Championships at Orleans Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 16 Georgia State (18-10) vs. No. 1 Gonzaga (26-3) – Portland, Ore.

Only once in NCAA tournament history has a No. 16 seed beat a No. 1 seed in the Round of 64. Gonzaga has made it to the Sweet 16 in each of its last five tournament appearances. I expect a similar result this time around.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 9 Memphis (21-10) vs. No. 8 Boise State (27-7) – Portland, Ore.

I’ve been torn on this game all week. Both of these teams are playing well right now. I’m going to go with Boise State, though. The Broncos have won 24 of their last 27 games, including winning a pretty good Mountain West twice.

Winner: Boise State

No. 12 New Mexico State (26-6) vs. No. 5 UConn (23-9) – Buffalo, N.Y.

New Mexico State is good in a few different areas of the game, but it doesn’t shoot the ball particularly well. UConn has more talent and is much better on the offensive end. I also think Dan Hurley is an underrated coach.

Winner: UConn

No. 13 Vermont (28-5) vs. No. 4 Arkansas (25-8) – Buffalo, N.Y.

I was so close to picking the upset in this game. I think Vermont is a dangerous team that is capable of pulling off an upset. However, Arkansas is playing well right now – winners of 15 of its last 18 games. I think the Razorbacks get it done.

Winner: Arkansas

No. 11 Notre Dame (23-10) vs. No. 6 Alabama (19-13) – San Diego

I was originally going to pick the upset, but I’m not convinced that Notre Dame/Rutgers is good enough on either end of the court to pull off the upset. Alabama has been inconsistent, but I think it’s just good enough to win this game.

Winner: Alabama

No. 14 Montana State (27-7) vs. No. 3 Texas Tech (25-9) – San Diego

Montana State is actually one of the best-shooting teams in the country. However, I doubt that the Bobcats will shoot well against Texas Tech. The Red Raiders are an excellent defensive team – ranking in the top 100 in field goal- and 3-point defense.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 10 Davidson (27-6) vs. No. 7 Michigan State (22-12) – Greenville, S.C.

I wouldn’t rule out Davidson in this matchup. The Wildcats are very good at playing fundamental basketball. I could see them giving Michigan State fits. However, Tom Izzo is an excellent coach and the Spartans have more talent.

Winner: Michigan State

No. 15 Cal State Fullerton (21-10) vs. No. 2 Duke (28-6) – Greenville, S.C.

I don’t like the way that Duke ended the regular season, but it has so much talent on its roster. I don’t think Cal State Fullerton will be able to keep up. If this is Mike Krzyzewski’s last run, it can’t end with a loss in the Round of 64.

Winner: Duke

Baylor Bears guard James Akinjo (11) drives to the basket around Oklahoma Sooners guard Jordan Goldwire (0) during the first half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 16 Norfolk State (24-6) vs. No. 1 Baylor (26-6) – Fort Worth, Texas

No disrespect to Norfolk State, but it ranks in the bottom 20 in the country in strength of schedule. I don’t think the Spartans are going to be ready for Baylor. The Bears are too talented and shouldn’t have many issues advancing to the next round.

Winner: Baylor

No. 9 Marquette (19-12) vs. No. 8 North Carolina (24-9) – Fort Worth, Texas

Shaka Smart doesn’t have a good track record in the tournament. He has a record of 2-7 ever since taking VCU to the Final Four in 2013. I’m having a difficult time trusting Smart and Marquette. I’ll go with North Carolina.

Winner: North Carolina

No. 12 Indiana (21-13) vs. No. 5 Saint Mary’s (25-7) – Portland, Ore.

Saint Mary’s is another team that I’ve learned to never trust in the tournament. The Gaels have made it past the Round of 64 just three times in program history. Indiana has been playing very well since the start of the Big Ten tournament.

Winner: Indiana

No. 13 Akron (24-9) vs. No. 4 UCLA (25-7) – Portland, Ore.

I’m not seeing an upset in this matchup. According to KenPom, Akron ranks as the No. 57 team in this tournament. I think the Zips are slightly overseeded. UCLA is the more talented team in this matchup and is built for a deep run.

Winner: UCLA

No. 11 Virginia Tech (23-12) vs. No. 6 Texas (21-11) – Milwaukee

I don’t like picking against Chris Beard, and I do think Texas is under seeded, but this feels like a tough matchup for the Longhorns. Texas has won only nine of its last 18 games, whereas Virginia Tech has won 13 of its last 15.

Winner: Virginia Tech

No. 14 Yale (19-11) vs. No. 3 Purdue (27-7) – Milwaukee

I usually give Ivy League teams credit, but this feels like a tough matchup for Yale. Purdue ranks No. 3 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency, whereas the Bulldogs rank No. 203. I don’t expect the Boilermakers to have many problems.

Winner: Purdue

No. 10 San Francisco (24-9) vs. No. 7 Murray State (30-2) – Indianapolis

I went back and forth on which team to pick in this matchup. I eventually decided to go with Murray State. The Racers are very good on both ends of the court and have three players who can score 20 points any given night.

Winner: Murray State

No. 15 Saint Peter’s (19-11) vs. No. 2 Kentucky (26-7) – Indianapolis

Saint Peter’s will have a difficult time defending Kentucky. The Wildcats have a very talented roster and average close to 80 points per game. John Calipari also hasn’t lost in the Round of 64 since his early years at Memphis.

Winner: Kentucky

Arizona Wildcats guard Dalen Terry (4) dunks against the UCLA Bruins during the second half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 16 Wright State (22-13) vs. No. 1 Arizona (31-3) – San Diego

Tommy Lloyd has done an excellent job in his first season in Arizona. The Wildcats rank in the top 20 in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency. I’m struggling to see a scenario where Wright State/Bryant pulls off the upset.

Winner: Arizona

No. 9 TCU (20-12) vs. No. 8 Seton Hall (21-10) – San Diego

TCU ranks in the bottom 40 in the country in turnovers – committing 14.5 per game – and struggles to shoot the ball. Jamie Dixon is also a coach that I don’t trust in the tournament. I feel like I have to pick Seton Hall.

Winner: Seton Hall

No. 12 UAB (27-7) vs. No. 5 Houston (29-5) – Pittsburgh

UAB has size and shoots the ball well. Houston is going to be very tough matchup for the Blazers, though. The Cougars are one of the best defensive teams in the country – allowing only 58.9 points and forcing 14.4 turnovers per game.

Winner: Houston

No. 13 Chattanooga (27-7) vs. No. 4 Illinois (22-10) – Pittsburgh

If not for late-game heroics, I doubt Chattanooga would be in this position. I think the Mocs are going to have a difficult time defending Illinois’ offense, which averages 75.8 points per game and shoots almost 37% from 3-point territory.

Winner: Illinois

No. 11 Michigan (17-14) vs. No. 6 Colorado State (25-5) – Indianapolis

I’d ignore Michigan’s record. Part of the reason why the Wolverines have 14 losses is because they played one of the toughest schedules in the country. Michigan shoots the ball very well, too. This feels like a tough draw for Colorado State.

Winner: Michigan

No. 14 Longwood (26-6) vs. No. 3 Tennessee (26-7) – Indianapolis

Tennessee is entering the NCAA tournament on a high note. The Volunteers have won 15 of their last 17 games, including winning the SEC tournament a few days ago. I doubt Longwood will pose much of a problem for Tennessee.

Winner: Tennessee

No. 10 Loyola Chicago (25-7) vs. No. 7 Ohio State (19-11) – Pittsburgh

Ohio State is hobbling into the NCAA tournament. The Buckeyes have lost seven of their last 13 games, including four of their last five. I also don’t think Chris Holtmann is much of a coach either. I’ll ride with Sister Jean.

Winner: Loyola Chicago

No. 15 Delaware (22-12) vs. No. 2 Villanova (26-7) – Pittsburgh

Delaware got hot at the right time in order to punch its ticket to the NCAA tournament. Villanova has the depth and ability to play in a variety of different ways. I expect the Wildcats to give the Fightin’ Blue Hens a lot of trouble.

Winner: Villanova

Kansas Jayhawks head coach Bill Self smiles in the second half against the Texas Tech Red Raiders at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Amy Kontras-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 16 Texas Southern (19-12) vs. No. 1 Kansas (28-6) – Fort Worth, Texas

Bill Self hasn’t lost a game in the Round of 64 since 2006. I don’t see that streak breaking this year. Kansas isn’t the most talented team in this tournament, but it’s very well rounded. I expect the Jayhawks to roll against Texas Southern.

Winner: Kansas

No. 9 Creighton (22-11) vs. No. 8 San Diego State (23-8) – Fort Worth, Texas

These teams are almost mirror images of each other. They play great defense and can disappear on the offensive end. The team that wins is the one that will be more efficient offensively, so I give the slight advantage to Creighton.

Winner: Creighton

No. 12 Richmond (23-12) vs. No. 5 Iowa (26-9) – Buffalo, N.Y.

Richmond is certainly capable of pulling off an upset, but I’m having a difficult time picking against Iowa. The Hawkeyes are red hot right now. They’ve won 12 of their last 14 games, including winning the Big Ten tournament.

Winner: Iowa

No. 13 South Dakota State (30-4) vs. No. 4 Providence (25-5) – Buffalo, N.Y.

Don’t sleep on the upset in this matchup. Providence feels like a team that is vastly overseeded. KenPom has the Friars as the No. 43 team in this tournament. However, he also has South Dakota State ranked much lower.

Winner: Providence

No. 11 Iowa State (20-12) vs. No. 6 LSU (22-11) – Milwaukee

This feels like the most likely first-round matchup to end in an upset since LSU fired Will Wade just a few days ago. I have no idea what to expect from the Tigers without their head coach. I think Iowa State gets the win.

Winner: Iowa State

No. 14 Colgate (23-11) vs. No. 3 Wisconsin (24-7) – Milwaukee

Colgate is going to have to do everything right to knock off Wisconsin. The Badgers are one of the best defensive teams in the country – ranking in the top third in the country in points allowed per game and 3-point defense.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 10 Miami (23-10) vs. No. 7 USC (26-7) – Greenville, S.C.

Miami feels like a slightly overseeded team. KenPom has the Hurricanes as the No. 48 team in this tournament. They also weren’t that impressive in a weak ACC this season. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll go with USC.

Winner: USC

No. 15 Jacksonville State (21-10) vs. No. 2 Auburn (27-5) – Greenville, S.C.

Auburn has kind of stumbled in recent weeks – losing four of its last nine games. However, I don’t think Jacksonville State is good enough on the offensive end to get the upset. The Tigers are very talented team and should win.

Winner: Auburn

Round of 32

Connecticut Huskies forward Isaiah Whaley (5) celebrates with guard Tyrese Martin (4) after blocking a shot in the first half against the Villanova Wildcats at the Big East Tournament at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Wendell Cruz-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional

No. 8 Boise State vs. No. 1 Gonzaga – Portland, Ore.

Boise State could make this a game because it does a good job of offensive rebounding – grabbing 10.2 per game. I’m not convinced that’s going to be good enough to upset Gonzaga, though. The Bulldogs should have the talent and coaching advantage in this matchup.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 5 UConn vs. No. 4 Arkansas – Buffalo, N.Y.

I don’t really have anything scientific with this pick, but I’ll take UConn to win. KenPom and NET have the Huskies ranked higher than Arkansas, and Nate Silver gives UConn a 49% chance to advance to the Sweet 16. The Huskies are also playing well right now – winners of seven of their last nine games.

Winner: UConn

No. 6 Alabama vs. No. 3 Texas Tech – San Diego

Unless your team is incredibly efficient on the offensive end, I think you’re going to have a hard time beating Texas Tech. The Red Raiders rank in the top 20 in the country in field goal defense, turnovers forced, and defensive rebounds. I expect Alabama to have a difficult time making shots.

Winner: Texas Tech

No. 7 Michigan State vs. No. 2 Duke – Greenville, S.C.

I wouldn’t quickly pencil in Duke to win this game. I think Michigan State matches up well with Duke because neither team has shown consistency this season. There’s a good chance that Izzo uglies this game up in order to pull off the upset. I still expect the Blue Devils to get it done, though.

Winner: Duke

Virginia Tech Hokies guard Hunter Cattoor (0) reacts after hitting a three point shot against the Duke Blue Devils during the first half of the ACC Men’s Basketball Tournament final at Barclays Center. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional

No. 8 North Carolina vs. No. 1 Baylor – Fort Worth, Texas

I think Baylor is the most vulnerable No. 1 seed this year. The Bears aren’t consistent enough on the offensive end. I wouldn’t be surprised if they lose this game, but this is going to essentially be a home game for them and they have the coaching advantage in Scott Drew.

Winner: Baylor

No. 12 Indiana vs. No. 4 UCLA – Portland, Ore.

UCLA does a really good job of taking care of the basketball. I think that’s very important in the tournament. The teams that don’t beat themselves typically make deep runs. That’s why I expect the Bruins to win this game. They’re too talented and don’t hurt themselves.

Winner: UCLA

No. 11 Virginia Tech vs. No. 3 Purdue – Milwaukee

Both of these teams have the ability to make shots and be efficient offensively. So, the winner is going to be the team that can make stops. I don’t think Purdue can do that. According to KenPom, the Boilermakers rank among the bottom 20 teams in the tournament in adjusted defensive efficiency.

Winner: Virginia Tech

No. 7 Murray State vs. No. 2 Kentucky – Indianapolis

This is going to be a difficult matchup for Kentucky. I think Murray State is much better than its seed would indicate. The Racers have the scoring ability to go toe-to-toe with the Wildcats. I think Kentucky’s combination of talent, depth, and coaching will be the difference maker, though.

Winner: Kentucky

Houston Cougars guard Kyler Edwards (11) celebrates after scoring a three point shot against the Memphis Tigers during the first half at Dickies Arena. Mandatory Credit: Chris Jones-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional

No. 8 Seton Hall vs. No. 1 Arizona – San Diego

Seton Hall feels like it might be an underseeded team. The Pirates rank in the top 75 in the country in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency, but I don’t think they have the horses to upset Arizona. The Wildcats have the deeper and more talented team. I like them to advance.

Winner: Arizona

No. 5 Houston vs. No. 4 Illinois – Pittsburgh

I’m going to give the advantage to Houston in this matchup. The Cougars have a ton of scoring depth, with six players averaging at least 10.1 points per game. They also rank in the top 10 among tournament teams in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency.

Winner: Houston

No. 11 Michigan vs. No. 3 Tennessee – Indianapolis

Michigan got the benefit of the doubt because it played a tough schedule. I don’t see the Wolverines getting past this point, though. I have a hard time trusting teams to figure it out in the tournament when they didn’t in the regular season. I expect Tennessee to take care of business.

Winner: Tennessee

No. 10 Loyola Chicago vs. No. 2 Villanova – Pittsburgh

Loyola Chicago likes to slow it down and force opponents to play its way, but I don’t think that’ll effect Villanova. The Wildcats also don’t play with much tempo – ranking second to last among tournament teams – and are still efficient offensively. I think Villanova matches up well with the Ramblers.

Winner: Villanova

Iowa Hawkeyes guard Tony Perkins (11) and forward Keegan Murray (15) celebrate beating Purdue Boilermakers at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional

No. 9 Creighton vs. No. 1 Kansas – Fort Worth, Texas

Creighton is one of the worst offensive teams in the tournament. The Bluejays rank in the bottom 12 in adjusted offensive efficiency. They’re likely going to have a difficult time scoring on Kansas, which ranks in the top 30 in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Jayhawks ought to be able to advance.

Winner: Kansas

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 4 Providence – Buffalo, N.Y.

Ed Cooley has done a great job building up Providence in the last decade, but he doesn’t have a great track record in the NCAA tournament – winning one game in five appearances. Iowa is hot right now – averaging 85.2 points in its last 14 games. I think the Hawkeyes keep their momentum going.

Winner: Iowa

No. 11 Iowa State vs. No. 3 Wisconsin – Milwaukee

Iowa State is another team that isn’t very good on the offensive end – ranking among the bottom 10 teams in the tournament in adjusted offensive efficiency. Dating back to the Bo Ryan days, Wisconsin is always a tough team defensively. This feels like a nightmare matchup for the Cyclones.

Winner: Wisconsin

No. 7 USC vs. No. 2 Auburn – Greenville, S.C.

I flirted with taking the upset, but changed my mind after doing some research. USC isn’t very good offensively and is one of the worst teams in the country at forcing turnovers. I haven’t been that impressed with Auburn recently, but it’ll advance if it takes care of the ball.

Winner: Auburn

Sweet 16

Duke Blue Devils head coach Mike Krzyzewski coaches against the Miami Hurricanes during the second half of the ACC Tournament semifinal game at Barclays Center. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional semifinals – San Francisco

No. 5 UConn vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

I think UConn matches up well with Gonzaga. The Huskies rank in the top six in the country in both offensive and defensive rebounds, and I think they might have the better backcourt. Keep in mind, the Huskies have played well this season when they’ve had a healthy lineup. I think Mark Few will have his team ready after almost a full week of preparation, though.

Winner: Gonzaga

No. 3 Texas Tech vs. No. 2 Duke

I’m not trying to sound like a Duke hater, but I’m semi-convinced that the tournament will be rigged for Krzyzewski to go out on top. This game will be a tough matchup for the Blue Devils, though. They have one of the youngest rosters in the country and lack an offensive identity. I don’t think that’s a good recipe when going up against Texas Tech’s defense. I’ll take the Red Raiders.

Winner: Texas Tech

UCLA Bruins guard Jules Bernard (1) dribbles behind Arizona Wildcats guard Justin Kier (5) during the first half at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional semifinals – Philadelphia

No. 4 UCLA vs. No. 1 Baylor

I think UCLA is the most underrated team in this tournament. The Bruins rank in the top 15 in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency. They also do a good job of making 3-pointers, free throws, and limiting turnovers. Baylor’s offense is too inconsistent at times. The Bears also don’t shoot the ball particularly well and turn the ball over too much. I’ll pick UCLA to get the upset.

Winner: UCLA

No. 11 Virginia Tech vs. No. 2 Kentucky

This feels like when Virginia Tech’s run is going to end. The Hokies don’t match up with Kentucky. Virginia Tech is one of the worst rebounding teams in the country – averaging only 8.6 offensive rebounds and 32.2 total rebounds per game. I think Oscar Tshiebwe, who’s the frontrunner to win Naismith College Player of the Year, and the Wildcats’ frontcourt will be too much for the Hokies.

Winner: Kentucky

Tennessee Volunteers guard Zakai Zeigler (5) drives to the basket against Texas A&M Aggies forward Ethan Henderson (10) in the first half at Amelie Arena. Mandatory Credit: Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional semifinals – San Antonio

No. 5 Houston vs. No. 1 Arizona

If Houston was healthy and in another bracket, I’d probably pick it to go much deeper in the tournament. Facing Arizona in the Sweet 16 is a tough draw. I’ll give the Wildcats the advantage because I think they’ll be the healthier team. Arizona also has more scoring depth, with four players who average at least 10.1 points per game, and then another five players who average between 5.0-7.6 points.

Winner: Arizona

No. 3 Tennessee vs. No. 2 Villanova

I usually don’t trust Rick Barnes in the NCAA tournament. However, Tennessee is playing very well right now. Villanova’s lack of a post presence worries me. I also think the Wildcats rely too much on 3-pointers – ranking No. 4 in 3-point attempts among tournament teams. Opponents have shot only 31.2% from beyond the arc against the Volunteers this season.

Winner: Tennessee

Wisconsin Badgers guard Brad Davison (34) shoots the ball while Michigan State Spartans guard Max Christie (5) defends in the first half at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional semifinals – Chicago

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 1 Kansas

I’m actually not crazy about this Kansas team. It’s far from Self’s most talented team. The Jayhawks also aren’t great when Ochai Agbaji isn’t making shots. I don’t trust the rest of their lineup to step up if Agbaji doesn’t get going. Iowa is arguably the hottest team in the country and it might have the best player in the tournament in Murray Keegan. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll take the Hawkeyes.

Winner: Iowa

No. 3 Wisconsin vs. No. 2 Auburn

I think Wisconsin is way too reliant on Johnny Davis. If he gets hot, Wisconsin ought to win this game. I think that’s going to be a tall order against Auburn’s defense, which ranks in the top 100 in the country in adjusted defensive efficiency, field-goal defense, 3-point defense, and turnovers forced. I don’t really trust the Tigers, but this feels like a favorable matchup for them.

Winner: Auburn

Elite Eight

Texas Tech Red Raiders guard Davion Warren (2) looks for an opening around Kansas Jayhawks guard Dajuan Harris Jr. (3) during the second half at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: William Purnell-USA TODAY Sports

West Regional final – San Francisco

No. 3 Texas Tech vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

Texas Tech has what it takes to knock off Gonzaga. The Red Raiders are excellent defensively and are physical in the paint. They’ll be able to body Drew Timme and collect rebounds. That’s the key to beating the Bulldogs. At some point, though, Texas Tech has to be able to make shots, which it hasn’t been able to do consistently this season. I’m not sold on Gonzaga getting to the Final Four, but I can’t deny that it’s the best overall team in this region.

Winner: Gonzaga

Kentucky Wildcats forward Oscar Tshiebwe (34) reacts after a basket against the Vanderbilt Commodores at Amelie Arena. Mandatory Credit: Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports

East Regional final – Philadelphia

No. 4 UCLA vs. No. 2 Kentucky

I don’t anticipate UCLA to have quite the same run as it did last year. Even though I think the Bruins are an underrated team, they had some magic last year that I doubt they’ll be able to replicate. UCLA also doesn’t match up that well with Kentucky. The Bruins don’t have as good of a post presence as the Wildcats. I think UCLA will struggle to contain Tshiebwe. If the Bruins somehow manage to contain him, this Kentucky team has the ability to make shots.

Winner: Kentucky

Arizona Wildcats center Oumar Ballo (11) celebrates after the Wildcats defeated the UCLA Bruins to win the Pac-12 Conference Championship at T-Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-USA TODAY Sports

South Regional final – San Antonio

No. 3 Tennessee vs. No. 1 Arizona

Tennessee is one of the hottest teams in the country right now. However, the Volunteers don’t have enough scoring depth to knock off Arizona. Tennessee only has two players who average double figures, and only four other players who average between 5.0 to 9.9 points. The Wildcats had five different players lead the team in scoring this season, and four of those players also eclipsed 20 points. I think that’s going to be tough for Tennessee to overcome.

Winner: Arizona

Auburn Tigers guard Wendell Green Jr. (1) drives to the basket as Texas A&M Aggies guard Hassan Diarra (5) defends during the second half at Amalie Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Midwest Regional final – Chicago

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 2 Auburn

I don’t believe that I’ve ever picked any team lower than a No. 4 seed to make the Final Four. There’s a first time for everything, though. I can’t say it enough that I really like the way that Iowa has been playing. In their last 14 games, the Hawkeyes are shooting 47.8% from the field and 41.3% from 3-point territory. Auburn’s inconsistent backcourt worries me a lot, too, and I don’t trust Bruce Pearl as a head coach. I’m not confident in it, but I’ll pick Iowa to beat the Tigers.

Winner: Iowa

Final Four – New Orleans

No. 2 Kentucky vs. No. 1 Gonzaga

I’ve been adamant in the past about why I don’t trust Gonzaga in the NCAA tournament. My opinion isn’t changing this year. I don’t think the Bulldogs are challenged enough in the regular season and I think that’s always going to hurt them. I also don’t think Gonzaga is as good of a team as last year. The Bulldogs aren’t as strong in the post and their backcourt has been inconsistent. I think Kentucky matches up very well with Gonzaga. The Wildcats are physical and can limit Timme’s production down low. Kentucky also has a deep scoring lineup.

Winner: Kentucky

No. 5 Iowa vs. No. 1 Arizona

Momentum only lasts for so long in the tournament. Sure, every now and then a team like UConn in 2011 and 2014 gets hot and wins the whole thing, but it’s rare. Iowa has been shooting the ball well, but I think you also need size and a great defense to beat a team of Arizona’s caliber. The Hawkeyes struggle on the defensive end of the court – ranking in the bottom half among tournament teams in adjusted defensive efficiency. The Wildcats have one of the deepest and biggest lineups in the country. I expect Iowa to have a difficult time getting shots off against Arizona.

Winner: Arizona

The NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball National Championship Trophy. Mandatory credit: Getty Images.

National Championship – New Orleans

No. 2 Kentucky vs. No. 1 Arizona

I have a pair of wildcats playing for the national championship. Sorry, I had to point that out. This Kentucky team actually feels like it could be John Calipari’s best team. It’s not necessarily Calipari’s most talented team, even though it’s not that much of a drop-off, but Kentucky has an experienced roster for a change and it can win in a variety of ways. I also think Kentucky has the scoring depth to match Arizona. Kentucky had seven different players lead the team in scoring this season, and six of them eclipsed 20 points. Arizona is going to have a difficult time defending Kentucky’s offense. In one game for all the marbles, I have more trust in Calipari than I do Lloyd. I think Kentucky will be cutting down the nets.

Winner: Kentucky

Contact Me

Name(required)

Email(required)

Submit

Δ

• Twitter
• LinkedIn

College football week 14 picks

Movie quote of the day:

“Listen, Al, if I never see you again, I want you to know that I love you very much. I also buried 1600 kilos of cocaine somewhere in the apartment, right next to the cure for blindness. Good luck.”

– Wade Wilson, “Deadpool” (2016)

Here are the intriguing matchups for week 14:

Week 13 record: 9-3 (75 percent)
2017 record: 107-49 (68.6 percent)
All-time record: 340-160 (68 percent)

Friday:

Southern California Trojans quarterback Sam Darnold (14) throws the ball during the first half against the UCLA Bruins at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Mandatory Credit: Kelvin Kuo-USA TODAY Sports

Pac-12 Championship
No. 12 Stanford (9-3) vs. No. 10 USC (10-2)
Levi’s Stadium
Santa Clara, Calif.
Line: USC -3.5
O/U: 59

USC got the better of Stanford back in September, but I think it’ll be a completely different outcome this week. The Cardinal have won eight of their last nine games – the one game they lost was to a good Washington State team on the road by a field goal. Bryce Love has been running the ball effectively as always, but K.J. Costello has really given Stanford a boost at quarterback recently – 62.8 completion percentage, 572 passing yards, five touchdowns, and just one interception in Stanford’s last three games. It’s hard to pick against Sam Darnold and a USC team coming off a bye week, but I think David Shaw is going to have a good game plan against USC the second time around.

Prediction: Stanford 29, USC 24

Saturday:

UCF Knights kick returner Mike Hughes (19) runs back the kick 94 yards for the go ahead scorer against the South Florida Bulls during the second half at Spectrum Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Reinhold Matay-USA TODAY Sports

AAC Championship
No. 20 Memphis (10-1) vs. No. 14 Central Florida (11-0)
Spectrum Stadium
Orlando, Fla.
Line: UCF -7.5
O/U: 85.5

I would imagine that the winner of this game is going to be the Group of Five representative in a New Year’s Six bowl. Both of these teams have high-powered offenses, so there’s going to be a lot of points scored. I think something to keep an eye on is if Central Florida head coach Scott Frost is focused on this game since his name has been floated around for several head coaching positions this week. Since he hasn’t taken a job, and it’s still unclear if he’ll even leave UCF, I think that means he’s focused on winning the AAC championship. Central Florida defeated Memphis by 27 points back in September, but I think it’ll be much closer this week. However, it’s really hard to pick against the Knights. Their offense is one of the best in the country – scoring 31 points or more in every game this season – and UCF will have home-field advantage.

Prediction: Central Florida 34, Memphis 24

Toledo Rockets quarterback Logan Woodside (11) attempts a pass against the Miami Hurricanes during the first half at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jasen Vinlove-USA TODAY Sports

MAC Championship
Akron (7-5) vs. Toledo (10-2)
Ford Field
Detroit
Line: TOL -21
O/U: 58.5

I’m struggling to see Akron winning this game. While the Zips do have a decent scoring defense – allowing just 24.8 points per game this season. However, Toledo has been the best team in the MAC all season, and has one of the best offenses in the country – ranking in the top 30 in the country in total offense, scoring offense, passing yards per game, and rushing yards per game. The Rockets should take care of business Saturday.

Prediction: Toledo 37, Akron 20

Oklahoma Sooners running back Rodney Anderson (24) runs for a touchdown in front of West Virginia Mountaineers linebacker Al-Rasheed Benton (3) during the first quarter at Gaylord Family – Oklahoma Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark D. Smith-USA TODAY Sports

Big 12 Championship
No. 11 TCU (10-2) vs. No. 3 Oklahoma (11-1)
AT&T Stadium
Arlington, Texas
Line: OKLA -7
O/U: 63.5

I’m kind of on the fence about this game, it just feels like it has upset written all over it. Gary Patterson seems like the coach that you don’t want to face twice in a season, especially if you’ve already beat him once during the regular season (which Oklahoma has done already). However, the Sooners have the best player in the country in Baker Mayfield, and probably the best offense in the country right now. I think TCU’s defense will contain Mayfield at first, but eventually he’ll take over the game and the Sooners will squeak out a win.

Prediction: Oklahoma 31, TCU 27

Auburn Tigers head coach Gus Malzahn reacts during the fourth quarter against the Alabama Crimson Tide at Jordan-Hare Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Christopher Hanewinckel-USA TODAY Sports

SEC Championship
No. 6 Georgia (11-1) vs. No. 2 Auburn (10-2)
Mercedes-Benz Stadium
Atlanta
Line: AUB -1.5
O/U: 48

I just think it’s too much to ask Auburn to beat Georgia twice and Alabama in less than a month. The Tigers are banged up and potentially could be without their top rushers for this game. I think the Bulldogs will be a completely different team than what they were in Auburn a few weeks ago with the SEC championship, and likely a spot in the playoff, on the line. Georgia had only 46 rushing yards on 32 carries against Auburn back in November, so I think Kirby Smart will make sure to make physicality an emphasis this week.

Prediction: Georgia 24, Auburn 21

Boise State Broncos quarterback Montell Cozart (3) prepares to throw a pass against the Fresno State Bulldogs in the second quarter at Bulldog Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Cary Edmondson-USA TODAY Sports

Mountain West Championship
No. 25 Fresno State (9-3) vs. Boise State (9-3)
Albertsons Stadium
Boise, Idaho
Line: BSU -9.5
O/U: 50

I don’t think Fresno State will be able to knock off Boise State in back-to-back weeks, especially since this game will be in Boise. The Broncos are a well-coached team with a pretty good defense – giving up just 23.2 points per game. Plus, Boise State’s hopes to make a New Year’s Six bowl game were ruined last week by Fresno State, and I think the Broncos will be seeking vengeance with the conference championship on the line.

Prediction: Boise State 27, Fresno State 20

Ohio State Buckeyes running back J.K. Dobbins (2) rushes in the second half against the Michigan Wolverines at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports

Big Ten Championship
No. 8 Ohio State (10-2) vs. No. 4 Wisconsin (12-0)
Lucas Oil Stadium
Indianapolis, Ind.
Line: OSU -6
O/U: 51

A few weeks ago, I would’ve taken Ohio State to handily beat Wisconsin in the Big Ten championship. However, I’ve changed my mind over the last few weeks. The Badgers have been playing very well recently – outscoring opponents 138-41 in their last four games. Wisconsin has been disrespected all season and I think the Badgers are going to come out angry in this game and play with a chip on their shoulder to prove the doubters wrong. I also don’t think that Ohio State has played with an identity this season, unlike Wisconsin – the Badgers win games by an effective run game and playing stingy defense. Plus, J.T. Barrett had minor knee surgery this week and likely won’t be 100 percent.

Prediction: Wisconsin 27, Ohio State 24

Game of the week:

Clemson Tigers wide receiver Deon Cain (8) makes a catch against the South Carolina Gamecocks during the first half at Williams-Brice Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jim Dedmon-USA TODAY Sports

ACC Championship
No. 7 Miami (10-1) vs. No. 1 Clemson (11-1)
Bank of America Stadium
Charlotte, N.C.
Line: CLEM -9.5
O/U: 46.5

I’ve picked against Clemson in the ACC championship the last two years, and the Tigers have proved me wrong both times. I’ve learned my lesson, I’m not doing that again this week. Clemson has been a completely different team since that Syracuse loss with a healthy Kelly Bryant – outscoring opponents 188-68 over the last five weeks. Miami had an awful game against Pitt last week, but I think the Hurricanes will bounce back and play better after having extra time to prepare for this game. However, the Tigers have one of the best passing defenses in the country (allowing 169.7 passing yards per game), and Miami struggled throwing the ball last week and will be without one of its top wide receivers in this game.

Prediction: Clemson 34, Miami 21

Thanks for reading

Shane Price
Follow me on Twitter – @priceisright53